Vol.
4, 445-453.
February
Sequential with
1998
Clinical
Treatment
Bryostatin
Preclinical
1 followed
Chronic
Lymphocytic
445
Research
Leukemia
by 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine:
Studies’
Ramzi
M.
Victor
P. Almatchy,
Mohammad,2
Christian
of Human
Cancer
Khalil Nathan
P. Schultz,
Mary
Varterasian,
Division
of Hematology
Henry and
efficacy
Katato, Wall,
Kan-zhi
H. Mantsch,
Ayad
M.
Al-Katib
into
and
Oncology. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201 [R. M. M., K. K., V. P. A., N. W.,
M. V., A. M. A-K.], and Institute for Biodiagnosties, National Research Council Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 1Y6, Canada [K-z. L., C. P. S.. H. H. M.]
ABSTRACT We have previously
reported
induces
of
differentiation
that bryostatin
chronic
1 and
2-CdA,
we used
a xenograft
a new
batch
of severe
combined
model
immunodeficient
Bryo
1 and 2-CdA at the maximum .Lg/kg i.p. and 30 mgfkg s.c., respectively) to the mice at different combinations survival
of
in
days,
the
tumor
mice.
tolerated doses (75 were administered and schedules. The
growth
inhibition
ratio,
the
tumor growth delay, and the log10 kill of the mice treated with Bryo 1 followed by 2-CdA were significantly better than the control and other groups. We conclude that the
1 (Bryo
lymphocytic
of Bryo
CLL in WSU-CLL-bearing mice with severe combined immune deficiency. s.c. tumors were developed by injection of WSU-CLL cells, and fragments were then transplanted
Liu,
1)
leukemia
in vitro to a hairy cell (HC) stage. This study tests the hypothesis that Bryo 1-differentiated CLL cells are more
sequential treatment with suIted in higher antitumor
Bryo 1 followed by 2-CdA reactivity and improved animal
survival.
(CLL)
susceptible to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) than parent CLL cells. A recently established EBV-negative CLL line (WSU-CLL) from a patient resistant to chemotherapy including fludarabine was used to test this hypothesis. Both Bryo 1 (10-1000 nM) and 2-CdA (5.6-22.4 riM) exhibited a dose-dependent growth inhibitory effect on the WSU-CLL cell line. In vitro, the sequential exposure to Bryo 1 (100 nr’i for 72 h) followed by 2-CdA (11.2 M) resulted in significantly
higher
rates
of growth
inhibition
than
either
agent
INTRODUCTION B-cell ing
for
When
therapy
recently, time,
is the most 30%
the new at this point
very
active
patients
with
patients
2-CdA
with
fludarabine-resistant
trate-resistant
incorporation
markers,
acid CD11c
and
phosphatase CD25,
reaction after
and two
72 h of culture,
important confirming
the differentiation of CLL to HC. The Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopic analysis showed that the amount of membrane lipids significantly increased in Bryo 1-treated cells compared to controls after 24 h, whereas the protein content, as well as the DNA content, decreased. This finding supports
the
change
of CLL
to HC.
To evaluate
the in vivo
Received 7/1/97; revised 10/7/97; accepted 10/27/97. costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 1 8 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. I This work was made possible by Grant 6323-97 from the Leukemia Society of America, and it was supported in part by a grant from Ortho Biotech, Inc. (Raritan, NJ).
To whom Hematology 2
requests for reprints should be addressed. at Division of and Oncology, Wayne State University School of Mcdi-
550 East Canfield, Lande Medical Research Building, Room Detroit, Ml 48201. Phone: (313)577-7919; Fax: (313)577-7925: mail:
[email protected].
dine,
317, E-
into
of action
combination
regimens
and
with
antilymphoid
products,
have
been
identified
motherapeutic
agents.
protein
C activator
kinase
animal
tumors Bugula
cells
to a HC
phological markers
Institute
I , a macrocyclic that
has
subsequent
Natural
among new treatment in combination with
Bryo
changes like CD!
(5).
This
activity. and are now modalities is standard che-
laetonc
a differentiating
and
on
lc and TRAP.
differentiation the
induction
This
study
the
Products
is based of tested
and
activity
(3), is extracted and purified from the neritina (4). It has the ability to differentiate stage
in
improve
Cancer
entering clinical trials. Also, the use of biological agents
that
inactive
their
should
agents
marine
Over
treatment
little success in extending discovery of antilymphoid
of novel
from
used.
is no curative
Program, derived
more
analogue but
(2). There
mechanisms
a number
(1).
and,
and
outcome in this disease. As part of the National
CLL
The
novel
are
agents,
leukemia
CLL
therapy for CLL, and there has been the overall duration of survival. The with
steroids,
is a purine
HC
account-
countries
fludarabine, to these
alone. Changes in immunophenotype, enzymes, lipids, proteins, and the DNA of WSU-CLL cells were studied before and after Bryo 1 treatment. Bryo 1 induced a positive tar-
agents
leukemia,
in Western
agents,
analogue. resistant
are limited.
in
adult
alkylating
purinc
become
common of all cases
is required,
patients
options is
CLL3
approximately
a on
marine CLL
on
mor-
HC-associatcd the hypothesis
The abbreviations used are: CLL, chronic lymphocytie leukemia; 2-CdA. 2-ehlorodeoxyadenosine; Bryo, bryostatin: HC. hairy cell: TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase: ET-IR, Fourier transforma3
tion infrared; SCID, severe phatase: MID, maximum sity.
combined tolerated
immunodeficient; AeP, acid phosdose; WSU. Wayne State Univer-
446
Sequential
that
Treatment
Bryo
2-CdA
1-differentiated
than
parent
of cellular
samples,
such
example,
using
patients
‘
and
cm
strate
qualitative
ratio
Recently,
‘.
from
of two
the area
1540
also
spectroscopy,
use
anec
to treatment
eluded
from
of two
Schultz
that
patients
in
from
B-CLL of normal
bands,
regions, were
(9)
using
bearing
a CLL
strated,
by using
ET-IR
of the
WSU-CLL
cells
proteins,
and
those
line
DNA
noglobulin
at I 080
and
were
cells
express
CLL observed
FT-IR
having
lished
Studies.
in our
laboratory
refractory fludarabine; The
cell
line
shows
(3)t(p
l4;p24).
and
forms
suspension
The
penicillin cclls/ml.
medium
tially
with
State
University)
or 2-CdA 5.6,
bovine
Bryo
diluent
(0.02%
in RPMI
1640
1%
CLL
The
WSU-CLL
containing
treated
Inc.,
Raritan,
riM. was
the
14
free
analysis,
To
NJ)
an
added
200,
to the
six
triangular
centration
of S
1%
as
BSA
x
Staining
l0
described
cells/tube
and into
and washed
previously
(12).
