Status of Mediterranean and Black Sea resources in

5 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
Dec 16, 2013 - >1 stock is overexploitetd. Status of Mediterranean and Black Sea resources in European Waters in 2013. Guidelines for the evaluation of stock ...
European Parliament, PECHE Committee, public hearing on Evaluation of the Mediterranean Fisheries Regulations.

Status of Mediterranean and Black Sea resources in European Waters in 2013 Giacomo Chato Osio* & Max Cardinale** 16 December 2013

* European Commission Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy **Chairman of STECF EWG MED, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Status of Mediterranean and Black Sea resources in European Waters in 2013 Guidelines for the evaluation of stock status Terminology • Spawning stock biomass (SSB) is the biomass of the adult or reproducing fish • Fishing mortality (F) is the proportion of fish in the stock that are taken by the fisheries • FMSY is the F associated to high long term yields and the long-term sustainable exploitation of the stock • F/FMSY indicates how far each stock is from the MSY target. If F/FMSY >1 stock is overexploitetd Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Mediterranean and Black Sea stock assessment unit

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Historical trend of the assessed stocks 60 Assessment F reference points

Number of stocks

50

40

30

20

10

0 2008

2009

2010 Years

2011

2012

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Process to determine the status of stocks • Results of STECF stock assessments are summarized from – ≈ 16 expert meetings – held over 7 years (2008-2013) – Reviewed by STECF

• The supporting data comes from: – the DCR and DCF data collection carried out over the period 2002-2012 – and ≈ 12 data calls

• Results of GFCM stock assessments derive from: – assessments performed in 1 working group per year – revised by SCSA once per year in last 4 years

• This is a large body of high quality stock assessments. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status compared to MSY target

1.00

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status compared to MSY target by year

1.00

1.00 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status compared to MSY target by GSA

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status compared to MSY target by GSA

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status compared to MSY target by GSA

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status compared to MSY target by groups

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Nominal effort trends of otter trawlers

Italy

Greece Spain

France Malta, Cyprus, Slovenia Unstandardized data from 2012 DCF datacall

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Nominal Effort trends by GSA and country

Unstandardized data from 2013 DCF datacall Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Nominal Effort trends by GSA and country

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Unstandardized data from 2013 DCF datacall

Nominal Effort trends by GSA, Fishery, VL and Year

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Unstandardized data from 2012 DCF datacall

Nominal Effort trends by GSA, Fishery, VL and Year

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Unstandardized data from 2012 DCF datacall

Stock status in the last assessment year compared to STECF MSY target GSA Common name 1 Blue and red shrimp 1 Hake 1 Red mullet 1 Blue whiting 1 Norway lobster 1 Pink shrimp 5 Angler fish 5 Pink shrimp 5 Hake 5 Norway lobster 5 Octopus 5 Striped red mullet 6 Norway lobster 6 Pink shrimp 6 Angler fish 6 Blue and red shrimp 6 Blue whiting 6 Hake 6 Pink shrimp 6 Red mullet

2010-2012 % decrease in F Species Fcurr Fmsy GSA Aristeus antentus 1.32 0.29 0.78 7 Merluccius merluccius 1.61 0.22 0.86 7 Mullus barbatus 1.79 0.30 0.83 7 Micromesistius poutassou 1.4 0.40 0.71 9 Nephrops norvegicus 0.32 0.20 0.38 9 Parapenaeus longirostris 0.43 0.26 0.40 9 Lophius budegassa 1.13 0.18 0.84 9 Parapenaeus longirostris 0.77 0.62 0.19 9 Merluccius merluccius 1.21 0.16 0.87 9 Nephrops norvegicus 0.55 0.42 0.24 9 Octopus vulgaris 0.47 0.32 0.32 9 Mullus surmuletus 0.55 0.26 0.53 9 Nephrops norvegicus 0.63 0.15 0.76 9 Parapenaeus longirostris 1.48 0.27 0.82 9 Lophius budegassa 0.72 0.15 0.79 9 Aristeus antentus 1.05 0.30 0.71 9 Micromesistius poutassou 1.05 0.32 0.70 9 Merluccius merluccius 1.30 0.11 0.92 9 Parapeeus longirostris 1.00 0.25 0.75 10 Mullus barbatus 1.90 0.38 0.80 10

