Temperature-Regulated Microcolony Formation by Burkholderia ...

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, Sept. 2006, p. 5374–5381 0019-9567/06/$08.00⫹0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00569-06 Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Vol. 74, No. 9

Temperature-Regulated Microcolony Formation by Burkholderia pseudomallei Requires pilA and Enhances Association with Cultured Human Cells Justin A. Boddey,1† Cameron P. Flegg,1 Chris J. Day,2 Ifor R. Beacham,1* and Ian R. Peak1 Institute for Glycomics1 and School of Medical Science,2 Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia Received 6 April 2006/Returned for modification 2 June 2006/Accepted 28 June 2006

Burkholderia pseudomallei is the causative agent of melioidosis, a potentially fatal disease that is endemic to Northern Australia and Southeast Asia and is acquired from soil or water. Adherence of B. pseudomallei 08 to cultured cells increases dramatically following prior growth at 30°C or less compared to that following prior growth at 37°C. Here, we show that this occurs almost entirely as the result of microcolony formation (bacterium-bacterium interactions) following growth at 27°C but not at 37°C, which considerably enhances bacterial association with eukaryotic cells. Further, we demonstrate that the type IVA pilin-encoding gene, pilA, is essential for microcolony development by B. pseudomallei 08, and thus optimum association with eukaryotic cells, but is not required for direct adherence (bacterium-cell interactions). In contrast, although the B. pseudomallei genome sequence strain, K96243, also contains transcriptionally active pilA, microcolony formation rarely occurs following growth at either 27°C or 37°C and cell association occurs significantly less than with strain 08. Analysis of pilA transcription in 08 identified that pilA is dramatically upregulated under microcolony-forming conditions, viz., growth at low temperature, and association with eukaryotic cells; the pattern of transcription of pilA in K96243 differed from that in 08. Our study also suggests that biofilm formation by B. pseudomallei 08 and K96243 on polyvinylchloride is not mediated by pilA. Adherence and microcolony formation, and pilA transcription, vary between strains, consistent with known genomic variation in B. pseudomallei, and these phenotypes may be relevant to colonization from the environment. Burkholderia pseudomallei is a gram-negative, saprophytic bacterium that causes a variety of serious and potentially fatal diseases, known as melioidoses, in mammals. Melioidosis is acquired by inhalation, inoculation, or ingestion of B. pseudomallei from soil, dust, or water, and mammal-mammal transmission is very rare (10, 12, 32, 52). Melioidosis is endemic to tropical Australia and Southeast Asia, particularly Thailand and Singapore; however, the disease is considered to be emerging worldwide (9, 13). Melioidosis has a spectrum of clinical presentations that can mimic many other diseases and can thus be misdiagnosed (17, 32). Melioidosis may be acute, chronic, or subclinical (23, 25) and can affect essentially any organ, with lungs, liver, and spleen most commonly involved (32). Melioidosis is difficult to treat and results in up to 50% mortality in Thailand (51) and 19% mortality in Australia (11). B. pseudomallei is listed as a category B bioterrorism agent by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (53), and there is currently no vaccine against melioidosis. Adherence to and colonization of host surfaces are essential first steps in the establishment of bacterial infections (19). Nonintimate adherence to a host cell is often mediated by pili, whereas more-intimate interactions are usually established by nonpilus adhesins (20, 26). A number of studies have investigated B. pseudomallei adherence to eukaryotic cells (1, 6, 18, 22, 27, 28, 45), and the pilA gene, putatively encoding a type IVA pilin, is necessary for adherence of B. pseudomallei

