Spectrophotometric Determination of Poorly Water Soluble Drug ...

6 downloads 23 Views 477KB Size Report
Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 579 mobile phase, flow rate, temperature, mobile phase ... analysis the advantages are low cost of reagents, ... Available from; http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20100113783. [Last ..... discovery and development. ... estimation of some poorly water soluble drugs using hydrotropic.


TABLE 2: RECOVERY STUDIES OF PRULIFLOXACININ TABLET Label claim mg/tablet Prulifloxacin 600

Total amount added (mg) 8.0 10.00 12.00

Amount Recovered* (mg) 8.1±0.18 9.9±0.21 11.9±0.12

%Recovery 101.25 99.0 99.16

*Each value is a mean± deviation of three determinations.


Intraday precision Mean % area R.S.D 4473357 0.88 6796148 0.92 8878567 0.95

Interday precision Mean % area R.S.D 4334389.3 1.03 66798412 0.92 9108180 1.02

mobile phase, flow rate, temperature, mobile phase composition etc. and found to be unaffected. A sensitive accurate, fast and precise isocratic reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the determination of prulifloxacin in bulk and in tablet dosage form. The developed method was found to be simple and have short run time which makes the method rapid. Statistical analysis proves that method is repeatable and selective for the analysis of prulifloxacin. This method may be employed for the quality control analysis the advantages are low cost of reagents, speed and simplicity of sample treatment.

REFERENCES 1. Giannarini G, Tascini C, Selli C. Clinical studies of a broad-spectrum quinolone agent. Future Microbiol 2009;4:13-24.

2. Cai T, Mazzoli S, Nesi G, Boddi V, Mondaini N, Bartoletti R. 14-day prulifloxacin treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis in women with recurrent urinary tract infections: a prospective, open-label, pilot trial with 6-month follow-up. J Chemother 2009;21:535-41. 3. Blasi F, Aliberti S, Tarsia P, Santus P, Centanni S, Allegra L. Prulifloxacin: A brief review of its potential in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007;2:27-31. 4. Available from; http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20100113783. [Last accessed on 2010 July 05]. 5. Yang Z , Wang X, Qin W, Zhao H. Capillary electrophoresischemiluminescence determination of norfloxacin and prulifloxacin. Anal Chim Acta 2008;623:231-7. 6. Huang YB, Wang SJ, Zi YQ, Yu Z, Gao XY, Tang YC, et al . Investigation on the interaction of prulifloxacin with human serum albumin: A spectroscopic analysis. Chem Pharm Bull 2010;58:582-6. 7. Huang Y, Yan J, Liu B, Yu Z, Gao X, Tang Y, et al. Investigation on interaction of prulifloxacin with pepsin: A spectroscopic analysis. Spectrochim Acta A 2010;73:1024-9. 8. Guo L, Qi M, Jin X, Wang P, Zhao H. Determination of the active metabolite of prulifloxacin in human plasma by liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2006;832:280-5. 9. Yu F, Liu W, Chen F, Cai P. Highly sensitive spectrofluorimetric determination of trace amounts of prulifloxacin using the aluminium(III)-prulifloxacin system. Luminescence 2008;23:429-33. 10. Wang X, Shen B, Zhao H, Jin L. Determination of ulifloxacin by terbium-sensitized fluorescence with second-order scattering and its applications. Anal Sci 2007;23:1373-6. 11. Zhang L, Wen J, Pan Y, Li Z, Fan G, Fan G, et al. Determination of ulifloxacin, the active metabolite of prulifloxacin, in human plasma by a 96-well format solid-phase extraction and capillary zone electrophoresis. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2008;872:172-6. 12. International Conference on Harmonisation, Guidance for Industry In: Q2B Validation on Analytical Procedures: Methodology. Switzerland: IFPMA;1996. p.1-8 Accepted 8 September 2011 Revised 4 August 2011 Received 9 August 2010 Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2011, 73 (5): 577-579

Spectrophotometric Determination of Poorly Water Soluble Drug Rosiglitazone Using Hydrotropic Solubilization technique A. P. SHERJE* AND K. J. DESAI

Department of Quality Assurance, SPP School of Pharmacy and Technology Management, SVKM’s NMIMS, Vile Parle (W), Mumbai-400 056, India

