Review Targeting Cancer Stem Cells for Treatment of ... - SAGE Journals

Cell Transplantation, Vol. 22, pp. 731–739, 2013 Printed in the USA. All rights reserved. Copyright  2013 Cognizant Comm. Corp.

0963-6897/13 $90.00 + .00 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096368912X655136 E-ISSN 1555-3892 www.cognizantcommunication.com

Review Targeting Cancer Stem Cells for Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme Der-Yang Cho,*† Shinn-Zong Lin,*†‡ Wen-Kuang Yang,§¶ Han-Chung Lee,*¶ Den-Mei Hsu,§ Hung-Lin Lin,* Chun-Chung Chen,*¶ Chun-Lin Liu,* Wen-Yuan Lee,*¶ and Li-Hui Ho* *Department of Neurosurgery, Neuropsychiatry Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC †Graduate Institute of Immunology, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC ‡Department of Neurosurgery, China Medical University Beigan Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan, ROC §Cell/Gene Therapy Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC ¶Department of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are radioresistant and chemoresistant, which eventually results in tumor recurrence. Targeting CSCs for treatment is the most crucial issue. There are five methods for targeting the CSCs of GBM. One is to develop a new chemotherapeutic agent specific to CSCs. A second is to use a radiosensitizer to enhance the radiotherapy effect on CSCs. A third is to use immune cells to attack the CSCs. In a fourth method, an agent is used to promote CSCs to differentiate into normal cells. Finally, ongoing gene therapy may be helpful. New therapeutic agents for targeting a signal pathway, such as epidermal growth factor (EGF) and vascular epidermal growth factor (VEGF) or protein kinase inhibitors, have been used for GBM but for CSCs the effects still require further evaluation. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibitors have proven to be effective for increasing radiation sensitivity of CSCs in culture. Autologous dendritic cells (DCs) are one of the promising immunotherapeutic agents in clinical trials and may provide another innovative method for eradication of CSCs. Bone-morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) is an agent used to induce CSCs to differentiate into normal glial cells. Research on gene therapy by viral vector is also being carried out in clinical trials. Targeting CSCs by eliminating the GBM tumor may provide an innovative way to reduce tumor recurrence by providing a synergistic effect with conventional treatment. The combination of conventional surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy with stem cell-orientated therapy may provide a new promising treatment for reducing GBM recurrence and improving the survival rate. Key words: Bone-morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4); Cancer stem cells (CSCs); Dendritic cells (DCs); Gene therapy; Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM); Immunotherapy; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); Radiosensitizers

INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common type of primary malignant brain tumor, accounting for 55% of primary brain tumors (43). The prognosis of GBM is very poor; most patients die of tumor recurrence (39,70). The best mean survival time with successful tumor resection, radiotherapy, and temozolamide (Temodal, TMZ) chemotherapy may reach up to 18 months (17,51,70). But even in the best of the most recent reports, the 2-year survival rate was still less than 30% (67,68). Causes of recurrence are complex and

include no clear tumor margin for complete resection, high proliferative index, resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy especially in cancer stem cells (CSCs), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dissemination. Recently, targeting cancer stem cells (CSCs) has emerged as a treatment (1–5,7,12,16,23,25,35,60). The CSCs have a multipotent function, having self-renewal potential and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy (6). Liu et al. (45) reported that the resistance was probably contributed to by CD133+ cells with higher expression of breakpoint cluster region pseudogene 1 (BCRP1; drug resistant

Online prepub date: February 7, 2013. Address correspondence to Wen-Kuang Yang, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Cell/Gene Therapy Research Laboratory, China Medical University Hospital, No. 2 Yu-Der Road, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC. Tel: +886-42-2052121 ext. 6077; Fax: +886-42-2064888; E-mail: [email protected]

731

732

gene) and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT; DNA repair enzyme) as well as antiapoptosis proteins and inhibitors (37). In comparison to CD133cells, CD133+ cells have 32- to 56-fold more activity of MGMT. Ji et al. (36) showed that CD133+ CSCs express high levels of the drug transporter gene BCRP, combined with upregulation of DNA repair protein, MGMT mRNA, and mRNAs of other genes that inhibit apoptosis including FAS-associating death domain (FADD)-like antiapoptotic molecule (FLIP), B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-X, and some inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family members (55,57,61). Nakai et al. (53) showed CSCs possess stronger drug resistance to conventional anticancer drugs such as doxorubicin, etoposide (VP-16), carboplatin, and bischloroethylnitrosourea (BCNU) than non-stem cells of malignant gliomas. Double immunofluorescence staining showed coexpression of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) and CD133 on CSCs. Johannessen et al. (37) reported that the alkalizing agents BCNU and TMZ are the drugs of choice for adjuvant glioma chemotherapy. A DNA repair mechanism can restore the integrity of alkylated DNA bases and thus contribute to drug resistance. Cancer stem cells possess enhanced DNA repair capacity (37). Recently, there are many methods for influencing the growth of CSCs. TMZ is effective for treating patients with positive methylated promoter of MGMT based on clinical experience. Fu et al. (24) reported CSCs display a strong capability of tumor resistance to TMZ. This resistance was probably contributed to by CD133+ cells with down-regulation of autophagy-related proteins. Beier et al. (8) reported TMZ induced a dose- and time-dependent decline of brain CSCs in a cell culture study. TMZ showed some effectiveness in reduction of CSCs at the level of 50 µmol/L and was most effective at the level of 500 µmol/L. However, with the usual clinical dose, the CSF level of TMZ only reaches 50 µmol/L. In conventional radiation, undamaged CD133+ cells exhibit activating phosphorylation of three key mediators of cell cycle checkpoints—Rad17, Chk1, Chk2—that are significantly enhanced after exposure to radiation (53). In CD133- cells, these proteins are phosphorylated only in response to ionizing radiation, and the magnitude is blunted compared with CD133+ cells. This implies that glioma stem cells exhibit constitutive activation of multiple cell cycle checkpoints that may further upregulate in response to DNA damage. Chalmers (12) showed that the radioresistant phenotype might be the consequence of constitutively upregulated and hyperresponsive cell checkpoint pathways. Usually, CSCs constitute only 2–3% of a glioma tumor (23). The most commonly used tumor marker is CD133+ (a membrane protein of CSCs and other cells). Singh et al. (65) reported that even 100 CD133+ cells transplanted into severe combined immunodeficient (SCID)

