Task 2.3 Micro-Siting Results Summary Report

California Energy Commission Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program

INTERIM DELIVERABLE REPORT

Task 2.3 Micro-Siting Results Summary Report Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

California Energy Commission Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor May 2017 | CEC-XXX-XXXX-XXX

Primary Author(s): Jerome Carman Kristen Radecsky Greg Chapman Schatz Energy Research Center 1 Harpst Street Arcata, CA 95521 www.schatzlab.org

Contract Number: ARV-14-046 Prepared for: California Energy Commission

Lindsee Tanimoto Project Manager John Butler Office Manager Emerging Fuels and Technology Office Randy Roesser Deputy Director Fuels and Transportation Division

Robert P. Oglesby Executive Director

DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees, or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warrant, expressed or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report.

PREFACE Assembly Bill (AB) 118 (Nùñez, Chapter 750, Statutes of 2007), created the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program (ARFVTP). The statute authorizes the California Energy Commission (Energy Commission) to develop and deploy alternative and renewable fuels and advanced transportation technologies to help attain the state’s climate change policies. AB 8 (Perea, Chapter 401, Statutes of 2013) reauthorizes the ARFVTP through January 1, 2024, and specifies that the Energy Commission allocate up to $20 million per year (or up to 20 percent of each fiscal year’s funds) in funding for hydrogen station development until at least 100 stations are operational. The ARFVTP has an annual budget of approximately $100 million and provides financial support for projects that: •

Reduce California’s use and dependence on petroleum transportation fuels and increase the use of alternative and renewable fuels and advanced vehicle technologies.

•

Produce sustainable alternative and renewable low-carbon fuels in California.

•

Expand alternative fueling infrastructure and fueling stations.

•

Improve the efficiency, performance and market viability of alternative light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicle technologies.

•

Retrofit medium- and heavy-duty on-road and non-road vehicle fleets to alternative technologies or fuel use.

•

Expand the alternative fueling infrastructure available to existing fleets, public transit, and transportation corridors.

•

Establish workforce training programs and conduct public outreach on the benefits of alternative transportation fuels and vehicle technologies.

To be eligible for funding under the ARFVTP, a project must be consistent with the Energy Commission’s ARFVTP Investment Plan, updated annually. The Energy Commission issued PON-14-603 fund grant projects that support new and existing planning efforts for plug-in electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles. In response to PON-14-603, the Redwood Coast Energy Authority (Recipient) submitted application number 2, which was proposed for funding in the Energy Commission's Notice of Proposed Awards on January 16th, 2015, and the agreement was executed as ARV-14046 on May 8th, 2015.

i

ABSTRACT The Redwood Coast Energy Authority (RCEA) contracted with the Schatz Energy Research Center (SERC) on California Energy Commission (CEC) contract ARV-14-046 to provide technical support and services for implementing the North Coast Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan (Plan). This report summarizes efforts meeting Task 2.3 of the contract. This task focused on micrositing potential site host locations of electric vehicle (EV) chargers in order to support the accelerated adoption of electric vehicles in the planning region of Del Norte, Humboldt, and Trinity counties. We identified 75 potential locations for hosting public EV chargers. We completed engineering designs, drawings, and cost estimates for 26 of these locations to the 10% design level. This report details the methodology used to identify site host locations and develop installation designs, and also discusses challenges and barriers identified during the process.

Keywords: electric vehicles, EV, planning, charging infrastructure, site selection, Title 24

Please use the following citation for this report: Carman, Jerome, Kristen Radecsky, Greg Chapman. Schatz Energy Research Center. 2017. Task 2.3 Micrositing Results Summary Report. California Energy Commission. Publication Number: CEC-XXX-201X-XXX. ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface ............................................................................................................................................. i Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: Micrositing Results Summary Report ................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Micrositing Process and Results .............................................................................................. 5 Macrositing Guidance .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Potential Site Host Identification and Outreach ......................................................................................... 7 Site Selection .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Site Design ........................................................................................................................................................... 10

Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 12 APPENDIX A: Comparison to Macrositing Recommendations .............................................. 15 Del Norte County ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Humboldt County .............................................................................................................................................. 17 Trinity County .................................................................................................................................................... 20

APPENDIX B: Micrositing Criteria Scoring Guidelines ............................................................ 21 APPENDIX C: Complete List of Potential Site Host Locations Considered .......................... 27 APPENDIX D: Complete List of Selected Site Host Locations ................................................ 32 APPENDIX E: 10% Engineering Designs and Cost Estimates .................................................. 34

LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: Map showing existing, funded, and sited AC and DC charger locations in the three-county project region. Existing and funded DC chargers along the I-5 corridor are also shown to show the potential for inter-regional travel. Only sites that provide J1772, CHAdeMO, and/or SAE Combo plugs are shown. ..................................................................... 4 Figure 2: Map showing existing, funded, and sited AC and DC charger locations around Arcata Bay in Humboldt County. Only sites that provide J1772, CHAdeMO, and/or SAE Combo plugs are shown. .............................................................................................................. 5 iii

LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: High level summary of the number of AC and DC plugs that are recommended by macrositing results from the Readiness Plan, are already existing, are funded but are not yet installed, or have been proposed under this project. Remaining indicates the number of plugs that remain to be installed to obtain the geographic distribution recommended by the macrositing results. ................................................................................ 7 Table 2: Table of criteria and associated weights used to score potential site host locations. ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Table 3: The total number of locations that were considered and scored for the development of 10% engineering designs and cost estimates. A total of 26 of these locations were chosen. Six of these were funded and will be developed by ChargePoint. . 9 Table 4: Distribution of selected sites and proposed plug types by county and city. Note that the six funded locations that were microsited under this project are not included here. However, fleet locations are included. ............................................................................ 10 Table 5: Statistics of estimates of probable cost for all proposed sites. ............................ 12 Table 6: Del Norte County - An overview of the number of existing, funded, and microsited EV charging plugs compared with macrositing recommendations. Remaining plugs indicate the difference between macrositing recommendations and the sum of existing, funded, and microsited. .............................................................................................. 16 Table 7: Humboldt County - An overview of the number of existing, funded, and microsited EV charging plugs compared with macrositing recommendations. Remaining plugs indicate the difference between macrositing recommendations and the sum of existing, funded, and microsited. .............................................................................................. 17 Table 8: Trinity County - Overview of existing, funded, and microsited EV charging plugs compared with macrositing recommendations. Remaining plugs indicate the difference between macrositing recommendations and the sum of existing, funded, and microsited. ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 Table 9: Guidelines used to score a site location on each criterion. .................................... 21 Table 10: Del Norte County – Table of scoring results for all sites considered for micrositing. ................................................................................................................................... 28 Table 11: Humboldt County – Table of scoring results for all sites considered for micrositing. ................................................................................................................................... 29 Table 12: Trinity County – Table of scoring results for all sites considered for micrositing. ................................................................................................................................... 31 iv

Table 13: Detailed list of selected site host locations, resulting number of plugs per design, and resulting opinion of probable cost. ..................................................................... 32

v

vi

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Redwood Coast Energy Authority (RCEA) contracted with the Schatz Energy Research Center (SERC) on California Energy Commission (CEC) contract ARV-14-046 to provide technical support and services for implementing the North Coast Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan (Plan). This report summarizes efforts meeting Task 2.3 of the contract. This task focused on micrositing potential site host locations of electric vehicle (EV) chargers in order to support the accelerated adoption of electric vehicles in the planning region of Del Norte, Humboldt, and Trinity counties. The primary goals were to: •

Visit site hosts previously mentioned in the Plan,

•

Conduct outreach to new potential site hosts,

•

Conduct site visits and site evaluations for new potential site hosts,

•

Engage with all potential site hosts to inform them of their options and negotiate terms for future agreements between possible EVCS owners/administrators and site hosts, and

•

Prepare and submit 30 – 40 engineering designs, drawings, and cost estimates for sites with the highest favorability and most willing site hosts.

Guided by macrositing recommendations from the Plan, we focused on obtaining geographic coverage over the planning region with the expectation that the private market will more likely focus on the higher population centers. We identified 75 new potential site host locations. Of these, 36 (48%) are located in more rural areas of the planning region. Challenges with identifying favorable sites with a willingness to host charging stations in the more rural areas of the planning region hampered our ability to meet our geographic coverage objective. Our focus on geographic coverage also conflicted with our goal of micrositing 30 – 40 sites because of our challenges in rural areas. We were able to successfully complete engineering designs, drawings, and cost estimates for 26 sites. Thirteen of these sites (50%) are located in smaller outlying population centers. Macrositing recommendations from the Plan provide guidance on the number of plugs needed for a 2% penetration of EVs into the on-road community fleet. Our focus on geographic coverage made significant progress towards meeting the recommended geographic distribution of the Plan. However, there is indication that we are already approaching an overbuild of necessary early market infrastructure in the population centers. The total number of plugs recommended by the Plan (with some modification during this project as described in Appendix A) for the three-county region is 101 AC and 5 DC. The total number of existing, known funded, and currently microsited plugs is 97 AC and 19 DC. However, the continued need for wider geographic coverage results in a shortfall of 50 AC plugs and 2 DC plugs (total shortfall is so large because there are numerous areas that have substantially more plugs than macrositing results indicate are 1

needed). This shortfall occurs primarily in the more rural areas of the planning region. This result is due to the following factors: •

The local communities, who are historically early adopters, are funding their own installations primarily in the population centers,

•

The state-funded West Coast Electric Highway effort exceeds projected early market needs, and

•

It is challenging to find locations in rural areas that have both favorable existing infrastructure and willing property owners.

New California Building Code requirements presented additional challenges to identifying potential locations with favorable existing infrastructure and willing site hosts. The main challenges were: •

The requirement to label EV charging spaces as “EV Charging Only”. The majority of businesses in the planning region have limited parking. With few EVs currently on the road many business owners see this requirement as reducing their ability to attract customers.

•

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements further impact existing parking space. All designs require at least one EV charging space to be van accessible which requires the space of two standard parking spaces.

Furthermore, existing parking lot and path of travel infrastructure is often not well designed to accommodate the addition of EV chargers. Curbs, bollards, and wheelstops can present pedestrian path of travel hazards between the EV charger and the vehicle. ADA path of travel can be particularly challenging when the EV charger is located on a different elevation than the vehicle, such as a sidewalk. We also learned it is extremely important to be mindful of the fact that the driver will need to safely navigate this path of travel while also pulling a long electrical cord. The designs and drawings developed successfully highlight and address these challenges. Solutions to these challenges developed during the micrositing effort were communicated to numerous permitting and planning staff in the region. The drawings developed will also inform the site hosts and contractors who implement them.

2

CHAPTER 1: Micrositing Results Summary Report Introduction Over the last six years the North Coast region has seen significant planning and implementation activity in the field of low carbon transportation. Of the numerous stakeholders engaged in this work, the Redwood Coast Energy Authority (RCEA) has been very active in planning for an accelerated adoption of electric vehicles (EV) in the North Coast region. A high-level timeline and description of this activity is provided here to set the context within which micrositing efforts were conducted for this project. In 2014, under California Energy Commission (CEC) agreement ARV-11-006, the RCEA, Schatz Energy Research Center (SERC), and GHD completed the North Coast Plug-In Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan (Plan). Among many other recommendations, this Plan provided high-level EV charging “macrositing” results for the counties of Del Norte, Humboldt, and Trinity. These results identified the quantity of publically accessible AC (also referred to as Level 1 and Level 2 depending on the rated power) and DC (also referred to as Level 3 or Fast Charger) charging plugs needed for specific transportation analysis zones within Humboldt County, and at a County-level for Del Norte and Trinity. Also in 2014 follow-up implementation funding was secured to install a first phase of the infrastructure recommendations in the Plan. Through CEC agreement ARV-13-029 ten AC charging stations serving twenty parking spaces were installed in nine locations throughout Humboldt County and all incorporated jurisdictions. The local community has also installed a number of additional AC charging stations for public and customer use. Currently existing EV charging infrastructure can be seen in Figure 1 and Figure 2. In 2015, under CEC agreement ARV-14-046 for which this report is being written, the RCEA and SERC secured additional follow-up funding to continue implementing other aspects of the Plan such as stakeholder engagement, streamlining of permitting processes, development of a charging station installation guide, and additional micrositing of potential installation locations. The goal of additional micrositing is to develop 10% engineering designs and cost estimates to prepare the region for future funding opportunities. This report focuses on the development methodology and results of these 10% engineering designs and cost estimates. In 2016, under solicitation GFO-15-603, the CEC awarded funding to two private companies for the installation of eighteen DC and twelve AC chargers at twelve locations along Highway 101 between the Oregon border and the southern border of

3

Humboldt County.1 These funded locations (shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2 as funded) influenced the chosen locations that were microsited under this project. Finally, in 2016 Pacific Gas & Electric completed an internal analysis for their service territory that looked at possible DC installation locations. 2 Variables considered included available distribution infrastructure capacity and driver services. While the results of this analysis were released too late to impact this micrositing effort, it nevertheless is an important effort that will impact future efforts in this region. Figure 1: Map showing existing, funded, and sited AC and DC charger locations in the three-county project region. Existing and funded DC chargers along the I-5 corridor are also shown to show the potential for inter-regional travel. Only sites that provide J1772, CHAdeMO, and/or SAE Combo plugs are shown.

Source: SERC, 2017

1 See http://www.energy.ca.gov/2016publications/CEC-600-2016-008/CEC-600-2016-008.pdf for the list of proposed locations. 2 See https://www.pge.com/en_US/about-pge/environment/what-we-are-doing/electric-program-investmentcharge/direct-current-electric-vehicle-fast-chargers.page for analysis results and tools.

4

Figure 2: Map showing existing, funded, and sited AC and DC charger locations around Arcata Bay in Humboldt County. Only sites that provide J1772, CHAdeMO, and/or SAE Combo plugs are shown.

Source: SERC, 2017

Micrositing Process and Results This section describes the various steps of the micrositing effort. The first step was to reference the Plan’s macrositing recommendations, correlate these with existing and funded station locations, and identify which areas warrant focus to meet macrositing recommendations. Following this, a list of potential site hosts was generated in areas targeted through the macrositing recommendations. The next step involves filtering the list of potential site hosts through a grading rubric to objectively identify sites that score high on numerous criteria that factor into an ideal location. The third step involves securing committed site hosts. The final step results in the development of a 10% engineering design and cost estimate for each site.

Macrositing Guidance 5

The Plan generated recommendations for the general location and number of EV charging plugs for Humboldt County, and extrapolated those results to Del Norte and Trinity counties based on population and EV sales. The macrositing recommendations for Humboldt County were provided at a high level of spatial detail such that recommendations could be used directly. However, the extrapolated results for Del Norte and Trinity counties were estimates at the county level. Local knowledge was used to distribute the macrositing recommendations out to specific population centers for these two counties. Furthermore, because of the large geographic area encompassed by Del Norte and Trinity counties, we increased the number of recommended EV charging plugs in order to further emphasize geographic coverage. A summary comparison across all three counties is shown in Table 1, with details provided in APPENDIX A: Comparison to Macrositing Recommendations. The following explains the different sections in the table: •

Recommended refers to the number of AC and DC plugs that were recommended by the Readiness Plan, with some additional extrapolation as detailed in APPENDIX A: Comparison to Macrositing Recommendations.

•

Existing refers to all publically accessible AC and DC plugs that are currently installed and operational (all Tesla chargers and those chargers only serving business customers are excluded).

•

Microsited refers to those locations for which 10% engineering designs and estimates of probable cost have been developed under this project. o

Funded refers to locations that will be developed under CEC solicitation GFO-15-603. Six locations will be developed by ChargePoint. These locations were microsited under this project in collaboration with ChargePoint for their winning grant submission. Another six locations will be developed by ReCargo. These locations were not microsited under this project.

o

Proposed refers to those locations microsited under this project that currently do not have a funding source identified for implementation.

•

▪

Pub refers to locations designed for general public access.

▪

Fleet refers to locations designed specifically for private fleet use.

Remaining refers to the remaining number of plugs to be identified to meet the macrositing recommendations. The values shown here indicate the difference between the number of recommended plugs and the sum of existing, funded, and microsited. However, this difference is determined at the sub-county level as justified in APPENDIX A: Comparison to Macrositing Recommendations. The discrepancy in Table 1 is associated with the fact that the locations and plug counts of existing, funded, 6

and microsited do not correlate exactly with the recommended locations and plug counts from the Readiness Plan. While 97 AC plugs and 19 DC plugs are either existing, funded, or have been proposed, there are a number of locations where the total exceeds the recommended number of plugs. In other words, 51 of the 97 AC plugs are projected as necessary, and the remaining 46 AC plugs represent additional infrastructure that is not necessary for an early market 2% penetration of EVs into the on-road fleet. This discrepancy indicates the need for a continued focus on geographic coverage over attaining the recommended total number of plugs. Table 1: High level summary of the number of AC and DC plugs that are recommended by macrositing results from the Readiness Plan, are already existing, are funded but are not yet installed, or have been proposed under this project. Remaining indicates the number of plugs that remain to be installed to obtain the geographic distribution recommended by the macrositing results. Microsited for this Project Recommended County

Funded3

Existing

AC

DC

AC

DC

Del Norte

16

2

3

Humboldt

66

2

Trinity

19

1

Total

101

5

ReCargo

Proposed

ChargePoint

AC

Remaining DC

AC

DC

0

7

0

2

0

31

2

0

1

12

0

4

1

50

2

AC

DC

AC

DC

Pub

Fleet

Pub

0

2

2

3

4

4

2

37

0

4

6

3

6

29

1

0

0

0

0

0

7

41

0

6

8

6

10

40

Source: SERC, 2017

The macrositing recommendations significantly guided where we looked for willing site hosts. However, challenges with identifying willing site hosts (as described in the following section) resulted in siting EV chargers in areas that are already sufficiently covered. In these cases, effort was made to focus on areas within high population centers where there was a clear void of existing or known funded infrastructure. Overall, the micrositing results achieved alignment with macrositing recommendations. However, there is still significant work needed to achieve the geographic coverage recommended by the macrositing results.

Potential Site Host Identification and Outreach A micrositing rubric that was developed in the past under previous grant funded projects4 was further developed and expanded under this project. It is a weighted

3 Note that all DC charger designs microsited under this project, except Weaverville, were developed for inclusion in ChargePoint’s winning grant submission under GFO-15-603. The designs developed under this project were ultimately modified by ChargePoint for the final grant submission such that the number of plugs shown here differs from the number designed under this project. In addition, ReCargo was also awarded CEC grant funds to install DC chargers along highway 101. Stations to be installed by ReCargo are also shown here.

7

decision matrix tool that is used to score and compare potential EVCS sites. Leveraging past versions of the micrositing rubric we modified and developed additional criteria for a total of twenty-two criteria used to score a potential EVCS site (described in APPENDIX B: Micrositing Criteria Scoring Guidelines). Each criterion was then collaboratively and iteratively weighted to indicate the relative importance of each criteria. Criteria weights were developed separately for AC stations and DC stations because the customer interaction is sufficiently different between these station types. The resulting criteria and weights are shown in Table 2. Further modification to the rubric was also done to ensure micrositing efforts targeted local fleets. This was accomplished by excluding certain criteria used for general public use sites from being applied to the potential fleet-serving sites. Details are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Table of criteria and associated weights used to score potential site host locations.