(mouse antihuman) to B cell differentiation munoglobulins were added at saturating and
incubated
incubated antimouse)
at 4#{176}C for 35 mm. for that
30
mm was
Cells
at 4#{176}C with FITC-conjugatcd.
Arizona
and
1000
nM of
of wells,
all
films
with
of each
good
against out
prepaarea
homogenous IR
spectra
used
as described
three
spectra,
a blank
a
under used to
the sampling For
samples,
earned
were
coadded
and previ-
each
from
background.
on a FTS-60
to generate
of 8 cm The
.
smoothing
‘
with
spectra
function
used
as
The
FT-IR
a single
an encoding
were
before
then
spec-
spectrum,
interval
apodized
applying
solved
in acetone
p.g/ml
and was
previously 106
to
again cells
light. the
and
town, were
for band
of 1 with
the Fourier
Cells and
a
trans-
24-h
ceived
l0
each
were
sacrificed
pelleted, washed
Bryo
flank
were
When
the tumors
light
dis-
of 200 as described
solution
were
supematant
was
with
Samples
cells
generated
PBS. were
added
removed,
analyzed
from by flow
by combining
Four-week from
mice were as described
area.
to a concentration from
D
was
forward
fluorescence.
obtained
WSU-CLL and
the twice
1-treated
7AAD
CA)
1 ml of PBS, and mixed well. for 20 mm on ice while protected
Xenografts.
were
NY). The developed
(goat
in PBS
Actinomycin Jolla,
100 .sl of 7AAD
Scattergrams
mice
La
diluted
were was
with
half-widths
Cytometry.
at -20#{176}C,protected
Briefly,
pellet
scatter
SCID im-
Flow
suspended in cells were stained
WSU-CLL
with
mixed,
antibody
light
‘
and
and kept
(15). cells,
WSU-CLL
and
16 cm
Staining
Calbiochem-Novabiochem,
cytometry.
antibodies or
of I .6 and
7AAD
to
at a con-
antigens
Finally,
were
quality within
h
IR-transparent
disc
(7AAD,
Cytometry.
washed
on
or sequen-
concentrations, were
of the
(14).
in 3 ml of PBS
a second
24
pi
Five
(k value)
tubes
Monoclonal
WSUafter
of2 X l0 105/ml in
X
and
Flow
75-mm
(13).
of Fourier parameters
untreated aliquoted
with
Cells.
circular
was
obtained
resolution
cell
times. were
ace-
for AcP
Flemans
NaCl.
The
method
for
were
interferograms
three
to be stained
Inc.,
in 60%
cultures
chemicals.
same
Briefly,
film,
at nominal
from
Immunofluorescence
and
produced
contaminating the
10).
films.
methodology
measurements
control. Cells were counted daily for S days using trypan blue dye and hemocytometer. The entire experiment was repeated
Cells
of the
prethe
formation. In addition, band narrowing by the method self-deconvolution was performed with smoothing
number medium
of
wavenumber/cm
at concentrations
equal
(9,
stained
deposited
as thin
by IR microscopy
This
cluster
fixed
1-treated
were
down
were using
Instruments,
were
in 0.9%
as a
mm. The films were kept in a desiccator for 3-5 mm. The BaF,-window was
humidity
mm2.
smears cultures
of WSU-CLL
Bryo
106 cells) dried
checked
cul-
unit/ml
by G. R. Pettit,
of 10. 100,
1;
10% heat100
concurrently
X and
was
markers.
to Hayhoc
resuspended
(-3
films,
IR
with
in liquid
and
of 2-3 vacuum
ration
expressed
and then
and
immu-
phycoerythnin
were
Southern
Analysis
Mouse
or
or double
smears
according
control
with mono-
trometer (Bio-Rad, Cambridge, MA). equipped with a nitrogencooled mercury cadmium telluride detector. Two hundred fifty-
t(5; 12)(q3
L-glutaminc,
provided
22.4
DMSO)
with
1 3),
It grows mice.
were
washed
Results
3% gluteraldhyde
from
a different
estab-
aberrations
1 ;q22;p
in SCID
at concentrations and
was
male
chromosomal
1 (generously
16.8,
line
streptomycin at a density at a concentration of 2
and
(OrthoBiotcch,
1 1 .2,
cell
a 66-year-old
serum,
were
ously
t(4; 12; 12)(q3
G. and 200 pg/ml Cells were seeded
culture
or to
vincristinc, and prednisonc; Adriamycin, and dexamethasone.
tumors
cells
A
incubated
FITC
for single
air-dried
tartrate,
CLL
of
WSU-CLL
multiple
without
stabilize
in lipids,
leukemia.
from
maintained
fetal
demon-
to 2-CdA
and
diameter a mild
treatment
changes
sensitive
t(l8;21)(q12;p12).
s.c.
was
inactivated
the
of HC
cells
containing
were
in the dark.
with
(Shandon,
The
BaF,-windows
model
also
PA).
suspensions
METHODS
add(16)(q24)x2,
tune
I induces
with
Bryo 1. 1 followed
the in vitro
II centrifuge
tone
cells
Studies. Cytocentrifuge control and Bryo 1-treated
IR Spectroscopic
present spectra
xenograft
1 1). We
that
Bryo
to cyclophosphamide, and vincnistine,
45,x,del p13),
with
AND
Vitro
Ref.
spectroscopy,
the features
MATERIALS In
(WSU-CLL;
mouse
con-
spectra
cells. In the in the ET-IR
Cytospin
and
were analyzed. The results expressing immunofluores-
control.
positive
in PBS Dickinson).
phycoerythrin-conjugated
conjugated
of cells
I % BSA (Beckon
staining. and
as a negative
Sewickley,
sensitivity/resist-
color
of
at 4#{176}C for 30 mm
Enzymatic from the
pared
ml
cytometer
per test of cells
FITC-
isotypes
used
proteins,
and
in 0.5 flow
dual of
percentage
to demon-
(10)
the
antibodies
530
in DNA,
chlorambucil
a SCID
consistent
elonal
and
able
ex viva
For
combinations
peripheral
at 966
resuspended
on a FACScan
cence.