K96243 to eukaryotic cells in vitro and contributes to complete virulence in animal models of disease (18). Type IV pili can facilitate bacterium-bacterium interactions that result in microcolonies and/or biofilms (8). Microcolonies and biofilms are both important in pathogenesis as they increase bacterial numbers and can enhance protection from host defenses and antibiotics (7, 8, 21, 42). While B. pseudomallei can form microcolonies and biofilms both in vitro and in vivo (6, 31, 33, 44, 48–50), the molecular basis for these phenotypes is currently unknown. This paper describes the comparative analysis of adherence, microcolony formation, and biofilm development by B. pseudomallei strains 08 and K96243 and identifies differences in these phenotypes and in their regulation between strains. Furthermore, we show that pilA in strain 08 is upregulated at lower temperatures and in the presence of eukaryotic cells and is essential for microcolony formation, which thereby enhances bacterial association with eukaryotic cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions. The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Bacteria were grown at 27°C or 37°C on LB agar or in Luria broth at 200 rpm overnight. Antibiotics were added to the following final concentrations: chloramphenicol, 50 ␮g/ml (Escherichia coli) and 100 ␮g/ml (B. pseudomallei); gentamicin, 15 ␮g/ml; and streptomycin, 100 ␮g/ml. Unmarked deletion mutagenesis of pilA in B. pseudomallei 08. The unmarked and in-frame deletion of pilA in B. pseudomallei 08 (strain JAB1608) was generated and confirmed as described previously for K96243 (strain JAB16) (18). In brief, a single crossover mutant of 08 (JAB1608.1x) was generated by conjugation from S17.1(␭pir) containing pAEH16, and the allele replacement derivative (JAB1608) was generated from this mutant by using sacB counterselection (Table 1). Assay for bacterial adherence or association with eukaryotic cells. Our previous work with various cell lines determined that B. pseudomallei 08 adheres

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, PMB50, Gold Coast Mail Centre, Queensland 9726, Australia. Phone: 61 7 5552 8185. Fax: 011 61 7 5552 8908. E-mail: [email protected]. † Present address: The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 5374

VOL. 74, 2006

MICROCOLONY FORMATION AND ADHERENCE BY B. PSEUDOMALLEI 08

5375

TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study Species/strain/plasmid

Genotype/sourcea

Reference/source

Bacterial strains Burkholderia pseudomallei 08 JAB1608.1x JAB1608 K96243 JAB16

WT, clinical isolate; Gmr Smr Cms 08 derivative, pilA::pAEH16 (⌬pilA 关nt 67-612兴 cat sacB oriT oriR6K) Gmr Smr Cmr 08 derivative, ⌬pilA (nt 67-612) Gmr Smr Cms WT, clinical isolate; Gmr Smr Cms K96243 derivative, ⌬pilA (nt 67-612) Gmr Smr Cms

5 This study This study 24 18

RP4-2-Tc::Mu Km::Tn7 Tp Sm(␭ pir) phoA20 thi-1 rpsE rpoB araE(Am) recA1 S17.1 (␭pir) containing pAEH16

41 18

sacBR oriT oriR6K Cmr pDM4 with 2,099 bp XbaI fragment, representing ⌬pilA (nt 67-612)

37 18

Escherichia coli S17.1 (␭ pir) JABEC16 Plasmids pDM4 pAEH16 a

Cm, chloramphenicol; Gm, gentamicin; Sm, streptomycin; s, sensitive; r, resistant; nt, nucleotides; WT, wild type.