Cho ET AL.

Figure 1. The percentage of cancer stem cells (CD133+) in a glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumor is significantly higher than in an anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) tumor.

mouse brain can reproduce a new GBM tumor mass but 106 cells of CD133- cannot create the same GBM tumor mass. On the other hand, the CSC count is correlated with tumor malignancy (69). The mean CSC count for malignant astrocytoma (AA) is somewhat less than 1%, but for GBM it may increase to 3–5%, as shown in Figure 1. Usually the CSCs are in a quiescent state. But when they are stimulated by surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, their population may grow exponentially (46). When CSCs regrow rapidly, patients eventually die of tumor recurrence. Targeting the CSCs for treatment is an innovative therapeutic rationale (42). Targeting this small portion of tumor consisting of cancer stem cells may improve patient survival. In ongoing multimodal and pluridisciplinary treatment of GBM with surgery and subsequently radiation and chemotherapy (32,42), most tumor cells are eradicated but the residual CSCs usually increase as shown in Figure 2. Furthermore, the recurrence is unavoidable. Hermann et al. (32) showed that a novel approach targeting CSCs is capable of overcoming resistance to therapies. Therefore, initially reducing CSCs should be most crucial. CURRENTLY TARGETING CSCs FOR GBM Schulenburg et al. (63) reported that neoplastic stem cells might be a novel therapeutic target in clinical oncology. Up to now, there have been five methods used for eradicating CSCs, as shown in Figure 3. One method is focused on targeting a new molecular protein signal pathway of CSCs with a new targeting therapeutic agent. Another method is focused on increasing the radiosensitivity (47) and chemotherapy sensitivity of CSCs by using a hypersensitivity agent (15). A third method involves using immunotherapy including autologous

targeted therapy for gbm stem cells

733

Figure 2. Cancer stem cells may be transformed from normal stem cells or progenitor cells or from glial cells. Radiation and chemotherapy may eradiate most of tumor cells and increase the population of radioresistant and chemoresistant cancer stem cells, respectively.

dendritic cells (DCs). A fourth method uses a differentiation agent such as bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) to promote the CSCs to differentiate into normal cells. Finally, gene therapy may be used to reduce CSC proliferation. Signal pathways targeted in CSCs include wingless-type MMTV integration site family (Wnt) (54), sonic hedgehog (shh) (7), Notch (34), homeobox (HOx) family, B lymphoma

Mo-MLV insertion region 1 homolog (Bmi-1) (52), and phosphatase and tensin (PTEN) (19), telomerase (48), efflux transporters (50), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) (20,66), micro-RNA (44) and vascular epidermal growth factor (VEGF) receptors (50). We may be able eliminate CSCs by employing a new targeting therapy. Targeting CSCs by using passive immunotherapy (antibody therapy) such as anti-CD-44 antibody in acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) or active immunotherapy (72) such as dendritic cells is undergoing investigation in ongoing trials. Also being investigated is the strategy of promoting CSCs to differentiate into normal cells. BMP-4 may induce CSCs to become normal cells (59). Once the CSCs are eliminated, then subsequent conventional chemotherapy and radiation may be more effective. Targeting CSCs on Oncoprotein Pathway and Receptor

Figure 3. Five methods currently used to treat CSCs.

Nicolis (54) reported that partially differentiated precursor cells might develop into neural stem cells through fibroblastic growth factor-2 (FGF-2) and EGF. These neural stem cells may be the origin of cancer. The Shh and Wnt pathways lead to cancer cell proliferation. Fan et al. (22) showed that the Notch signaling pathway regulates normal stem cells in the brain and that GBMs contain stem-like cells with higher Notch activity. Notch blockade by g-secretase inhibitors reduces neurosphere