For
cells
the
CLL
B-CLL
and
minimum of 20,000 cells were given as a percentage
biological
of WSU-CLL cells before and after treatment with We report here the preclinical activity of Bryo 2-CdA
washed
the
normal lymphocytes. The in the FT-IR spectra of
and
2-CdA-resistant
for
purified
differences
2-CdA
tool
complex
spectral
differently from 2-CdA-scnsitive study. we examined the variation
by
to
(6-8).
et al.
to predict
with
for
those
and quantitative
cells
susceptible
or cell cultures
IR marker
and lipids between CLL cells and same group also used the differences CLL
more
a powerful
tissues,
be distinguished
and/or
,
become
fluids,
ET-IR
are
analyzed
components
by making
cm
cells
cells. has
as body
can
blood
CLL
CLL
spectroscopy
ET-IR analysis
of CLL
cells s.c.
Taconie
old
female
Laboratory
adapted and previously
WSU-CLL ( 1 1 ). Each
(in serum-free
RPMI
tumors
were
developed,
dissected
and
xenografts mouse re1640)
the
ICR-
(German-
mice
mechanically
s.c.
in
were dis-
Clinical
Cancer
447
Research
i E
z
C
C-)
C,
I
Days Effect of various concentrations the WSU-CLL cell line. E, control; Fig.
.,
of Bryo 1 on the cell growth #{149} , 10 nM; V. 100 nM; A, 200
I
1000
I
in Culture nM;
Fig.
2
into
single-cell
by
Ficoll-Hypaque
separated
suspensions.
twice
with
RPMI
typic
and
karyotypic
lished
cell line to ensure
by cutting
the tumors
planted
s.c.
group
of mice.
s.c.
Design.
groups
different
origin
bilaterally
into
naive,
S.
mice
observed
monitoring
changes
drugs.
Animals
reached
2000
for s.c. tumor
occurred,
Assessment
tumors
euthanized
when
their
of body
of
Tumor
assessing
antitumor
activity
used
in our laboratories
weight
length
and
bition when
(T/C)
(mg)
the median
T is the
median
tumor 900
median
tumor
(in
days)
tumor
required
plus
of the burden
discomfort.
end
points
group
for
the
group
inhi(7)
C, where
-
treatment
group
tumors to reach 900 mg, the control group tumors
and C is the median to reach the same
cell kill doubling
T - C/3.32 (Td), where Td is tumor involving mice were performed under
gross time.
Institutional ysis
on 48
(log10) All studies Review
animals
Board-approved with
bilateral
protocol. tumors,
using
time
(in
weight;
days)
(d)
Statistical a t test
1 and showed
with
Bryo compared
1 showed
nM,
2-CdA
on Cell
growth
At a 10 nM any significant
cells,
except
some growth either control or
compared
on
day
4.
significant
A
on day
with
the control
nrvi concentration over
with
inhibition
cells treated respectively, was
inhibition
4 (Fig.
1). At 100
and
100
dose,
nM
for
tumor
(Fig.
with
2). Isobologram
between of Bryo
Bryo 1 (100
1 1 .2 p.M of 2-CdA of 2-CdA,
1 and nM)
on day
To examine effect
respectively,
Bryo
1 showed
nrsi concentration
compared
growth
at 200 nsi concentra63 and 39% inhibiof
the 200
4) when
the
no
for growth a significant
control
cells
and
with 5.6 p.M. and exhibited 57 and 21 .3% inhibition, on day 4. 2-CdA at concentrations of 16.8 and 22.4
toxic
interaction
when
Bryo
growth
inhibition (on day 10 nM. A significant
1000
advantage
Both inhibitory
concentration,
inhibition of WSU-CLL cells was noticed tion. Bryo 1 at this concentration exhibited tion
Growth.
a dose-dependent
untreated
with
bination (a)
(C) reached T
of Bryo 2-CdA
compared
JIM
for
standard
growth
treated
=
all
Studies
I and
B are the tumor
(b) tumor
delay
from
of control.
growth
with
growth
weight
that
with
as follows:
in the control
(c) tumor
with
along
total
in the
on tumor
compared
inhibition and may not be clinically achievable. On the other hand, 2-CdA at 1 1 .2 p.M showed
(1 2) and were
weight
on the cell growth of 1 1 .2 p.M: #{149} , I 6.8
,
once
effects
A and
riM;
and
side
The
where
to
PBS
in accordance
respectively;
weight
mg;
time
B2)/2,
X
(in mm),
is the
approximately
(A
=
width
were
assigned
to avoid
Response.
procedures tumor
weight)
conducted
and
effect on WSU-CLL cells. 1-treated cells did not show
conditioned
measured
and
was
groups
Vitro
Bnyo
were
development,
weight
10%
trans-
given i.p. and 2-CdA indicated in Table 2.
were
intervals,
Effect
drug-efficacy
received
in animal
were mg (-
were
xenografts
randomly
The
of 2-CdA
A, 5.6
p.M.
experimental
In
After
of a second
similarly
were
22.4
confidence
accomplished
flanks
(animals
concentrations
cell line. N, control;
RESULTS
estab-
Mice were checked three times Once palpable tumors devel-
or as control
development
washed
the
that
the
as a diluent). Bryo 1 was according to the schedule
tumor
was
WSU-CLL
into
of 6 or more
were
with
fragments
the
then
and its stability.
0.02% DMSO was given s.c. mice
of various
to pheno-
For the subsequent
from
treatments
and
comparison
trocar
were
subjected
propagation
using a 1 2 gauge trocar. for tumor development.
oped,
were
20-30-mg
a 1 2 gauge
fragments
transplanted animals a week
into
Trial
small
for
serial
cells
centrifugation
cells
the human
tumors,
via
Efficacy
These
analysis
of s.c.
Tumor
density
1640.
formation
trials,
Effect
the WSU-CLL JiM;
sociated
4
Days in Culture
of
nM.
3
2
whether Bryo
analysis 2-CdA
with
concentrations
4 was
synergistic
Bryo
1 can
1 at 100 nsi and
to characterize
revealed
that
the
the
of either
(data
augment 2-CdA
5.6
not the
at 11.2
comor
shown). inhibitory p.M
were
chosen for the subsequent combination treatments
experiments. Of all of the different tested, only the sequential addition of
100
(72 h later)
in
nM
Bryo
complete
1 followed growth
Adding
2-CdA
growth
inhibition
inhibition
24 or 48
h after
compared
cells
95%
2-CdA
as compared (data
not
with shown).
the
i.M
WSU-CLL
Bryo
with
sequential additions (2-CdA, points showed a lesser growth
anal-
by 1 1 .2
of
1 showed
its addition
then Bryo inhibiting
concurrent
2-CdA cells
less
resulted (Fig.
