Review Article

0 downloads 0 Views 249KB Size Report
appreciation of scents, such as perfume or a fresh sea breeze. 1.1 Anatomy and .... breathing [47], [51] correlate with olfactory function as such. ..... For a long time, laryngectomized patients were also thought to be anosmic [152]. However ...
                an overview of available therapies 

   

X                      X

;8. !

0" )     & +#( ,2               !"#$     %     &%  ' (%       )    *    %    &%     

)     *'        

          

     %      ' + ,-        %  .

             .       '                   .     %' +   %          %  %  %          "

%

 %   &% .' +                 %  . %            ' /  %%    

          ' +       . % %' ? #                 "

: @    )                 %      %  .   %.  ' / % %       .    %    %  %  %          %   ' / %   

   %    %    %     .%    .% 

%.     &%   . .          0           %   %       . '

:    *   %    %    .% 1  %          .% # #       %        )      %  %   .    %  % . *          '       

!

"   #    $ %   &"  ' $ ("   )     $ *    +$ !& +,- ' $ . /

$ 0 # 1+ 2 324+,5$ 67# 1+ 2 324 +,23$ 8 #  9: 

!

G" 

">% %   +    C )>>"+* 2#13   >>>A>  2#73' ,%      %   ;C  0 ;  .   



                )B%  ! )B' !** 2#:3 2#93 2483' +    /   24!3    0    F .    24#3 2443' + D E   2453    % /    %  2463'     %  0         %   .=        2413 2473'

-: !     )    (           %        " .    %   



   

     %    

.'    

     

  %            %   ;/ .  

#

G"  2763  %

    % %   D     %              )       *   "    '  %

     18$  :8$     %      %   . %

%       ' -         %0             .' +::- .   @     %  %                      )         *    .  ' %  %                  .             %  2713' > &%     %          %

   %  2773        . %

  '  %

% .   %   

%. &%       2153 %  D0   27:3             '     %         %         2793 2:83' 0          #6$         6$          2:!3'   %             .   '  M  '        %    %    68$  11$        2:#3 2:43'   %   %.   .     .  )>" *           "%   2:53' @      %     %              %  45$    2:43'       . %         %  J          

% .       ' 4   2:63'           .    ;C  0 ;      %.=  



  78   2:13' +       .   %.=  



       

    !7:            %  2:73' %       -0 %  #886J5K81

, %      %                   .%        % 2!853' ,  %.=           2!73 2513              2!863 2!813' /0 %  ' 2!873 .                     9 %            %   %. &%     ' + 41 %  %       %  %                            %           2!8:3' 

             .       %

   %           2!893' +:3:: &    6  *   )    (     % %     0    ''                %.      %   %' +            .           %  2!!83 2!!!3'          %        %    %     %  29:3' +:3::3 ) = +           %   % /  % %         %   .%            %  )>-*     .%.   %    %  )%     %   >-     !88$    * 2!!#3' > &%    % "%           "4     .                        >- 2!!43' +:3::- 0    *   )    (        "     ' +       %    2P#4 !9       5 %       .   ;C  0 ;   % 2#93 2483  "  )188 L *  5'6      2!!53'           :           '    % 

             %.". % .%   %

                   % %  # 

      %  2!863' +:3::+ 0    *  C *  /    %  %  ''       

       2!!63 %        %        !99! . %       -0 %  #886J5K81

)'' / C    ? 0 C   *        )''    

*    .      2!853' / %    %     

            %                2!593     0         ? 0 C   ' +    %       % .       %     '  %

   %      .%     .     .    

2!683 2!6!3' B             %  .   2!6#3'      %       % % %           2!643 2!653                  .      &% 2!663 2!613'

+:- B7"   (   )  0    +:-: &  0 "  % .   '           %                 %  .%          2!73'   .%. %   %     " %              2!#!3                     %   %           2!673' +                  %.      &%0                2!6:3'     % %  1#         J         .  

       

 2!693' +:-:3 (" / %    .    %              .%.     #        %     .   . 2!183'  

%        %      %      %         %  .    %.   .0 %      2!183'       %          .       .%              %    %.= 2!1!3' + ? 0 C    %   '     %.         .%.          

. %           ? 0 C    2!1#3' +:-:- "        .  %% %    

' +   %  % % %% %          #4   %  2!143' +       %         %% %         . %       #  2!153' +:-:+ 0"

 %       -0 %  #886J5K81

.%    %  2!1:3'     %  %  .   ' +:-:2 F  Q  /  .            .       /"T"   2!193' @   I  "%       -0 %  #886J5K81

%           %      

  .             

.                      '  

.      

     %

  J        2!:73'        

.      %

     '

G: 0  (     !  " A        %  )   .      *   %      %   ' #        2!::3'     % .     !  #       2!:93' +    %  A   ' 2!983          %       %  )4 56 L   %       !       *      .'     %           %         %      2!9!3' % %      %     %      %  2!9#3'

G:3 * "   0  (             %  .  

%    % .    

        )8'4!$*      %  2!943' D%  ' 2!953 % !!:                  % %   '  %.=            .    