734

growth and clonogenicity in vitro. Hovinga et al. (34) also emphasized that the Notch pathway plays a critical role in linking angiogenesis and CSC self-renewal and thus is a potential therapeutic target. Gal et al. (26) reported that a key hedgehog pathway target was highly expressed in five of 19 primary GBM specimens and in four of seven GBM cell lines. Shh ligand was expressed in GBM-derived neurospheres, suggesting a mechanism for pathway activation. Bar et al. (7) reported that cyclopamine might block the hedgehog pathway causing a 40–60% reduction in growth of glioma cell lines. Gilbertson et al. (29) reported that CSCs can secrete diffusible factors such as VEGF, which recruits aberrant tumor vasculature to the niche, making these cells a therapeutic target. Clinical trials of the antiangiogenic drugs bevacizumab and cediranib have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in patients with GBM. This antitumor effect could be the result of normalization of tumor vasculature or depletion of tumor blood supply. These drugs might function by disrupting stem cell maintenance. Calabrese et al. (10) showed that treating glioblastoma-bearing mice with bevacizumab depleted tumor blood vessels and caused a dramatic reduction in the number of GBM stem cells and the growth rate of tumors. Borovski et al. (9) reported that tumor microvasculature supported proliferation and expansion of gliomapropagating cells. CD133+ CSCs are located in the perivascular niche and interaction with the niche promotes tumor growth and therapy resistance. Microvascular endothelial cells support the growth of glioma propagating cells (GCPs) resulting in a higher tumor proliferation rate. Aguado et al. (1) reported that cannabinoids not only induce apoptosis of transformed cells but inhibition of tumor angiogenesis also induces glioma stem cell differentiation and inhibits glioma angiogenesis. The efficacy of targeted therapies that inhibit tyrosine kinase pathways in GBM has been modest. CD133+ cells express higher levels of BCRP1 and MGMT mRNA as well as higher mRNA levels of genes that inhibit apoptosis. CD133 cancer cells promote tumor angiogenesis through increased expression of VEGF. However, Gadji et al. (25) showed that monotherapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGF receptor-targeted inhibition) has no therapeutic effect. Bao et al. (6) showed that a multidirectional drug approach for CSCs plays a role in promoting angiogenesis and that this action is blocked with the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab. Targeting the CSCs by Radiation and Chemotherapy Sensitizers Sauvageot et al. (62) reported that heat shock protein (HSP-90) has the ability to inhibit CSCs and synergize with radiation and or TMZ. Michelakis et al. (50) also

Cho ET AL.

reported that anti-epidermal growth factor receptors (cetuximab, nimotuzumab) increase the radiosensitivity of CSCs. Stea et al. (66) found that the time- and dosedependent radiosensitization of GBM exists because of the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Iressa). Kang et al. (38) reported that, when combined with BCNU, a chloride channel blocker might promote apoptosis or sensitize gliomas to BCNU chemotherapy. Xu et al. (72) also found that CD44 is a major cell surface hyaluronan receptor and cancer stem cell marker. CD44 is upregulated in GBM, and its depletion blocks GBM growth and sensitizes GBM cells to cytotoxic drugs in vivo. CD44 antagonists potently inhibit glioma growth in preclinical mouse models. Martin et al. (49) demonstrated advances through antiangiogenesis therapy for gliomas. Targeting the inflammatory cascade with a cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) inhibitor that plays a role in glioma angiogenesis, decreased tumor cell proliferation and tumor size, and increased tumor apoptosis. Celecoxib and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (11,14) significantly enhanced GBM radiosensitivity and prolonged the survival of GBM implant mice by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis, resulting in extensive tumor necrosis. Targeting CSCs by Immunotherapy Ghebeh et al. (28) reported that cancer stem cell immunotherapy is the right bullet for the target. Immune suppression is commonly found in patients with GBM including decreased cellular and humoral immunity. Pellegatta et al. (56) reported that neurospheres enriched in CSCs were highly effective in eliciting a dendritic cell-mediated immune response against malignant gliomas. Cancer stem cells express high levels of tumor-associated antigens as well as major histocompatibility complex molecules. Xu et al. (71) reported that DC vaccination using CSC antigens elicited antigen-specific T-cell responses against CSCs. Dendritic cell vaccination-induced interferon-g production is positively correlated with the number of antigenspecific T-cells generated. In our laboratory, we found that cytotoxic T lymphocytes may kill the CSCs in cell culture (Fig. 4). The survival rate of neurosphere lysed-pulsed dendritic cells was longer than in that of the control group. Two vaccine preparations have been tested, mixed leukocyte culture (MLS) and tumor B-cell hybridoma (THB). Yao et al. (73) found that B7 homolog 1 (B7-H1 or programmed cell death ligand) was positively correlated with malignancy grade gliomas and negatively correlated with tumor infiltration CD8+ T-cells but was not expressed exclusively on tumor stem cells. B7-H1 is the third member of the B7 family that has been described to negatively regulate T-cell functions. Hongeng et al. (33) reported that CD3+ CD56+ cytokineinduced killer (natural killer, NK) cells appear to be a


735

may act as a key inhibitory regulator of cancer initiation and may be used in combined stem cell-based therapy as a noncytotoxic therapeutic agent. BMP4 treatment also may render the stem cells more susceptible to a conventional therapy. Piccirillo et al. (58) showed that BMP4 can reduce the tumorigenic ability of CSCs in GBM. Mechanisms regulating the physiology of normal brainstem cells may still be in place in cancerous brainstem cells, and this may lead to the development of cures that selectively target the CSCs population.

