Supplementary Materials Exposure to Formaldehyde Perturbs ... - MDPI

2 downloads 0 Views 602KB Size Report
School of Computer, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China. 4. School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Science, Wuhan ...
Supplementary Materials

Exposure to Formaldehyde Perturbs the Mouse Gut Microbiome Junhui Guo 1,2§,4, Yun Zhao 1, Xingpeng Jiang 3,2§, Rui Li 1,2§, Hao Xie 4, Leixin Ge 1, Bo Xie 1,2§, Xu Yang 1,* and Luoping Zhang 2,* 1

2

3 4

Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA School of Computer, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

§: As a visiting scholar at UC Berkeley. * Correspondence: Luoping Zhang, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA. E-mail: [email protected], Tel.: +1 510 334 5959; and Xu Yang, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China. E-mail: [email protected], Tel.: +86 27 6786 6997.

Genes 2018, 9, 192; doi:10.3390/9040192

www.mdpi.com/journal/genes

Genes 2018, 9, 192

2 of 6

Supplementary Materials: Figure S 1. 1200

OTUs

900

600 No additives 0.1 ng/ml MeOH 0.3 ng/ml MeOH 1.0 ng/ml FA 3.0 ng/ml FA

300

0

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

Sequences per sample

Figure S 1. The rarefaction curves for the FA or MeOH treated samples.

Genes 2018, 9, 192

3 of 6

Figure S 2. (B) 1500

50

1200

40

Phylogenetic Diversity

Chao1 Index

(A)

900

600

300

0

s OH OH A A ditive ng/ml Me ng/ml Me ng/ml F ng/ml F 1.0 3.0 0.1 0.3

No ad

30

20

10

0

s OH OH A A ditive ng/ml Me ng/ml Me ng/ml F ng/ml F 1.0 3.0 0.1 0.3

No ad

Figure S 2. The richness (Chao1 index) and phylogenetic diversity analysis of the FA or MeOH treated samples.

Genes 2018, 9, 192

4 of 6

Figure S 3.

(A)

(B)

f_S24-7

g_Coprococcus g_Desulfovibrio

o_Clostridiales

g_[Ruminococcus]

g_Bacteroides

f_F16

f_Lachnospiraceae

g_Adlercreutzia

f_Rikenellaceae

f_Desulfovibrionaceae g_Turicibacter

g_Lactobacillus

g_Clostridium

f_Ruminococcaceae

g_Anaerostipes

g_[Prevotella]

g_Dorea

g_Oscillospira

g_Dehalobacterium f_Erysipelotrichaceae

g_Ruminococcus g_Prevotella g_Parabacteroides 0.1

o_YS2

No additives 0.1 ng/ml MeOH 0.3 ng/ml MeOH 1.0 ng/ml FA 3.0 ng/ml FA

1

10

o_RF39 0.01

100

Relative Abundance (%)

(C)

No additives 0.1 ng/ml MeOH 0.3 ng/ml MeOH 1.0 ng/ml FA 3.0 ng/ml FA

g_Helicobacter

0.1

1

10

Relative Abundance (%)

(D)

g_Roseburia

o_Clostridiales

f_Clostridiaceae

g_Streptococcus

Unassigned

g_Achromobacter

f_[Mogibacteriaceae]

f_Gemellaceae

o_Bacteroidales

g_Coprobacillus

g_Candidatus Arthromitus

f_Caulobacteraceae

g_Mucispirillum f_Coriobacteriaceae

f_Peptococcaceae g_Serratia

g_Lactococcus g_Bacillus

f_Lachnospiraceae

g_Solibacillus

f_Prevotellaceae

f_Christensenellaceae

f_Enterobacteriaceae g_Anaeroplasma

g_Delftia 0.001

g_Microcystis

No additives 0.1 ng/ml MeOH 0.3 ng/ml MeOH 1.0 ng/ml FA 3.0 ng/ml FA

f_Desulfovibrionaceae

0.01

0.1

Relative Abundance (%)

No additives 0.1 ng/ml MeOH 0.3 ng/ml MeOH 1.0 ng/ml FA 3.0 ng/ml FA

f_Ruminococcaceae f_Bacillaceae

1

0.001

0.01

0.1

Relative Abundance (%)

Figure S 3. The relative abundance of bacterial community composition at the genus level. (A), dominant genera; (B), common genera; (C) and (D), rare genera.

Genes 2018, 9, 192

5 of 6

Figure S 4.

Figure S 4. Differential PICRUSt predicted KEGG pathways between untreated and MeOH treated mice detected by STAMP software [34]. (A) Differential KEGG pathways between untreated and the 0.3 ng/ml MeOH treated mice. (B) Differential KEGG pathways between untreated and the 0.1 ng/ml FA treated mice.

Genes 2018, 9, 192

6 of 6

Table S1: Summary of sequence data Num samples

21

Num observations

1197

Total count

699775

Table density (fraction of non-zero values)

0.723

Counts/sample summary Min

29276

Max

38178

Median

33092

Mean

33322.62

Std. dev.

2793.643

Sample Metadata Categories

None provided

Observation Metadata Categories

taxonomy

Counts/sample detail p3.24.Y3.3

29276

0.24.Y1.3

29438

p1.24.Y4.1

29650

p10.24.Y4.2

30338

p30.24.Y7.1

30450

p30.24.Y5.3

31165

0.24.Y6.3

31402

0.24.Y6.2

31409

p10.24.Y4.1

31947

0.24.Y6.1

31999

p1.24.Y2.1

33092

p1.24.Y2.3

33961

p30.24.Y7.2

34536

p30.24.Y5.2

34915

p30.24.Y7.3

35349

p3.24.Y3.2

35802

p1.24.Y2.2

35934

p3.24.Y3.1

36462

p30.24.Y5.1

36722

0.24.Y1.1

37750

0.24.Y1.2

38178