4 The lead development agencies involved were RCEA, GHD, the City of Mount Shasta, the Siskiyou County Economic Development Council, and SERC. Development of the rubric was funded in part by the following CEC grant contracts: ARV-11-006, ARV-12-007, ARV-14-046, and ARV-14-058.

8

Criteria Description Willing owner/operator or host Site can accommodate a safe design that is user friendly and doesn't present an obstacle or hazard to users or bystanders Close proximity to suitable electrical point of connection Minimal trenching required through paved areas Within 1/2 mile of Basic Services as per LEED 2009 Site is well lit without the addition of dedicated lighting installed with station Site has good pedestrian infrastructure connecting the site and surrounding basic services Site is highly visible to the public Suitable for block of multiple chargers Long term control/ownership of the site is unlikely to change in the next 10 years Risk of public / employee backlash from converting conventional parking spaces Site appears to support workplace charging scenario Within 1/2 mile of other modes of transportation Site has the potential to support overnight charging for long-distance travelers Site fills a gap in EV charging infrastructure for travelers along a main corridor (I-5, 101, 299, etc.) and possibly a minor corridor / rural route Site in safe location, minimal vandalism ADA accessibility potential Site is attended due to the site host business type Site has shelter from inclement weather Willingness of site host to install behind existing meter Ability and site host willingness to establish hardwire internet connection in lieu of cell phone data connection. Site can enforce EV charging parking restrictions

To which intended use does the criteria apply Public Fleet Y Y

Criteria Weighting AC DC Reqd Reqd

Y

Y

Reqd

Reqd

Y Y Y

Y Y N

4.25 5 4.25

4 5 2.75

Y

Y

2

1

Y

N

3.5

3

Y Y

N Y

2.88 1.75

3.75 4

Y

Y

2.88

3

Y

N

3.63

3.25

Y Y

Y N

4 2.5

1 1

Y

N

1.5

1

Y

N

5

5

Y Y Y Y Y

Y Y N N N

4 5 2.13 1 1.75

4.5 5 2.75 2.75 0

Y

Y

4

3

Y

N

2.75

4

Source: SERC, 2017

Once target areas were identified using guidance from macrositing results, we used Google Maps to identify potential locations for public and fleet charging. We also responded to a number of word-of-mouth references and direct requests through local contacts. In addition, CEC grant solicitation GFO-15-603 was released during our micrositing effort and we ended up collaborating with a winning entity by assisting with siting DC charger locations during the grant proposal development. A total of six locations were sited, included in the proposal submitted by the company, and successfully awarded for funding. The total number of locations considered in each county is shown in Table 3, along with the total number of locations that were microsited. The complete list of potential site host locations that were considered and scored using the modified rubric is shown in APPENDIX C: Complete List of Potential Site Host Locations Considered. Table 3: The total number of locations that were considered and scored for the development of 10% engineering designs and cost estimates. A total of 26 of these 9

locations were chosen. Six of these were funded and will be developed by ChargePoint. Potential Locations AC DC Total Del Norte

17

3

20

Humboldt

31

8

39

Trinity

15

1

16

Total

63

12

75

Source: SERC, 2017

Of the total number of potential locations identified 36 (48%) are located in more rural areas such as Gasquet, Myers Flat, and Lewiston. As discussed in the previous section and elaborated on in APPENDIX A: Comparison to Macrositing Recommendations, continued focus on geographic distribution in rural and sphere-of-influence5 areas is needed to meet macrositing recommendations.

Site Selection Final site selection weighed heavily on site host willingness. We contacted representatives from potential sites that scored well in the rubric table; however, the majority was uninterested in hosting an EVCS. Out of the 75 potential sites that scored well in the rubric table, 26 of the site hosts (33%) were interested to move forward with the micrositing process. Feedback from uninterested contacts includes: •

Reluctance to lose existing parking spaces;

•

Anticipation that charging stations will not be used;

•

Negative perception of electric vehicles.

Below in Table 4 is a breakdown of AC and DC plugs for the 20 proposed locations (funded sites not included). Overall, the median number of plugs per location (AC and DC combined) is 2. Discussing whether the station would include DC charging or not ended up influencing the decisions of some site hosts. See Figure 1 for the distribution by type (i.e. AC or DC) of these microsited stations along with the existing charging stations in the region. The complete list of selected site host locations is provided in APPENDIX D: Complete List of Selected Site Host Locations. Of the total microsited locations 13 (50%) are located in more rural areas. Table 4: Distribution of selected sites and proposed plug types by county and city. Note that the six funded locations that were microsited under this project are not included here. However, fleet locations are included. County

City

# of Proposed Plugs AC DC Public Fleet Public

# of Proposed Locations AC DC Public Fleet Public

5 Sphere-of-influence refers to the sphere-of-influence planning areas surrounding primary population centers.

10

County

City Crescent City Gasquet

Del Norte

# of Proposed Plugs AC DC Public Fleet Public 2

1

2

Klamath

# of Proposed Locations AC DC Public Fleet Public 1 1

2 4

Arcata

8

3

Bayside

2

1

Cutten

2

1

College of the Redwoods

4

1

Fortuna

4

1

Garberville

1

1

Meyers Flat

1

1

Myrtletown

6

2

Redway

1

1

Humboldt

Trinidad All Humboldt

Trinity

2

0

2

All Del Norte

2

0

12

Hayfork

2

1

Junction City

2

1

Lewiston

1

1

Weaverville

2

All Trinity

7

0

1

3

40

4

1

17

Total

0

1

2 29

1

1

0

1

1

1 2

1

Source: SERC, 2017

Site Design A multiple step process was required to develop the 10% engineering designs. Once a potential site contact showed interest in hosting a charging station, we provided the site contact with a conceptual layout. The layouts were simple schematics drawn over Google Maps images to show the approximate size and location of the charging station and the electrical supply route from the point of connection to the station. Feedback from the site contact was provided via email, telephone, and/or in person and was used to revise the design based on the following criteria: •

site host preferences (e.g. not losing prime parking spaces),

•

site host logistics,

•

electrical connection costs,

•

California Building Code requirements,

•

proximity to lighting, and

•

electrical specifications and capacity at the electrical point of connection (POC).

11

Often times the initial layout exchange would consider the latter four criteria, while the final layout took into account the first two criteria. Iterating with site hosts on design criteria to determine an agreed-upon layout took more time than expected, averaging around 3 – 4 weeks per site. However, agreeing on the layout with the potential site host is a key step to ensure realistic 10% engineering designs. Without the site host’s input on site logistics and preferences, the 10% engineering designs likely would require significant modification when implemented. In addition to engaging with site hosts, we also engaged with electric utility companies in order to determine available capacity and new service costs. If the site design does not require a new service or transformer upgrade, then available capacity at the site’s POC can be determined by examining the site’s existing service panel. Most site designs, however, required installing a new service to meet the electrical load of the charger. Engagement with the utility is required to determine if the existing utility infrastructure can accommodate the new service. This engagement is best performed or repeated at the time the proposed designs are moved forward to the implementation phase, as utility load management may change between now and then. For sites we know require a transformer upgrade, we were able to get a rough high-level cost estimate from the local utility. Transformer-upgrade costs range with project complexity. Transformer upgrades also require an application process through the utility. American Disability Act (ADA) requirements were pivotal in design considerations. The 2016 California Building Code (adopted January 1, 2017) proposes significant changes to accessibility requirements in Title 24. The most notable design considerations from Title 24 that influenced our designs were: •

Van accessible EV charging space and its adjacent access aisle combined dimensions (displacement of two existing parking spaces rather than just one)

•

Maximum grade for van accessible charging space and access aisle surface,

•

Path of travel requirements between the charging station to existing site services, and

•

Path of travel requirements between the EV charger and the vehicle, recognizing that a disabled person needs to successfully navigate while pulling a charging cord.

After a design layout was agreed upon with the potential site host, we proceeded to develop the 10% engineering designs using AutoCAD®. The 10% engineering design drawings identify major civil and electrical work and equipment that we anticipate will be needed. For most drawings, we did not specify the charging station(s) brand and model and decided that it would be best for the site host and/or selected contractor to determine the specific charger at the time of implementation as this impacts civil and electrical design requirements. The 10% engineering designs were reviewed by our internal team, and many were reviewed by the respective site hosts.

12

Upon completion of 10% engineering designs, we developed an opinion of probable cost for the project. We primarily referenced the 2015 RSMeans® Electrical Cost Data manual, and supplemented with local pricing when available. In order to provide complete estimates for the designs, we estimated the complexity of the utility work and assumed the EV chargers selected would be a ChargePoint CT4000 (AC charging), and a ChargePoint CPE200 (DC charging). To estimate wire and conduit costs we calculated wire and conduit sizes based on the 2016 California Building Code requirements. Cost estimates for each of the 26 sites are provided in APPENDIX D: Complete List of Selected Site Host Locations. Table 5 below shows the minimum, maximum, median and average costs on a per site and per plug basis for the two types of chargers. The AC charger installations ranged between approximately $7,000 to $69,000 in probable cost while the higher power, DC fast charger installations ranged between approximately $122,000 to $219,000 in probable cost 6. Table 5: Statistics of estimates of probable cost for all proposed sites.

Minimum

AC Charger Sites Per Site Per Plug $7,300 $3,650

DC Charger Sites Per Site Per Plug $122,309 $40,770

Maximum

$68,679

$34,340

$218,998

$72,999

Median

$29,556

$14,778

$174,856

$58,285

Average

$33,104

$15,425

$183,588

$61,196

Source: SERC, 2017

Conclusion The micrositing effort was a particularly useful process for the project region for the following reasons: •

The preliminary designs provided to the site hosts prepares the region to take advantage of expected future funding opportunities through the anticipated statewide EV charging block grant for station installation.

•

Integrating ADA requirements into installations at existing facilities is particularly challenging, and to date has not been well thought through across the state. Site designs developed under this project bring awareness of this challenge to site hosts, contractors, and the authorities having jurisdiction.

•

One-on-one interaction with local business owners in the area has gone a long way to promote and educate the general public about electric vehicles.

Guidance provided by macrositing model recommendations was extremely useful to bring structure to decisions regarding geographic location and quantity of plugs per location. These recommendations have proven invaluable for removing a significant

6 Note that all DC charger sites were designed with one DC plug, and two AC plugs. In addition, all sites except Weaverville were designed with infrastructure to support 150kW of future charging capacity.

13

amount of guesswork from micrositing efforts thereby helping to manage the effective use of public funds for early market infrastructure investment. The primary barrier to fully achieving macrositing recommendations has been finding willing and interested site hosts. In a rural region requiring distribution over a large geographic area the number of potential site hosts for many towns is typically very low. After filtering for a number of key criteria, it was common for a particular target town in a remote area to only have one or two reasonable locations. Hence property owner interest is critical, and continues to be a significant barrier for identifying locations in remote locations. Navigating ADA accommodations for installations at existing facilities proved to require significant time and numerous design iterations. These accommodations also significantly increased probable cost estimates for a number of locations. The following were the major challenges we encountered: •

Variability in charging plug location on OEM vehicles makes ADA path of travel planning between the EV charger and the vehicle difficult.

•

Path of travel and access to EV charger point of sale screens and key pads often conflict with the need to protect the charger from vehicle impact. Wheel stops present a path of travel hazard for pedestrians and wheel chairs. Bollards present a “charging cord path of travel” barrier. Location of EV chargers on sidewalks or in landscaping areas typically present a long ADA path of travel between EV charger and vehicle that makes managing a charging cord in hand difficult.

•

Available physical space in existing parking areas and sidewalks can significantly limit ADA path of travel with regards to turning around and backing up. Some sites required significant modification to existing infrastructure in order to accommodate reasonable EV charger access.

While all of these challenges can be easily addressed for new construction, they present a significant cost barrier for installation at existing parking lots and businesses. Finally, spurred by significant state-level investment and pressure, the early market landscape of EV charging infrastructure is rapidly evolving. We had to remain nimble in our micrositing efforts in order to balance macrositing recommendations with the following factors: •

Active development of charging infrastructure by the local community, and

•

Grant awards by the CEC under GFO-15-603.

Furthermore, the following events occurred during the project period: •

PG&E completed an internal assessment of potential DC charger locations as part of their larger on-going effort to internally build out significant EV charging infrastructure within their territory, and 14

•

The Volkswagen ZEV settlement occurred which will result in significant EV charger infrastructure investment over the next 10 years.

These events had an impact on our micrositing effort by causing us to re-assess our geographic focus areas based on the suspected impacts of these events. In order to try to most efficiently spend CEC grant funds we re-assessed target geographic areas multiple times in response to these factors and events.

15

APPENDIX A: Comparison to Macrositing Recommendations The tables below compare publically accessible existing, funded, and microsited EV charging plugs with recommendations from the macrositing work conducted for the North Coast PEV Readiness Plan. Funded plugs refer to those funded by the California Energy Commission (CEC) from solicitation CEC-GFO-15-603. Microsited plugs refer to those identified and designed for this project. There are three tables that look at the counties of Del Norte, Humboldt, and Trinity. Numbers listed indicate the number of recommended plugs for a given area for a 2% penetration of plug-in electric vehicles into the on-road light duty vehicle fleet. Existing Tesla stations are not listed since they are exclusive to Tesla drivers. Proposed fleet-specific installations are also not included.

Del Norte County Macrositing recommendations indicated a need for eight to ten AC plugs for the county. We distributed ten plugs between Crescent City, Klamath, Smith River, and Gasquet. We added additional plugs to Hiouchi and Fort Dick in order to include additional small yet important population centers. We also added two DC plugs to support inter-regional travel. Finally, we added four additional plugs at Pelican Bay prison to support workplace charging. Roughly 20% of the local resident population works at the prison making this a primary location for workplace charging. We also used local knowledge to guess at the priority rating for the different areas. Results are shown in the table below.

16

Table 6: Del Norte County - An overview of the number of existing, funded, and microsited EV charging plugs compared with macrositing recommendations. Remaining plugs indicate the difference between macrositing recommendations and the sum of existing, funded, and microsited. Microsited Under This Project Recommended Priority 1

Area

AC

DC

AC

Crescent City

5

1

1

Klamath

2

1

2

Gasquet

1

Pelican Bay

4

Smith River

2

Klamath Glenn

0

2

3

Funded

Existing DC

ReCargo AC 1

DC 1

ChargePoint

Proposed

AC

DC

AC

1

1

2

1

2

DC

Remaining AC

DC

1

2 4 1 1

1

1

Hiouchi

1

1

Fort Dick

1

1

Total

16

2

3

0

2

Source: SERC, 2017

17

2

3

4

4

0

7

0

Humboldt County Macrositing recommendations for Humboldt County are shown in the table below. Numbers are rounded up to the nearest whole number from the original macrositing recommendations. Per the recommendations from the Plan, only recommended DC plugs for Willow Creek are included. Although there are non-zero macrositing recommendations for DC plugs for other areas, they are not included here. It’s also worth noting that the CEC funded DC stations sufficiently cover Highway 101. Table 7: Humboldt County - An overview of the number of existing, funded, and microsited EV charging plugs compared with macrositing recommendations. Remaining plugs indicate the difference between macrositing recommendations and the sum of existing, funded, and microsited.

Recommended Priority

1

2

DC

Existing AC

DC

Microsited Under This Project Funded Proposed ReCargo ChargePoint AC DC AC DC AC DC

Remaining

Area

AC

AC

Eureka - Harrison

2

Eureka - Myrtletown

1

6

College of the Redwoods

2

4

Bayside

2

2

Arcata - Giuntolli

2

1

McKinleyville - North

1

2

Trinidad

1

2

Orick

2

Loleta

1

Willow Creek

5

Redway

3

Scotia

2

2

Bridgeville

2

2

Eureka - Slough

1

1

Eureka - Harris

1

1

Eureka - Henderson

1

DC

4

1

1 2 2

1

1 1

2

2

3

1

1

1

1

18

2


3

4

DC

Existing AC

DC


Remaining

Area

AC

AC

Eureka - Cutten

1

Eureka - Bayview

1

1

Fields Landing

1

1

2

Arcata - HSU

1

1

McKinleyville - South

1

1

Fortuna - Central

1

Fortuna - East

1

2 1

Ferndale

1

Arcata - Westend

1

2

Garberville

1

Eureka - S. Broadway

1

Eureka - N. Broadway

1

1

Eureka - E. Central

1

2

Eureka - W. Central

1

Arcata - Sunnybrae

1

McKinleyville - Central

1

Fieldbrook

1

Fortuna - South

1

Hydesville

1

1 1

1

2

1 1

1 4 1 1 4 1 1

1

Rio Dell

1

2

Blue Lake

1

5

Hoopa

1

1

Alderpoint

1

1

Eureka - Waterfront

1

1

19

DC


Area

AC

Eureka - NW 101

1

Eureka - NE 101

1

Arcata - South

1

DC

Existing AC

DC


Remaining AC

DC

1 1

3 1

Arcata - Plaza

1

1

Arcata - Greenview

1

2

Arcata - North

1

Arcata - Westwood

1

1

2

3 1 1

1

1

Miranda / Myers Flat

1

Arcata - Bottoms

1

1

Samoa

1

1

Fortuna - North

1

1

Shelter Cove

1

1

Lost Coast

1

1

Total

66

2

37

0

Source: SERC, 2017

20

4

6

1

3

6

28

0

31

2

Trinity County Macrositing recommendations indicated four to five AC plugs for the county. We focused all of these in Weaverville and Hayfork. We also added a single DC plug in Weaverville to facilitate inter-regional travel. We decided to recommend an additional thirteen AC plugs across thirteen population centers for a total of nineteen AC plugs for the county. We decided the geographic coverage was important enough to warrant the additional recommendations in order to provide a strong signal to the region that electric vehicles are a viable option. We also used local knowledge to guess at the priority rating for each area. Results are shown in the table below. Table 8: Trinity County - Overview of existing, funded, and microsited EV charging plugs compared with macrositing recommendations. Remaining plugs indicate the difference between macrositing recommendations and the sum of existing, funded, and microsited. Microsited Under This Project Recommended Priority 1

2

3

DC

Existing AC

DC

Funded AC

Proposed DC

AC

Remaining

Region

AC

DC

AC

Hayfork

2

Weaverville

4

1

2

Coffee Creek

1

Junction City

1

2

Lewiston

1

1

Big Bar

1

1

Burnt Ranch

1

1

Douglas City

1

1

Hawkins Bar

1

1

Hyampom

1

1

Mad River

1

1

DC

2 1

2 1

Salyer

1

1

Trinity Center

1

1

Trinity Lake

1

1

Trinity Village

1

1

Total

19

1

1

0

Source: SERC, 2017

21

0

0

7

1

12

0

APPENDIX B: Micrositing Criteria Scoring Guidelines The following table details the guidelines developed and used to score a site on each of the 23 criteria developed for assessing a site locations attractiveness for hosting a charging station for public or fleet use. The applied weights of each criteria, and their applicability to either a public or fleet application, is described in Table 2 in Section 1.2.2. Table 9: Guidelines used to score a site location on each criterion. Criteria Description Willing owner/operator or host Site can accommodate a safe design that is user friendly and doesn't present an obstacle or hazard to users or bystanders Site appears to be suitable for use by residents of a multifamily housing development

Score 5 4 3 2 1 0 In addition to interest in hosting a charging station, site host must be willing to give up 1 additional parking spot to Title 24 van accessibility requirement. Rate the overall interest level of the site host as high, medium, neutral, against. This is just a check on the appropriateness of the site from an end user perspective. Would the presence of stations and charging vehicles interfere with any existing infrastructure or intended uses of the property? Do the surroundings generally appear to be designed for public access?