2010-2012 % decrease in F Common name Species Fcurr Fmsy White anglerfish Lophius budegassa 0.97 0.29 0.70 Hake Merluccius merluccius 1.83 0.11 0.94 Red mullet Mullus barbatus 1.26 0.51 0.60 Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus 1.00 0.40 0.60 Blackmouth catshark Galeus melastomus 0.35 0.13 0.63 Blue and red shrimp Aristeus antentus 0.62 0.32 0.48 Blue whiting Micromesistius poutassou 1.12 0.53 0.53 Common Pandora Pagellus erythrinus 0.63 0.48 0.24 Giant red shrimp Aristaeomorpha foliacea 0.62 0.36 0.42 Hake Merluccius merluccius 1.32 0.20 0.85 Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus 0.34 0.21 0.38 Pink shrimp Parapeeus longirostris 0.29 0.70 -1.41 Poor cod Trisopterus minutus 0.90 0.74 0.18 Red mullet Mullus barbatus 0.68 0.61 0.10 Sardine Sardina pilchardus 0.41 0.40 0.02 Greater forkbeard Phycis blennoides 1.01 0.32 0.68 Spottail mantis shrimp Squilla mantis 1.24 0.54 0.56 Striped red mullet Mullus surmuletus 0.56 0.31 0.45 Hake Merluccius merluccius 1.00 0.14 0.86 Blue and red shrimp Aristeus antennatus 0.43 0.28 0.35

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status in the last assessment year compared to STECF MSY target GSA Common name Species 11 Giant red shrimp Aristaeomorpha foliacea 11 Hake Merluccius merluccius 11 Red mullet Mullus barbatus 11 Pink shrimp Parapeeus longirostris 16 Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus 16 Sardine Sardina pilchardus 17 Common sole Solea solea 17 Red mullet Mullus barbatus 17 Sardine Sardi pilchardus 17 Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus 17 Hake Merluccius merluccius 17 Spottail mantis shrimp Squilla mantis 18 Giant red shrimp Aristaeomorpha foliacea 18 Hake Merluccius merluccius 18 Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus 18 Pink shrimp Parapeeus longirostris 18 Red mullet Mullus barbatus

2010-2012 % decrease in F Fcurr Fmsy 0.98 0.49 0.50 2.50 0.25 0.90 2.5 0.29 0.88 0.69 0.49 0.29 0.50 0.40 0.20 0.17 0.40 -1.35 0.93 0.31 0.67 0.71 0.36 0.49 0.57 0.40 0.30 0.47 0.40 0.15 2.02 0.20 0.90 1.00 0.30 0.70 1.00 0.30 0.70 1.00 0.19 0.81 0.54 0.30 0.44 1.45 0.68 0.53 1.50 0.50 0.67

GSA 18 19 19 19 22 22 25 29 29 29 29 15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16

2010-2012 % decrease in F Common name Species Fcurr Fmsy Spottail mantis shrimp Squilla mantis 1.04 0.27 0.74 Hake Merluccius merluccius 1.21 0.22 0.82 Red mullet Mullus barbatus 1.94 0.30 0.85 Pink shrimp Parapenaeus longirostris 1.31 0.67 0.49 Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus 0.38 0.40 -0.05 Sardine Sardina pilchardus 0.48 0.40 0.17 Picarel Spicara smaris 0.08 0.31 -2.88 Anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus 0.76 0.54 0.29 Sprat Sprattus sprattus 0.81 0.64 0.21 Turbot Psetta maxima 1.00 0.15 0.85 Whiting Merlangius merlangus 0.66 0.40 0.39 Common Pandora Pagellus erythrinus 0.72 0.30 0.58 Giant red shrimp Aristaeomorpha foliacea 1.09 0.40 0.63 Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus 0.15 0.20 -0.33 Blue and red shrimp Aristeus antennatus 0.81 0.26 0.68 Red mullet Mullus barbatus 1.30 0.45 0.65 Black bellied anglerfish Lophius budegassa 0.30 0.16 0.47

