screening of low density polyethylene ...

56 downloads 0 Views 545KB Size Report
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. 2. 1.4.2. High density polyethylene. 3. 1.4.3. Cross linked polyethylene. 3. 1.4.4. Medium density polyethylene. 4. 1.4.5.
SCREENING OF LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE DEGRADINGBACTERIAL ISOLATES FROM PLASTIC RECYCLING PLANT: A STEP TOWARDS PLASTIC FREE ENVIRONMENT

Muhammad Ovais Shagufta Naz July, 2015

A thesis submitted to the University of Peshawar in partial fulfillment of the degree of bachelors in Biotechnology CENTRE OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE BENEFICENT THE MERCIFUL

Are those who know and those who do not know alike? Only the men of understanding are mindful. (Surah Al Zumar 39:9) (Al-Quran)

CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This thesis titled “Screening of low density polyethylene degrading bacterial isolates from plastic recycling plant: A step towards plastic free environment” submitted by Muhammad Ovais and Shagufta Naz is hereby approved and recommended as partial fulfillment for the award of Degree of bachelors in Biotechnology

1. Supervisor

___________________________

2. External Examiner

___________________________

3. Director

___________________________

Center of Biotechnology and Microbiology University of Peshawar 2015

Dedication We dedicate all our efforts for this scientific work in the name of Holy Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) and his pious companions, to our parents, teachers and to all those who taught us even a single word, we will also love to dedicate this effort to all thoseinnocent Muslims who were killed in the name of “war against terror” plus all those Palestinian childrenwhowere brutally killed byIsraelianArmy. Muslim scientists who are striving for the revival of Muslims dignity, and the era of glory also deserves all of our dedication.

M.Ovais.Q.Khan

CONTENTS

Page Number

List of Tables

I

List of Figures

II

List of Schemes

III

Acknowledgments

IV

Abstract

V

Pictures

VI

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION & LITERATURE REVIEW 1.1

History of polyethylene

1

1.2

What is polyethylene?

1

1.3

Structure of polyethylene

1

1.4

Classification of polyethylene

2

1.4.1

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene

2

1.4.2

High density polyethylene

3

1.4.3

Cross linked polyethylene

3

1.4.4

Medium density polyethylene

4

1.4.5

Linear low density polyethylene

4

1.4.6

Low density polyethylene

4

1.4.7

Very low density polyethylene

5

1.5

Applications

5

1.6

Problems associated with polyethylene

6

1.7

Degradation of polyethylene

8

1.7.1

Photodegradation

9

1.7.2

Thermal degradation

10

1.7.3

Oxo-biodegradation

10

1.7.4

Biodegradation

10

Factors affecting biodegradation

11

1.7.4.1

1.7.4.2

End products of biodegradation

11

1.7.4.3

Mechanism of biodegradation

13

Methods used to determine biodegradation

15

1.8.1

Scanning electron microscopy

15

1.8.2

Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)

15

1.8.3

Chromatography

15

1.8.4

Percent weight loss

16

1.8

1.9

AIMS & OBJECTIVES

17

CHAPTER 2: MATERIAL& METHODS General experimental information

18

2.1.1

Sample location

18

2.1.2

Sample collection

18

2.1.3

Study design

18

2.2

Serial dilution

20

2.3

Media preparation

21

2.4

Inoculation

21

2.5

Incubation

22

2.6

Total heterotrophic Count

22

2.7

Sub-Culturing

22

2.8

Identification

23

Morphological Identification

23

2.8.1.1

Gram staining

23

2.8.1.2

Colony morphology

24

Biochemical tests

24

2.8.2.1

Catalase test

24

2.8.2.2

Motility test

25

2.8.2.3

Endospore test

25

2.1

2.8.1

2.8.2

2.8.2.4

Methyl red test

26

2.8.2.5

Carbohydrate fermentation test

27

2.8.2.6

Triple sugar iron test (TSI)

28

2.8.2.7

Urease test

28

2.8.2.8

Citrate utilization test

29

2.8.2.9

Tube coagulase test

29

2.8.2.10

Oxidase test

30

2.8.3

Bacterial Identification

31

2.8.4

Biodegradation testing

32

2.8.4.1

Pretreatment of the sample

32

2.8.4.2

Film culturing and harvesting

32

2.8.4.3

Method for monitoring biodegradation

32

Percent weight lossdetermination

33

2.8.4.3.1

CHAPTER 3: RESULTS & DISCUSSION 3.1

Heterotrophic bacterial count

34

3.2

Morphological tests

35

3.3

Biochemical tests

39

3.4

Bacterial identification via PIBWin bacterial identification software

55

3.5

Biodegradation estimation via % weight loss

57

3.6

Conclusion and Recommendations

59

REFERENCES

60-64

LIST OF TABLES Number

Tables

Page number

Table 1

Composition of Mineral salt media used in screening of polyethylene

33

degrading microbes. Table 2

Total Heterotrophic bacterial count in Sample A, B, & C.