Site location is on the property of a multi-family housing development

Location is within 1 block of multi-family housing, site host is willing to allow use by residents, pedestrian access is optimal

Location is within 1 block of multi-family housing and site host is willing to allow use by residents, but pedestrian access is suboptimal though sufficient

22

Location is within 2 block of multi-family housing, site host is willing to allow use by residents, pedestrian access is optimal

Location is within 2 block of multi-family housing and site host is willing to allow use by residents, but pedestrian access is suboptimal though sufficient

Not a good spot for access by multi-family housing

Criteria Description 5 No transformer upgrade needed, transformer location on property or directly adjacent property

4 No transformer upgrade needed, transformer located a few properties away

Minimal trenching required through paved areas

Trenching only through dirt and/or asphalt areas required, minimal trenching length wholly on site host property

Within 1/2 mile of Basic Services as per LEED 2009

More than 5 services within a 1 block radius, food, water, and bathrooms easily available at or within 1 block of host site Sufficient general lighting exists, sufficient lighting exists at specific location where charger is proposed that facilitates reading of instructions and use of charging station

Trenching through some concrete required, minimal trenching length wholly on site host property More than 5 services within a 5 block radius, food, water, and bathrooms easily available at or within 1 block of host site Sufficient general lighting exists, would need to add lighting at specific location where charger is proposed that facilitates reading of instructions and use of charging station

Close proximity to apparently suitable electrical point of connection

Site is well lit without the addition of dedicated lighting installed with station

Score 3 2 Transformer Transformer upgrade needed, upgrade needed, transformer location transformer located on property or a few properties directly adjacent away or across a property street

1

0 No appropriate power available, would require significant investment to get suitable electrical connection Unusually long trenching required and/or trenching may pose significant cost or barrier for some reason

Trenching only through dirt and/or asphalt areas required, notable trenching distance required, possibly across neighboring property lines Food, water, and bathrooms easily available at or within 1 block of host site

Trenching through some concrete required, notable trenching distance required, possibly across neighboring property lines Food, water, and bathrooms easily available within 5 blocks of host site

Minimal or no basic services available

Would need to add minimal general lighting, would need to add lighting at specific location where charger is proposed that facilitates reading of instructions and use of charging station

Would need to add significant general lighting, would need to add lighting at specific location where charger is proposed that facilitates reading of instructions and use of charging station

Addition of sufficient lighting poses a significant barrier or challenge for some reason.

23

Criteria Description 5 Site has, and all basic services are accessible by, existing pedestrian walk ways that appear to meet Title 24 and ADA requirements

4 Site has, and most basic services are accessible by, existing pedestrian walk ways that appear to meet Title 24 and ADA requirements

Site is highly visible to the public

On main drag and clearly visible from main drag.

Suitable for block of multiple chargers

suitable for additional DC and/or AC with plenty of space

On main drag but not readily obvious without sign suitable for additional DC but maybe not additional AC (because of few/no services and/or no workplace charging), plenty of space

Site has good pedestrian infrastructure connecting the site and surrounding basic services

Score 3 2 Site walk ways may Site walk ways may need some minor need some minor upgrades triggered upgrades triggered by permit, and most by permit, and basic services are surrounding walk accessible by, ways do not appear existing pedestrian to meet Title 24 and walk ways that ADA requirements appear to meet Title 24 and ADA requirements Off main drag but Off main drag and obvious once turn not readily obvious without sign Suitable for additional DC and/or AC but space may be difficult / unsure about space

24

Suitable for additional DC but maybe not additional AC (because of few/no services and/or no workplace charging), but space may be difficult / unsure about space

1

0 Site walk ways may need major upgrades triggered by permit, and surrounding walk ways do not appear to meet Title 24 and ADA requirements Difficult even with signs

Not suitable for either additional DC or additional AC and space may be difficult

Criteria Description Long term control/ownership of the site is unlikely to change in the next 10 years

Score 5 Site owner is a confirmed long term owner, confirmed site host interest in charging stations, confirmed no near-term intent to transfer ownership of property

Risk of public / employee backlash from converting conventional parking spaces

Plenty of unused parking area

Site appears to support workplace charging scenario Within 1/2 mile of connection points to other modes of transportation Site has the potential to support overnight charging for long-distance travelers

surrounded by businesses and on main drag 5 CY)

Total $ $ $ $ $

-

4.04 112.00 24.50

--

- -3.84 --

-

$

-

--

-

$

-

$

General Contractor General Requirement (access, project clean up, testing, etc.) Sales Tax Contingency Bonds ( $/1000 per RS Means) Weighted Average Total Location Adjustment Factor for Eureka CA (%)

8% 8.25% Subtotal 25% Subtotal $12.00 Subtotal 108.4

Construction and Equipment Total Construction Administration Design Bidding, Construction Admin Assistance (consultant)

7% 20%

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

-

Notes

Form for sidewalk and slab Perimeter of concrete slab (27' x 25') and sidewalk Concrete for sidewalk and slab Labor for sidewalk and slab

0.66 Charger mounting hardware

51.80 2 way-finding signs, 2 EV charging only signs, 2 parking time limit signs, 1 Van Accessible sign 11.95 1 pole for each stall, 1 pole for way-finding sign

4x 6 AWG from load center to EV Charger (2 per plug) 30' L x 4

1x 8 AWG from load center to EV Charger (1 ground) 30' L x 1 Underground section of conduit from load center to the charger Above ground section of conduit from load center to the charger (5' estimate) + between weatherhead and load center (10' estimate) Pull box to be located where conduit comes out from ground at the load center New load center holding circuit breakers, where PG&E line comes in (via weather head), and 7.59 power goes out to the dual charger 30.94 Meter 2 circuits Trench length 20' 2.18 Trench depth is 20" (bottom 4 inches are sand, but assumed same cost as AB) For detailed shoveling while trenching 66.89 11.29 0.03

2 EV spaces + access aisle EV PARKING ONLY: 13 letters x 2 stalls = 26; NO PARKING: 9 letters; Total: 35 letters One wheel stop per stall 12' of trenching in the landscaping x 1.5' wide trench

$ 602.25 $

-

Assumed that Pacific Power costs are similar to PG&E

Site: Redwood Hotel and Casino -‐ Klamath Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Three EV spaces, two served by one dual head level 2 charger, and one served by one level 3 charger. New utility transformer, new meter and load center, stubout expansion for 150kw of future level 3 chargers Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces, uses existing access aisle for van accessible EV space Installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment

Subcontract (Total + O&P)

15.3 3.2 355.2 4.7

SY CY CY Ton

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00

$ 6.70 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 $ -‐

$ 5.00 $ -‐ $ 0.59 $ -‐

$ 15.75 $ 38.50 $ 1.07 $ 81.00

3 25

EA LF

$ 69.50 $ 74.00 $ 1.04 $ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46

Cast in place anchor bolts, 4 bolt pattern set, job built, J type incl nuts and washers, 6" long, 1/2" dia

3

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

Exterior signs, 24 ga. Alum. Bracket mounted, double face, 12" x 10" Traffic signs, steel post, galvanized, 10' 0", upright, bolted.

9 4

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

11.1 3.8 0.3 163 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

CLF CLF CLF LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA

$ 87.50 $ 38.50 $ 11.05 $ 12.45 $ 2.99 $ 54.50 $ 25,000.00 $ 775.00 $ 2,775.00 $ 44.00 $ 780.00 $ 370.24 $ 16.50 $ 644.54 $ 36.00

Excavating Utility Trench, common earth, chain trencher and backfill by hand including compaction, 16" wide, 18" deep 31: Earthwork Aggregate base for trench backfill Structural excavation for minor structures, hand pits to 6' deep, heavy soil or clay

185 5.0 2.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐

Asphalt Paving-‐ Pavement replacement over trench, 4" thick 32: Exterior Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities Improvements Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA

4.9 SY $ 15.87 4 STALL -‐-‐ 51 EA -‐-‐ 4 EA $ 810.75

Description

2: Existing Conditions -‐ Demolition

Demolish, remove pavement and curb, concrete to 6" thick, hydraulic hammer, mesh reinforced Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 -‐ 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges, typical urban city, tipping fees only, building construction materials

3: Concrete

Cast-‐in-‐place concrete, miscellaneous cast-‐in-‐place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 4' x 4' x 6" thick Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep

5: Metals 10: Specialties

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded #4 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded, #14 5" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 1 1/2" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Pull Boxes, NEMA 3R, Type SC, raintight & weatherproof, 12" L x 12" W x 6" D Meter and load center, 3P, 4W, 480/277V, 400A with 25kVA XFMR to 120/208 (local estimate) Smart metering, in panel, three phase, 277/480V, 400A Enclosed (NEMA 1) circuit breaker, 600V, 3P, 400A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 277 volt, 1 pole, 15 -‐ 30A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 480 volt, 3 pole, 70 -‐ 225 amp Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 208Y -‐ 240VAC, 3 pole, 100A (local estimate) Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 120 volt, 1 pole, 15-‐50 amp Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 480 volt, 3 pole, 40 amp (local estimate) Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

Qty

$ 82.50 $ 54.50 $ 33.50 $ 12.50 $ 4.38 $ 87.50 $ -‐ $ 93.50 $ 545.00 $ 54.50 $ 190.00 $ 122.00 $ 44.00 $ 190.00 $ 54.50

$ 29.33 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 52.90

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

$ 2.45 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 19.21

EV Charger

Dual, Level 2 Smart Charger Level 3 Smart Charger

1 1

EA EA

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 35,000.00 $ -‐ $ -‐

Utility Cost

Pacific Power: Average quoted cost for (N) PM XFMR, easy straightforward project.

1

EA

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

Source: Notes:

Abbreviations: CLF MSF LF EA SY STALL BCY

RSMeans, 38th annual edition, 2015 Material, Labor and Equipment Costs are for General Contractor, no markups RS Means descriptions of work to be performed is limited, not all line item specifications are exact for this level of cost estimate. Refer to design drawings and general or electrical contractor for final design specifications Hundred linear feet Thousand square feet Linear foot Each Square yard Parking stall Bank Cubic Yards

Which pricing to use?

Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal $ 191.00 Total with O&P $ 24.50 Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal $ 220.00 Total with O&P $ 124.00 Total with O&P $ 62.50 Total with O&P $ 32.50 Total with O&P $ 9.85 Total with O&P $ 191.00 Total with O&P $ 25,000.00 Total with O&P $ 990.00 Total with O&P $ 3,900.00 Total with O&P $ 131.00 Total with O&P $ 1,150.00 Total with O&P $ 569.24 Total with O&P $ 84.00 Total with O&P $ 1,014.54 Total with O&P $ 122.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal $ 1.28 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs $ 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs $ 120.75 Total with O&P $ 11.50 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Equipment Subtotal $ 20,000.00 Total with O&P Utility Subtotal

Total $ 241 $ 122 $ 380 $ 381 $ 1,124 $ 573 $ 613 $ 1,186 $ 88 $ 88 $ 929 $ 236 $ 1,165 $ 2,444 $ 476 $ 17 $ 5,298 $ 478 $ 191 $ 25,000 $ 990 $ 3,900 $ 131 $ 1,150 $ 569 $ 84 $ 1,015 $ 244 $ 41,986 $ 237 $ 71 $ 232 $ 540 $ 233 $ 483 $ 587 $ 3,531 $ 4,834 $ 7,300 $ 35,000 $ 42,300 $ 20,000 $ 20,000

Construction and Equipment Subtotal $ 113,223 General Contractor General Requirement (access, project clean up, testing, etc.) Sales Tax Contingency Bonds ( $/1000 per RS Means) Weighted Average Total Location Adjustment Factor for Eureka CA (%)


$ 9,058 $ 3,848 $ 126,128 $ 31,532 $ 157,660 $ 1,892 $ 159,552 $ 13,402

Construction and Equipment Total $ 172,954

Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.99 $ 66.60 $ 15.94 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 5.85 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 267.55 $ 602.25 $ 2,887.50 $ -‐

Site: Yurok Tribe -‐ Klamath Administration Office ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Project: Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Use (E) load center (panel review recommended) Two EV spaces served by new dual head basic EV charger (substitute single charger if power supply limited) Installation of pavement markings and signage

RS Means Division 3: Concrete 5: Metals

Description Cast-‐in-‐place concrete, miscellaneous cast-‐in-‐place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 3' x 3' x 6" thick Cast in place anchor bolts, 4 bolt pattern set, job built, J type incl nuts and washers, 6" long, 1/2" dia

10: Specialties Exterior signs, 24 ga. Alum. Bracket mounted, double face, 12" x 10"

26: Electrical

1" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1" diameter Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

31: Earthwork

Aggregate base for trench backfill Structural excavation for minor structures, hand pits to 6' deep, heavy soil or clay

Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities 32: Exterior Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" Improvements Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA EV Charger

Source: Notes:

Dual, Level 2 Basic Charger

RSMeans, 38th annual edition, 2015 Material, Labor and Equipment Costs are for General Contractor, no markups Refer to design drawings and general or electrical contractor for final design specifications

Abbreviations: CLF Hundred linear feet MSF Thousand square feet LF Linear foot EA Each SY Square yard STALL Parking stall BCY Bank Cubic Yards

1

Unit EA

Subcontract Material Labor Equipment (Total + O&P) $ 47.00 $ 49.50 $ 0.69 $ 128.00

1

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐ -‐-‐

2

EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ -‐-‐

15.0 10.0 1 2

LF LF CLF EA

$ 2.11 $ 3.95 $ 38.50 $ 36.00

1.0 1.0

CY BCY

$ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐ $ 116.00

Qty

$ 3.50 $ 6.75 $ 54.50 $ 54.50

$ -‐ $ 7.55 $ -‐ $ 14.45 $ -‐ $ 124.00 $ -‐ $ 122.00

2 STALL -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 120.75 26 EA -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 11.50 1 EA $ 810.75 $ 52.90 $ 19.21 -‐-‐ 1

EA

$ 1,200.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

Which pricing to use? Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal Unit costs Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 128 $ 128 $ 29 $ 29 $ 206 $ 206 $ 113 $ 145 $ 93 $ 244 $ 595 $ 14 $ 116 $ 130 $ 242 $ 299 $ 883 $ 1,423 $ 1,200 $ 1,200



$ 296.97 $ 183 $ 4,192 $ 1,047.92 $ 5,240 $ 63 $ 5,302 $ 445

Construction and Equipment Total $ 5,748 Construction Administration Design Bidding, Construction Admin Assistance (consultant)

7% 20%

$ 402.35 $ 1,149.57

Grand Total $ 7,300

Site: Lucky 7 Fuel Mart -‐ Smith River Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center


RS Means Division

Description

Qty

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment


$ 2.48 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 $ -‐

$ 1.85 $ -‐ $ 0.59 $ -‐

$ 5.80 $ 38.50 $ 1.07 $ 81.00


Demolish, remove pavement and curb, pavement removal, bitumous roads, 3" thick Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 -‐ 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges, typical urban city, tipping fees only, building construction materials

5.5 1.9 57.8 2.8

SY CY CY Ton

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00

3: Concrete


3 89.5

EA LF

$ 69.50 $ 74.00 $ 1.04 $ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46


3

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

10: Specialties


9 4

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

26: Electrical


11.8 4.4 0.2 175 33 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2


$ 87.50 $ 38.50 $ 11.05 $ 12.45 $ 2.63 $ 54.50 $ 25,000.00 $ 775.00 $ 2,775.00 $ 44.00 $ 780.00 $ 370.24 $ 16.50 $ 644.54 $ 36.00


180 4.9 2.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐


5.5 SY $ 15.87 4 STALL -‐-‐ 51 EA -‐-‐ 4 EA $ 810.75

5: Metals

$ 82.50 $ 54.50 $ 33.50 $ 12.50 $ 3.98 $ 87.50 $ -‐ $ 93.50 $ 545.00 $ 54.50 $ 190.00 $ 122.00 $ 44.00 $ 190.00 $ 54.50

$ 29.33 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 52.90

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

$ 2.45 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 19.21

EV Charger


1 1

EA EA

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 35,000.00 $ -‐ $ -‐

Utility Cost

Pacific Power: Average quoted cost for (N) PM XFMR, easy straightforward project.