most to ME-180 cells (6), and this was also observed for K96243 (J. Boddey, unpublished data). ME-180 cells were therefore used in this study; they were grown to 95 to 99% confluence in McCoy’s 5a medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum in 24-well culture plates (Greiner BioOne) containing 13-mm coverslips (Nalge Nunc International). Two milliliters of overnight-grown bacterial starter cultures (37°C; 200 rpm) was diluted 1:100 into fresh Luria broth and grown with shaking for 18 h at 27°C or 37°C. Bacteria were seeded into triplicate wells at a multiplicity of infection of 25:1, spun at 198 ⫻ g for 2 min, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 2 h. Nonadherent bacteria were removed by four washes with phosphate-buffered saline. Samples were fixed with methanol at 4°C for 2 h, stained with Giemsa (pH 6.7; Sigma-Aldrich), and mounted onto glass slides (First Brand) with cover glasses (Marienfeld, Germany). Slides were ordered in a manner unknown to the observer (“blinded”) and viewed under oil immersion. Five digital images per coverslip of cell-associated bacteria were captured (three coverslips per strain per experiment), and the following parameters were enumerated (43): the mean association index (the number of bacteria associated with one cell); the mean infection index (the number of cells with at least one adherent bacterium); and the mean microcolony index (the number of adherent microcolonies per field of view). The five greatest numbers of cell-associated bacteria per field of view were used to derive the association index. All cells that were entirely visible (i.e., not partially out of view) were included in the derivation of the infection index. Adherent microcolonies were arbitrarily defined as 10 or more continuous bacterium-bacterium interactions, and these were used to derive the microcolony index. The data for each parameter were pooled from triplicate experiments, averaged, and subjected to appropriate statistical analyses (see below), and finally, the strains were revealed (“unblinded”). It may be noted that only the infection index reflects adherence (direct bacterium-cell interaction), whereas the association index and the microcolony index reflect the formation of microcolonies. pilA mRNA expression analysis by Q-PCR. For analysis of pilA mRNA expression in the presence or absence of eukaryotic cells, bacteria from overnight cultures (27°C or 37°C in Luria broth; 200 rpm) were seeded at a multiplicity of infection of 25:1 into T-25 flasks containing McCoy’s 5a medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, with or without ME-180 cells (95 to 99% confluence). Cultures were incubated for 3 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cell monolayers were washed four times to remove nonadherent bacteria, and cells and associated bacteria were lysed with 4 M guanidium isothiocyanate-1% lauryl sarcosine solution. Media were collected from flasks lacking ME-180 cells and briefly centrifuged at 10,000 ⫻ g, and bacteria were resuspended in 4 M guanidium isothiocyanate-1% lauryl sarcosine solution. For analysis of pilA mRNA expression during growth in Luria broth or on LB agar, bacteria were grown for 18 h at 27°C or 37°C. Liquid cultures were briefly centrifuged at 10,000 ⫻ g, and bacterial pellets were resuspended in 4 M guanidium isothiocyanate-1% lauryl sarcosine solution. Bacterial cultures grown on agar were resuspended directly in 4 M guanidium isothiocyanate, 1% lauryl sarcosine solution. Following cell lysis, total RNA and first-strand cDNA were prepared as described previously (14). Quantitative real-time PCRs (Q-PCRs) were performed at an annealing temperature of 59°C or 62°C in 1⫻ SYBR green I supermix (Bio-Rad). Primer concentrations were 5 ␮mol for 16S RNA (4) and 7.5 ␮mol for pilA expression

with the oligonucleotide primer pair JAB16RTF (5⬘-GCCTATCAGGATTATC TCGC-3⬘) and JAB16RTR (5⬘-CACCAGCACGAGCGTATT-3⬘). The PCR mixtures were cycled as follows: 96°C for 30 s, 59°C or 62°C (for 16S and pilA, respectively) for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 minute, followed by a melt curve ranging from 59 to 96°C, with data collected for 5 s at each half-degree-Celsius change. Copy numbers were calculated from standard curves of 10 to 109 copies of PCR product. Biofilm assay. The biofilm assay was adapted from reference 33. Nonsterile 96-well polyvinyl chloride culture plates (Falcon 3911 Microtest III, Becton Dickinson Labware) were sterilized with 70% ethanol and air dried in a sterile class II biosafety cabinet immediately prior to use. Luria broth (100 ␮l per well) was added followed by 1 ␮l of bacterial culture that had been grown at 37°C overnight at 200 rpm. Wells were covered and incubated without shaking for 18 h at 37°C. Thereafter, 1 ␮l from each well (mixed) was transferred into triplicate wells containing 100 ␮l fresh Luria broth or M9 medium (supplemented with 0.5% Casamino Acids [Sigma-Aldrich Co.]) and plates were incubated without shaking at 27°C or 37°C for 18 h. The supernatant was carefully removed, and wells were stained with 150 ␮l 1% crystal violet (Biomerieux) for 30 min at room temperature. The stain was removed, and the wells were washed twice with 175 ␮l sterile water. Crystal violet stain was solubilized by the addition of 175 ␮l dimethyl sulfoxide (Ajax Chemicals) to each well, and the absorbance at 595 nm (A595) of the solution was measured in a Wallac Victor3 plate reader (Perkin Elmer). The absorbance was adjusted by subtracting the A595 for wells that contained media but no bacteria, following the addition of dimethyl sulfoxide, from the overall A595 for wells that contained bacteria. Each strain was investigated with three wells per experiment, over three independent experiments. Statistical analyses. Statistical analyses were undertaken by using the independent-sample two-tailed t test. The Mann-Whitney test was applied to data that were not normally distributed. All t tests were performed with GraphPad Prism 4 for Windows and had a significance threshold (␣) of 0.05.