Around 94% of the analysed Mediterranean and Black Sea stocks are estimated to be exploited unsustainably in 2010-2012 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status in the last assessment year compared to GFCM MSY target GSA

Species

1 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Merluccius merluccius Merluccius merluccius Mullus surmulletus Aristaeus antennatus Nephrops norvegicus Mullus barbatus Aristaeus antennatus Parapenaeus longirostris Merluccius merluccius Mullus barbatus Merluccius merluccius Mullus barbatus Mullus surmulletus Galeus melastomus Aristaeus antennatus Nephrops norvegicus Parapenaeus longirostris Raja asterias Raja clavata Scyliorhinus canicula

Year period FMSY Fcurr 2002-2011 2000-2011 2000-2011 1992-2011 2001-2011 1995-2010 1996-2011 2001-2011 1998-2011 2004-2011 2005-2010 1994-2010 2009-2010 2009-2010 2009-2010 2006-2010 2006-2010 1994-2010 1994-2010 1994-2010

0.28 0.17 0.23 0.33 0.13 0.20 0.56 0.34 0.15 0.50 0.22 0.47 0.35 0.11 0.32 0.21 0.78 0.49 0.08 0.13

1.50 1.57 0.71 1.28 0.45 0.72 1.16 1.08 1.65 1.26 1.75 0.54 0.64 0.35 0.62 0.35 0.40 0.49 0.23 0.33

FMSY/Fcurr

Status

% reduction in F

5.36 9.08 3.10 3.88 3.36 3.60 2.07 3.18 11.00 2.52 7.95 1.15 1.81 3.18 1.94 1.67 0.51 1.00 3.03 2.54

Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Overexploited Sustainable Sustainable Overexploited Overexploited

81 89 68 74 70 72 52 69 91 60 87 13 45 69 48 40 -95 0 67 61

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Stock status in the last assessment year compared to GFCM MSY target GSA 16 17 17 18 18 25 25 25 26 29 29 29 12-16 15-16 15-16 15-16 15-16

Species Year period Raja clavata 1994-2010 Squilla mantis 2007-2011 Solea solea 2005-2010 Merluccius merluccius 1994-2010 Parapenaeus longirostris 2008-2011 Mullus barbatus 2005-2010 Mullus surmulletus 2009-2010 Boops boops 2005-2010 Pagellus erythrinus 2006-2007 Merlangius merlangius 2000-2011 Psetta maxima 1970-2010 Squalus acanthias 1989-2011 Parapenaeus longirostris 2007-2010 Mullus barbatus 1994-2011 Lophius budegassa 2002-2011 Pagellus erythrinus 1994-2011 Aristaeomorpha foliacea 1994-2010

FMSY

Fcurr

FMSY/Fcurr

0.10 0.26 0.26 0.21 0.68 0.33 0.23 0.25 0.29 0.35 0.18 0.22 0.95 0.45 0.16 0.30 0.40

0.13 1.43 1.43 0.87 1.45 0.45 0.46 0.37 0.64 0.37 0.62 0.26 1.21 1.30 0.30 0.72 1.00

1.30 5.50 5.50 4.14 2.13 1.35 2.02 1.48 2.23 1.06 3.44 1.18 1.27 2.89 1.88 2.40 2.50

Status % reduction in F Overexploited 23 Overexploited 82 Overexploited 82 Overexploited 76 Overexploited 53 Overexploited 26 Overexploited 51 Overexploited 32 Overexploited 55 Overexploited 5 Overexploited 71 Overexploited 15 Overexploited 21 Overexploited 65 Overexploited 47 Overexploited 58 Overexploited 60

Around 95% of the analysed Mediterranean and Black Sea stocks are estimated to be exploited unsustainably in 2010-2011 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Modelling achievements

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Productivity and Susceptibility analysis 151 Mediterranean Demersal and bathydemersal fish stocks Productivity Attributes: • • • • • • •

Maximum age (tmax) Maximum size (Lmax) Growth coefficient (k) Natural mortality (M) Fecundity Age-at-maturity (tmat) Mean trophic level

Susceptibility attributes: • • • • • • •

Areal overlap Vertical overlap Morphological characteristics affecting capture Desirability or value of the fishery Management strategy Fishing mortality rate (in relation to M) Survival after capture and release.