1

EA

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

Source: Notes:





Total $ 32 $ 73 $ 62 $ 229 $ 396 $ 573 $ 2,193 $ 2,766 $ 88 $ 88 $ 929 $ 236 $ 1,165 $ 2,587 $ 542 $ 12 $ 5,688 $ 292 $ 191 $ 25,000 $ 990 $ 3,900 $ 131 $ 1,150 $ 569 $ 84 $ 1,015 $ 244 $ 42,394 $ 230 $ 70 $ 232 $ 533 $ 264 $ 483 $ 587 $ 3,531 $ 4,865 $ 7,300 $ 35,000 $ 42,300 $ 20,000 $ 20,000



$ 9,161 $ 3,848 $ 127,515 $ 31,879 $ 159,394 $ 1,913 $ 161,306 $ 13,550


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.99 $ 66.60 $ 15.94 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 5.78 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 267.55 $ 602.25 $ 2,887.50 $ -‐

Site: Arcata -‐ F St Parking Lot ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Project: Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Two EV spaces served by one dual head "smart" EV charger Use of existing meter main/load center Installation of spare conduit to enable future expansion Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces, and installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division 3: Concrete 5: Metals 10: Specialties

26: Electrical

Qty 1 8

Unit EA LF

Subcontract Material Labor Equipment (Total + O&P) $ 47.00 $ 49.50 $ 0.69 $ 128.00 $ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46 $ 24.50


2

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐ -‐-‐


5 2

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84 -‐-‐

2.0 25 40 2

CLF LF LF EA

$ 38.50 $ 6.10 $ 6.10 $ 36.00

Description Cast-‐in-‐place concrete, miscellaneous cast-‐in-‐place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 3' x 3' x 6" thick Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1 1/2" diameter Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1 1/2" diameter Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp


Source: Notes:

Dual, Level 2 Smart Charger

RSMeans, 38th annual edition, 2015 Material, Labor and Equipment Costs are for General Contractor, no markups RS Means descriptions of work to be performed is limited, not all line item specifications are exact for this level of cost estimate. Refer to design drawings and general or electrical contractor for final design specifications


3 35 2 1

$ 54.50 $ 7.95 $ 7.95 $ 54.50

$ -‐ $ 124.00 $ -‐ $ 18.65 $ -‐ $ 18.65 $ -‐ $ 122.00

STALL -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 120.75 EA -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 11.50 EA $ 810.75 $ 52.90 $ 19.21 -‐-‐ EA

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

Which pricing to use? Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal Unit costs Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 128 $ 196 $ 324 $ 59 $ 59 $ 516 $ 118 $ 634 $ 248 $ 466 $ 746 $ 244 $ 1,704 $ 362 $ 403 $ 1,766 $ 2,530 $ 7,300 $ 7,300



$ 1,004 $ 782 $ 14,338 $ 3,585 $ 17,923 $ 215 $ 18,138 $ 1,524


7% 20%

$ 1,376 $ 3,932

Grand Total $ 24,970

Opinion of Probable Costs

Site: Arcata Sports Complex Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Four EV spaces served by two dual head "smart" EV chargers (substitute basic dual chargers to reduce costs) Installation of new meter and load center supporting four new circuits Demolition of portion of (E) sidewalk and replace and extend (N) sidewalk flush with asphalt to enable unobstructed mobility Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces, and installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment


42.8 7.3 116.0 10.8

SY CY CY Ton

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

$ 6.70 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 -‐-‐

$ 5.00 $ -‐ $ 0.59 -‐-‐

$ 15.75 $ 38.50 $ 1.07 $ 175.41

1 15 215 9.25 9.25

EA LF LF CY CY

$ 47.00 $ 0.14 $ 0.35 $ 102.00 $ -‐

$ 49.50 $ 0.66 $ 2.38 $ -‐ $ 34.00

$ 0.69 $ 0.46 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.13


2

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

10: Specialties


9 4

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

26: Electrical

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded 600 kcmil Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded #6 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 1 1/4" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 2 1/2" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 1" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Pull Boxes, NEMA 3R, Type SC, raintight & weatherproof, 12" L x 12" W x 6" D Meter center and sockets, meter center, main fusible switch, rainproof, 1P, 3W, 120/240 Volt, 400 amp Smart metering, in panel, single phase, 120/208V, 200A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

0.1 1.8 3.6 70 6 50 2 1 1 4

CLF CLF CLF LF LF LF EA EA EA EA

$ 1,350.00 $ 57.50 $ 38.50 $ 2.63 $ 5.45 $ 2.11 $ 54.50 $ 3,000.00 $ 375.00 $ 36.00


83 2.3 1.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐

Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities 32: Exterior Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" Improvements Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA

5 STALL -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ 61 EA -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ 2 EA $ 810.75 $ 52.90 $ 19.21

Description


Demolish, remove pavement and curb, concrete to 6" thick, hydraulic hammer, mesh reinforced Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 -‐ 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges -‐ local disposal at HWMA rates

3: Concrete

Cast-‐in-‐place concrete, miscellaneous cast-‐in-‐place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 3' x 3' x 6" thick Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep Concrete forming, structural cost-‐in-‐place concrete forming, forms in place, slab on grade, edge forms, wood, 4 use, ob grade, to 6" high Heavyweight concrete, Ready mix, delivered, local aggregate, sand, Portland cement (Type I), 3000 psi Placing concrete, labor and equipmt to place, level and consolidate, Footing, continuous, shallow, direct chute (≥ 1 CY and ≤ 5 CY)

5: Metals

EV Charger

Source: Notes:




Qty

2

EA

$ 335.00 $ 67.50 $ 54.50 $ 3.98 $ 6.75 $ 3.50 $ 87.50 $ 545.00 $ 50.00 $ 54.50

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐


Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal $ 128.00 Total with O&P $ 24.50 Total with O&P $ 4.04 Total with O&P $ 112.00 Total with O&P $ 53.50 Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal $ 1,975.00 Total with O&P $ 165.00 Total with O&P $ 124.00 Total with O&P $ 8.85 Total with O&P $ 16.10 Total with O&P $ 7.55 Total with O&P $ 191.00 Total with O&P $ 3,545.00 Unit costs $ 485.00 Total with O&P $ 122.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal $ 1.28 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs $ 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal $ 120.75 Total with O&P $ 11.50 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 674 $ 279 $ 124 $ 1,889 $ 2,965 $ 128 $ 368 $ 869 $ 1,036 $ 495 $ 2,895 $ 59 $ 59 $ 929 $ 236 $ 1,165 $ 221 $ 302 $ 440 $ 620 $ 90 $ 378 $ 382 $ 3,545 $ 485 $ 488 $ 6,951 $ 106 $ 33 $ 116 $ 255 $ 604 $ 702 $ 1,766 $ 3,071 $ 14,600 $ 14,600



$ 2,557 $ 1,672 $ 36,190 $ 9,048 $ 45,238 $ 543 $ 45,781 $ 3,846


7% 20%

$ 3,474 $ 9,925


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.33 $ 66.60 $ 15.94 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 247.50 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 2.70 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 133.77 $ 1,204.50

PROJECT LOCATION

NORTH COAST CO-OP G

ARGIN EV CH LY ON

ING ARG EV CHONLY

NO KING

PAR

PROJECT DESIGN · (N) SITE LOAD CENTER TO PROVIDE TWO (N) 1ɸ 2P BREAKERS AT 240VAC, AMPERAGE RATING SPECIFIED BY EV CHARGER MANUFACTURER. · TAP INTO (E) UNDERGROUND VAULT AS POINT OF CONNECTION · ONE (N) DUAL PLUG EV CHARGER, MAKE AND MODEL TO BE DETERMINED. · THREE PARKING STALLS CONVERTED TO TWO 2016 CODE COMPLIANT EV SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE WITH AN ACCESS AISLE AND ONE OF WHICH IS A STANDARD EV CHARGING SPACE. · OPTIONAL 1' MARKED SPACING RECOMMENDED BETWEEN STALLS TO PREVENT DRIVERS FROM PARKING IN FRONT OF CHARGING STATION. GENERAL NOTES CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SPECIFICATIONS NOT INDICATED AND LEFT TO THE CONTRACTOR PENDING FINAL DESIGN. · SCREENED LINES ARE (E) EQUIPMENT OR CIVIL WORK. BOLD LINES ARE (N) CIVIL OR ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE INSTALLED OR MODIFIED.

·

ABBREVIATIONS AG ABOVE GROUND BG BELOW GROUND DIA, Ø DIAMETER (E) EXISTING EVCS ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION GALV GALVANIZED GRD GROUND

(N) POC RGS SCH TYP UG

NEW POINT OF CONNECTION RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL SCHEDULE TYPICAL UNDERGROUND 0

20'

40'

NORTH COAST EV IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

N 1

3/17/2017

REV

DATE

10% ENGINEERING DESIGN DESCRIPTION

NORTH COAST CO-OP 811 I ST, ARCATA, CA VICINITY

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK: JC

---SHEET 1

G

GIN HAR EV C ONLY

MIN

12"

OPTIONAL SPACE 1' WIDE

.

GIN HAR EV C NLY O

.

G

VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL 12' WIDE MAX.

NO KING

PAR

.

ACCESS AISLE 5' WIDE MIN.



0

5'

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK:

10'

N 1

3/17/2017

REV

DATE


NORTH COAST CO-OP 811 I ST, ARCATA, CA ENLARGEMENT

---SHEET 2

JC


Client: Purpose: Project: Prepared by:

Arcata North Coast Co-Op Cost estimate for the preliminary design of an electric vehicle charging station install ARV-14-046 PEV Readiness NorthCoast Schatz Energy Research Center

RS Means Division

Description

Preliminary design costs based on: New meter 200 A load center and two 50 A circuits for EV charger Trench from utility point of connection (underground vault) to new meter center Trench from new meter center to EV charger (partially sharing a trench with utlity point of connection trench) Installation of a smart dual Level 2 EV charger (substitute a basic dual charger to reduce costs, if needed) Installation of one protective bollard for electrical equipment; allowing for easily access to station by user via exisiting sidewalk Installation of code required signage Utility to install cable between underground vault and load center

Qty

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment



Cast-in-place concrete, miscellaneous cast-in-place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 3' x 3' x 6" thick

Total

Divison 2 Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $

-

2: Existing Conditions Demolition

Sales Tax $ No demolition required for site $ $ $ -

2

EA

$

47.00 $ 49.50 $

0.69 $

128.00

Total with O&P

$

256 $

-

35 4

LF EA

$ $

0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.28 $ 42.00 $

0.46 $ 7.00 $

24.50 72.50

SET

$

8.05 $ 21.33 $

$ $ $ $ $

869 $ 290 $ 1,415 29 $ 29

-

1

Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal

7 3

EA EA

$ $

89.70 $ 13.51 $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $

Unit costs Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal

$ $ $

722 $ 177 $ 900

0.8

CLF

$

57.50 $ 67.50 $

-

$

165.00

Total with O&P

$

132 $

-

0.2 20

CLF LF

$ $

38.50 $ 54.50 $ 2.11 $ 3.50 $

-

$ $

124.00 7.55

Total with O&P Total with O&P

$ $

25 $ 151 $

-

33 1 2 1

LF EA EA EA EA

$ $ $ $ $

-

$ $ $ $ $

LF CY BCY

$ $ $

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

383 191 244 322 425 1,873 26 26 116 168 423 403

$ $ $ $ $

20 1.9 1.0

11.60 Total with O&P 191.00 Total with O&P 122.00 Total with O&P 322.00 Unit costs 485.00 Unit costs Division 26 Subtotal 1.28 Total with O&P Unit costs 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal 120.75 Total with O&P 11.50 Total with O&P

$ $

-

Unit costs Unit costs Unit costs Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal 2,000.00 Total with O&P Equipment Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

883 164 280 1,136 3,289 7,300 7,300 2,000 2,000

$ $ $ $

66.89 11.29 13.41 31.23

Construction and Equipment Subtotal

$

9,674

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

774 830 11,278 2,819 14,097 169 14,266 1,198

$

15,465

$ $

1,083 3,093

Grand Total $

19,640

3: Concrete Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep Concrete core drilling, reinforced concrete slab, up to 6" thick, incl bit, layout, and setup, 2" diameter hole 5: Metals


10: Specialties Exterior signs, 24 ga. Alum. Bracket mounted, double face, 12" x 10" Traffic signs, steel post, galvanized, 10' 0", upright, bolted.

26: Electrical

Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-THHN, stranded #6 Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-THHN, stranded, #8 1" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 2" dia SCH 40 PVC conduit, above ground, up to 15' high, includes 2 terminations, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps, and 11 couplings per 100 LF Pull Boxes, NEMA 3R, Type SC, raintight & weatherproof, 12" L x 12" W x 6" D Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-50 amp Meter center and sockets, single position, 4 terminal, 200 amp Smart metering, in panel, single phase, 120/208V, 200A

Excavating Utility Trench, common earth, chain trencher and backfill by hand including compaction, 16" wide, 18" deep 31: Earthwork Aggregate base for trench backfill Structural excavation for minor structures, hand pits to 6' deep, heavy soil or clay Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" 32: Exterior Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA Improvements Precast concrete parking bumpers, incl dowels, 6" x 10" x 6'0" Sidewalks, driveways, patios, concrete, 3000 psi, CIP, mesh reinforcement, 6" thick Asphalt Paving- Pavement replacement over trench, 4" thick

1

EA EA SF SY

$ $ $ $

810.75 68.43 30.36 15.87

7,300.00 $

1

EA

$

Utility Cost

PG&E: Electric Service Connection - engineering, tie-in, distribution line installation

1

EA

$

RS Means descriptions of work to be performed is limited, not all line item specifications are exact for this level of cost estimate. Refer to design drawings and general or electrical contractor for final design specifications Abbreviations: CLF MSF LF EA SY STALL BCY

Hundred linear feet Thousand square feet Linear foot Each Square yard Parking stall Bank Cubic Yards

4.86 87.50 54.50 230.00 50.00

---

1 2 5 24


RSMeans, 38th annual edition, 2015 Material, Labor and Equipment Costs are for General Contractor, no markups

$ $ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $

0.52 $ 0.45 $ 14.25 $ - $ - $ 75.00 $

3.5 STALL -35 EA --

EV Charger

Source: Notes:

3.90 54.50 36.00 92.00 375.00

-

$ $ $ $

$

-

- -3.84 --

0.97 $ - -- $

--52.90 13.63 21.97 29.33

$ $ $ $

--

$ $ 19.21 2.45

-----

-

$

-

--

-

$

-

$




7% 20%

$ $ $

Load center and charging station Cutting existing pavement and concrete sidewalk where charging station will go, assume trench is 1.5' wide Holes for sign poles (2 EV spots) and 2 bollards




1x 8 AWG from load center to EV Charger (1 ground) 20' L x 1 Underground section of conduit from load center to the charger Conduit for PG&E's wires from power pole base to load center = 33' (includes 18" in and out of trench) Pull box to be located where conduit comes out from ground at the load center 2 circuits 7.59 New load center 30.94 Meter Trench length 20' 2.18 Trench depth is 20" (bottom 4 inches are sand, but assumed same cost as AB) For detailed shoveling while trenching 2 EV spaces + access aisle + partial access aisle EV PARKING ONLY: 13 letters x 2 stalls = 26; NO PARKING: 9 letters; Total: 35 letters 2 ballards to prevent cars from rolling (since curb is removed) and 1 bollard to protect charger One wheel stop per stall Concrete replacement in sidewalk over trench, assume trench is 1.5' wide Asphalt replacement in parking lot over trench, assume trench is 1.5' wide

$ 602.25 $

Notes

-

Estimated price for typical project

Site: Arcata G & 7 St ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Project: Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: One EV space for single head level 2 charger, and one EV space for level 3 charger New utility transformer, new meter and load center, stubout expansion for 150kw of future level 3 chargers Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces Installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division 2: Existing Conditions -‐ Demolition

Description Demolish, remove pavement and curb, concrete to 6" thick, hydraulic hammer, mesh reinforced Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 -‐ 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges, typical urban city, tipping fees only, building construction materials

Unit SY CY CY Ton

Material $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00

Subcontract Labor Equipment (Total + O&P) $ 6.70 $ 5.00 $ 15.75 $ 25.00 $ -‐ $ 38.50 $ 0.28 $ 0.59 $ 1.07 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 81.00

3 146.5

EA LF

$ 69.50 $ 74.00 $ 1.04 $ 191.00 $ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46 $ 24.50


3

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐ -‐-‐


7 4

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84 -‐-‐

0.5 0.9 0.5 15 85 68 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

CLF CLF CLF LF LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA

$ 87.50 $ 82.50 $ -‐ $ 220.00 $ 38.50 $ 54.50 $ -‐ $ 124.00 $ 38.50 $ 54.50 $ -‐ $ 124.00 $ 12.45 $ 12.50 $ -‐ $ 32.50 $ 6.30 $ 7.95 $ -‐ $ 18.80 $ 2.63 $ 3.98 $ -‐ $ 8.85 $ 54.50 $ 87.50 $ -‐ $ 191.00 $ 25,000.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 25,000.00 $ 775.00 $ 93.50 $ -‐ $ 990.00 $ 2,775.00 $ 545.00 $ -‐ $ 3,900.00 $ 44.00 $ 54.50 $ -‐ $ 131.00 $ 780.00 $ 190.00 $ -‐ $ 1,150.00 $ 370.24 $ 122.00 $ -‐ $ 569.24 $ 16.50 $ 44.00 $ -‐ $ 84.00 $ 644.54 $ 190.00 $ -‐ $ 1,014.54 $ 36.00 $ 54.50 $ -‐ $ 122.00


121 3.4 3.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 1.28 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐ $ 116.00


10.2 SY $ 15.87 3 STALL -‐-‐ 37 EA -‐-‐ 7 EA $ 810.75

3: Concrete 5: Metals 10: Specialties

26: Electrical


Qty 10.7 3.3 61.8 4.9

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded #4 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 5" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 3" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 1 1/4" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Pull Boxes, NEMA 3R, Type SC, raintight & weatherproof, 12" L x 12" W x 6" D Meter and load center, 3P, 4W, 480/277V, 400A with 25kVA XFMR to 120/208 (local estimate) Smart metering, in panel, three phase, 277/480V, 400A Enclosed (NEMA 1) circuit breaker, 600V, 3P, 400A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 277 volt, 1 pole, 15 -‐ 30A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 480 volt, 3 pole, 70 -‐ 225 amp Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 208Y -‐ 240VAC, 3 pole, 100A (local estimate) Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 120 volt, 1 pole, 15-‐50 amp Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 480 volt, 3 pole, 40 amp (local estimate) Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

$ 29.33 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 52.90

$ 2.45 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 19.21

-‐-‐ $ 120.75 $ 11.50 -‐-‐

EV Charger


1 1

EA EA

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ 35,000.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

Utility Cost

PG&E: New UG XFMR -‐ intercept (E) duct and re-‐pull primary cable. Includes XFMR, cable, labor, estimating, service planning, mapping.