3).
dramatic
at 72 h. Reverse
1 ) at different time effect on WSU-CLL addition
of Bryo
I and
448
Sequential
Treatment
of CLL
Table
Bryo
I
I-induced
enzymatic cells in vitro
changes
in WSU-CLL
w,e
Bryostatin-treated cells
I-
‘C
Stain
E
Untreated
z C,
3
strong
positivity.
2CdA
induce
CD11c
1
(22.4%)
CD1
lc,
top
panel)
(Fig.
2CdA
cells
B cell
Bryo
1-treated also
lymphoma
typically
cells
this
4
2
3
Days
in Culture
range
ence
3
Sequential addition of 2-CdA (A. 24 h; LI. 48 h; , 72 h) to 1-treated WSU-CLL cells in vitro (100 nsi Bryo 1, 11.2 p.M 2-CdA) compared with adding both agents at time zero (Bryo 1 +2#{149}).
methylene
untreated
and
Bryo
1-treated
reactions.
TRAP
AeP
and TRAP
The
reaction
specific
(positive was
for
WSU-CLL
At 72 and
HC
120 h, Bryo
reaction)
stronger leukemia
after (16,
We
in lipid,
protein,
1-treated
and
120 17)
AcP
peaks
cells
for able
to induce
cells
(Table
1).
reaction
is
acids
in
features protein
h. The
and
TRAP
is typically
negative
Effect
of Bryo
ers (CD1O, CD! le, 1-treated WSU-CLL were (2.8%),
1 on Immunophenotypic
the expression
highly CD25
positive ( 1 .3%),
of selected
CD22, cells
and at 24,
for CD1O and
CD22
Changes.
immunophcnotypic
CD25) 72,
(99%),
on
and
120
and
( 1 1 .2%).
We
and
Bryo
lipid
1 was
able
in A
found
in WSU-
with
untreated
(bottom
panel)
(RCH3),
methylenc
the treated
cells,
contents.
The
protein
5 demonstrates and
cells
here ‘
and
fewer
the existproteins
indicated cm
) and
an ester
(open
by two
positive
negative
methyl
on band
decreased
Bryo
intensity
of typical
to
CLL
cells
in Fig. 6 shows
24-h
Bryo in the infor-
band
at
1467
the
fatty
at 1740
cm
coming
from
lipids.
Typical
protein
amide
II and
I
indicate a relatively lower panel indicate an increased
content.
in DNA
the
Bryo
the
methylene
6)
panel,
represented
Spectroscopically,
Content.
lc
24-h bottom
the
is then
a different
protein
decrease
6,
between
which
1650 cm in the upper
DNA
between Fig.
difference
membrane
with
content cells.
of the top panel.
at 1550 and content. Arrows
treated
DNA
control cells,
is based
in simple
and
now
untreated
and valleys
significant were
cells
for CD!
and untreated
Decreased
Bryo
h. Untreated
negative
cm
mark-
untreated
5
For in
and 2923
spectroscopic
and
mation
CLL.
examined
the
1-treated
1 was
in WSU-CLL
was
methyl groups].
arrows)
(at 2853
Observed
and Bryo 1-treated cells value is typical for C-H
in Fig.
1-treated
of
expres-
Spectroscopy.
Fig.
change
panel)
13%
amide B bands (at 2953 and 3060 cm The spectral range between 800 and 1800 cm ‘ (Fig. provides absorbance readings which further indicate differences
examined and
bands
hand,
(2 1-23).
of lipids
as
of Bryo and mono-
a specific
Contents
of control cm ‘; this
(filled
Bryo
on
and
depicts TRAP.
lipids
in the
on
other
by FT-IR
(R3 CH)
(top
CD1O/CD2S
1 for 24 h compared
a massive
spectra
of more
leukemia
replications.
[such
methinc
indicates
difference
5
Bryo
and
Bryo
4,
CD22/CD25
on 22.4% leukemia
the
Protein Cells
three
vibrations
arrows)
AcP
with
in all
and
(R2CH,),
On
in the amount
treated cells
stretching
1 on
and
WSU-CLL
increase
and
CD22/CD25,
in HC
(Fig.
respectively, at 72 h. 200 nM of Bryo 1 for
CD22/CD1 lc is unique to HC
shows the two mean spectra in the range of 2800-3150
V
Bryo
seen
it
CD22/
cultures
of the cells,
(18-20).
in Lipid
1-treated
control
and 1.1%, cells with
coexpressed
and
4).
CD1O/CD2S,
control
le on 22.4%,
of
cells
expression,
le,
lc on 22%
coexpression WSU-CLL
cytoid
CLL
C,
of
+++,
at 72 h (Fig.
untreated
CD22/CDI panel).
significant
4
in
4, bottom
Changes
Effect
h
+++
moderate;
++,
(13%)
(92.4%)
of CD1O/CD1
CD1O/CD1
13%
The 1-treated
K
CD25
was 5, 1.3, 2.8, of the WSU-CLL
of the cells,
Bryo
and
CD22/CD25
13%
sion
CdA:
mild:
+,
expression
coexpression and
72 h induced
0 C,
Fig.
+++
++
equivocal;
-/+,
CD22
Treatment
E z
120
++
4
The
z
72 h
-
negative;
up-regulated
K
cells
-/+“
a
.
WSU-CLL
AeP TRAP
Our results content
1 for 24 h. This DNA bands
bands.
when
demonstrated WSU-CLL
can be seen The
at 1000,
IR spectra 1100,
and
a cells
by following of WSU1713
cm
Clinical
-i: 4Ti
LcD10/CO5
[oiOfCO11C
h
:
00 iQ FL1-HCOiO
-
102 FITC-’
1--i ?1
#{149}
iOl
98Z
ji 102 I gO FL1-H’CD1OFuTC-)
1O
.
FL1-H\CDiO
I 00 10’ FI.1-H\C022
10 4
103
100
FITC-
1 00
-i
22.4%
3
i
iO
10’
iO3
1o3
l:C027/C1J25
2E
in
78 -j
Differences
between
revealed
1-treated
Bryo
cells
at all
Induction
of
these
fluorescence-activated
trol and panels).
Bryo
1-treated
This
shows
cells),
and
cells (R3-live
from
8%
cells),
7AAD-dim
(Ri-late
+
8%
in
in Fig. defined
of con-
7AAD
control
to
24%
io
FI’TC
or the concurrent
not show
any
and control
cycles
(X2)
tumors Mean
Studies 2 shows and their
1, 2-CdA,
Bryo
1 was given
after
2-CdA.