Figure 4. (A) Microscopic field shows cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8+) (arrows) cocultured with CD133+ cancer stem cells at 18 h. (B) After 120 h of incubation, CD8+ T lymphocytes attacked the CD133+ cancer stem cells. The CD133+ cancer stem cells were destroyed by lymphocytes. The cell membranes of the cancer stem cells were ruptured, and their cytoplasm was vacuolated (arrows).

promising effector cell type but with great cytotoxicity for pediatric cancer cells. Ahmed et al. (2) showed that stimulation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-specific T-cells with HER2-positive autologous GBM cells results in T-cell proliferation and secretion of INF-g and interleukin-2. HER2-specific T-cells kill CD133+ and CD133- cells derived from primary HER2-specific GBM. Duhem-Tonnelle et al. (21) showed that erb3 (HER2-new) immunoreactivity was prominent in CD133+ putative tumor stem cells, which suggests that erb3 may represent a new potential therapeutic target. Targeting CSCs by Promoting Cell Differentiation Altaner (4) showed that CSCs contribute to glioma radioresistance by increasing DNA repair capacity through preferential activation of the DNA damage response checkpoints. BMP4 reduces proliferation of CD133+ cells effectively in vitro and tumor growth in vivo (59). BMP4

Targeting CSCs by Gene Therapy Dey et al. (18) reported on virotherapy, a novel therapeutic approach utilizing conditionally replicative viruses to directly target CSCs (31). In virotherapy, oncolysis is achieved by intraneoplastic cell virus replication-mediated cell lysis. A single-stranded RNA virus is the natural host. Reovirus selectively replicated in glioma cells inhibits RNA-activated protein kinase activation, and thus, viral protein can be synthesized leading to tumor regression. Viral replication and CSC lysis lead to infection of neighboring CSCs (23). Chang et al. (13) reported on using lentiviral vector expressing small hairpin RNA (shRNA) to knockdown sirtuin 1 (SirT1) expression in GBM CD133+ cells. Silencing of SirT1 significantly enhanced the sensitivity of GBM CSCs to radiation and increased the level of radiation-mediated apoptosis, which has been proven in nude mice transplanted with CSCs to cause inhibition of tumor growth and improve the mean survival rate. Inappropriate met proto-oncogene (c-Met) activation in cancer occurs through autocrine and paracrine activation, transcriptional overexpression, gene amplification, and activating mutations and has been observed in brain tumors. Overexpression of c-Met in brain tumor cells enhances their tumorigenicity, tumor growth, and tumorassociated angiogenesis. Guessous et al. (30) reported that small molecule kinase inhibitor of c-Met may inhibit tumor stem cell malignancy. Aloy et al. (3) showed that HSP27 has the ability to protect cells from stressful stimuli and increased levels in tumors resistant to anticancer therapeutics. HSP27 gene therapy offers a potential adjuvant therapy to radiationbased therapy of resistant tumors. Stem cell-based gene therapy using rat mesenchymal stem cells engineered with adenoviral vector encoding human interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been shown to be an effective treatment for glioma cells in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Balyasnikova et al. (5) reported that genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells can express a single-chair antibody against EGFRvIII on the cell surface. Human adult mesenchymal stem cells are cellular vehicles for delivery of antitumor agents to solid tumors providing a new method for enhanced delivery of therapy.

736

Cho ET AL.

Figure 5. The combination of cancer stem cell-targeted therapy with conventional therapy may reduce the number of cancer stem cells that remain and reduce tumor recurrence when compared with conventional treatment only.

Zhang et al. (74) reported that the transcriptional repressor RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST), which is best known for its role in neural progenitor cells, may also be crucial for self-renewal of CSCs. Gangemi et al. (27) showed that sex-determining region Y box 2 (SOX2) is a master gene involved in sustaining self-renewal of CSCs. Knockdown of SOX2 expression in glioma cells using retroviral vectors harboring a microRNA engineered to target SOX2 mRNA may stop proliferation and result in the loss of tumorigenicity. Sherry et al. (64) found that small molecule inhibitors of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) DNA binding inhibits cell proliferation and the formation of new neurospheres from single cells. Genetic knockdown of STAT3 using an shRNA also reduces GBM stem cell proliferation and neurosphere formation. Gal et al. (26) reported that microRNA (MIR-451) and imatinib inhibit tumor growth of glioblastoma stem cells. Krichevsky et al. (40) found that MIR-21 regulates oncogenic roles and has potential as a disease biomarker and novel therapeutic target in oncology. Marian et al. (48) showed that the telomerase antagonist imetelstat efficiently targets glioma tumor-initiating cells leading to decreased proliferation and tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS The combination of conventional surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy with stem cell-orientated therapy may provide a new promising treatment for reducing GBM recurrence and improve the survival rate (41) as shown in Figure 5. Targeting stem cells using signal pathway inhibitors, radiosensitizers and chemosensitizers, immunotherapy, stem cell differentiation promoters, and gene therapy may provide a new clinical field. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: This study was supported in part by the Taiwan Department of Health Cancer Research Center of Excellence (DOH-TD-C-111-005) and in part by the Taiwan Department of Health Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence (DOH-TD-B-111-004). It also was partially funded by a grant from the National Science Council (NSC-2314-B039-012-MY2).