34

Table 3

Colony Morphology of Bacterial strains showing various variables.

35

Table 4

Gram staining results showing highly diverse Morphologies.

38

Table 5

Results of catalase tests are indicated, diverse results have been shown

40

by the bacterial isolate. Table 6

Bacterial isolates are separated on the basis of their Motile and Non-

41

Motile Nature. Table 7

Endospore positive and negative cases for the bacterial isolates.

42

Table 8

Methyl red test result of Bacterial species.

43

Table 9

Carbohydrate fermentation test result of bacterial species.

45

Table 10

TSI results of Bacterial species.

47

Table 11

Urease test results of bacterial species.

49

Table 12

Citrate utilization test results of bacterial isolates.

50

Table 13

Oxidase test results of bacterial isolates.

52

Table 14

Coagulase test results of bacterial isolates.

54

Table 15

Result of bacterial identification via PIBWin bacterial identification

56

software. Table 16

Result of degradation of plastic sample by bacterial isolates after 1

58

month.

i

LIST OF FIGURES Number

Figures

Page number

Figure 1

Low density polyethylene beads.

VIII

Figure 2

Low density polyethylene plastic.

VIII

Figure 3

Chemical structure of pure polyethylene.

2

Figure 4

General mechanism and end products of plastic biodegradation under

12

aerobic conditions. Figure 5

Samples collected from recycling plants and their respective solutions.

20

Figure 6

Serially diluted test tubes for Sample A, B, C respectively (from left to

21

right) Figure 7

Properly packed and inoculated nutrient media plates.

22

Figure 8

Slides of gram staining at the end of experiment.

22

Figure 9

Conversion of Hydrogen per oxide from 37% to 3 % working solution.

25

Figure 10

Malachite green stain solution.

26

Figure 11

Methyl red indicator.

27

Figure 12

PIBWin programme showing result of A1 sample.

31

Figure 13

Pure cultures of bacterial isolates on nutrient agar media.

36

Figure 14

100x image of Gram –ve Cocci.

37

Figure 15

Catalase +ve and catalase –ve results of bacterial isolates.

39

Figure 16

Methyl red -ve result.

44

Figure 17

Methyl red +ve result.

44

Figure 18

-ve result of carbohydrate fermentation (upper) +ve result of

46

carbohydrate fermentation (lower) Figure 19

Multiple results of TSI Test.

48

Figure 20

Positive result of urease test.

50

Figure 21

Positive result of citrate test.

51

Figure 22

Various results of oxidase test.

53

ii

LIST OF SCHEME Number

Scheme

Page number

Scheme 1

Various mechanisms of plastic degradation.

9

Scheme 2

Study design of the project.

19

iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS All praises are for Allah Almighty, the most merciful and beneficent, the one and only who bestowed us with the creative mind to think, sight to see and endowed us with the courage to work more and more with creative moves. Blessings and salutations are upon Prophet Muhammad ‫ﷺ‬whoisa role model for each and every human.“There has certainly been for you in the Messenger of Allah an excellent pattern for anyone whose hope is in Allah and the Last Day and [who] remembers Allah often” (Surat Al-Ahzab 33:21). It’s our honor to work under the supervision of Dr.Ibrar Khan (Assistant Professor) Center of Biotechnology and Microbiology University of Peshawar,weexpress our deepest gratitude for his genuine cooperation, dedicated efforts and continuous support throughout our research tenure due to his dedicated character we consider him among the top mentors of our department. We will also love to acknowledge Prof.Dr.Ghousia Lautfullah (Director) Center of Biotechnology and Microbiology University of for her strong support interms of practical advices and parental character, her humble personality and dedicated work for her department had nurtured many seedlings into potent scientists. We will never forget the support of Lalina Maroof (Ph.D. Scholar) for her guidance and support at each and every step of our project. How we can forget our genuine friends who supported us at every moment of our social life and research carrier, and whom support is one of the main reasons we glitter today, Muhammad Khalid Afghan, Usman Ghani, Abdu’s Samad, Naila Aziz, Noreen Malik, Rabia Tareen, Asad Ali and Rafiq Malik. We will also like to thank Dr.Kafeel Ahmed Assistant Professor at COBAM, Dr.Zakiullah, Dr.Fazli Khuda and Dr.Gowhar Ali Lecturers at Department of Pharmacy, Dr.Khishroon (Post.doc USA) Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology University of Peshawar and Dr.Sajid Ali, Assistant Professor Biotechnology Department, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan for their love and guidance. Thanks to all those who bestowed upon us the light of education. Shagufta Naz

Muhammad Ovais

iv