(12),
and
Bryo
1 was was
in this
the MTD
the basis
their
3 shows
against
is illustrated a TIC
Using
Bryo
antitumor
activity,
after
Bryo
for Bryo
used
MTD, When
at its MTD
2-CdA
was
Bryo
was
group.
On
1 . This
=
(%),
T
-
a drug
1 alone 0.90)
2-CdA however, was
true
0.05,
1, 2-CdA, mice
C (days), is considered
was
against showed
active
log10 active
(T/C
=
19%;
WSU-CLL-SCID no activity. The
was
seen
when
for
both
the
2-CdA one
and
of tumor
0.03,
and 0.03,
differences (alone),
were
the group
We have
one
indicate 1 ) or two
(X
the duration other
weight
in mg,
showed
that
for the
treatments
(Fig.
as Ps,
as well
there
respectively. observed
were
were
significant
given
followed
Bryo
by 2-CdA
On the other
hand,
between
the group
1 + 2CdA,
the group
for 5 days,
previously
of CLLs
in vitro
reported
that
to a HC
stage
Bryo (5).
and
hypothesis that Bryo 1-differentiated CLL ceptible to 2-CdA, a drug active in treating
kill.
mia
if it
recently a patient
xenografts.
and
in extending with
The in all
the results
1 for either
compared
3). Results
1 for 3 days
tiation of Bryo
mg.
S days
xcnografts
Clearly,
Bryo
for activity.
and
no
given given control
DISCUSSION
of 30 mg/kg/day
2).
activity
studied.
after
2-CdA
antitumor
did
Admin-
p.glkg/
35 mg/kg/day.
a dose
were
were
addition agents,
mice.
SCID
16 and
between the control group and the groups with Bryo or Bryo I followed by 2-CdA (either X 1 or X2). The
significant
which 1 (75
(Table
differences 1 (alone) PS
or
2-CdA
Bryo
remained
Briefly,
and before
42%.
log10 kill whereas
=
was its
with
we used
criterion,
13; xenografts, C
at
WSU-CLL-SCID
by TIC
response
achieves TIC Accordingly,
in mice
antitumor
combinations
Activity
i.p. and s.c.
of 2-CdA, (Table
design
2-CdA,
to be 35 mg/kg/day.
for 2-CdA studies
Table
injected
or sequentially
of the MTD
in subsequent
with
injected
study
trial
in one and two cycles.
concurrently
in combination
day),
preclinical
combinations alone,
2-CdA
determined given
the efficacy
WSU-CLL
effective
2000 range
sequential
by any
I 1%,
20 days,
use of both
followed
of
were
12%,
reverse
did not show
was more
and
values
3 days
given
to reach
The
or with 200 nsi In each reading. the
top)
and
WSU-CLL-bearing
weight
2-CdA
that
kill
against
later)
again
calculated Table
1 for
treatments
8).
Vivo
activity
tumor
24 h.
In
2-CdA,
median
after
log10 schedule
schedule.
1 and
4 days
16%
C, and
-
1 .36 for the two-cycle
Bryo
As
T
of Bryo
(starting
cells).
+
TIC,
1.10 for the one-cycle
istering
to induce apoptosis on 16% of 1 increased late apoptotic +
the
The
and
right
(R2-apoptotic or dead
days,
stain-
and
7 (left by
apoptotic
in Fig. 7, Bryo 1 was able WSU-CLL cells at 24 h. Bryo
by Bryo.
scattergrams
regions
shown
apoptotic
Cells
sorting
arc shown
three
7AAD-bright
schedules.
WSU-CLL
of the 24 h Bryo
in WSU-CLL cell
the
untreated
content
bands.
of Apoptosis
7AAD-negative
and
in the DNA
Typical
ing:
1-treated
a decrease
8Z
-
FL1 i4CO22
Fig. 4 Two-color flow eytometrie analysis of WSU-CLL cells in vitro at 72 h. WSU-CLL cells were cultured alone (control: Bryo I (bottom) for 72 h at 37#{176}C. Panels from left to right show CDIO/CDI Ic, CDIO/CD25. CD22/CDI le, and CD22/CD25. number of cells gated was kept constant.
cells
i04
‘
137.
_FL1.H’CO22_FUC-
FITC-
ioz FITC
?!.
71Z iO
‘
iOi HCD22
FLI
!
102
ji
FL1-H\colo
A
in
lOt
FITC-’
1:C022[CIJ11C
-
87Z -
:
8Z
104
22%
I ,
‘.
13%
478Z
10r-ro
i3
.
l:COlO/C025
CiflO/COh1C
!:
:
t:
I
2.8%
1.3%
::
....
,%
,-
J
5Z
449
Research
CON 0I.CO22fCt
)L.C022/COI1C
A
A5
Cancer
T
-
mice highest
used
but
not
active
established resistant
to test
in fludarabine-resistant EBV-negativc to chemotherapy
this
1 induces This
hypothesis.
cells de
are nova
given
2-CdA
two
cycle
This
after sequential
Bryo
I resulted
interaction
Bryo
A from was
for the first CLL tumors administering
antitumor 1 and
the
susleuke-
(24-26).
we demonstrate
in improved between
more
(WSU-CLL) fludarabine
time that Bryo 1 given to SCID mice bearing showed reasonable antitumor activity. Moreover,
was
differentested HC
CLL
CLL line including
Here,
study
2-CdA
activity. is se-
450
Sequential
Treatment
of CLL
1
Lipids
1 Difference Bryostatin
-
control
LII
LtI Protein
Fig. 5 The difference in spectra demonstrates the existence of more lipids (filled arrows) and fewer proteins (open arrows) in the Bryo 1-treated cells. indicated by two positive methylene bands (at 2853 and 2923 cm ‘ ) and negative methyl and amide B bands (at 2953 and 3060 em ‘).
C (U
-e 0 U)
.0
Control
----
Cells
.
1_
.
I
I
.
I
2850
2800
2900
.
.