References 1. Aguado, T.; Carracedo, A.; Julien, B.; Velasco, G.; Milman, G.; Mechoulam, R.; Alvarez, L.; Guzmán, M.; GalveRoperh, I. Cannabinoids induce glioma stem-like cell differentiation and inhibit gliomagenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 282(9):6854–6862; 2007. 2. Ahmed, N.; Salsman, V. S.; Kew, Y.; Shaffer, D.; Powell, S.; Zhang, Y. J.; Grossman, R. G.; Heslop, H. E.; Gottschalk, S. HER2-specific T cells target primary glioblastoma stem


cells and induce regression of autologous experimental tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 16(2):474–485; 2010. 3. Aloy, M. T.; Hadchity, E.; Bionda, C.; Diaz-Latoud, C.; Claude, L.; Rousson, R.; Arrigo, A. P.; Rodriguez-Lafrasse, C. Protective role of Hsp27 protein against gamma radiation-induced apoptosis and radiosensitization effects of Hsp27 gene silencing in different human tumor cells. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 70(2):543–553; 2008. 4. Altaner, C. Glioblastoma and stem cells. Neoplasma 55(5):369–374; 2008. 5. Balyasnikova, I. V.; Franco-Gou, R.; Mathis, J. M.; Lesniak, M. S. Genetic modification of mesenchymal stem cells to express a single-chain antibody against EGFRvIII on the cell surface. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 4(4):247–258; 2010. 6. Bao, S.; Wu, Q.; McLendon, R. E.; Hao, Y.; Shi, Q.; Hjelmeland, A. B.; Dewhirst, M. W.; Bigner, D. D.; Rich, J. N. Glioma stem cell promotes radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 444(7120):756–760; 2006. 7. Bar, E. E.; Chaudhry, A.; Lin, A.; Fan, X.; Schreck, K.; Matsui, W.; Piccirillo, S.; Vescovi, A. L.; DiMeco, F.; Olivi, A.; Eberhart, C. G. Cyclopamine-mediated hedgehog pathway inhibition depletes stem-like cancer cells in glioblastoma. Stem Cells 25(10):2524–2533; 2007. 8. Beier, D.; Rohri, S.; Pillai, D. R.; Schwarz, S.; KunzSchughart, L. A.; Leukei, P.; Prescholdt, M.; Brawanski, A.; Bogahn, U.; Trampe-Kieslich, A.; Giebel, B.; Wischhusen, J.; Reifenberger, G.; Hau, P.; Beier, C. P. Temozolomide preferentially depletes cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 68(14):5706–5715; 2008. 9. Borovski, T.; Verhoeff, J. J.; ten Cate, R.; Cameron, K.; de Vries, N. A.; van Tellingen, O.; Richel, D. J.; van Furth, W. R.; Medema, J. P.; Sprick, M. R. Tumor microvasculature supports proliferation and expansion of glioma-propagating cells. Int. J. Cancer 125(5):1222–1230; 2009. 10. Calabrese, C.; Poppleton, H.; Kocak, M.; Hogg, T. L.; Fuller, C.; Hamner, B.; Oh, E. Y.; Gaber, M. W.; Finklestein, D.; Allen, M.; Frank, A.; Bayazitov, I. T.; Zakharenko, S. S.; Gajjar, A.; Davidoff, A.; Gilbertson, R. J. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 11(1):69–82; 2007. 11. Casper, D.; Lekhuaj, R.; Yaparpalvi, U. S.; Pidel, A.; Jaggernauth, W. A.; Werner, P.; Tribius, S.; Rowe, J. D.; LaSala, P. A. Acetaminophen selectively reduces glioma cell growth and increases radiosensitivity in culture. J. Neurooncol. 46(3):215–229; 2000. 12. Chalmers, A. J. Radioresistant glioma stem cells— therapeutic obstacle or promising target? DNA Repair 6(9):1391–1394; 2007. 13. Chang, C. J.; Hsu, C. C.; Yung, M. C.; Chen, K. Y.; Tzao, C.; Wu, W. F.; Chou, H. Y.; Lee, Y. Y.; Lu, K. H.; Chiou, S. H.; Ma, H. I. Enhanced radiosensitivity and radiationinduced apoptosis in glioma CD133-positive cells by knockdown of SirT1 expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 380(2):236–342; 2009. 14. Chang, T. A.; Morin, P. T.; Vogelstein, B.; Kinzler, K. W. Mechanisms underlying nonsteroidal antiflammatory drugmediated apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95(2):681– 686; 1998. 15. Cho, D. Y.; Lin, S. Z.; Yang, W. K.; Hsu, D. M.; Lee, H. C.; Lee, W. Y.; Liu, S. P. Recent advances of dendritic cells (DCs)-base immunotherapy for malignant gliomas. Cell Transplant. 18(9):977–983; 2009.

