SOLITARY FIBROUS TUMOR OF THE KIDNEY

10 downloads 0 Views 287KB Size Report
angiomyolipoma, fibroma, fibro- sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma (3). The therapeutic management is surgery with a high survival rate approaching 100% at 5 ...
JBR–BTR, 2014, 97: 298-300.

SOLITARY FIBROUS TUMOR OF THE KIDNEY P. Tritschler1, B. Coulier1, I. Gielen2 Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is an unusual spindle cell neoplasm rarely described in the kidney. Usually occurring in the pleura, it has also been described in various extrapleural sites. We report a rare case of SFT of the kidney fortuitously found in a 55-year-old patient. The imaging features are illustrated. The definite diagnosis was made through histological and immunohistochemical study after radical nephrectomy. Key-word: Kidney, neoplasms, diagnosis.

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare lesion representing 2% of all soft tissue tumors (1). Described for the first time in the pleura by Klemperer and Rabin in 1931 (2), SFTs can also rarely occur in intra- or extrathoracic site. Imaging features on SFT are mostly non specific and essentially show a highly vascularised tumor. The definite diagnosis can only be made through histological and immunohistochemical study. We report a new case of solitary fibrous tumor of the kidneys ­ fortuitously found in a 55-year-old ­ patient. Case report A 55-year-old patient was referred to our radiology department with a few weeks history of right upper quadrant pain. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or ­hematuria were absent. Abdominal physical examination and blood tests were normal. The patient had no previous medical or surgical history. Abdominal ultrasound demonstrated uncomplicated gallstones but extended examination revealed a central mass in the right kidney (Fig. 1A,C). There was no pyelectasy. This well circumscribed solid mass was developing in the renal sinus. Slight cortical atrophy was associated and power Doppler showed a high vascularisation (Fig. 1B). The arterial phase of contrast enhanced mdCT confirmed a 5 × 7 cm well circumscribed and richly vascularised mass developing in the right renal sinus (Fig. 1C, D, E). The tumor appeared separated from the renal cortex. Areas of parenchyma atrophy

of the renal cortex were visible ­adjacent to the tumor. No delay of renal excretion was seen. The hypothesis renal cell carcinoma or atypical urothelial carcinoma was retained. Radical uretero-nephrectomy was first planified. Nevertheless intraoperative opening of the resected kidney (Fig. 1F) restricted the diagnosis to a non-urothelial neoplasm and complementary resection of the uretera was avoided. Histological examination showed a hypercellular solid tumor made by spindles cells with rounded or oval nucleus, arranging in all directions with formation of vortices hemangiopericytoma like (Fig. 2B). The ­cytoplasm was moderately abundant with imprecise boundaries. No mitotic activity nor atypia were ­ found. This tumor invades the hilar fatty tissue (Fig. 2A). Immunohistochemical examination revealed a positivity on numerous cells for the CD99, Bcl2, CD34, vimentine and a minority of cells for the actine. Desmine and EMA are negative. The Ki67 nuclear proliferation index is low 3%. A diagnosis of solitary fibrous ­tumor of the kidney is then evoked. Discussion Solitary fibroma tumors (SFTs) are mesenchymal tumors, now considered a variant of hemangiopericytomas (3). SFTs were described for the first time in the pleura but they can affect all the body at any location (4). Cases have been described in upper respiratory tract, lung, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, orbits, salivary glands, mediastinum, ­

From: 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Clinique St Luc, Bouge, Belgium, 2. Institute of Pathology and Genetics, Loverval, Belgium. Address for correspondence: Dr P. Tritschler, M.D., Department of Diagnostic ­Radiology, Clinique St Luc, Rue St Luc 8, 5004 Bouge (Namur) Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]

tritschler-.indd 298

breast, meninges, liver and urogenital organs (3). Thus, there are intra and extra-thoracic locations but most of cases are intra-thoracic (5). Intra-thoracic and extra-thoracic SFTs are often considered benign neoplasms but the incidence of aggressive forms manifested by local invasion or distant metastases (6) is about 10-15% for intra-thoracic SFTs and more than 10% for extra-thoracic SFTs (7). Therefore all patients with SFT need to be on long-term follow-up (3). SFTs of kidney is very rare with only about 40 cases described in the literature  (1). The origin of most ­cases kidney SFTs is difficult to determine and may originate from the capsule, interstitial tissues, or peripelvic connective tissues (3). The average age of presentation is 51 years (1), with a small female predilection (6) but usually the addition of intra and extra-thoracic forms revealed no preference, male and ­ ­female being equally affected. Clinical examination can show a palpable mass, a flank pain and often hematuria. Blood test are non contributive. Sometimes hypoglycaemia is described for extra or intra thoracic forms but never for kidney SFTs (7). The diagnosis is often delayed because these tumor are usually ­ asymptomatic when they have a ­ small size. Histopathological nature of SFTs is distinguished by a hypercellular stroma of bland spindles cells with a patternless architecture. Typical immunohistochemicals characteristics are a high positivity for CD34 – regarded as an indispensable finding in the diagnosis (3) and to a lesser extent for Bcl2, vimentin and CD99  (1, 8). The differential diagnosis is large and includes highly vascularized tumors as renal cell carcinoma, ­ sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma, ­ angiomyolipoma, fibroma, fibro­ sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma (3). The therapeutic management is surgery with a high survival rate ­approaching 100% at 5 years (1).