I
2950
quence
dependent
quential Bryo years
because
use of the two 1 has
neither
agents
received
mon activity,
Bryo
entiating
indicate
growth
inhibitory
on
that
Bryo
1 ( 100 nM) followed complete
(Fig.
in the HC stage Bryo
reaction)
in WSU-CLL
specific
2-CdA
powerful
show
inhibition
past
1 was
for HC Bryo
In
differ-
(3).
our
vitro,
1 and
by 2-CdA of
2). The
I also
usually
able
leukemia induced
express
to induce
cells (16,
(Table
specific
cells
AcP
and
I ). The
17) and
the expression
enzymes TRAP
TRAP
is typically of specific
Subsequently,
lines
(20)
(positive
and
FT-IR of
it is
and
lipids)
Drcxlcr
able
to
features
the peripheral
of
blood
et al. (3)
reported
that
of
B-CLL
cells
differentiation
has
and
DNA
peripheral
negative
in
this
technique
has
of CLL of
by studying
CLL
treatment ehlorambucil resulted
cells with
to
to
of
normal
higher
(18, Bryo
phenotypic
from
demonstrate
that
non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoblastic
used
with
normal
which is also typically seen in HC leukemia is consistent with our previous findings that
(5).
were
and
taken
inducing
comparison than
CD22/CD25,
of
spectroscopy CLL;
have
imporle and
disease
acute
is
phenotypic
cells
of the human
reaction
4). More CD22/CD1
CLL
we
modulation
nosis
and
such as CD! le and CD25 1-treated cells eoexpressed
This
(Fig.
enzymatic,
on fresh
Bryo
1
B-lymphoma
leukemia
cell
a powerful
tool
line
Rch
(27).
( 1 1 .2 p.M)
WSU-CLL
morphological.
leukemia
induces cell
a dose-dependent
(Figs.
markers, tantly, Bryo HC
20-23).
1 induces
of patients with this Bryo 1 was capable
few
to its antitu-
27).
cells
3150
proteins.
3). Cells
markers.
CLL.
in the
(20,
72 h later
growth
se-
HC
to possess
on WSU-CLL
resulted
reverse
In addition
tumors
1 and
effect
use of Bryo in
found
B-cell
nor
attention
(3-5).
I has been
properties
results
agent
I
3100
activity.
considerable
as an antincoplastic
.
3050
I cm1
concurrent
showed
Bryostatin
+
I
3000
Wavenumber
cells
cellular
purified
CLL
protein blood
been
extended
the
lipid
observed ex
viva
antileukemic show that
content
and
CLL cells.
to evaluation
(DNA,
from
patients cells
and a lower
mononuclear
the variations predict
(9).
content
in diag-
components
cells
lymphocytes
two common (10). Here we
in a higher
become study
lipid More
content recently,
of the
prognosis
in the ET-IR sensitivity/resistance
agents, treatment lower
protein
in
usually
spectra to
2-CdA and with Bryo 1 and
DNA
Clinical
Cancer
Research
Lipid
1
Lipid
4, i;en;
f t
Bryostatin
-
t
controlp
DNA
Protein DNA
Fig.
6
IR spectra
of untreated
and
Bryo
‘I)
1-treated
U C
WSU-CLL cells shows bands specific for DNA at 1000. 1 100, and 1713 em’ (botto,n panel). These
rotein3l
(U .0
bands showed reduced intensity after 24 h of Bryo I treatment (data represent average of three experiments). This reduced intensity is the difference between Bryo I -treated and control cells (top panel).
I.-.
0
U)
.0
Cells
+
Bryostatin
Control 800
1000
cells
1200
1400
Wavenumber
:.:
I
. .
‘
I.
8%R1
.
24%R1 Seattergrams of 7AAD-stained cells are Left, untreated WSU-CLL cells: rig/it, WSU-CLL cells treated with 200 nM concentration of Bryo 1 for 24 h. RI, late apoptotie or dead Fig. 7 shown.
I.
8%R21
16%R21 ‘
84%R3
:-
‘
-
iOO 6OiJ’ iO#{243} iObO
‘
FSC-H\FSC-Height---)
cells,
which
structure
and/or
may explain
‘2O#{244}
cells;
R2,
forward
60%R3
.
apoptotie light scatter;
cells; FL?.
R3,
live
7AAD
cells;
FSC,
fluorescence.
4O0 6O0 aOO
FSC-H\FSC-Height---
(Figs. S and 6). Because these findings suggest
membrane
1 cm
.
.
contents membrane,
1800
1600
lipids that
in the whole the morphological
arc located there are composition changes
in the cell changes in
size)
of the CLL
ation
of membrane
larger
anee
of CLL
(e.g.,
treated
and
cytoplasmic
with
Bryo
extensions
1 . Previously, lipids
to chlorambucil
plays
our
seen
in
group
found
an important and
WSU-CLL role
to the nucleoside
that
cells the alter-
in the
resist-
analogues
451
452
Sequential
Treatment
of CLL
Table
-
2
in
Bryo
vito
1 and
Agent”
do se and
2-CdA
Dose”
Diluent (control) Bryostatin 1 2-CdA Bryo I + 2-CdA (2 cycles) Bryo-2-CdA (I cycle) Bryo-*2-CdA (2 cycles) 2-CdA--*Bryo (2 cycles) Bryo-2-CdA (3 + 5)’
0.0 75 30 75 30
schedule
for
W SU-CLL-bearing No.
Route
mgfkg/inj/day’ p.g/kg/inj/day mg/kg/mi/day
p.g/kg/inj/day mg/kg/mi/day
SCID
of animals
Table
Diluent
Bryo
In vito
3
T/C (%)
20 10 10
i.p.
7
20
6 6 6 6
10 20 20 8
s.c. i.p.-s.c. i.p.-s.c. s.e.-i.p. i.p_-+s_e_
(control)
100
I
activity
T
of Bryo
19
( 1 X)
Bryo-2CdA 2CdA-’Bryo Bryo-2CdA
(2X) (2X) (3 + 5)”
Significant at P = 0.05. NS, not significant at P 0.05. ‘. Highly significant at P = 0.05. ‘I Three days of Bryo I , followed
against
Log10
for 2 weeks a week.
(gross)
Mean
0.00
7 16 20 4 0.00
agent
followed
(mg)
by second
Range
1557.0 400.7#{176} 955.8 NS” 586.5 NS 260.0’ 243.3’ 509.2NS 1 1 19.4 NS
0.90 0.00 0.48 1. 10 1.36 0.27 0.00
0.00
(first
model
WSU-CLL-SCID
kill
13
60 I1 12 67 88
(2X)
Bryo-*2CdA
2-CdA
0.00
100
2-CdA Bryo + 2CdA
1 and
C (days)
-
of injections
6” 6 6
1 cycle (for one agent), treatment for 2 weeks, 5 days a week. I cycle (for two agents). treatment 5 days a week. 2 cycles, treatment for 4 weeks (first agent followed by second agent), 5 days I’ Doses were determined based on previous experiments with these drugs. ‘ mi, injection. ‘I SCID mice with bilateral tumors. ‘, Three days Bryo 1, followed by 2-CdA 4 days later.