737

16. Cho, D. Y.; Lin, S. Z.; Yang, W. K.; Hsu, D. M.; Lin, H. L.; Lee, H. C.; Lee, W. Y.; Chiu, S. C. The role of cancer stem cells (CD133+) in malignant gliomas. Cell Transplant. 20(1):121–125; 2011. 17. Davis, F. G.; Frees, S.; Grutsch, J.; Barlas, S.; Brem, S. Survival rates in patients with primary malignant brain tumors stratified by patient age and tumor histological type: An analysis base on surveillance, epidemiology, end results (SEER) data 1973–1991. J. Neurosurg. 88(1):1–10; 1998. 18. Dey, M.; Ulasov, I. V.; Lesniak, M. S. Virotherapy against malignant glioma stem cells. Cancer Lett. 289(1):1–10; 2010. 19. Di Cristofano, A.; Pandolfi, P. P. The multiple roles of PTEN in tumor suppression. Cell 100(4):387–390; 2000. 20. Diaz Miqueli, A.; Rolff, J.; Lemm, M.; Fichtner, I.; Perez, R.; Montero, E. Radiosensitisation of U87MG brain tumours by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies. Br. J. Cancer 100(6):950–958; 2009. 21. Duhem-Tonnelle, V.; Bièche, I.; Vacher, S.; Loyens, A.; Maurage, C. A.; Collier, F.; Baroncini, M.; Blond, S.; Prevot, V.; Sharif, A. Differential distribution of erbB receptors in human glioblastoma multiforme: Expression of erbB3 in CD133-positive putative cancer stem cells. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 69(6):606–622; 2010. 22. Fan, X.; Khaki, L.; Zhu, T. S.; Soules, M. E.; Talsma, C. E.; Gul, N.; Koh, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y. M.; Maciaczyk, J.; Nikkhah, G.; Dimeco, F.; Piccirillo, S.; Vescovi, A. L.; Eberhart, C. G. NOTCH pathway blockade depletes CD133positive glioblastoma cells and inhibits growth of tumor neurospheres and xenografts. Stem Cells 28(1):5–16; 2010. 23. Fan, X.; Salford, L. G.; Widegren, B. Glioma stem cell: Evidence and limitation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 17(3):214– 218; 2007. 24. Fu, J.; Liu, Z. G.; Liu, X. M.; Chen, F. R.; Shi, H. L.; Pangjesse, C. S.; Ng, H. K.; Chen, Z. P. Glioblastoma stem cells resistant to temozolomide-induced autophagy. Chin. Med. J. 122(11):1255–1259; 2009. 25. Gadji, M.; Crous, A. M.; Fortin, D.; Krcek, J.; Torchia, M.; Mai, S.; Drouin, R.; Klonisch, T. EGF receptor inhibitors in the treatment of glioblastoma multiform: Old clinical allies and newly emerging therapeutic concepts. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 625(1–3):23–30; 2009. 26. Gal, H.; Pandi, G.; Kanner, A. A.; Ram, Z.; Lithwick-Yanai, G.; Amariglio, N.; Rechavi, G.; Givol, D. MIR-451 and Imatinib mesylate inhibit tumor growth of Glioblastoma stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 376(1):86– 90; 2008. 27. Gangemi, R. M.; Griffero, F.; Marubbi, D.; Perera, M.; Capra, M. C.; Malatesta, P.; Ravetti, G. L.; Zona, G. L.; Daga, A. Corte G. SOX2 silencing in glioblastoma tumorinitiating cells causes stop of proliferation and loss of tumo rigenicity. Stem Cells 27(1):40–48; 2009. 28. Ghebeh, H.; Bakr, M. M.; Dermime, S. Cancer stem cell immunotherapy: The right bullet for the right target. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Ther. 1(1):1–2; 2008. 29. Gilbertson, R. J.; Rich, J. N. Making a tumour’s bed: Glioblastoma stem cells and the vascular niche. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7(10):733–736; 2007. 30. Guessous, F.; Zhang, Y.; diPierro, C.; Marcinkiewicz, L.; Sarkaria, J.; Schiff, D.; Buchanan, S.; Abounader R. An orally bioavailable c-Met kinase inhibitor potently inhibits brain tumor malignancy and growth. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 10(1):28–35; 2010.

738

31. Halatsch, M. E.; Schmidt, U.; Bötefür, I. C.; Holland, J. F.; Ohnuma, T. Marked inhibition of glioblastoma target cell tumorigenicity in vitro by retrovirus-mediated transfer of a hairpin ribozyme against deletion-mutant epidermal growth factor receptor messenger RNA. J. Neurosurg. 92(2):297–305; 2000. 32. Hermann, P. C.; Bhaskar, S.; Cioffi, M.; Heeschen, C. Cancer stem cells in solid tumors. Semin. Cancer Biol. 20(2):77–84; 2010. 33. Hongeng, S.; Petvises, S.; Worapongpaiboon, S.; Rerkamnuaychoke, B.; Pakakasama, S.; Jootar, S. Generation of CD3+ CD56+ cytokine-induced killer cells and their in vitro cytotoxicity against pediatric cancer cells. Int. J. Hematol. 77(2):175–179; 2003. 34. Hovinga, K. E.; Shimizu, F.; Wang, R.; Panagiotakos, G.; Van Der Heijden, M.; Moayedpardazi, H.; Correia, A. S.; Soulet, D.; Major, T.; Menon, J.; Tabar, V. Inhibition of notch signaling in glioblastoma targets cancer stem cells via an endothelial cell intermediate. Stem Cells 28(6):1019– 1029; 2010. 35. Hughes, S. A.; Achanta, P.; Ho, A. L.; Duenas, V. J.; Quiñones-Hinojosa, A. Biological horizons for targeting brain malignancy. In: Jandial R., ed. Frontiers in Brain Repair. New York, NY: Landes Bioscience and Springer Science + Business Media; 2010:93–104. 36. Ji, J.; Black, K. L.; Yu, J. S. Glioma stem cell research for the development of immunotherapy. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 21(1):159–166; 2010. 37. Johannessen, T. C.; Bjerkvig, R.; Tysnes, B. B. DNA repair and cancer stem-like cells—potential partners in glioma drug resistance? Cancer Treat. Rev. 34(6):558–567; 2008. 38. Kang, M. K.; Kang, S. K. Pharmacologic blockade of chloride channel synergistically enhances apoptosis of chemotherapeutic drug-resistant cancer stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 373(4):539–544; 2008. 39. Kelly, K. A.; Kirkwood, J. M.; Kapp, D. S. Glioblastoma multiforme: Pathology, natural history and treatment. Cancer Treat. Rev. 11(1):1–26; 1984. 40. Krichevsky, A. M.; Gabriely, G. miR-21: A small multifaceted RNA. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 13(1):39–53; 2009. 41. Lefranc, F. Editorial: On the road to multi-modal and pluridisciplinary treatment of glioblastomas. Acta Neurochir. 151(2):109–112; 2009. 42. Lefranc, F.; Rynkowski, M.; DeWitte. O.; Kiss, R. Present and potential future adjuvant issues in high-grade astrocytic glioma treatment. Adv. Tech. Stand. Neurosurg. 34:3–35; 2009. 43. Legler, J. M.; Ries, L. A.; Smith, M. A.; Warren, J. L.; Heineman, E. F.; Kaplan, R. S.; Linet, M. S. Cancer surveillance series (corrected): Brain and other central nervous system cancers: Recent trends in incidence and mortality. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91(16):1382–1390; 1999. 44. Li, Y.; Guessous, F.; Zhang, Y.; Dipierro, C.; Kefas, B.; Johnson, E.; Marcinkiewicz, L.; Jiang, J.; Yang, Y.; Schmittgen, T. D.; Lopes, B.; Schiff, D.; Purow, B.; Abounader, R. MicroRNA34a inhibits glioblastoma growth by targeting multiple oncogenes. Cancer Res. 69(19):7569–7576; 2009. 45. Liu, G.; Yuan, X.; Zeng Z.; Tunici, P.; Ng, H.; Abdulkadir, I. R.; Lu, L.; Irvin, D.; Black, K. L.; Yu, J. S. Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer 5:67–78; 2006. 46. Lubensky, I. A.; Vortmeyer, A. O.; Kim, S.; Lonser, R. R.; Park, D. M.; Ikejiri, B.; Li, J.; Okamoto, H.; Walbridge, S.; Ryschkewitsch, C.; Major, E.; Oldfield, E. H.; Zhuang, Z.

