Small molecule activation of NOTCH signaling inhibits ...

3 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
MAML. 96.0. pCDH. NB4. GFP d b. 0.3. 0.6. 0.9. 1.2. 1.5. 0. **. DLL4. NMHC. C e ll v ia b ility v s. C trl. *. **. 0. 0.2. 0.4. 0.6. 0.8. 1.0. 1.2. **. **. HES1. HEY1. R e la.
Small molecule activation of NOTCH signaling inhibits acute myeloid leukemia Qi Ye 1,2,†, Jue Jiang1,†, Guanqun Zhan1,†, Wanyao Yan1 , Liang Huang3 , Yufeng Hu1 , Hexiu Su1 , Qingyi Tong1 , Ming Yue4 , Hua Li1 , Guangmin Yao1, * , Yonghui Zhang1,* , Hudan Liu5,* 1 Hubei

Key Laboratory of Natural Medicinal Chemistry and Resource Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China; 2 Department of Pharmacy, Wuhan Children’s Hospital, Wuhan, 430014, P. R. China; 3 Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, 430030, China; 4 School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China; 5 Medical Research Institute, Wuhan Univers ity, Wuhan, 430071, China. †These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.Y. (email: [email protected]) or Y.Z. (email: [email protected]) or H.L. (email: [email protected])

Supplementary Figure 1

a 1.5

**

**

6

3

0 µM 1 µM

THP-1

8

**

4

**

4

2 0.5

HES1

0

HEY1

0.9

HES1

0

HEY1

NB4

c

0.0

*

96.0

pCDH

0.6

**

92.6

0.3

DNMAML

** 0

NMHC DLL4

HES1

HEY1

d

Ctrl

1.2

*

2

1

1.5

Cell viability vs Ctrl

NB4

5

1.0

0

b

**

HL-60

Relative mRNA expression

Relative mRNA expression

2.0

GFP

pCDH DNMAML

1.2 1.0 0.8

**

0.6

**

0.4 0.2 0

HES1

HEY1

e 24.6

24 27.6

48

h

26.4

22.1

DNMAML GFP

31.0

40.7

HL-60

pCDH

Relative GFP ratio

0

2.0

** **

1.5

0h 24h 48h

1.0 0.5 0.0

pCDH

DNMAML

Figure S1. NMHC promotes NOTCH activity and NOTCH activation-mediated AML inhibition. (a) Effects of extended NMHC exposure on NOTCH target gene expression. Cells were treated with 1μM NMHC for 48 h. HES1 and HEY1 mRNAs were determined by RT-qPCR as described in Fig. 4. (b) Synergistic cytotoxic effect of NMHC in combination with DLL4. NB4 cells were treated with DLL4 (10 μg/mL), NMHC (1 μM) or both for 24 h. Cell viability was detected by CCK8 and presented as a ratio relative to untreated samples. Data shown is the mean ± SD from triplicate wells. (c) NB4 cells infected with pCDH and pCDH-DNMAML were selected by puromycin. As pCDH vector has GFP as a surrogate marker, we ensured cell purity by detecting GFP+ percentages. (d) NOTCH inactivation downregulated target gene expression. Infected cells from (c) were harvested for RT-qPCR and NOTCH1 targets, such as HES1 and HEY1, were analyzed and presented as shown. Data shown is the mean ± SD from triplicate wells. (e) NMHC enriched AML cells with NOTCH inactivation. HL-60 cells infected with pCDH or pCDHDNMAML were subjected to NMHC (1 μM) treatments 2 day post-infection. GFP+ distributions were analyzed by flow cytometry at the indicated time points (left). GFP ratio relative to untreated cells was presented (right). Data shown is the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Above all, p-values were derived from Student's t-test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

NOTCH1 mRNA level

Supplementary Figure 2

1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0

0

1

2

µM

Figure S2. NOTCH1 mRNA levels in AML cells are unaffected by NMHC. HL-60 cells were subjected to 1 or 2 M NMHC treatments for 24 h, then harvested for reverse transcription. NOTCH1 mRNA amounts were determined by qPCR, normalized with 18s rRNA. qPCR primers used to detect NOTCH1 are CCGCAGTTGTGCTCCTGAA and ACCTTGGCGGTCTCGTAGCT.