        %      '    ' 2!963      .  "      ) %.= *        .=    %   %  .  %  ' /  #    #'7$     )P!!4*   %.=      '      %  . %  .  

   .  2!913' +     %   =%      %   " " % %   %               58$    2!973'

G:- ( @  0  (    %"%  %  .%    %   %        

     />, .     )#8$  % *   %     )!88$  % * 2!683 2!6!3' +         % .        &%    .%  . 

              % 0 2!9:3' /"          .    .          2!993'

G:+ 0 "  %  H  0  (   -% % % %   .         ' +  .   

%                6       .%  % 

        2#883' +   % )P!!9J      % . P56J  %"%    % . P4:J    P41*     . 68$ 

   5 0  . :8$   : 0       %  )!88    

 * 2#8!3' +  %.". ."  % )P74J      % . P5:J      P#6*        )48      *  4       %.=    



            %   %   %          .    .  %       2#8#3'   .   %.". % . 0  ' 2!7!3   %.". %  16   . U   ' 2#843       ' - 

        %"%    % .    %             % .          %   2#843' / %.". %     )P##*                   )68 L *   !# 0 2#853'          %.". %    %  . 0  '         %  2#863 2#813'

!8

G"%       -0 %  #886J5K81

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.

Say P, Leopold DA, Cochran G, Smith L, Greiner T. Resection of the inferior superior turbinate: Does it affect olfactory ability or contain olfactory neuronal tissue? Am J Rhinol 2004; 18:157-160 Leopold DA, Hummel T, Schwob JE, Hong SC, Knecht M, Kobal G. Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium. Laryngoscope 2000; 110:417-421 Doty RL, Mishra A. Olfaction and its alteration by nasal obstruction, rhinitis and rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2001; 111:409-423 Firestein S. How the olfactory system makes sense of scents. Nature 2001; 413:211-218 Costanzo RM, Graziadei PPC. Development and plasticity of the olfactory system. In: Finger TE, Silver WL, editors. Neurobiology of smell and taste. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987: 233-250 Conley DB, Robinson AM, Shinners MJ, Kern RC. Age-related olfactory dysfunction: cellular and molecular characterization in the rat. Am J Rhinol 2003; 17:169-175 Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM. Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA 2002; 288:2307-2312 Paik SI, Lehman MN, Seiden AM, Duncan HJ, Smith DV. Human olfactory biopsy: the influence of age and receptor distribution. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118:731-738 Schwob JE. Neural regeneration and the peripheral olfactory system. Anat Rec 2002; 269:33-49 Perry C, Mackay-Sim A, Féron F, McGrath J. Olfactory neural cells: an untapped diagnostic and therapeutic resource. Laryngoscope 2002; 112:603-607 Santos-Benito FF, Ramón-Cueto A. Olfactory ensheathing glia transplantation: a therapy to promote repair in the mammalian central nervous system. Anat Rec 2003; 271B:77-85 Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M, Evans AC, Meyer E. Functional localization and lateralization of human olfactory cortex. Nature 1992; 360:339-340 Yousem DM, Williams SCR, Howard RO et al. Functional MR imaging during Odor stimulation: preliminary data. Radiology 1997; 204:833-838 Deems DA, Doty RL, Settle G et al. Smell and taste disorders, a study of 750 patients from the university of Pennsylvania smell and taste center. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117:519-528 Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, DiNardo LJ, Reiter ER. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001; 127:497-503 Hedén Blomqvist E, Brämerson A, Stjärne P, Nordin S. Consequences of olfactory loss and adopted coping strategies. Rhinology. In press Temmel AFP, Quint C, Schickinger-Fischer B, Klimek L, Stoller E, Hummel T. Characteristics of olfactory disorders in relation to major causes of olfactory loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128:635-641 Santos DV, Reiter ER, DiNardo LJ, Costanzo RM. Hazardous events associated with impaired olfactory function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:317-319 Hummel T, Nesztler C, Kallert S, Kobal G, Bende M, Nordin S. Gustatory sensitivity in patients with anosmia. Chem Senses 2001; 26:1118 Nordin S, Monsch AU, Murphy C. Unawareness of smell loss in normal aging and Alzheimer´s disease: discrepancy between self-reported and diagnosed smell sensitivity. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1995; 50B:187-192 Landis BN, Hummel T, Hugentobler M, Giger R, Lacroix JS. Ratings of overall olfactory function. Chem Senses 2003; 28:691-694 Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: A standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function UPSIT. Physiol Behav 1984; 32:489-502 Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW. Development of the 12-Item cross-cultural smell identification test CC-SIT. Laryngoscope 1996; 106:353-356 Cain WS, Gent JF, Goodspeed RB, Leonard G. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the conneticut chemosensory clinical research center. Laryngoscope 1988; 98:83-88 Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf SR. "Sniffin´Sticks": Screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 1996; 34:222-226 Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. "Sniffin´Sticks": olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Chemical Senses 1997; 22:39-52 Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M et al. Multicenter investigation of 1036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 257:205-211

!#

G"