Cho ET AL.

Identification of tumor precursor cells in the brains of primates with radiation-induced de novo glioblastoma multi forme. Cell Cycle 5(4):452–456; 2006. 47. Luther, N.; Cheung, N. K.; Souliopoulos, E. P.; Karempelas, I.; Bassiri, D.; Edgar, M. A.; Guo, H. F.; Pastan, I.; Gutin, P. H.; Souweidane, M. M. Interstitial infusion of gliomatargeted recombinant immunotoxin 8H9scFv-PE38. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9(4):1039–1046; 2010. 48. Marian, C. O.; Cho, S. K.; McEllin, B. M.; Maher, E. A.; Hatanpaa, K. J.; Madden, C. J.; Mickey, B. E.; Wright, W. E.; Shay, J. W.; Bachoo, R. M. The telomerase antagonist, imetelstat, efficiently targets glioblastoma tumor-initiating cells leading to decreased proliferation and tumor growth. Clin. Cancer Res. 16(1):154–163; 2010. 49. Martin, V.; Liu, D.; Gomez-Manzano, C. Encountering and advancing through antiangiogenesis therapy for gliomas. Curr. Pharm. Des. 15(4):353–364; 2009. 50. Michelakis, E. D.; Sutendra, G.; Dromparis, P.; Webster, L.; Haromy, A.; Niven, E.; Maguire, C.; Gammer, T. L.; Mackey, J. R.; Fulton, D.; Abdulkarim, B.; McMurtry, M. S.; Petruk, K. C. Metabolic modulation of glioblastoma with dichloroacetate. Sci. Transl. Med. 2(31):31–34; 2010. 51. Mirimanoff, R. O.; Gorlia, T.; Mason, W.; Van den Bent, M. J.; Kortmann, R. D.; Fisher, B.; Reni, M.; Brandes, A. A.; Curschmann, J.; Villa, S.; Cairncross, G.; Allgeier, A.; Lacombe, D.; Stupp, R. Radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Recursive partitioning analysis of EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 phase III randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 24(16):2563–2569; 2006. 52. Molofsky, A. V.; Pardal, R.; Iwashita, T.; Park, I. K.; Clarke, M. F.; Morrison, S. J. Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature 425(6961):962–967; 2003. 53. Nakai, E.; Park, K.; Yawata, T.; Chihara, T.; Kumazawa, A.; Nakabayashi, H.; Shimizu, K. Enhanced MDR1 expression and chemoresistance of cancer stem cells derived from glioblastoma. Cancer Invest. 27(9):901–908; 2009. 54. Nicolis, S. K. Cancer stem cells and “stemness” genes in neuro-oncology. Neurobiol. Dis. 25(2):217–229; 2007. 55. Oka, N.; Soeda, A.; Noda, S.; Iwama, T. Brain tumor stem cell from an adenoid glioblastoma multiforme. Neurol. Med. Chir. 49(4):146–151; 2009. 56. Pellegatta, S.; Poliani. P. L.; Corno, D.; Menghi, F.; Ghielmetti, F.; Suarez-Merino, B.; Caldera, V.; Nava, S.; Ravanini, M.; Facchetti, F.; Bruzzone, M. G.; Finocchiaro, G. Neurospheres enriched in cancer stem-like cells are highly effective in eliciting a dendritic cell-mediated immune response against malignant gliomas. Cancer Res. 66(21):10247–10252; 2006. 57. Pérez Castillo, A.; Aguilar-Morante, D.; Morales-García, J. A.; Dorado, J. Cancer stem cell and brain tumors. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 10(5):262–267; 2008 58. Piccirillo, S. G.; Reynolds, B. A.; Zanetti, N.; Lamorte, G.; Binda, E.; Broggi, G.; Brem, H.; Olivi, A.; Dimeco, F.; Vescovi, A. L. Bone morphogenetic proteins inhibit the tumororigenic potentials of human brain tumor-iinitating cells. Nature 444(7120):761–765; 2006. 59. Piccirillo, S. G.; Vescovi, A. L. Brain tumour stem cells: Possibilities of new therapeutic strategies. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 7(8):1129–1135; 2007. 60. Rappa, G.; Mercapide, J.; Anzanello, F.; Prasmickaite, L.; Xi, Y.; Ju, J.; Fodstad, O.; Lorico, A. Growth of cancer cell lines under stem cell-like conditions has the potential to unveil therapeutic targets. Exp. Cell Res. 314(10):2110– 2122; 2008.