1

EA

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 51,443.00

Source: Notes:



Which pricing to use? Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal Unit costs Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal Total with O&P Unit costs Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal Unit costs Total with O&P Total with O&P Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Unit costs Equipment Subtotal Total with O&P Utility Subtotal

Total $ 169 $ 127 $ 66 $ 395 $ 757 $ 573 $ 3,589 $ 4,162 $ 88 $ 88 $ 722 $ 236 $ 959 $ 103 $ 115 $ 58 $ 488 $ 1,598 $ 602 $ 382 $ 25,000 $ 990 $ 3,900 $ 131 $ 1,150 $ 569 $ 84 $ 1,015 $ 244 $ 36,429 $ 155 $ 48 $ 348 $ 551 $ 486 $ 362 $ 426 $ 6,180 $ 7,454 $ 7,300 $ 35,000 $ 42,300 $ 51,443 $ 51,443



$ 11,531 $ 4,032 $ 159,706 $ 39,926 $ 199,632 $ 2,396 $ 202,028 $ 16,970


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.99 $ 51.80 $ 15.94 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 3.95 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 468.21 $ 602.25 $ 2,887.50 $ -‐


Site: College of the Redwoods Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Four EV spaces served by two dual head "smart" EV chargers (substitute basic dual chargers to reduce costs) Installation of new meter and load center supporting four 50A circuits (if new load center not needed this will significantly reduce cost) Demolition of portion of (E) sidewalk and replace and extend (N) sidewalk flush with asphalt to enable unobstructed mobility Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces, and installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

Description

Qty

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment

Subcontract (Total + O&P) $ 15.75 $ 38.50 $ 1.07 $ 175.41



18.0 6.0 96.0 8.9

SY CY CY Ton

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

$ 6.70 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 -‐-‐

$ 5.00 $ -‐ $ 0.59 -‐-‐

3: Concrete

Cast-‐in-‐place concrete, miscellaneous cast-‐in-‐place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 3' x 3' x 6" thick Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep Concrete forming, structural cost-‐in-‐place concrete forming, forms in place, slab on grade, edge forms, wood, 4 use, ob grade, to 6" high Heavyweight concrete, Ready mix, delivered, local aggregate, sand, Portland cement (Type I), 3000 psi Placing concrete, labor and equipmt to place, level and consolidate, Footing, continuous, shallow, direct chute (≥ 1 CY and ≤ 5 CY)

1 10 140 6.25 6.25

EA LF LF CY CY

$ 47.00 $ 0.14 $ 0.35 $ 102.00 $ -‐

$ 49.50 $ 0.66 $ 2.38 $ -‐ $ 15.65

$ 0.69 $ 0.46 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 0.52

2

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

11 5

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

2.9 1.6 145 41 1 1 4

CLF CLF LF LF EA EA EA

$ 405.00 $ 63.50 $ 2.99 $ 2.11 $ 3,000.00 $ 375.00 $ 36.00

165 5.0 1.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐

5: Metals


10: Specialties


26: Electrical

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded 3/0 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded, #6 1 1/2" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 1" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Meter center and sockets, meter center, main fusible switch, rainproof, 1P, 3W, 120/240 Volt, 400 amp Smart metering, in panel, single phase, 120/208V, 200A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

Excavating Utility Trench, common earth, chain trencher and backfill by hand including compaction, 16" wide, 18" deep 31: Earthwork Aggregate base for trench backfill-‐ based on local pricing from Kernan Construction-‐ supplier of AB Structural excavation for minor structures, hand pits to 6' deep, heavy soil or clay Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities 32: Exterior Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" Improvements Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA Precast concrete parking bumpers, incl dowels, 6" x 10" x 6'0" EV Charger

Source: Notes:




5 STALL -‐-‐ 79 EA -‐-‐ 2 EA $ 810.75 4 EA $ 68.43 2

EA

$ 175.00 $ 67.50 $ 4.38 $ 3.50 $ 545.00 $ 50.00 $ 54.50

-‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 52.90 $ 13.63

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

-‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 19.21 $ -‐

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐


Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal $ 128.00 Total with O&P $ 24.50 Total with O&P $ 4.04 Total with O&P $ 112.00 Total with O&P $ 24.50 Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal $ 710.00 Total with O&P $ 171.00 Total with O&P $ 9.85 Total with O&P $ 7.55 Total with O&P $ 3,545.00 Unit costs $ 485.00 Total with O&P $ 122.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal $ 1.28 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs $ 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal $ 120.75 Total with O&P $ 11.50 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 284 $ 231 $ 103 $ 1,563 $ 2,180 $ 128 $ 245 $ 566 $ 700 $ 153 $ 1,792 $ 59 $ 59 $ 1,135 $ 295 $ 1,431 $ 2,059 $ 274 $ 1,428 $ 310 $ 3,545 $ 485 $ 488 $ 8,588 $ 211 $ 71 $ 116 $ 398 $ 604 $ 909 $ 1,766 $ 328 $ 3,606 $ 14,600 $ 14,600



$ 2,612 $ 1,717 $ 36,984 $ 9,246 $ 46,230 $ 555 $ 46,784 $ 3,930


7% 20%

$ 3,550 $ 10,143


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.33 $ 81.40 $ 19.92 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 247.50 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 5.88 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 133.77 $ 22.58 $ 1,204.50

PARK

PROJECT LOCATION

W ST

PROJECT DESIGN · (E) SITE LOAD CENTER TO PROVIDE TWO (N) 1ɸ 2P BREAKERS AT 240VAC, AMPERAGE RATING SPECIFIED BY EV CHARGER MANUFACTURER. · ONE (N) DUAL PLUG EV CHARGER, MAKE AND MODEL TO BE DETERMINED. · THREE PARKING STALLS CONVERTED TO TWO 2016 CODE COMPLIANT EV SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE WITH AN ACCESS AISLE AND ONE OF WHICH IS A STANDARD EV CHARGING SPACE. · CUT (E) CONCRETE CURB TO MAINTAIN UNOBSTRUCTED SPACE AROUND THE EV CHARGERS FOR MOBILITY. GENERAL NOTES · CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SPECIFICATIONS NOT INDICATED AND LEFT TO THE CONTRACTOR PENDING FINAL DESIGN. · SCREENED LINES ARE (E) EQUIPMENT OR CIVIL WORK. BOLD LINES ARE (N) CIVIL OR ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE INSTALLED OR MODIFIED.

G

EV



GIN AR CH NLY O

G EV

GIN AR CH NLY O

G IN

RK

NO

PA

MADRONE AVE

NEW POINT OF CONNECTION RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL SCHEDULE TYPICAL UNDERGROUND 0

20'

40'



N 2 1 REV

4/7/2017 3/17/2017 DATE

REVISION 10% ENGINEERING DESIGN DESCRIPTION

SEQUOIA PARK 3414 W ST, EUREKA, CA VICINITY

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK: JC

---SHEET 1

G

N GI AR Y CH NL V O E

G

IN

RK

NO

PA


.

. ACCESS AISLE 5' WIDE MIN.

NG GI AR Y CH NL EV O



0

5'

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK:

10'

N 2 1 REV

4/7/2017 3/17/2017 DATE

REVISION 10% ENGINEERING DESIGN DESCRIPTION

SEQUOIA PARK 3414 W ST, EUREKA, CA ENLARGEMENT

---SHEET 2

JC



RS Means Division 2: Existing Conditions Demolition

3: Concrete

5: Metals

Sequoia Park Cost estimate for the preliminary design of an electric vehicle charging station install ARV-14-046 PEV Readiness NorthCoast Schatz Energy Research Center

Description Demolish, remove pavement and curb, concrete to 6" thick, hydraulic hammer, mesh reinforced Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 - 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges - local disposal at HWMA rates

EV Charger

Source: Notes:

Material $ $ $ --

Labor $ 6.70 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 --

Equipment $ 5.00 $ $ 0.59 --


$ $ $ $ $

33 13 7 90 144

Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

128 123 363 613 29 29


$ $ $

722 $ 177 $ 900

Sales Tax $ $ $ $ -

Notes Existing curb in front of EV charging stalls and access lane Material removal County solid waste transfer station HWMA, 10 miles one way Dump charges

$ $ $

Charging station Cutting existing pavement where charging station will go Holes for sign poles (2 EV spots) and 3 bollards

47.00 $ 49.50 $ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.28 $ 42.00 $


1

SET

$

8.05 $ 21.33 $

7 3

EA EA

$ $

89.70 $ 13.51 $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $

1.1

CLF

$

57.50 $ 67.50 $

-

$

165.00

Total with O&P

$

185 $

-


0.3 28

CLF LF

$ $

38.50 $ 54.50 $ 2.11 $ 3.50 $

-

$ $

124.00 7.55


$ $

35 $ 211 $

-

1x 8 AWG from load center to EV Charger (1 ground) 28' L x 1 Underground section of conduit from load center to the charger

5 1 2

LF EA EA

$ $ $

3.95 $ 6.75 $ 54.50 $ 87.50 $ 36.00 $ 54.50 $

-

$ $ $

$ $ $

0.52 $ 0.45 $ 14.25 $ - $ - $ 75.00 $

72 191 244 938 32 33 116 181 362 403

Above ground section of conduit from load center to the charger (5' is my estimate) Pull box to be located where conduit comes out from ground at the load center 2 circuits

LF CY BCY

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

-

25 2.3 1.0

14.45 Total with O&P 191.00 Total with O&P 122.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal 1.28 Total with O&P Unit costs 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal 120.75 Total with O&P 11.50 Total with O&P Unit costs Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $


$

13,519

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,082 870 15,471 3,868 19,339 232 19,571 1,644

$

21,215

$ $

1,485 4,243

Grand Total $

26,943

Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA Mechanical turf seeding, hand push spreader, 4.5 lb per 1000 SF (MSF) Dual, Level 2 Smart Charger



3 STALL -35 EA -3 0.03 1

EA MSF

$ $

EA

$

---

-

--

- -3.84 --

0.97 $ - -- $

---

$ $

810.75 $ 52.90 $ 20.47 $ 1.79 $

19.21 -- --

7,300.00 $

-

$

128.00 24.50 72.50

Total

$ $ $

Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-THHN, stranded #6 Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-THHN, stranded, #8 1" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1" diameter Pull Boxes, NEMA 3R, Type SC, raintight & weatherproof, 12" L x 12" W x 6" D Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-50 amp

0.69 $ 0.46 $ 7.00 $

Which pricing to use? Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal

EA LF EA

RS Means descriptions of work to be performed is limited, not all line item specifications are exact for this level of cost estimate. Refer to design drawings and general or electrical contractor for final design specifications Abbreviations: CLF MSF LF EA SY STALL BCY

2.1 0.3 6.9 0.5

Unit SY CY CY Ton

1 5 5


32: Exterior Improvements

Qty

Cast-in-place concrete, miscellaneous cast-in-place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 3' x 3' x 6" thick Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep Concrete core drilling, reinforced concrete slab, up to 6" thick, incl bit, layout, and setup, 2" diameter hole

10: Specialties Exterior signs, 24 ga. Alum. Bracket mounted, double face, 12" x 10" Traffic signs, steel post, galvanized, 10' 0", upright, bolted.

26: Electrical

Preliminary design costs based on: Two 50 A circuits for EV charger in exisiting service panel located outside park's restrooms Trench from service panel to EV charger Installation of a smart dual Level 2 EV charger (substitute a basic dual charger to reduce costs, if needed) Installation of a protective bollards for electrical equipment and to prevent vehicles from rolling into the existing walkway Installation of code required signage

-

--




7% 20%

$

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

-



Trench length estimated to be 25' 2.72 Trench depth is 20" (bottom 4 inches are sand, but assumed same cost as AB) For detailed shoveling while trenching -

2 EV spaces + access aisle EV PARKING ONLY: 13 letters x 2 stalls = 26; NO PARKING: 9 letters; Total: 35 letters

2,649 $ 200.66 2 ballards to prevent cars from rolling (since curb is removed) and 1 bollard to protect charger 1 $ 0.15 20' of trenching in the landscaping x 1.5' wide trench 3,414 7,300 $ 602.25 7,300

Site: Bear River Casino Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center


RS Means Division

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment


1.2 1.3 12.1 1.9

SY CY CY Ton

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00

$ 2.48 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 $ -‐

$ 1.85 $ -‐ $ 0.59 $ -‐

$ 5.80 $ 38.50 $ 1.07 $ 81.00

3 146.5

EA LF

$ 69.50 $ 74.00 $ 1.04 $ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46


3

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

10: Specialties


9 4

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

26: Electrical


11.5 4.1 0.6 33 110 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2


$ 87.50 $ 38.50 $ 11.05 $ 12.45 $ 2.63 $ 54.50 $ 25,000.00 $ 775.00 $ 2,775.00 $ 44.00 $ 780.00 $ 370.24 $ 16.50 $ 644.54 $ 36.00


180 4.9 2.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐


5.5 SY $ 15.87 4 STALL -‐-‐ 51 EA -‐-‐ 4 EA $ 810.75

Description


Demolish, remove pavement and curb, pavement removal, bitumous roads, 3" thick Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 -‐ 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges, typical urban city, tipping fees only, building construction materials

3: Concrete


5: Metals

Qty

$ 82.50 $ 54.50 $ 33.50 $ 12.50 $ 3.98 $ 87.50 $ -‐ $ 93.50 $ 545.00 $ 54.50 $ 190.00 $ 122.00 $ 44.00 $ 190.00 $ 54.50

$ 29.33 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 52.90

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

$ 2.45 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 19.21

EV Charger


1 1

EA EA

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 35,000.00 $ -‐ $ -‐

Utility Cost

PG&E: New UG XFMR -‐ intercept (E) duct and re-‐pull primary cable. Includes XFMR, cable, labor, estimating, service planning, mapping.

1

EA

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

Source: Notes:





Total $ 7 $ 50 $ 13 $ 155 $ 224 $ 573 $ 3,589 $ 4,162 $ 88 $ 88 $ 929 $ 236 $ 1,165 $ 2,522 $ 506 $ 35 $ 1,056 $ 974 $ 191 $ 25,000 $ 990 $ 3,900 $ 131 $ 1,150 $ 569 $ 84 $ 1,015 $ 244 $ 38,366 $ 230 $ 70 $ 232 $ 533 $ 264 $ 483 $ 587 $ 3,531 $ 4,865 $ 7,300 $ 35,000 $ 42,300 $ 51,443 $ 51,443



$ 11,452 $ 3,848 $ 158,446 $ 39,611 $ 198,057 $ 2,377 $ 200,434 $ 16,836


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.99 $ 66.60 $ 15.94 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 5.78 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 267.55 $ 602.25 $ 2,887.50 $ -‐

Site: Fortuna River Lodge ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Project: Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Four EV spaces served by two dual head "smart" EV chargers (substitute basic dual chargers to reduce costs) Trenching from POC on north side of road to new meter and load center that supports four new circuits Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces, uses existing access aisle for van accessible EV space Installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

7.9 4.0 4.0 5.9

Unit SY CY CY Ton

Material $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00


94 72 1.7 1.7

LF LF CY CY

$ 0.14 $ 0.35 $ 102.00 $ -‐

$ 0.66 $ 0.46 $ 24.50 $ 2.38 $ -‐ $ 4.04 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 112.00 $ 34.00 $ 1.13 $ 53.50

2

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐ -‐-‐


10 5

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84 -‐-‐

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded #6 3" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 1 1/2" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Meter center and sockets, meter center, main fusible switch, rainproof, 1P, 3W, 120/240 Volt, 400 amp Smart metering, in panel, single phase, 120/208V, 200A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

2.3 56 76 1 1 4

CLF LF LF EA EA EA

$ 57.50 $ 67.50 $ -‐ $ 165.00 $ 6.30 $ 7.95 $ -‐ $ 18.80 $ 2.99 $ 4.38 $ -‐ $ 9.85 $ 3,000.00 $ 545.00 $ -‐ $ 3,545.00 $ 375.00 $ 50.00 $ -‐ $ 485.00 $ 36.00 $ 54.50 $ -‐ $ 122.00


68 3.6 5.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 1.28 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐ $ 116.00


5.3 SY $ 15.87 4 STALL -‐-‐ 61 EA -‐-‐ 6 EA $ 810.75


3: Concrete


26: Electrical

EV Charger Utility

Source: Notes:

Description Demolish, remove pavement and curb, concrete to 6" thick, hydraulic hammer, mesh reinforced Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 -‐ 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges, typical urban city, tipping fees only, building construction materials Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep Concrete forming, structural cost-‐in-‐place concrete forming, forms in place, slab on grade, edge forms, wood, 4 use, ob grade, to 6" high Heavyweight concrete, Ready mix, delivered, local aggregate, sand, Portland cement (Type I), 3000 psi Placing concrete, labor and equipmt to place, level and consolidate, Footing, continuous, shallow, direct chute (≥ 1 CY and ≤ 5 CY) Cast in place anchor bolts, 4 bolt pattern set, job built, J type incl nuts and washers, 6" long, 1/2" dia

Dual, Level 2 Smart Charger PG&E: Electric Service Connection -‐ engineering, tie-‐in, distribution line installation Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, aluminum type XLPE, stranded 4/0



Qty

$ 29.33 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 52.90

$ 2.45 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 19.21

-‐-‐ $ 120.75 $ 11.50 -‐-‐

2

EA

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

1 1.35

EA CLF

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 2,000.00 $ 206.00 $ 141.00 $ -‐ $ 440.00

Which pricing to use? Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal Unit costs Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Unit costs Total with O&P Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal Total with O&P Unit costs Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal Unit costs Total with O&P Total with O&P Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Utility Subtotal

Total $ 124 $ 152 $ 40 $ 475 $ 792 $ 2,303 $ 291 $ 190 $ 91 $ 2,875 $ 59 $ 59 $ 1,032 $ 295 $ 1,328 $ 371 $ 1,053 $ 749 $ 3,545 $ 485 $ 488 $ 6,691 $ 87 $ 51 $ 580 $ 718 $ 254 $ 483 $ 702 $ 5,297 $ 6,736 $ 14,600 $ 14,600 $ 2,000 $ 594 $ 2,594



$ 2,911 $ 1,953 $ 41,256 $ 10,314 $ 51,570 $ 619 $ 52,189 $ 4,384


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.33 $ 74.00 $ 19.92 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 247.50 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 4.23 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 401.32 $ 1,204.50 $ -‐ $ -‐

!"#$% !"#$%#&'((%)*%+$,-).++ /012342546)7,#89):,";8)D"()9%">)(%&%()E)B9"#F%#G)"+>),+%)=1);@"B%)C,#)(%&%()H)B9"#F%# 7%-)D8'('8K)8#"+;C,#?%#G)+%-)?%8%#)"+>)(,">)B%+8%#G);8D$,D8)%L@"+;',+)C,#)3M5N-),C)CD8D#%)(%&%()H)B9"#F%#; O%;'F+),C)B,>%2B,?@('"+8)=1);@"B%; .+;8"(("8',+),C)B,>%2#%PD'#%>);'F+"F%

5!*6$.)'* &"7"'",) E`)=L';8'+F) :,+>'8',+;)2) O%?,('8',+

&$'+1"3#",) O%?,(';9G)#%?,&%)@"&%?%+8)"+>)BD#$G)B,+B#%8%)8,)6Q)89'BNG)9K>#"D('B)9"??%#G)?%;9)#%'+C,#B%> I%(%B8'&%)>%?,('8',+G)(,">G)9"D(G)>D?@)"+>)#%8D#+G)5)2)M5X)9"D(G)9"+>)B"##'%> I%(%B8'&%)>%?,('8',+G)9"D(G)@%#)?'(%G)D@)8,)Y):RSR)8#DBN)Z:S)8'?%;)#,D+>)8#'@)?'(%;[ I%(%B8'&%)>%?,('8',+G)>D?@)B9"#F%;G)>D?@)B9"#F%;G)8K@'B"()D#$"+)B'8KG)8'@@'+F)C%%;),+(KG)$D'(>'+F)B,+;8#DB8',+)?"8%#'"(;

5R5 5R6 3ERM 5R\

9)"# IS :S :S A,+

6.#$1".: )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))))))U4R55)

!>-+,)#1.+#* ;.-,1 "3?$)# @A,#.:*B*CD0E )T))))))))6RU5) )T)))))))))))))))MR55) )T)))))))))))))))3MRUM) )T))))))EMR55) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))))))))HYRM5) )T))))))))5REY) )T)))))))))))))))5RM\) )T)))))))))))))))))3R5U) )T)))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))))))))Y3R55)

H E5

=/ ^_

)T)))))))))))))6\RM5) )T))))))U4R55) )T)))))))))))))))3R54) )T))))))))))))3\3R55) )T)))))))))))))))5R34) )T))))))))5R66) )T)))))))))))))))5R46) )T)))))))))))))))E4RM5)

:";8)'+)@("B%)"+B9,#)$,(8;G)4)$,(8)@"88%#+);%8G)b,$)$D'(8G)c)8K@%)'+B()+D8;)"+>)-";9%#;G)6Q)(,+FG)3]EQ)>'"

H

I=A

)T)))))))))))))))YR5M) )T))))))E3RHH) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )22)

=L8%#',#);'F+;G)E4)F"R)/(D?R)*#"BN%8)?,D+8%>G)>,D$(%)C"B%G)3EQ)L)35Q A#"CC'B);'F+;G);8%%()@,;8G)F"(&"+'J%>G)35X)5QG)D@#'F98G)$,(8%>R