Agent
No.
i_p. i_p. s.c.
“
agent).
mice
(3376-836 mg) (1626-14 mg) (1436-140 mg) (1372-14 mg) (800-14 mg) (726-14 mg) (1099-14mg) (2745-14 mg)
“
I’
by 2-CdA
4 days
later.
or simply Bnyo
C)
E
flow
C
within
showed
cytometric 72
cellular
DNA
content)
unique
and
Bryo
1 can
active 5
101520253035404550556065
2-CdA
Days Fig. 8 various 2-CdA
SCID xenografts in (X2); LL Bryo+ (X2).
HC
‘
and in
the
1-treated can
be
an
1 treatment.
(10).
spectra
cells.
or even
2-CdA
To
indicate
A possible
enhanced
induction
The a
lower
explanation
metabolism
of programmed determine
bands
whether
at 1000, DNA
1 100, content
for this reduction
(increase
in vesiculuar
cell death the
cells
subsequent underwent
and in
1713
one
Bryo
tical
of DNA
that
activity
cycle analysis
and
apoptosis
compared
12%, revealed
0.03)
cycles,
shows
the
other
treatment that
were and
there
was
tumors the
Bryo
significant
2-CdA ratio
kill
16 days, two
highest
1 and
inhibition the log10
2).
but not
WSU-CLL
after
a
1 and
(Table
showed
11%,
1.36
Bryo
to 2-CdA
growth C) and
is very
(T/
in Bryo 1.10
after
cycles.
Statis-
tumor
weight
1 was given alone (P = 0.05) and when by 2-CdA for one (P 0.03) and two (P =
compared median
with
is
CLL.
in vivo,
conducted
bearing 2-CdA
-
which using
were
and
to treat
2-CdA,
by
(T
20 days,
strategies
resistant
change
to 2-CdA,
combinations
tumor
to protein
hypothesis
mice
to HC stage
and
this
was
SCID
delay
bodies)
new
model
1 followed
cells
sensitive
with
WSU-CLL
growth
to Bryo
for
and
3). The
by 2-CdA and
with
decrease
in CLL
To test
(Table
decrease when Bryo Bryo 1 was followed
apoptosis
basis
and
in conjunction
Bryo
the tumor
seen
leukemia.
1 . Interestingly,
1 followed fludarabine
the
the WSU-CLL
showed
antitumor C),
form
be used
with
treated staining
1 induced CLL
lipid
to that
against
treated
Bryo
phenotypic),
(increase
similar could
and
schedules
to Bnyo
that
were
of 7AAD
1 to differentiate
of different
Results
Median tumor weight in mg of WSU-CLL treatments. 0, control: A, 2-CdA--Bryo (X2): A. Bryo-2-CdA (X I); S. Bryo-2-CdA
contents
combinations
cm
of Bryo
against
series
indicate
enzymatic,
basic
cells
results
7).
ability
(morphological,
II
WSU-CLL
72 h. The
analysis
h (Fig.
The C)
necrosis,
1 for 24, 48, and
with tumor
the untreated weight
of
control
WSU-CLL
group. in
SCID
Fig.
7 xc-
Clinical
nografts.
Conversely,
administering
concurrently
with
worth
that administering
by
noting 2-CdA
activity
starting (Table
finding: the
tibility that
Bryo later,
1 therapy (this
tumors
did
to grow
immediately
hiatus
was
following
based
at the beginning It had were
been
hiatus
between
the 4-day
of the 2-CdA);
suggests
2-CdA
Bryo
has
I for full benefit.
convenience;
drugs
14.
the
deoxycytidine 5’-nucleotidasc
levels
of patients who (28). The levels
responded of these
lower in CLL in nonresponders
1-treated WSU-CLL results showed that
5’-nucleotidase
ratio
(mean
Bryo
cells
at
I -treated
cells
In summary,
of three
replications)
was
with
and
in vitro
in vivo
were to two
of Bryo
1 and 2-CdA
sequential
carefully
clinical
trials
CLL.
against
in
(data
studies
age the evaluation designed
levels
higher
controls
not
encour-
regimens
in
54:
H.
resolution
H.
New
enhanced
1992.
insight
infrared
into
spectra.
protein Bioehim.
952:
115-130,
1988.
1996.
2244-2251,
87:
simplicity of use other techniques.
16. Traweek, S. T., Sheibani, K., Winberg, C. D., Mena, R. R., Wu, A. M., and Rappaport, H. Monocytoid B cell lymphoma: its evaluation and
relationship
to other
low-grade
B-cell
neoplasms.
Blood,
73: 573-
578, 1989. 17. Yam, isoenzyme
L., Li, C., and Lam, K. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase in the reticulum cells of leukemie reticuloendotheliosis.
N. EngI. J. Med., 18.
284:
Sehwarting,
R.,
S-HCL1
357-360,
Stein,
(Leul4)
hairy cell leukemia.
are
1971.
H., and and
Wang,
S-HCL3
C. Y. The
(leuM5)
Blood, 65: 974-983,
J. S., and
Sheibani,
they
the
anti-
diagnosis
of
1985.
K. Hairy
related?
monoelonal
allow
cells
Leukemia
and
monocytoid B 1: 298-300,
(Baltimore),
Mohammad, R. M., Al-Katib, A., Pettit, G. R., and Sensenbrenner, L. L. Differential effects of bryostatin 1 on human non-Hodgkin’s B-lymphoma cell lines. Leuk. Res.. 17: 1-8, 1993. 21.
Nosanchuk,
J. S. Hairy-cell
R. K. Brynes,
Ward
M. J. Cline, Hematology
(eds.),
833-840.
22. Anderson,
G. R., Herald,
C. L., Doubek,
J. Isolation
104: 6846-6848,
and structure
D. L., Herald,
of bryostatin
D. L., Arnold,
E.,
1 . J. Am. Chem.
Soc.,
1982.
A., Mohammad,
R. M..
A., Pettit,
G. R., and Sensenbrenner,
cell feature matol, 21:
on chronic lymphocytic 61-65, 1993.
6. Taillandier.
E., and Liquier,
ods Enzymol.,
211:
307-31
Dan,
M..
Hussein,
L. L. Bryostatin leukemia
F. Infrared
cells
M. E., Akhtar,
I-induced hairy in vitro. Exp. He-
speetroseopy
of DNA.
Meth-
1, 1992.