61. Sakariassen, P. Ø.; Immervoll, H.; Chekenya, M. Cancer stem cells as mediators of treatment resistance in brain tumors: Status and controversies. Neoplasia 9(11):882– 892; 2007. 62. Sauvageot, C. M.; Weatherbee, J. L.; Kesari, S.; Winters, S. E.; Barnes, J.; Dellagatta, J.; Ramakrishna, N. R.; Stiles, C. D.; Kung, A. L.; Kieran, M. W.; Wen, P. Y. Efficacy of the HSP90 inhibitor 17-AAG in human glioma cell lines and tumorigenic glioma stem cells. Neuro Oncol. 11(2):109–121; 2009. 63. Schulenburg, A.; Ulrich-Pur, H.; Thurnher, D.; Erovic, B.; Florian, S.; Sperr, W. R.; Kalhs, P.; Marian, B.; Wrba, F.; Zielinski, C. C.; Valent, P. Neoplastic stem cells: A novel therapeutic target in clinical oncology. Cancer 107(10):2512–2520; 2006. 64. Sherry, M. M.; Reeves, A.; Wu, J. K.; Cochran, B. H. STAT3 is required for proliferation and maintenance of multipotency in glioblastoma stem cells. Stem Cells 27(10):2383– 2392; 2009. 65. Singh, S. K.; Hawkins, C.; Clarke, I. D.; Squrire, J. A.; Bayani, J.; Hide, T.; Henkelman, R. M.; Cusimano, M. D; Dirks, P. B. Identification of human brain tumor initiating cells. Nature 432:396–401; 2004. 66. Stea, B.; Falsey, R.; Kislin, K.; Patel, J.; Glanzberg, H.; Carey, S.; Ambrad, A. A.; Meuillet, E. J.; Martinez, J. D. Time and dose-dependent radiosensitization of the glioblastoma multiforme U251 cells by the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 (‘Iressa’). Cancer Lett. 202(1):43–51; 2003. 67. Stupp, R.; Dietrich, P. Y.; Kraljevic, S. O.; Pica, A.; Maillard, I.; Maeder, P.; Miuli, R. J.; Pizzolato, G.; Miralbell, R.; Parchet, F.; Regli, L.; Tribolet, N.; Mirimanoff, R. O.; Leyvraz, S. Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant

739

radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. J. Clin. Oncol. 20(5):1375–1382; 2002. 68. Stupp, R.; Mason, W. P.; van den Bent, M. J.; Weller, M.; Fisher, B.; Taphoorn, M. J.; Belanger, K.; Brandes, A. A.; Marosi, C.; Bogdahn, U.; Curschmann, J.; Janzer, R. C.; Ludwin, S. K.; Gorlia, T.; Allgeier, A.; Lacombe, D.; Cairncross, J. G.; Eisenhauer, E.; Mirimanoff, R. O.; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant Temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 352(10):987–996; 2005. 69. Thon, N.; Damianoff, K.; Hegermann, J.; Grau, S.; Krebs, B.; Schnell, O.; Tonn, J. C.; Goldbrunner, R. Presence of pluripotent CD133+ cells correlates with malignancy of gliomas. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 43(1):51–59; 2010. 70. Wen, P. Y.; Kesari, S. Malignant gliomas in adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 359(5):492–507; 2008. 71. Xu, Q.; Liu, G.; Yuan, X.; Xu, M.; Wang, H.; Ji, J.; Konda, B.; Black, K. L.; Yu, J. S. Antigen-specific T-cell response from dendritic cell vaccination using cancer stem-like cellassociated antigens. Stem Cells 27(8):1734–1740; 2009. 72. Xu, Y.; Stamenkovic, I.; Yu, Q. CD44 attenuates activation of the hippo signaling pathway and is a prime therapeutic target for glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 70(6):2455–2464; 2010. 73. Yao, Y.; Tao, R.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Mao, Y.; Zhou, L. F. B7-H1 is correlated with malignancy-grade gliomas but is not expressed exclusively on tumor stem-like cells. Neuro Oncol. 2009 11(6):757–766; 2009. 74. Zhang, P.; Lathia, J. D.; Flavahan, W. A.; Rich, J. N.; Mattson, M. P. Squelching glioblastoma stem cells by targeting REST for proteasomal degradation. Trends Neurosci. 32(11):559–565; 2009.