\ 4

=/ =/

)T)))))))))))))Y\RU5) )T))))))3HRM3) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )22) )T)))))))))))))4YRH5) )T))))))))6R\6) )T)))))))))))))))HRY4) )22)

5RM 5R6 5RM 355 M5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 E

:^_ :^_ :^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ =/ =/ =/ =/ =/ =/ =/ =/ =/ =/

)T)))))))))))))YURM5) )T))))))YERM5) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))EE5R55) )T)))))))))))))HYRM5) )T))))))M4RM5) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))3E4R55) )T)))))))))))))HYRM5) )T))))))M4RM5) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))3E4R55) )T)))))))))))))3ER4M) )T))))))3ERM5) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))))))))HERM5) )T)))))))))))))))6RH5) )T))))))))UR\M) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))))))))3YRY5) )T)))))))))))))))ER6H) )T))))))))HR\Y) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))))))))))YRYM) )T)))))))))))))M4RM5) )T))))))YURM5) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))3\3R55) )T)))))EMG555R55) )T)))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))EMG555R55) )T)))))))))))UUMR55) )T))))))\HRM5) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))\\5R55) )T))))))))EGUUMR55) )T))))M4MR55) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))HG\55R55) )T)))))))))))))44R55) )T))))))M4RM5) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))3H3R55) )T)))))))))))UY5R55) )T))))3\5R55) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))3G3M5R55) )T)))))))))))HU5RE4) )T))))3EER55) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))M6\RE4) )T)))))))))))))36RM5) )T))))))44R55) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))))))))Y4R55) )T)))))))))))644RM4) )T))))3\5R55) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))3G534RM4) )T)))))))))))))H6R55) )T))))))M4RM5) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))3EER55)

=LB"&"8'+F)d8'('8K)A#%+B9G)B,??,+)%"#89G)B9"'+)8#%+B9%#)"+>)$"BNC'(()$K)9"+>)'+B(D>'+F)B,?@"B8',+G)36Q)-'>%G)3YQ)>%%@ H3`)="#89-,#N /FF#%F"8%)$";%)C,#)8#%+B9)$"BNC'(( I8#DB8D#"()%LB"&"8',+)C,#)?'+,#);8#DB8D#%;G)9"+>)@'8;)8,)6X)>%%@G)9%"&K);,'(),#)B("K

33\ HRH ER5

^_ :S *:S

)T)))))))))))))))5RME) )T))))))))5R4M) )T)))))))))))))))5R\U) )T)))))))))))))))))3REY) )T)))))))))))))34REM) )T)))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )22) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))UMR55) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))336R55)

/;@9"(8))ZH555)@;'[G)4X)L)4X)L)6Q)89'BN :,+B#%8%)BD88'+FG)C("8)B,+B#%8%]";@9"(8);"-'+FG);"-)BD8)B,+B#%8%);("$;G)@("'+G)D@)8,)HQ)>%%@

8#4

:,??,+)-,#N)#%;D(8;)C,#)%(%B8#'B"(G)(,-2&,(8"F%)%(%B8#'B"()@,-%#)B,+>DB8,#)"+>)B"$(%;G)e'#%G)655)&,(8G)B,@@%#)8K@%)Afe72Aff7G);8#"+>%>)g4 :,??,+)-,#N)#%;D(8;)C,#)%(%B8#'B"(G)(,-2&,(8"F%)%(%B8#'B"()@,-%#)B,+>DB8,#)"+>)B"$(%;G)e'#%G)655)&,(8G)B,@@%#)8K@%)Afe72Aff7G);8#"+>%>G)gY :,??,+)-,#N)#%;D(8;)C,#)%(%B8#'B"(G)(,-2&,(8"F%)%(%B8#'B"()@,-%#)B,+>DB8,#)"+>)B"$(%;G)e'#%G)655)&,(8G)B,@@%#)8K@%)Afe72Aff7G);8#"+>%>G)gY MQ)>'"))B,+>D'8G)'+)8#%+B9G)'+B(D>'+F)8%#?'+"8',+;G)C'88'+F;G);D@@,#8;G)IB9%>)45)'"))B,+>D'8G)'+)8#%+B9G)'+B(D>'+F)8%#?'+"8',+;G)C'88'+F;G);D@@,#8;G)IB9%>)45)'"))B,+>D'8G)'+)8#%+B9G)'+B(D>'+F)8%#?'+"8',+;G)C'88'+F;G);D@@,#8;G)IB9%>)45))B%+8%#G)H)Z7=a/)3[)B'#BD'8)$#%"N%#G)6551G)H)B%+8%#)B'#BD'8)$#%"N%#;G)EUU)&,(8G)3)@,(%G)3M)2)H5/ )"+>)(,">)B%+8%#)B'#BD'8)$#%"N%#;G)4Y5)&,(8G)H)@,(%G)U5)2)EEM)"?@ )"+>)(,">)B%+8%#)B'#BD'8)$#%"N%#;G)E5YS)2)E451/:G)H)@,(%G)355/)Z(,B"()%;8'?"8%[ )"+>)(,">)B%+8%#)B'#BD'8)$#%"N%#;G)3E5)&,(8G)3)@,(%G)3M2M5)"?@ )"+>)(,">)B%+8%#)B'#BD'8)$#%"N%#;G)4Y5)&,(8G)H)@,(%G)45)"?@)Z(,B"()%;8'?"8%[ )"+>)(,">)B%+8%#)B'#BD'8)$#%"N%#;G)E45)&,(8G)E)@,(%G)3M2M5)"?@

=1):9"#F%#

OD"(G)^%&%()E)I?"#8):9"#F%# ^%&%()H)I?"#8):9"#F%#

d8'('8K):,;8

%;)h_a0G)B"$(%G)("$,#G)%;8'?"8'+FG);%#&'B%)@("++'+FG)?"@@'+FR :,??,+)-,#N)#%;D(8;)C,#)%(%B8#'B"(G)(,-2&,(8"F%)%(%B8#'B"()@,-%#)B,+>DB8,#)"+>)B"$(%;G)e'#%G)655)&,(8G)B,@@%#)8K@%)hffeG);8#"+>%>)4]5

!"#$%&' (")&*'+

0Ia%"+;G)HY89)"++D"()%>'8',+G)E53M a"8%#'"(G)^"$,#)"+>)=PD'@?%+8):,;8;)"#%)C,#)!%+%#"():,+8#"B8,#G)+,)?"#ND@; 0I)a%"+;)>%;B#'@8',+;),C)-,#N)8,)$%)@%#C,#?%>)';)('?'8%>G)+,8)"(()('+%)'8%?);@%B'C'B"8',+;)"#%)%L"B8)C,#)89';)(%&%(),C)B,;8)%;8'?"8%R 0%C%#)8,)>%;'F+)>#"-'+F;)"+>)F%+%#"(),#)%(%B8#'B"()B,+8#"B8,#)C,#)C'+"()>%;'F+);@%B'C'B"8',+;

,--$&./0)/"1*' :^_ fD+>#%>)('+%"#)C%%8 aI_ A9,D;"+>);PD"#%)C%%8 ^_ ^'+%"#)C,,8 =/ ="B9 IS IPD"#%)K"#> IA/^^ ;

)T))))))E\RHH) )22) )22) )T))))))MER\5)

)T)))))))))))))))ER4M) )22) )22) )T)))))))))))))3\RE3)

)22) )T))))))))))))3E5RUM) )T)))))))))))))))33RM5) )22)

3 3

=/ =/

)T))))))))UGH55R55) )T)))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )22) )T)))))HMG555R55) )T)))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )22)

3 3RM

=/ :^_

)T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T)))))))M3G44HR55) )T)))))))))))M35R55) )T))))3\\R55) )T))))))))))))))))))))2))) )T))))))))))))Y65R55)

FG"+G*31"+")(*#,* >'$H )A,8"()-'89)VW-#,#.: )d+'8)B,;8;) )d+'8)B,;8;) &"7"'",)*JN*!>-#,#.: )A,8"()-'89)VW)/&%#"F%)A,8"()^,B"8',+)/>bD;8?%+8)_"B8,#)C,#)=D#%N"):/)Zi[

Yi YREMi !>-#,#.: EMi !>-#,#.: T3ER55 !>-#,#.: 35YR4

T))))))))))))))))33GE3U T))))))))))))))))))HGY46 L*************JQQMTOV T))))))))))))))))HYGY3U L*************JVSMNPR T))))))))))))))))))EGHE\ L*************JVOMSJO T))))))))))))))))36G4\\

U,)'#1>+#",)*.)/*"3?$)#*A,#.:*** L*************TJTMVJQ

!.:$'*A.I T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))3R\\ T))))))))66R65 T))))))))3MR\4 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))HRYY T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2 T))))))E6URMM T))))))65EREM T))EGYYURM5 T))))))))))))2 T))))))))))))2


Site: Myers Flat -‐ Riverbend Cellars Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Two EV spaces served by one dual head "smart" EV chargers (substitute basic dual chargers to reduce costs) Use of existing load center to keep cost down. Installation of new load center required for separate utility account and metering. Installation of stubout conduit to enable future expansion. Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces, and installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

Description

Unit

Material

Labor


Equipment

8.27 8.27 190

CY CY LF

$ 102.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 112.00 $ -‐ $ 15.65 $ 0.52 $ 24.50 $ 0.35 $ 2.38 $ -‐ $ 4.04


1

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

10: Specialties


3 1

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

26: Electrical

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded, #1 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded, #6 Meter center and sockets, single position, 4 terminal, 100 amp Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 80-‐100 amp Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1 1/4" diameter 1 1/4" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC

4.7 2.3 1.0 1.0 216 20

CLF CLF EA EA LF LF

$ 210.00 $ 63.50 $ 43.00 $ 93.50 $ 5.15 $ 2.63

31: Earthwork

Excavating Utility Trench, common earth, chain trencher and backfill by hand including compaction, 16" wide, 18" deep Structural excavation for minor structures, hand pits to 6' deep, heavy soil or clay

20 1.0

LF BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐

3: Concrete

5: Metals

Heavyweight concrete, Ready mix, delivered, local aggregate, sand, Portland cement (Type I), 3000 psi Placing concrete, labor and equipmt to place, level and consolidate, Footing, continuous, shallow, direct chute (> 5 CY) Concrete forming, structural cost-‐in-‐place concrete forming, forms in place, slab on grade, edge forms, wood, 4 use, ob grade, to 6" high

Qty


Source: Notes:


Single, Level 2 Smart Charger


$ 109.00 $ 67.50 $ 137.00 $ 87.50 $ 7.30 $ 3.98

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

3 STALL -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ 22 EA -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ 1 EA $ 810.75 $ 52.90 $ 19.21 1

EA

$ 5,010.00 $ -‐ $ -‐


Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal $ 395.00 Total with O&P $ 171.00 Total with O&P $ 253.00 Total with O&P $ 234.00 Total with O&P $ 16.60 Total with O&P $ 8.85 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal $ 1.28 Total with O&P $ 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal $ 120.75 Total with O&P $ 11.50 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 926 $ 203 $ 768 $ 1,896 $ 29 $ 29 $ 310 $ 59 $ 369 $ 1,842 $ 398 $ 253 $ 234 $ 3,586 $ 177 $ 6,490 $ 26 $ 116 $ 142 $ 362 $ 253 $ 883 $ 1,498 $ 5,010 $ 5,010



$ 1,235 $ 507 $ 17,176 $ 4,294 $ 21,471 $ 258 $ 21,728 $ 1,825


7% 20%

$ 1,649 $ 4,711


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 0.66 $ 22.20 $ 3.98 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 66.89 $ 413.33

BAYSIDE GRANGE PROJECT LOCATION

CH A ON RGIN LY G

EV

PROJECT DESIGN · (N) SITE LOAD CENTER TO PROVIDE TWO (N) 1ɸ 2P BREAKERS AT 240VAC, AMPERAGE RATING SPECIFIED BY EV CHARGER MANUFACTURER. · ONE (N) DUAL PLUG EV CHARGER, MAKE AND MODEL TO BE DETERMINED. · THREE PARKING STALLS CONVERTED TO TWO 2016 CODE COMPLIANT EV SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE WITH AN ACCESS AISLE AND ONE OF WHICH IS A STANDARD EV CHARGING SPACE. · STALL PAVEMENT TO BE EXTENDED OVER EXISTING GRAVEL APPROX. 2' SO THAT PARKING STALLS CAN BE ORIENTED HORIZONTAL INSTEAD OF ANGLED. · ONE STUB OUT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE DUAL PLUG EV CHARGER. · TWO ACCESS AISLES ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THE SPIRIT OF ACCESSIBILITY: ONE ON THE PASSENGER SIDE OF THE ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL AND A SECOND AT THE LOCATION OF THE CHARGING STATION TO ENABLE UNOBSTRUCTED MOBILITY BETWEEN EV CHARGERS AND VEHICLES.

NO R

PA KIN G CH A ON RGIN LY G

EV

GENERAL NOTES CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SPECIFICATIONS NOT INDICATED AND LEFT TO THE CONTRACTOR PENDING FINAL DESIGN. · SCREENED LINES ARE (E) EQUIPMENT OR CIVIL WORK. BOLD LINES ARE (N) CIVIL OR ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE INSTALLED OR MODIFIED.

·

NO PA RK ING


0


10'

20'

NEW POINT OF CONNECTION RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL SCHEDULE TYPICAL UNDERGROUND



N 1

2/24/2017

REV

DATE


BAYSIDE GRANGE 2297 JACOBY CREEK RD, BAYSIDE, CA VICINITY

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK:

---SHEET 1

JC

CH A ON RGI LY NG

EV

NO PA RK ING

.


E

MIN

3'

V C HA ON RGI LY NG

.


NO PA RK ING



0

5'

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK:

10'

N 1

2/24/2017

REV

DATE


BAYSIDE GRANGE 2297 JACOBY CREEK RD, BAYSIDE, CA ENLARGEMENT

---SHEET 2

JC

Site: Bayside Grange Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: New utility provided electrical service to new meter and load center Two EV spaces served by new dual head "smart" EV charger (substitute basic dual charger to reduce cost) Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces, and installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment


6.3 3.2 50.4 4.7

SY CY CY Ton

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00

$ 6.70 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 $ -‐

$ 5.00 $ -‐ $ 0.59 $ -‐

$ 15.75 $ 38.50 $ 1.07 $ 81.00

78 2.0

LF EA

$ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46 $ 47.00 $ 49.50 $ 0.69


1

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

10: Specialties


4 3

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

26: Electrical

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 3" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC 1 1/2" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Meter main load center and sockets, surface mount, rainproof, 1P, 3W, 120/240 Volt, 200 amp (local estimate) Smart metering, in panel, single phase, 120/208V, 200A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

0.5 71 20 1 1 2

CLF LF LF EA EA EA

$ 38.50 $ 6.30 $ 2.99 $ 1,500.00 $ 375.00 $ 36.00


75 2.2 1.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐


12 SY $ 15.87 4 STALL -‐-‐ 37 EA -‐-‐ 2 EA $ 810.75

Description



3: Concrete

Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep Cast-‐in-‐place concrete, miscellaneous cast-‐in-‐place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 3' x 3' x 6" thick

5: Metals

EV Charger Utility

Source: Notes:


Dual, Level 2 Smart Charger PG&E: Electric Service Connection -‐ engineering, tie-‐in, distribution line installation Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, aluminum type XLPE, stranded 4/0


Qty

$ 54.50 $ 7.95 $ 4.38 $ 545.00 $ 50.00 $ 54.50

$ 29.33 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 52.90

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

$ 2.45 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 19.21

1

EA

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐

1 2.3

EA CLF

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 206.00 $ 141.00 $ -‐


Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal $ 24.50 Total with O&P $ 128.00 Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal $ 124.00 Total with O&P $ 18.80 Total with O&P $ 9.85 Total with O&P $ 2,045.00 Unit costs $ 485.00 Total with O&P $ 122.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal $ 1.28 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs $ 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs $ 120.75 Total with O&P $ 11.50 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Equipment Subtotal $ 2,000.00 Total with O&P $ 440.00 Total with O&P Utility Subtotal

Total $ 99 $ 121 $ 40 $ 379 $ 639 $ 1,911 $ 256 $ 2,167 $ 29 $ 29 $ 413 $ 177 $ 590 $ 62 $ 1,335 $ 197 $ 2,045 $ 485 $ 244 $ 4,368 $ 96 $ 31 $ 116 $ 243 $ 572 $ 483 $ 426 $ 1,766 $ 3,246 $ 7,300 $ 7,300 $ 2,000 $ 990 $ 2,990



$ 1,705 $ 905 $ 23,922 $ 5,981 $ 29,903 $ 359 $ 30,261 $ 2,542


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 0.66 $ 29.60 $ 11.95 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 123.75 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 2.59 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 133.77 $ 602.25 $ -‐ $ -‐


Site: Eureka HealthSPORT Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Two EV spaces served by one dual head "smart" EV chargers (substitute basic dual chargers to reduce costs) Use of existing load center to keep cost down. Installation of new load center required for separate utility account and metering. Installation of stubout conduit to enable future expansion. Design of code-‐compliant EV spaces, and installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

Description

Qty

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment


$ 6.70 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 -‐-‐

$ 5.00 $ -‐ $ 0.59 -‐-‐

$ 15.75 $ 38.50 $ 1.07 $ 175.41



0.5 0.1 1.6 0.1

SY CY CY Ton

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

3: Concrete


1 10

EA LF

$ 47.00 $ 49.50 $ 0.69 $ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46


2

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

10: Specialties


5 2

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

26: Electrical

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded, #4 Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1 1/4" diameter Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 2" diameter Pull Boxes, NEMA 3R, Type SC, raintight & weatherproof, 12" L x 12" W x 6" D

5.3 100 100 1

CLF LF LF EA

$ 97.50 $ 5.15 $ 7.90 $ 54.50

31: Earthwork

Excavating Utility Trench, common earth, chain trencher and backfill by hand including compaction, 16" wide, 18" deep Structural excavation for minor structures, hand pits to 6' deep, heavy soil or clay

20 1.0

LF BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐

5: Metals


Source: Notes:




$ 82.50 $ 7.30 $ 9.70 $ 87.50

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐

5 STALL -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ 35 EA -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ 2 EA $ 810.75 $ 52.90 $ 19.21 1

EA

$ 7,300.00 $ -‐ $ -‐


Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal $ 128.00 Total with O&P $ 24.50 Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal $ 231.00 Total with O&P $ 16.60 Total with O&P $ 23.50 Total with O&P $ 191.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal $ 1.28 Total with O&P $ 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal $ 120.75 Total with O&P $ 11.50 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 8 $ 4 $ 2 $ 26 $ 39 $ 128 $ 245 $ 373 $ 59 $ 59 $ 516 $ 118 $ 634 $ 1,229 $ 1,660 $ 2,350 $ 191 $ 5,430 $ 26 $ 116 $ 142 $ 604 $ 403 $ 1,766 $ 2,772 $ 7,300 $ 7,300