7. Mantseh, H. H., and Jackson, agnostics. J. Mol. Struet., 347:
M. Molecular 187-192, 1995.
speetroseopy
C. P., Liu,
K. Z.,
Schultz,
Comparison
of infrared
tivity
assay)
C.
P.,
spectra
Johnston,
to ehlorambueil
of
and
Mantseh,
H.
H.
with their ex vivo sensi-
and eladribine.
Leuk.
Res.,
in press,
1998. Mohammad,
B., Katato,
R.
M.,
Mohamed,
K., Abubakr,
A.
N.,
Y. A., Dugan,
Leonard, expression in hairy
Hamdan,
M.
Y.,
Vo,
M. C., and Al-Katib,
S. J., Greene,
P. C. J.
Vol.
1, pp.
Inc., 1993.
A. W., Fisher, cell
D. C., Leslie,
leukemia:
a tumor
W. C., Cossman,
L. M., Marshall,
and
Practice,
J., Hsu,
S. L., Bakhshi,
D., Schlossof pre-plasma S. M.,
Jensen.
A., Depper,
J. M.,
W. J., Jaffe, E. S., and Waldmann, T. A. Rearrangement and of immunoglobulin genes and expression of Tac antigen cell leukemia. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA, 80. 4522-4526,
1983. 24.
Piro,
L.
D.,
Camera,
C. J.,
Son,
D.
A.,
and
Beutler,
remission in hairy cell leukemia induced by a single rodeoxyadenosine. N. Engl. J. Med., 322: 1117-1121,
26.
J. B.,
of CLL cells
and Laboratory
K. C., Boyd,
Korsmeyer,
Juliusson,
Wallman,
K-Z., Johnson, J. B., and Mantseh, H. H. Study leukemia cells by ET-IR speetroseopy and Res., 20: 649-655, 1996.
of chronic lymphocytie cluster analysis. Leuk.
Clinical
J. M. Bennett,
S. B. Shohet,
E.
infusion
Lasting
of 2-ehlo-
1990.
25. Saven, A., and Piro, L. D. Newer purine analogue for the treatment of hairy cell leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med., 330: 691-697, 1994.
in biodi-
8. Jackson, M., and Mantseh, H. H. Biomedical infrared speetroseopy. in: H. H. Mantseh and D. Chapman (eds.), Infrared Speetroseopy Biomoleeules, p. 31 1, Wiley-Liss, Inc., 1996.
G. Mutano,
S. F., and Nadler, L. M. Hairy Blood, 65: 620-629, 1985.
23.
in: R. L. Biek,
leukemia.
L. Kass,
St. Louis: C. V. Mosby,
J. P., Neekers,
11.
Res..
of Hematologieal
Inc.,
Blood,
4.
Chen,
Mantseh,
Atlas
Book,
D in identifying apoptosis: application compared with
man, cells.
(MiT
and
from
F. J. Color
Mosby-Year
use of 7-amino aetinomycin and broad spectrum of
3. Drexler, H. G., Gignae, S. M., Jones, R. A., Scott, C. S., Pettit, G. R., and Hoffbrand, A. V. Bryostatin 1 induces differentiation of B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood, 74: 1747-1757, 1989.
Liu.
Cancer
1987.
A., Camera. C. J.. Carson, D. A., Beutler, E., and Piro, L. D. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine treatment of refractory chronic lymphocytie leukemia. Leuk. Lymph., 5: 133-138, 1991.
10.
agents.
20.
2. Saven,
9. Schultz.
K.,
structure
19. Burke,
1. Armitage, J. 0., Berg, A. R., and Purtilo, D. T. Adult non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. in: R. L. Biek, J. M. Bennett, R. K. Brynes, M. J. Cline, L. Kass, G. Mutano, S. B. Shohet, and P. C. J. Ward (eds.), Hematology Clinical and Laboratory Practice, Vol. 2, pp. 875-893. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby. Inc., 1993.
5. Al-Katib,
and chemotherapy
St. Louis:
W.
Aeta,
bodies
REFERENCES
and Clardy.
ed.
Surewiez,
lymphocytes:
Pettit,
1996.
15. Philpott, N. J., Turner, A. J. C., Scopes, J., Westby, M., Marsh, J. C. W., Gordon-Smith, E. C., Daigleish, A. G., and Gibson, F. M. The
cells and control cells the deoxycytidinc kinase:
1 2 h compared
these
kinase
as a preelin-
Biophys.
given
the
utility 130-137,
or
4-day
that
10:
be
The
and
3rd
secondary
were
higher
biological
F. G., and Flemans,
Cytology,
to
reported
enzymes in Bryo were studied. Our
shown).
observa-
model:
(Baltimore),
453
1994.
Hayhoe,
13.
suscep-
xenograft
Leukemia
Research
R. M., Al-Katib, A., Pettit, G. R., and Sensenbrenner, treatment of human Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia
combination
165-168,
to induce
by our
with
B-CLL
model.
Mohammad, L. L. Successful
for this
increased
of a human
therapeutic
12.
of the week.
significantly
significantly 2-CdA than
antitumor
and beginning
on scheduling
ical
any
explanations
that
Establishment
followed
is not sufficient
during
1 or It is
3 days,
show
is supported
completion of Bryo 1 treatment (b) this latter observation also given
not
allowing
in viva
Bryo activity.
1 for only
possible
possibility
began
before
antitumor
for 3 days
differentiation
to 2-CdA
no
arc two
There
(a) Bryo
2-CdA
1 showed
4 days
3).
optimum
tion
Bryo
Cancer
T.,
A.
Leukei,
G.,
Heldal,
K., Stolt, C-M., R.,
and
D.,
Hippe,
Evensen,
Liliemark,
oxyadenosine for symptomatic 989-995, 1995.
E.,
Hedenus,
M.,
S. A., Albertioni,
J. Subcutaneous
injections
hairy cell leukemia.
Malm,
C.,
F., Tjonnfjord,
G.,
of
2-ehlorode-
J. Clin. Oneol.,
13:
27. Al-Katib, A., Mohammad, R. M., Khan, K., Dan, M. E., Pettit, G. R., and Sensenbrenner, L. L. Bryostatin 1-induced modulation of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line Reh. J. Immunother., 14: 33-41,
1993. 28. Kawasaki, H., Carrera, C. J., Piro, D. L., Saven, A., Kipps, T. J., and Carson, D. A. Relationship of deoxyeytidine kinase and cytoplasmie 5’-nueleotidase to the ehemotherapeutie efficacy of 2-ehlorodeoxyadenosinc. Blood, 81: 597-601. 1993.