2/10/14 14:49



SOLITARY FIBROUS TUMOR OF THE KIDNEY — TRITSCHLER et al

A

B

C

D

E

F

299

Fig. 1. – A. US study, coronal view, demonstrates a rather homogeneously hypoechoic tumor developed in the sinus of the right kidney. This relatively well circumscribed tumor measures 5 × 5 × 4,5 cm. B. Coronal power Doppler view demonstrates a rather homogeneously hypoechoic and hypervascular tumor developed in the sinus of the right kidney. C. Transverse gray-scale ultrasound (white star) and MDCT (black star) views demonstrate a homogeneously hypoechoic and hypodense tumor developed in the sinus of the right kidney. D. Corresponding coronal oblique contrast enhanced mdCT view shows a well circumscribed homogenous hypervascular tumor occupying the renal sinus. The excretory cavities appear only moderately compressed. E. Volume rendering view obtained during the early arterial phase of contrast enhanced mdCT shows a large tumor highly vascularized by larges vessels. F. Gross anatomy of the resected kidney (sagital section through the organ) shows a well circumscribed, non necrotic white color pink mass of firm consistency protruding within the hilar area.

Imaging is an important tool for the evaluation of extension and recurrence of renal SFT. Neverthe­ less CT, ultrasound and MR imaging features are not specific for the defi-

tritschler-.indd 299

nite characterization of SFT. Radiologists could only consider SFT in the differential diagnosis of a renal mass if the lesion is a large, situated in the renal sinus with lobulated margins

and highly vascularized by larges vessels (4). Finally the final diagnosis is always based on histopathology and immunohistochemical study.

2/10/14 14:49

300

A

JBR–BTR, 2014, 97 (5)

B

Fig. 2. – A. Photomicrograph (hematoxylin-eosin stain) shows at low power field view (×10) a rather well circumscribed hyper­ cellular tumor (white star) invades the sinusal fat (black star). B. Photomicrograph (hematoxylin-eosin stain) shows at higher power field view (×40) the hypercellular tumor appears composed of numerous bland uniform spindle cells with a patternless architecture.

References 1. Shanbhogue A.K., Prasad S.R., Takahashi N., et al.: Somatic and ­ ­visceral solitary fibrous tumors in the abdomen and pelvis: cross-sectional imaging spectrum. Radiographics, 2011, 31: 393-408. 2. Hanau C.A., Miettinen M.: Solitary fibrous tumor: histological and ­ immunohistochemical spectrum of ­ benign and malignant variants presenting at different sites. Hum Pathol, 1995, 26: 440-449. 3. Naveen H.N., Nelivigi G.N., ­Venkatesh G.K., Suriraju V.: A case of

tritschler-.indd 300

solitary fibrous tumor of the kidney. Urol Ann, 2011, 3: 158-160. 4. Wignall O.J., Moskovic E.C., K., Thomas J.M.: Solitary Thway  fibrous tumors of the soft tissues: ­ review of the imaging and clinical ­ ­features with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195: W55-62. 5. Gold J.S., Antonescu C.R., Hajdu C., et al.: Clinicopathologic correlates of solitary fibrous tumors. Cancer, 2002, 15, 94: 1057-1068. 6. Katabathina V.S., Vikram R., Nagar A.M., Tamboli P., Menias C.O., Prasad S.R.: Mesenchymal neoplasms

of the kidney in adults: imaging spectrum with radiologic-pathologic ­ correlation. Radiographics, 2010, 30: 1525-1540. 7. Hsieh T.Y., ChangChien Y.C., Chen W.H., et al. De novo malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the kidney. Diagn Pathol, 2011, 5, 6: 96. 8. Bugel H., Gobet F., Baron M., ­Pfister C., Sibert L., Grise P.: Solitary fibrous tumour of the kidney and other sites in the urogenital tract: ­ morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. Prog Urol, 2003, 13: 1397.

2/10/14 14:49