$ 1,340 $ 782 $ 18,871 $ 4,718 $ 23,589 $ 283 $ 23,872 $ 2,005


7% 20%

$ 1,811 $ 5,175


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 1.33 $ 37.00 $ 7.97 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 133.77 $ 602.25

Site: Redwood&Acres ARV,14,046&North&Coast&PEV&Readiness&Implementation& Project: Prepared*by: Schatz&Energy&Research&Center

Design*costs*based*on: Four&EV&spaces&served&by&two&dual&head&"smart"&EV&chargers&(substitute&basic&dual&chargers&to&reduce&costs) Trenching&from&POC&on&south&side&of&road&to&new&meter&and&load¢er&in&parking&lot Design&of&code,compliant&EV&spaces&and&installation&of&code,required&signage Installation&of&spare&stubout&for&future&high&power&charger

RS*Means* Division

8.3 4.2 33.2 6.2

Unit SY CY CY Ton

Material &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&74.00&

Subcontract* Labor Equipment (Total*+*O&P) &$&&&&&&&&6.70& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&5.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&15.75& &$&&&&&&25.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&38.50& &$&&&&&&&&0.28& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0.59& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&1.07& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&81.00&

141 34 1.0 1.0

LF LF CY CY

&$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0.14& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0.35& &$&&&&&&&&&&&102.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&&

&$&&&&&&&&0.66& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0.46& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&24.50& &$&&&&&&&&2.38& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&4.04& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&112.00& &$&&&&&&34.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&1.13& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&53.50&

2

SET

&$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&8.05& &$&&&&&&21.33& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &,,&

10 5

EA EA

&$&&&&&&&&&&&&&89.70& &$&&&&&&13.51& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &,,& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&48.30& &$&&&&&&&&6.96& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&3.84& &,,&

1.5 105 64 1 1 4

CLF LF LF EA EA EA

&$&&&&&&&&&&&&&57.50& &$&&&&&&67.50& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&165.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&6.30& &$&&&&&&&&7.95& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&18.80& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&2.99& &$&&&&&&&&4.38& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&9.85& &$&&&&&&&&1,500.00& &$&&&&545.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&2,045.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&375.00& &$&&&&&&50.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&485.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&36.00& &$&&&&&&54.50& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&122.00&

Excavating&Utility&Trench,&common&earth,&chain&trencher&and&backfill&by&hand&including&compaction,&16"&wide,&18"&deep 31:&Earthwork Aggregate&base&for&trench&backfill Structural&excavation&for&minor&structures,&hand&pits&to&6'&deep,&heavy&soil&or&clay

102 2.8 2.0

LF CY BCY

&$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0.52& &$&&&&&&&&0.45& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&0.97& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&1.28& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&14.25& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &,,& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&75.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&116.00&

Asphalt&Paving,&Pavement&replacement&over&trench,&4"&thick 32:&Exterior& Pavement&Parking&Markings,&lines&on&pavement,&parking&stall,&paint&white,&4"&wide,&small&quantities Improvements Pavement&Parking&Marking,&painted&letter,&6" Metal&Parking&Bumpers,&Pipe&Bollards,&conc&filled,&paint,&8'&L&x4"&D&hole,&6"&DIA

8.7 SY &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&15.87& 6 STALL &,,& 65 EA &,,& 6 EA &$&&&&&&&&&&&810.75&

2:&Existing& Conditions&,& Demolition

3:&Concrete

5:&Metals 10:&Specialties

26:&Electrical

EV&Charger Utility

Source: Notes:+

Description Demolish,&remove&pavement&and&curb,&concrete&to&6"&thick,&hydraulic&hammer,&mesh&reinforced Selective&demolition,&load,&haul,&dump&and&return,&0&,&50'&haul,&hand&carried Selective&demolition,&haul,&per&mile,&up&to&8&C.Y.&truck&(CY×&round&trip&miles) Selective&demolition,&dump&charges,&dump&charges,&typical&urban&city,&tipping&fees&only,&building&construction&materials Concrete&cutting,&flat&concrete/asphalt&sawing,&saw&cut&concrete&slabs,&plain,&up&to&3"&deep Concrete&forming,&structural&cost,in,place&concrete&forming,&forms&in&place,&slab&on&grade,&edge&forms,&wood,&4&use,&ob&grade,&to&6"&high Heavyweight&concrete,&Ready&mix,&delivered,&local&aggregate,&sand,&Portland&cement&(Type&I),&3000&psi Placing&concrete,&labor&and&equipmt&to&place,&level&and&consolidate,&Footing,&continuous,&shallow,&direct&chute&(≥&1&CY&and&≤&5&CY) Cast&in&place&anchor&bolts,&4&bolt&pattern&set,&job&built,&J&type&incl&nuts&and&washers,&6"&long,&1/2"&dia Exterior&signs,&24&ga.&Alum.&Bracket&mounted,&double&face,&12"&x&10" Traffic&signs,&steel&post,&galvanized,&10'&0",&upright,&bolted. Common&work&results&for&electrical,&low,voltage&electrical&power&conductor&and&cables,&Wire,&600&volt,&copper&type&THWN,THHN,&stranded 3"&dia&&conduit,&in&trench,&including&terminations,&fittings,&supports,&Sched&40&PVC&& 1&1/2"&dia&&conduit,&in&trench,&including&terminations,&fittings,&supports,&Sched&40&PVC&& Meter&main&load¢er&and&sockets,&surface&mount,&rainproof,&1P,&3W,&120/240&Volt,&200&&(local&estimate) Smart&metering,&in&panel,&single&phase,&120/208V,&200A Panelboard&and&load¢er&circuit&breakers,&240&volt,&2&pole,&15,50&

Dual,&Level&2&Smart&Charger PG&E:&Electric&Service&Connection&,&engineering,&tie,in,&distribution&line&installation Common&work&results&for&electrical,&low,voltage&electrical&power&conductor&and&cables,&Wire,&600&volt,&aluminum&type&XLPE,&stranded&4/0

RSMeans,&38th&annual&edition,&2015 Material,&Labor&and&Equipment&Costs&are&for&General&Contractor,&no&markups RS&Means&descriptions&of&work&to&be&performed&is&limited,¬&all&line&item&specifications&are&exact&for&this&level&of&cost&estimate. Refer&to&design&drawings&and&general&or&electrical&contractor&for&final&design&specifications

Abbreviations: CLF Hundred&linear&feet MSF Thousand&square&feet LF Linear&foot EA Each SY Square&yard STALL Parking&stall BCY Bank&Cubic&Yards

Qty

&$&&&&&&29.33& &,,& &,,& &$&&&&&&52.90&

&$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&2.45& &,,& &,,& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&19.21&

&,,& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&120.75& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&11.50& &,,&

2

EA

&$&&&&&&&&7,300.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &,,&

1 3.15

EA CLF

&$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&2,000.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&206.00& &$&&&&141.00& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&,&&& &$&&&&&&&&&&&&440.00&

Which*pricing*to* use? &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& Divison*2*Subtotal &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& Divison*3*Subtotal &Unit&costs& Division*5*Subtotal &Unit&costs& &Unit&costs& Division*10*Subtotal &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& &Unit&costs& &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& Division*26*Subtotal* &Total&with&O&P& &Unit&costs& &Total&with&O&P& Division*31*Subtotal &Unit&costs& &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& &Unit&costs& Divison*32*Subtotal &Unit&costs& Equipment*Subtotal &Total&with&O&P& &Total&with&O&P& Utility*Subtotal

*Total* $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&131 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&160 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&40 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&499 $*********************830 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&3,455 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&137 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&112 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&54 $******************3,757 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&59 $***********************59 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&1,032 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&295 $******************1,328 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&252 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&1,974 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&630 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&2,045 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&485 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&488 $******************5,875 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&131 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&40 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&232 $*********************402 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&415 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&725 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&748 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&5,297 $******************7,184 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&14,600 $****************14,600 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&2,000 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&1,386 $******************3,386

Construction*and*Equipment*Subtotal** $****************37,090 General&Contractor&General&Requirement&(access,&project&clean&up,&testing,&etc.) Sales&Tax Contingency Bonds&(&$/1000&per&RS&Means) Weighted&Average&Total&Location&Adjustment&Factor&for&Eureka&CA&(%)


$&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&2,967 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&1,828 $****************41,885 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&10,471 $****************52,356 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&628 $****************52,985 $&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&4,451

Construction*and*Equipment*Total*** $****************57,435

Sales*Tax $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&1.33 $&&&&&&&&74.00 $&&&&&&&&19.92 $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&123.75 $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&3.29 $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&401.32 $&&1,204.50 $&&&&&&&&&&&&, $&&&&&&&&&&&&,

Site: PV-‐Cables Project: ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

RS Means Division

Description

Design costs based on: One van-‐accessible EV space served by one single plug "smart" EV charger Use of existing load center Above grade rigid conduit run along curb from existing load center to EVCS Design of code-‐compliant EV space, and installation of code-‐required signage

Qty

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment


$ 6.70 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 $ -‐

$ 5.00 $ -‐ $ 0.59 $ -‐

$ 15.75 $ 38.50 $ 1.07 $ 81.00



1.0 0.5 2.5 0.7

SY CY CY Ton

$ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00

3: Concrete


10 1

LF EA

$ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46 $ 47.00 $ 49.50 $ 0.69


1

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐

10: Specialties


3 2

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84

26: Electrical

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1" diameter Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

2.2 65 1

CLF LF EA

$ 38.50 $ 54.50 $ -‐ $ 3.95 $ 6.75 $ -‐ $ 36.00 $ 54.50 $ -‐

31: Earthwork


0.5 1.0

CY BCY

$ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐

5: Metals


Source: Notes:




5 STALL -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ 23 EA -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ 2 EA $ 810.75 $ 52.90 $ 19.21 1

EA

$ 5,010.00 $ -‐ $ -‐


Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal $ 24.50 Total with O&P $ 128.00 Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs -‐-‐ Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal $ 124.00 Total with O&P $ 14.45 Total with O&P $ 122.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs $ 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal $ 120.75 Total with O&P $ 11.50 Total with O&P -‐-‐ Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal -‐-‐ Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 16 $ 19 $ 3 $ 60 $ 98 $ 245 $ 128 $ 373 $ 29 $ 29 $ 310 $ 118 $ 428 $ 267 $ 939 $ 122 $ 1,328 $ 7 $ 116 $ 123 $ 604 $ 265 $ 1,766 $ 2,634 $ 5,010 $ 5,010



$ 802 $ 579 $ 11,403 $ 2,851 $ 14,254 $ 171 $ 14,425 $ 1,212


7% 20%

$ 1,095 $ 3,127


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 0.66 $ 22.20 $ 7.97 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 0.59 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 133.77 $ 413.33

Site: Garberville Town Square ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Project: Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: One van-‐accessible EV space served by a single plug "smart" EV charger Use of existing load center (assumes existing load center is sufficient) Demolition of portion of (E) sidewalk and installation of an ADA ramp flush with asphalt to enable unobstructed mobility Design of code-‐compliant EV space, and installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

7.8 3.9 32.8 5.8

Unit SY CY CY Ton

Material $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00


69 69 3.9 3.9

LF LF CY CY

$ 0.14 $ 0.35 $ 102.00 $ -‐

$ 0.66 $ 0.46 $ 24.50 $ 2.38 $ -‐ $ 4.04 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 112.00 $ 34.00 $ 1.13 $ 53.50


1

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐ -‐-‐


4 2

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84 -‐-‐

0.6 0.3 30 1

CLF CLF LF EA

$ 152.00 $ 38.50 $ 2.99 $ 36.00


20 3.9 1.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 1.28 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐ $ 116.00

Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities 32: Exterior Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" Improvements Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA

2 STALL -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 120.75 22 EA -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 11.50 2 EA $ 810.75 $ 52.90 $ 19.21 -‐-‐


3: Concrete


26: Electrical

EV Charger

Source: Notes:

Description Demolish, remove pavement and curb, concrete to 6" thick, hydraulic hammer, mesh reinforced Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 -‐ 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges, typical urban city, tipping fees only, building construction materials Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep Concrete forming, structural cost-‐in-‐place concrete forming, forms in place, slab on grade, edge forms, wood, 4 use, ob grade, to 6" high Heavyweight concrete, Ready mix, delivered, local aggregate, sand, Portland cement (Type I), 3000 psi Placing concrete, labor and equipmt to place, level and consolidate, Footing, continuous, shallow, direct chute (≥ 1 CY and ≤ 5 CY)

Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded, #2 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 1 1/2" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp




Qty

1

EA

$ 97.00 $ 54.50 $ 4.38 $ 54.50

$ -‐ $ 315.00 $ -‐ $ 124.00 $ -‐ $ 9.85 $ -‐ $ 122.00

$ 5,010.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

Which pricing to use? Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal Unit costs Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal Total with O&P Unit costs Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 123 $ 150 $ 35 $ 469 $ 777 $ 1,691 $ 279 $ 437 $ 209 $ 2,615 $ 29 $ 29 $ 413 $ 118 $ 531 $ 189 $ 37 $ 296 $ 122 $ 644 $ 26 $ 56 $ 116 $ 197 $ 242 $ 253 $ 1,766 $ 2,260 $ 5,010 $ 5,010



$ 965 $ 590 $ 13,618 $ 3,405 $ 17,023 $ 204 $ 17,227 $ 1,447


7% 20%

$ 1,307 $ 3,735


Site: Yurok Tribe -‐ Klamath Administration Office ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Project: Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: Use (E) load center (panel review recommended) Two EV spaces served by new dual head basic EV charger (substitute single charger if power supply limited) Installation of pavement markings and signage

RS Means Division 3: Concrete 5: Metals

Description Cast-‐in-‐place concrete, miscellaneous cast-‐in-‐place concrete, concrete in place, equipment pad (3000 psi), 3' x 3' x 6" thick Cast in place anchor bolts, 4 bolt pattern set, job built, J type incl nuts and washers, 6" long, 1/2" dia

10: Specialties Exterior signs, 24 ga. Alum. Bracket mounted, double face, 12" x 10"

26: Electrical

1" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1" diameter Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded, #8 Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp

31: Earthwork



Source: Notes:

Dual, Level 2 Basic Charger

RSMeans, 38th annual edition, 2015 Material, Labor and Equipment Costs are for General Contractor, no markups Refer to design drawings and general or electrical contractor for final design specifications


1

Unit EA

Subcontract Material Labor Equipment (Total + O&P) $ 47.00 $ 49.50 $ 0.69 $ 128.00

1

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐ -‐-‐

2

EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ -‐-‐

15.0 10.0 1 2

LF LF CLF EA

$ 2.11 $ 3.95 $ 38.50 $ 36.00

1.0 1.0

CY BCY

$ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐ $ 116.00

Qty

$ 3.50 $ 6.75 $ 54.50 $ 54.50

$ -‐ $ 7.55 $ -‐ $ 14.45 $ -‐ $ 124.00 $ -‐ $ 122.00

2 STALL -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 120.75 26 EA -‐-‐ -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 11.50 1 EA $ 810.75 $ 52.90 $ 19.21 -‐-‐ 1

EA

$ 1,200.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

Which pricing to use? Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal Unit costs Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 128 $ 128 $ 29 $ 29 $ 206 $ 206 $ 113 $ 145 $ 93 $ 244 $ 595 $ 14 $ 116 $ 130 $ 242 $ 299 $ 883 $ 1,423 $ 1,200 $ 1,200



$ 296.97 $ 183 $ 4,192 $ 1,047.92 $ 5,240 $ 63 $ 5,302 $ 445


7% 20%

$ 402.35 $ 1,149.57

Grand Total $ 7,300

NO PARKING

PROJECT DESIGN · (N) SITE LOAD CENTER TO PROVIDE TWO (N) 1ɸ 2P BREAKERS AT 240VAC, AMPERAGE RATING SPECIFIED BY EV CHARGER MANUFACTURER. · ONE (N) DUAL PLUG EV CHARGER, MAKE AND MODEL TO BE DETERMINED. · AREA EQUAL TO APPROX. THREE PARKING STALLS CONVERTED TO TWO 2016 CODE COMPLIANT EV SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE WITH AN ACCESS AISLE AND ONE OF WHICH IS A STANDARD EV CHARGING SPACE. · PATH OF TRAVEL AT HEAD OF PARKING STALLS IS REQUIRED TO MEET THE SPIRIT OF ACCESSIBILITY. ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK EXTENDED FROM ACCESS ISLE IS REQUIRED TO ENABLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO THE LOCATION'S SERVICES. GENERAL NOTES CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SPECIFICATIONS NOT INDICATED AND LEFT TO THE CONTRACTOR PENDING FINAL DESIGN. · SCREENED LINES ARE (E) EQUIPMENT OR CIVIL WORK. BOLD LINES ARE (N) CIVIL OR ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE INSTALLED OR MODIFIED.

·




0

10'

20'



N 1

10/21/2016

REV

DATE


STRAWHOUSE CAFE 31301 CA-299, JUNCTION CITY, CA VICINITY

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK: JC

---SHEET 1


VAN ACCESSIBLE STALL 12' WIDE MIN.

MIN 3'

NO PARKING



0

5'

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK:

10'

N 1

10/21/2016

REV

DATE


STRAWHOUSE CAFE 31301 CA-299, JUNCTION CITY, CA ENLARGEMENT - CIVIL

---SHEET 2

JC

NO PARKING



0

5'

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK:

10'

N 1

10/21/2016

REV

DATE


STRAWHOUSE CAFE 31301 CA-299, JUNCTION CITY, CA ENLARGEMENT - ELECTRICAL

---SHEET 3

JC



Strawhouse Café Cost estimate for the preliminary design of an electric vehicle charging station install ARV-14-046 PEV Readiness NorthCoast Schatz Energy Research Center

RS Means Division

Description

Preliminary design costs based on: New meter 200 A load center and two 50 A circuits for EV charger Trench from new meter center to EV charger Installation of a smart dual Level 2 EV charger (substitute a basic dual charger to reduce costs, if needed) Installation of a protective bollard for electrical equipment Installation of code required signage Utility to install overhead line to new weather head on roof of building Does not include costs for utility work (connection to ultility pole, installing weather head, etc.)