Sherje and Desai: Spectrophotometric Determination of Rosiglitazone Maleate *Address for correspondence E-mail: [email protected] September - October 2011

Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences



In the present investigation, hydrotropic solution of urea was employed as a solubilizing agent for spectrophotometric determination of poorly water-soluble drug rosiglitazone maleate. In solubility determination study, it was found that there was more than 14-folds enhancement in solubility of rosiglitazone maleate in a 6M solution of urea. Rosiglitazone maleate obeys Beer’s law in concentration range of 5-300 µg/ml. Linearity of rosiglitazone maleate was found in the range of 80-120% of the label claim. The proposed method has been applied successfully to the analysis of the cited drug in pharmaceutical formulations with good accuracy and precision. The method herein described is new, simple, eco-friendly, economic, and accurate and can be utilized in routine analysis of rosiglitazone maleate in bulk drug and tablet dosage form. Key words: Hydrotropic solubilization, rosiglitazone, spectrophotometric determination

In the pharmaceutical analysis and formulation development fields it is most often required to increase the aqueous solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs. Most of the newly developed drug molecules are lipophillic in nature and poor solubility is one of the most difficult problems of these drugs. In general, in order for a drug to exert its biologic effect, it must be soluble in and transported by the body fluids, traverse the required biologic membrane barriers, etc. It is well known that drug efficacy can be severely limited by poor aqueous solubility. It is also known that the side effects of some drugs are the result of their poor solubility. The ability to increase aqueous solubility can thus be a valuable aid to increasing efficacy and/ or reducing side effects for certain drugs. Various organic solvents like methanol, chloroform, alcohol, dimethyl formamide, and benzene have been employed for the solubilization of poorly water soluble drugs for spectrophotometric estimations. Drawbacks of organic solvents include higher cost, toxicity, pollution, and error in analysis due to volatility[1-4]. There are various approaches for solubilization of poorly water soluble drugs. Hydrotropy is a solubilization technique in which addition of large amount of a second solute results in an increase in the aqueous solubility of another solute. The hydrotropic agents are defined as non-micelle-forming substances, either liquids or solids, organic or inorganic, capable of solubilizing insoluble compounds. Hydrotropic agents consist generally of two essential parts, an anionic group and a hydrophobic aromatic ring or ring system. The anionic group is obviously involved in bringing about high aqueous solubility, which is a prerequisite for a hydrotropic substance. On the other hand, planarity of the hydrophobic part has been emphasized as an important factor in the mechanism of hydrotropic solubilization[5,6]. Concentrated aqueous solutions of a large number of hydrotropic agents like sodium benzoate, sodium salicylate, urea, sodium 580

ascorbate, niacinamide and sodium citrate have been employed to enhance aqueous solubility of various poorly water-soluble drugs[7-10]. Rosiglitazone maleate (RZM), chemically, (±)-5-{p-[2(methyl-2-pyridylamino)ethoxy]benzyl}-2,4thiazolidinedione maleate (1:1) is an oral antidiabetic agent[11], which acts primarily by increasing insulin sensitivity. It is a thiazolidinedione which acts as a selective and potent agonist at the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor g (PPARg)[12,13]. It is official in Indian Pharmacopoeia 2007 where liquid chromatography is the method of assay. Extensive literature survey revealed HPLC, LC-MS-MS methods for estimation of RZM alone or in combination with other drugs which require use of costlier and toxic organic solvents. Further, the drug is poorly water soluble[14-17]. Therefore, the present study was aimed to carry out solubility enhancement study of RZM by using various hydrotropic agents and to develop a simple, safe and cost- effective spectrophotometric method for determination of RZM in bulk drug and its dosage form. The bulk drug of RZM was obtained from Cadila Healthcare Ltd., Ahmedabad, India. The tablets of RZM were purchased from the local market. All the reagents and chemicals used were of analytical grade. A Perkin Elmer, Double beam UV- Visible Spectrophotometer (Model- Lambda 25) with l cm matched quartz cells was used for the spectral measurements. The solubility of RZM in distilled water was studied by saturation technique. A quantity equivalent to 5 mg of drug was dissolved in 100 ml of distilled water and the solution was subjected to sonication for 2 h. Various aliquots were pipetted from this solution and diluted to get concentrations ranging from 10-50

Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

September - October 2011


µg/ ml. The absorbance of the resulting solutions was measured using UV/Vis spectrophotometer against corresponding blank at 248.6 nm. A standard curve was plotted between concentrations versus absorbance. The maximum solubility of drug in the distilled water was determined from the above standard calibration curve. The solubility of drug in various hydrotropic agents (viz. sodium benzoate, sodium citrate, sodium acetate, sodium salicylate and urea) was determined by saturation solubility technique. Among various hydrotropic agents, 6M solution of urea was used as the solvent for spectrophotometric determination of RZM, since, it showed maximum increase in the solubility of the RZM i.e. ~15 folds. Powder equivalent to 100 mg of drug was taken in a 250 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in 150 ml of 6M solution of urea. The solution was sonicated for 4 h and the volume was made up to the mark with urea solution. After filtration through a Whatman filter paper no. 41, the filtrate was divided into two parts i.e. A and B. Part A was kept at room temperature for 48  h to check its chemical stability and precipitation, if any. Part B was diluted with water to obtain a concentration of 25 µg/ml. The resulting solution was scanned in the range of 200-400 nm. From the UV-Visible spectrum of RZM, 251.0 nm (lmax) was selected as the wavelength of determination. A typical UV-Visible spectrum of RZM in the 6M urea solution is shown in the fig. 1. The standard stock solution of RZM was diluted to obtain a concentration range of 5-50 µg/ml and absorbances were measured at selected wavelength. The concentrations of drug against absorbance was plotted to obtain a calibration curve. RZM solution follows Beer-Lambert's law over concentration range of 5-300 µg/ml at selected wavelength, with r2~1. The absorptivity values (A 1%, 1 cm) of drug at selected wavelengths was determined. The concentration of drug in bulk drug solution was determined by substituting the absorbance and absorptivity values in Beer-Lambert Law equation i.e. A=abc. Part A solution was analyzed in the same way as part B solution after 48 h. For analysis of the tablet dosage form of RZM, twenty tablet of RZM were weighed and finely powdered. Powder equivalent to 100 mg of RZM was taken in a 250 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in 150 ml of 6M urea solution. The solution was sonicated to solubilize the drug; and the volume was September - October 2011

made up to the mark with hydrotropic solution. After filtration through a Whatman filter paper no. 41, the filtrate was divided into two parts A and B. The content of RZM in the tablet was determined in the same way as pure drug. The recovery studies were carried out at different level of concentration by spiking a known concentration of standard drug to the preanalyzed sample and contents were reanalyzed by proposed methods. The methods were validated statistically as per ICH/USP guidelines for parameter like accuracy, precision, ruggedness, linearity and range. Accuracy was ascertained on the basis of recovery studies. Precision was studied by analyzing five replicates of sample solution and standard deviation (SD) values were determined. Ruggedness was established by carrying out experiment at various conditions like different time within a day (intraday), different day (interday) and by different analyst. Linearity and range were determined by analyzing drug solution at 80-120% of label claim of the drug. Results of solubility studies indicate that, the enhancement in the solubility of RZM was more than 14 folds in 6M urea solution as compared to its solubility in distilled water and other hydrotropic agents. Therefore, this hydrotropic solution was selected to study the effect on enhancement in solubility of RZM. Part A solution of drug in 6M urea solution was kept at room temperature for 48 h. There was no precipitation of drug in Part A solution within 48 h. In addition, drug contents of Part A solutions (after 48 h) were same as those of Part B solutions (fresh solutions). This study reveals that the estimations can be done within 48 h at least, without having any detrimental effect on drug stability.

Fig. 1: A typical fundamental Spectrum of RZM in 6M urea solution (λmax at 251.0nm) It shows the zero order UV-visible spectrophotometric spectrum of Rosiglitazone maleate in 6M urea solution showing max= 251.0 nm.

Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences



From Table 1, it is evident that there is good agreement between the amounts estimated, and those claimed by the manufacturers. Percent label claims were very close to 100%, with low values of standard deviation. The recovery study shows accuracy of the method. On observing the validation parameters the method was found to be accurate and precise (Table 2). From this study, it is obvious that there was no interference of urea solution in the estimation of rosiglitazone maleate. Urea is cheaper than most of the organic solvents and can thus substitute expensive methanol, dimethyl formamide, chloroform and carbon tetrachloride. Drawbacks of organic solvents include toxicity, error due to volatility, pollution, and cost. Thus, hydrotropic solutions of urea to solubillized poorly water soluble drug RZM, from tablets to carry out spectrophotometric analysis precluding use of organic solvents. The tablets containing RZM were analyzed successfully. From the present investigation, it is concluded that the proposed method is new, simple, cost effective, accurate, safe, and precise. Thus, it can be successfully employed in the routine analysis of RZM in bulk drug and its pharmaceutical tablet dosage form. TABLE 1: RESULTS OF RZM TABLET FORMULATION AND RECOVERY STUDIES Tablet analysis Tablet Label formulation claim (mg) Brand A 4 Brand B


% Drug estimation*

Recovery study Pure drug % Recovery* added (mg) (Mean±SD)







*Results are the mean of five determinations

TABLE 2: RESULTS OF THE VALIDATION STUDY Validation parameter Accuracy Precision Ruggedness Intraday Interday Different analyst Linearity and range

Observation with S.D. 98.65±3.6521 a 98.1±1.0547 b 1.109a 0.084b 98.05%±0.14 97.52%±0.72 98.13%±1.31 80%-120%

The table gives results of the validation parameters of the method. The results are mean of five determinations. The “a” and “b” indicates brand A and brand B of the tablets of RZM, respectively.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are thankful to Cadila healthcare, Ahmedabad, India, for providing the gift sample of Rosiglitazone maleate.

REFERENCES 1. Sinko J, editor. Martin’s Physical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1993. 2. Avdeef A. Absorption and Drug Development. Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley and Sons; 2003. 3. Payghan S, Bhar M, Purohit S. Potential of solubility in drug discovery and development. Pharmainfo.net; 2008. Available from: http://www.pharmainfo.net’reviews/potential solubility-drug-discoveryanddevelopment. [Last accessed on 2012 Apr 10]. 4. Poochikian G, Cradock J. A review on the hydrotropes. J Pharm Sci 1979;68:728-9. 5. Newberg C, Biochem Z. A review the hydrotropic solubilization. J Chem Pharm Res 1916;76:107-9. 6. Badwan A, El-Khordagui L, Saleh A, Khalil S. The solubility of benzodiazepines in sodium salicylate solution and a proposed mechanism for hydrotropic solubilization. Int J Pharm 1983;13:67-74. 7. Maheshwari R, Deswal S, Tiwari D, Ali N, Pothen B, Jain S. Novel spectrophotometric estimation of frusemide using hydrotropic solubilization phenomenon. Indian J Pharm Sci 2007;69:822-4. 8. Maheshwari R, Bishnoi S, Kumar D, Krishna M. Quantitative spectrophotometric determination of Ornidazole tablet formulations using Ibuprofen sodium as hydrotropic solubilizing agent. Digest J Nanomater Biostruct 2010;5:97-100. 9. Maheshwari R, Chatuwedi S, Jain N. Novel spectrophotometric estimation of some poorly water soluble drugs using hydrotropic solubilizing agents. Indian J Pharm Sci 2006;68:165-8. 10. Shukla R, Patel A, Soni M, Modi V, Jaliwala Y. Quantitative spectrophotometric estimation of cefadroxil using hydrotropic solubilization technique. Asian J Pharm 2008;2:146-7. 11. Indian Pharmacopoeia. New Delhi: Controller of Publications, Government of India; 2007. p. 1060. 12. Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. 5th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.; 2004. 13. Parker KL Brunton LL, Lazo JS, editors. Goodman and Gilman’s- The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th ed. USA: McGraw Hill; 2006. 14. Radhakrishna T, Satyanarayana J, Satyanarayana A. LC determination of rosiglitazone in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2002;29:873-80. 15. Lin ZJ, Desai-Krieger D, Shum L. Simultaneous determination of glipizide and rosiglitazone unbound drug concentrations in plasma by equilibrium dialysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 2004;801:65-72. 16. Matthew W, Hruska, Reginald F. Simplified method for determination of rosiglitazone in human plasma. J Chromatogr B 2004;803:317-20. 17. Indian Pharmacopoeia. New Delhi: Controller of Publications, Government of India; 2007. p. 1061-3. Accepted 22 September 2011 Revised 17 September 2011 Received 19 May 2010 Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2011, 73 (5): 579-582

Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

September - October 2011

Suggest Documents