From Hobday et al. 2007 a Sciences ASwedish University of Agriculturalwww.slu.se

Species with estimated Mean Exploitation level

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

IUCN Classification

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Status of Mediterranean and Black Sea marine resources State of the art • Knowledge on the status of Mediterranean and Black Sea stocks is

improving rapidly

• Between 94% and 95% of the stocks analysed is overexploited compared to FMSY • An overall reduction between 45% and 51% in F is necessary to reach MSY •Observed reduction in nominal effort did not result in a decline in F •Reducing F will not reach MSY without changes in selectivity Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Current selectivity compared to the optimal one 20000 15000

300

Hake Gsa 7

200

10000

16000

Solea Gsa 17

250

12000

150

8000

100

5000

4000

50 0

0 18.3

Yield (tons)

Sardine Gsa 22

49.3

68.6

80.7

88.2

92.9

13.6 18.8 26.2 31.0 34.0 36.0 37.3 38.1

0 6.2

10.5

13.4

15.4

16.7

17.6

2000

Red mullet 1500 Gsa 6 1000 500 0

200

16000

Striped red mullet 150 Gsa 5

12000

100

8000

50

4000

0 3.8

17.9

26.1

30.2

32.3

33.4

33.9

13.0

18.9

24.8

80

400

60

Pink shrimp 300 Gsa 9

Norway lobster Gsa 9

40

200

20

100

0

29.1

32.1

34.3

35.9

0 2.5

21.3

36.5

47.3

55.0

60.5

64.4

Fopt FMSY Fcurr

9.3

19.6

30.4

36.3

39.6

Anchovy Gsa 7

0 9.4

11.0

13.4

15.1

16.3

17.1

800 700 Giant red shrimp 600 Gsa 16 500 400 300 200 100 0 16.5 30.3 40.4 47.9 53.4 57.5 60.5 62.7 64.3 65.5

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Colloca, Cardinale et al. Fish and Fisheries, 2011

Status of Mediterranean and Black Sea marine resources Immediate actions • Reduce F for all demersal fisheries through reduction in factual

effort or/and catches.

• Implement a TAC system for small pelagics (as in the GFCM resolution for small pelagics in GSA 17). • Modify gear selectivity to move towards MSY. • Several stocks are shared fisheries/stocks with non EU contries and thus more effort should go into assessing these stocks.

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Status of Mediterranean and Black Sea marine resources Way forward • Move to stock integrated models which can estimate M, handle

multifleet data and model selectivity. •

The number of species under assessment is low, need of providing advice for the others: •

For data poor un-assessed stocks move forward with risk analysis like the PSA.



For stocks with at least catch series apply methods tested by FAO to derive B/Bmsy. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Status of Mediterranean and Black Sea marine resources Foreseen Issues • There are signs of fisheries data quality loss:

• in the Mediterranean there are sampling problems in some areas (e.g. GSA 8 and 11) • in Black Sea poor sampling in many countries

• Data lack in the near future:

• no turbot survey was performed in Romania and no pelagic survey in Bulgaria and Romania in 2013 • catch and landings in Italy in 2013?

• Data issues might reduce the capacity of assessing stock status. • Resources for Mediterranean stock assessments are limited and it will be difficult to in increase the number of assessments. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Acknowledgments This presentation was possible thanks to: • Data collection of Member States • EC JRC for data collection and database management • STECF Secretariat and STECF • All the experts attending the STECF meetings • Stock assessments of GFCM

We are particularly grateful to Hajo Raetz and Aymen Charef

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Modelling achievements Moving from XSA to statistical catch at age model (e.g. A4a,SS3) Main advantages over classic VPA and other SCAA models: •Provide estimates of uncertainty •Can estimate M •Can provide different functional response for selectivity •Can handle multi fleets Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se