Qty

Unit

Material

Labor

Equipment



Concrete forming, structural cost-in-place concrete forming, forms in place, slab on grade, edge forms, wood, 4 use, ob grade, to 6" high Heavyweight concrete, Ready mix, delivered, local aggregate, sand, Portland cement (Type I), 3000 psi Placing concrete, labor and equipmt to place, level and consolidate, Footing, continuous, shallow, direct chute (> 5 CY)

Sales Tax $ No demolition required for site $ $ $ -

Divison 2 Subtotal

-

Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $

691 1,688 369 2,748 29 29


$ $ $

722 $ 177 $ 900

171 15.1 15.1

LF CY CY

$ $ $

0.35 $ 2.38 $ 102.00 $ - $ - $ 15.65 $

1

SET

$

8.05 $ 21.33 $

7 3

EA EA

$ $

89.70 $ 13.51 $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $

1.4

CLF

$

57.50 $ 67.50 $

-

$

165.00

Total with O&P

$

224 $

-

0.3 34

CLF LF

$ $

38.50 $ 54.50 $ 2.99 $ 4.38 $

-

$ $

124.00 9.85


$ $

42 $ 335 $

-

15 1

LF EA

$ $

3.95 $ 6.75 $ 54.50 $ 87.50 $

-

$ $

14.45 191.00


$ $

217 $ 191 $

1 1 2

EA EA EA

$ $ $

92.00 $ 230.00 $ 375.00 $ 50.00 $ 36.00 $ 54.50 $

-

$ $ $


31 2.9 1.0

LF CY BCY

$ $ $

0.52 $ 0.45 $ 14.25 $ - $ - $ 75.00 $

0.97 $ - -- $

Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities 32: Exterior Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" Improvements Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA Precast concrete parking bumpers, incl dowels, 6" x 10" x 6'0"

3 STALL -35 EA -1 EA $ 2 EA $

----810.75 $ 52.90 $ 68.43 $ 13.63 $

$ $ 19.21 -- --

322.00 Unit costs 485.00 Unit costs 122.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal 1.28 Total with O&P Unit costs 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal 120.75 Total with O&P 11.50 Total with O&P Unit costs Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

322 425 244 2,000 40 41 116 197 362 403 883 164 1,812 7,300 7,300


$

14,986

8% 8.25%

$ $

1,199 787

Subtotal 25% Subtotal $12.00 Subtotal 108.4

$ $ $ $ $ $

16,972 4,243 21,215 255 21,469 1,803

$

23,273

$ $

1,629 4,655

Grand Total $

29,556

3: Concrete

5: Metals


10: Specialties Exterior signs, 24 ga. Alum. Bracket mounted, double face, 12" x 10" Traffic signs, steel post, galvanized, 10' 0", upright, bolted. Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-THHN, stranded #6 Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-THHN, stranded, #8 1 1/2" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1" 26: Electrical diameter Pull Boxes, NEMA 3R, Type SC, raintight & weatherproof, 12" L x 12" W x 6" D Meter center and sockets, single position, 4 terminal, 200 amp Smart metering, in panel, single phase, 120/208V, 200A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-50 amp

EV Charger

Source: Notes:





1

EA

$

7,300.00 $

-

$

- $ - $ 0.52 $

Total $ $ $ $ $

2: Existing Conditions Demolition

-

4.04 112.00 24.50

--

- -3.84 --

-

--

General Contractor General Requirement (access, project clean up, testing, etc.) Sales Tax

Contingency Bonds ( $/1000 per RS Means) Weighted Average Total Location Adjustment Factor for Eureka CA (%)


7% 20%

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

-

Notes

Form for sidewalk and slab Perimeter of concrete slab (27' x 26') and sidewalk Concrete for sidewalk and slab Labor for sidewalk and slab




1x 8 AWG from load center to EV Charger (1 ground) 34' L x 1 Underground section of conduit from load center to the charger Above ground section of conduit from load center to the charger (5' estimate) + between weatherhead and load center (10' estimate) Pull box to be located where conduit comes out from ground at the load center New load center holding circuit breakers, where PG&E line comes in (via weather head), and 7.59 power goes out to the dual charger 30.94 Meter 2 circuits Trench length 31' 3.37 Trench depth is 20" (bottom 4 inches are sand, but assumed same cost as AB) For detailed shoveling while trenching 2 EV spaces + access aisle EV PARKING ONLY: 13 letters x 2 stalls = 26; NO PARKING: 9 letters; Total: 35 letters 66.89 11.29 One wheel stop per stall

$ 602.25

Site: Lewiston Valley Motel ARV-‐14-‐046 North Coast PEV Readiness Implementation Project: Prepared by: Schatz Energy Research Center

Design costs based on: One van-‐accessible EV space served by one single plug "smart" EV charger Use of existing load center Trench from existing load center across parking lot to EVCS Design of code-‐compliant EV space, and installation of code-‐required signage

RS Means Division

10 5 190 7.4 123 1

LF EA

$ 0.14 $ 0.66 $ 0.46 $ 24.50 $ 47.00 $ 49.50 $ 0.69 $ 128.00


1

SET

$ 8.05 $ 21.33 $ -‐ -‐-‐


4 2

EA EA

$ 89.70 $ 13.51 $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $ 3.84 -‐-‐

3.2 1.6 120 60 1

CLF CLF LF LF EA

$ 210.00 $ 57.50 $ 2.99 $ 3.95 $ 36.00


120 5.0 3.0

LF CY BCY

$ 0.52 $ 0.45 $ 0.97 $ 1.28 $ 14.25 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐ $ -‐ $ 75.00 $ -‐ $ 116.00


10.0 SY 2 STALL 22 EA 2 EA

3: Concrete 5: Metals 10: Specialties

26: Electrical

EV Charger

Source: Notes:


Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type XHHW, stranded, #1 Common work results for electrical, low-‐voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-‐THHN, stranded #6 1 1/2" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 1" diameter Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-‐50 amp




Qty

1

EA

Material $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 74.00


Unit SY CY CY Ton


Description Demolish, remove pavement and curb, concrete to 6" thick, hydraulic hammer, mesh reinforced Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 -‐ 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges, typical urban city, tipping fees only, building construction materials

$ 15.87 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 810.75

$ 109.00 $ -‐ $ 395.00 $ 67.50 $ -‐ $ 165.00 $ 4.38 $ -‐ $ 9.85 $ 6.75 $ -‐ $ 14.45 $ 54.50 $ -‐ $ 122.00

$ 29.33 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 52.90

$ 2.45 -‐-‐ -‐-‐ $ 19.21

-‐-‐ $ 120.75 $ 11.50 -‐-‐

$ 5,010.00 $ -‐ $ -‐ -‐-‐

Which pricing to use? Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 2 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal Unit costs Unit costs Division 10 Subtotal Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal Total with O&P Unit costs Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal Unit costs Total with O&P Total with O&P Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

Total $ 158 $ 193 $ 203 $ 601 $ 1,155 $ 3,014 $ 128 $ 3,142 $ 29 $ 29 $ 413 $ 118 $ 531 $ 1,264 $ 264 $ 1,182 $ 867 $ 122 $ 3,699 $ 154 $ 71 $ 348 $ 573 $ 476 $ 242 $ 253 $ 1,766 $ 2,737 $ 5,010 $ 5,010



$ 1,350 $ 591 $ 18,816 $ 4,704 $ 23,520 $ 282 $ 23,803 $ 1,999


7% 20%

$ 1,806 $ 5,160


Sales Tax $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 0.66 $ 29.60 $ 7.97 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 5.88 $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ -‐ $ 133.77 $ 413.33

LIBRARY

PROJECT LOCATION

PROJECT DESIGN · (N) SITE LOAD CENTER TO PROVIDE TWO (N) 1ɸ 2P BREAKERS AT 240VAC, AMPERAGE RATING SPECIFIED BY EV CHARGER MANUFACTURER. · ONE (N) DUAL PLUG EV CHARGER, MAKE AND MODEL TO BE DETERMINED. · THREE PARKING STALLS CONVERTED TO THREE (N) 2016 CODE COMPLIANT EV SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE. · THREE PARKING STALLS CONVERTED TO TWO 2016 CODE COMPLIANT EV SPACES, ONE OF WHICH IS ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE WITH AN ACCESS AISLE AND TWO OF WHICH ARE STANDARD EV CHARGING SPACES. · THREE STUB OUT FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE DUAL PLUG EV CHARGER.

EV

CH AR ON GING LY

EV

CH AR ON GING LY

EV

CH AR ON GING LY

NO

PA

RK

ING

GENERAL NOTES CONDUCTOR AND CONDUIT SPECIFICATIONS NOT INDICATED AND LEFT TO THE CONTRACTOR PENDING FINAL DESIGN. · SCREENED LINES ARE (E) EQUIPMENT OR CIVIL WORK. BOLD LINES ARE (N) CIVIL OR ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE INSTALLED OR MODIFIED.

·




0

20'

40'



N

3 2 1 REV

4/7/2017 2/28/2017 1/23/2017 DATE

REVISION REVISION 10% ENGINEERING DESIGN DESCRIPTION

LIBRARY 351 MAIN ST, WEAVERVILLE, CA VICINITY

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK:

---SHEET 1

JC

SHEET NOTES (N) 480VAC 3ɸ UTILITY XFMR TO BE SIZED TO SUPPORT (N) 400A LOAD PANEL. MAJORITY OF THIS LOAD IS ASSOCIATED WITH EXPECTED FUTURE LOAD SUPPORTED BY STUBOUTS. · PROPOSED DESIGN PLACES A 25KVA STEP DOWN XFMR AT THE LOAD CENTER TO PROVIDE 208 VAC OR 240 VAC TO LEVEL 2 CHARGER AND 120 VAC TO LEVEL 3 CHARGER'S PAYMENT MODULE. · LOAD CENTER TO HAVE SUFFICIENT PANEL CAPACITY TO SUPPORT UP TO THREE ADDITIONAL FUTURE LEVEL 3 CHARGERS. · NO SUPPLEMENTAL LIGHTING IS INCLUDED. CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE IF SUPPLEMENTAL LIGHTING IS NEEDED.

MIN

3'

·

EV

CH A ON RGIN LY G

EV

CH A ON RGIN LY G

EV

CH A ON RGIN LY G

VA

NA

CC

ES

SIB LE

ST ALL

NO 12'

WID

EM

PA RK ING

AC CE SS A

AX

.

ISL

E5 'W

IDE

EXAMPLE SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

0

5'

MIN .

10'

(DEPENDENT ON SELECTED CHARGER MANUFACTURER)



N

3 2 1 REV

4/7/2017 2/28/2017 1/23/2017 DATE

REVISION REVISION 10% ENGINEERING DESIGN DESCRIPTION

LIBRARY 351 MAIN ST, WEAVERVILLE, CA ENLARGEMENT

PHASE 1 DRWN: KR

CHK:

---SHEET 2

JC



RS Means Division 2: Existing Conditions Demolition

3: Concrete

5: Metals

10: Specialties

Trinity County Library in Weaverville Cost estimate for the preliminary design of an electric vehicle charging station install ARV-14-046 PEV Readiness NorthCoast Schatz Energy Research Center

Description Demolish, remove pavement and curb, concrete to 6" thick, hydraulic hammer, mesh reinforced Selective demolition, load, haul, dump and return, 0 - 50' haul, hand carried Selective demolition, haul, per mile, up to 8 C.Y. truck (CY times round trip miles) Selective demolition, dump charges, dump charges - local disposal at HWMA rates Concrete forming, structural cost-in-place concrete forming, forms in place, slab on grade, edge forms, wood, 4 use, ob grade, to 6" high Heavyweight concrete, Ready mix, delivered, local aggregate, sand, Portland cement (Type I), 3000 psi Placing concrete, labor and equipmt to place, level and consolidate, Footing, continuous, shallow, direct chute (> 5 CY) Concrete cutting, flat concrete/asphalt sawing, saw cut concrete slabs, plain, up to 3" deep Concrete core drilling, reinforced concrete slab, up to 6" thick, incl bit, layout, and setup, 2" diameter hole

$ $ $ --

-

Equipment $ 5.00 $ $ 0.59 --

$ $ $ $ $

-

--

Sales Tax $ $ $ $ -

Divison 2 Subtotal

362 442 37 2,992 3,833

Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Total with O&P Divison 3 Subtotal Unit costs Division 5 Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

356 352 77 4,018 145 4,948 59 59


$ $ $

929 $ 236 $ 1,165

9 4

EA EA

$ $

89.70 $ 13.51 $ 48.30 $ 6.96 $

0.93

CLF

$

38.50 $ 54.50 $

-

$

124.00

Total with O&P

$

115 $

-

4 x 8 AWG: load center to L2 = 14' x 4 = 56' (2 plugs, 2 wires each); ground wires = L2 + L3 = 14' + 23' = 37', total = 93' 4x 750 kcmil from utility 480V transformer to load center 344' x 2 = 688'

- -3.84 --

$

-



6.9

CLF

$

695.00 $ 274.00 $

-

$

1,175.00

Total with O&P

$

8,084 $

-

0.69

CLF

$

57.50 $ 67.50 $

-

$

165.00

Total with O&P

$

114 $

-

90

LF

$

12.45 $ 12.50 $

-

$

32.50

Total with O&P

$

2,925 $

284

LF

$

12.45 $ 12.50 $

-

$

32.50

Total with O&P

$

9,230 $

60 64.0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

LF LF EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

-

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

216 20.0 2.0

LF CY BCY

$ $ $

0.52 $ 0.45 $ 14.25 $ - $ - $ 75.00 $

0.97 $ - -- $

4 STALL -48 EA -2 EA $

----810.75 $ 52.90 $

$ $ 19.21 --

94.00 Total with O&P 7.55 Total with O&P 191.00 Total with O&P 3,545.00 Unit costs 900.00 Unit costs 3,900.00 Total with O&P 131.00 Total with O&P 1,150.00 Total with O&P 569.24 Total with O&P 84.00 Total with O&P 1,014.54 Total with O&P 122.00 Total with O&P Division 26 Subtotal 1.28 Total with O&P Unit costs 116.00 Total with O&P Division 31 Subtotal 120.75 Total with O&P 11.50 Total with O&P Unit costs Divison 32 Subtotal Unit costs Unit costs Equipment Subtotal

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2,000.00

Total with O&P Utility Subtotal

$ $


$

61,293

8% 8.25%

$ $

4,903 4,035

Subtotal 25% Subtotal $12.00 Subtotal 108.4

$ $ $ $ $ $

70,232 17,558 87,790 1,053 88,844 7,463

$

96,307

$ $

6,741 19,261

Grand Total $

122,309

1

46.00 2.11 54.50 3,000.00 690.00 2,775.00 44.00 780.00 370.24 16.50 644.54 36.00

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

29.00 3.50 87.50 545.00 93.50 545.00 54.50 190.00 122.00 44.00 190.00 54.50

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $


1 1

EA EA

$ 7,300.00 $ $ 35,000.00 $

-

$ $

-

---

PG&E: Electric Service Connection - engineering, tie-in, distribution line installation

1

EA

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

General Contractor General Requirement (access, project clean up, testing, etc.) Sales Tax

Abbreviations: Hundred linear feet Thousand square feet Linear foot Each Square yard Parking stall Bank Cubic Yards

$ $ $ $ $

Form for sidewalk sections Perimeter of west section of sidewalk (5.5' x 4.5') and east section of sidewalk (29' x 5') Concrete for sidewalk sections Labor for sidewalk sections Cutting existing pavement and concrete where needed Holes in asphalt for 2 bollards


RS Means descriptions of work to be performed is limited, not all line item specifications are exact for this level of cost estimate. Refer to design drawings and general or electrical contractor for final design specifications

4.04 112.00 24.50 24.50 72.50

Notes Existing sidewalk Material removal County solid waste transfer station in Weaverville, 1.5 miles one way Dump charges

8.05 $ 21.33 $


CLF MSF LF EA SY STALL BCY

Total $ $ $ $ $

$

Pavement Parking Markings, lines on pavement, parking stall, paint white, 4" wide, small quantities Pavement Parking Marking, painted letter, 6" Metal Parking Bumpers, Pipe Bollards, conc filled, paint, 8' L x4" D hole, 6" DIA

0.52 0.46 7.00


SET

32: Exterior Improvements

$ 2.38 $ $ - $ $ 15.65 $ $ 0.66 $ $ 42.00 $


2

5" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Conduit to 15' high, includes 2 terminators, 2 elbows, 11 beam clamps and 11 couplings per 100LF: rigid galvanized steel (RGS) 5" diameter 1" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC Pull Boxes, NEMA 3R, Type SC, raintight & weatherproof, 12" L x 12" W x 6" D Meter center and sockets, meter center, main fusible switch, rainproof, 1P, 3W, 120/240 Volt, 400 amp Smart metering, in panel, three phase, 120/208V, 400A Enclosed (NEMA 1) circuit breaker, 600V, 3P, 400A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 277 volt, 1 pole, 15 - 30A Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 480 volt, 3 pole, 70 - 225 amp Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 208Y - 240VAC, 3 pole, 100A (local estimate) Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 120 volt, 1 pole, 15-50 amp Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 480 volt, 3 pole, 40 amp (local estimate) Panelboard and load center circuit breakers, 240 volt, 2 pole, 15-50 amp

0.35 102.00 0.14 0.28

Labor $ 6.70 $ 25.00 $ 0.28 --


Excavating Utility Trench, common earth, chain trencher and backfill by hand including compaction, 16" wide, 18" deep Aggregate base for trench backfill Structural excavation for minor structures, hand pits to 6' deep, heavy soil or clay

Source: Notes:

Material

$ $ $ $ $

31: Earthwork

Utility Cost

Unit SY CY CY Ton

LF CY CY LF EA

5" dia conduit, in trench, including terminations, fittings, supports, Sched 40 PVC

EV Charger

Qty 23.0 11.5 34.5 17.1

88 3.1 3.1 164 2

Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-THHN, stranded, #8 Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt,aluminum type THHN stranded 750 kcmil Common work results for electrical, low-voltage electrical power conductor and cables, Wire, 600 volt, copper type THWN-THHN, stranded #6

26: Electrical

Preliminary design costs based on: New meter 400 A load center Trench from power pole to new metered load center, except for when running conduit through library ceiling Trench from new metered load center to EV charger Installation of a smart dual Level 2 EV charger (substitute a basic dual charger to reduce costs, if needed) Installation of a smart single Level 3 EV charger (substitute a basic dual charger to reduce costs, if needed) Installation of two protective bollard for electrical equipment, while allowing for easily accessing station by user Installation of code required signage Utility to install cable between power pole and load center

Contingency Bonds ( $/1000 per RS Means) Weighted Average Total Location Adjustment Factor for Eureka CA (%)


7% 20%

5,640 483 382 3,545 784 3,900 131 1,150 569 84 1,015 244 38,395 276 285 232 793 483 552 1,766 2,801 7,300 35,000 7,300

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

3 x 6 AWG for 480V service: load center to L3 = 23' * 3 = 69' Conduit for utility's wires from power pole base to transformer = 90' (includes 18" in and out of trench) Underground conduit for utility's wires from 480V transformer to load center = 284' (includes 18" in and out of trench) Outdoor above ground conduit for utility's wires from up and down building = 60' (assumed building has 30' height) Conduit from meter center to the charger, including stubouts Pull boxes 247.50 New load center 56.93 Meter Main load center breaker Optional lighting Breaker for L3 Step-down xfmr breaker Breaker for 120V service to L3 step-down xfmr breaker Breakers for L2 plugs Trench length = 29'+36'+26'+125'=216' 23.51 Trench depth is 20" (bottom 4 inches are sand, but assumed same cost as AB) For detailed shoveling while trenching 3 EV spaces + access aisle EV PARKING ONLY: 13 letters x 3 stalls = 39; NO PARKING: 9 letters; Total: 48 letters 133.77

$ 602.25 $ 2,887.50

2,000 $ 2,000

-

Assumed that Trinity Power Authority will cover the costs for the transformer upgrade Assumed that Trinity PUD costs are similar to PG&E