RESULTS Microcolony formation by B. pseudomallei 08 but not K96243 enhances association with eukaryotic cells and is modulated by temperature. We previously reported that adherence of B. pseudomallei 08 increases dramatically following prior growth at 30°C or less compared to that following prior growth at 37°C (6). Furthermore, adherent microcolonies were observed with growth at or below 30°C prior to assay but were rarely observed following growth at 37°C (6). We have further investigated the adherence phenotype of B. pseudomallei 08 and compared it with that of K96243 by determining the mean number of bacteria associated with one cell (association index), the mean number of cells with at least one adherent bacterium (the

5376

BODDEY ET AL.

INFECT. IMMUN.

FIG. 1. Microcolony formation by B. pseudomallei 08 but not K96243 is modulated by temperature and enhances association with ME-180 cells. (A) Mean numbers of ME-180-associated bacteria per cell ⫾ standard errors of the means (association index) following growth at 27°C and 37°C. (B) Mean numbers of adherent microcolonies per field of view ⫾ standard errors of the means (microcolony index) following growth at 27°C and 37°C. (C) Digital image of B. pseudomallei 08 adherence and microcolony formation (arrows) to ME-180 cells following growth at 27°C. Bar represents 10 ␮m. (D) Digital image of B. pseudomallei 08 adherence, with few microcolonies (arrow), to ME-180 cells following growth at 37°C. (E and F) Digital images of B. pseudomallei K96243 adherence to ME-180 cells without adherent microcolonies following growth at 27°C and 37°C, respectively. Data in panels A and B are pooled from triplicate experiments in which approximately equal inocula were delivered. *, P value of ⬍0.001.

infection index; see below), and the derivation of the mean number of microcolonies per field of view (the microcolony index; see reference 43 and Materials and Methods). Only the infection index reflects adherence alone, as opposed to microcolony formation. We observed that temperature drastically modulates the association of strain 08 with eukaryotic cells; a 3.4-fold increase in the association index was observed when 08 was grown at 27°C prior to assay compared to what was observed with growth at 37°C (Fig. 1A, C, and D). However, temperature did not influence K96243 association with cells, which was very low

relative to that for 08 (a 5.9-fold difference was observed between 27°C-grown cultures; P ⬍ 0.001) (Fig. 1A). Significantly, microcolony formation correlated with cell association; the microcolony index for 08 was 5.5-fold greater when bacteria were grown at 27°C prior to assay than when they were grown at 37°C (Fig. 1B to D), and while temperature did influence the K96243 microcolony index (in a manner opposite to that of 08), microcolony formation by K96243 was very low relative to that by 08 (⬎400-fold difference between 27°C-grown cultures; P ⬍ 0.001) (Fig. 1B, E, and F). We conclude that low growth temperature is a major determinant

VOL. 74, 2006


FIG. 2. Temperature is a minor modulator of B. pseudomallei 08 adherence to ME-180 cells. Mean percentages of ME-180 cells with one or more adherent bacteria ⫾ standard errors of the means (infection index) following growth of 08 or K96243 at 27°C or 37°C are shown. Data are pooled from triplicate experiments in which approximately equal inocula were delivered. *, P value of 0.012.

of microcolony formation, and hence of cell association, in 08 but not in K96243. Temperature plays a minor role in modulating direct adherence of B. pseudomallei 08 but not K96243 to eukaryotic cells. As temperature regulates microcolony formation (bacte-

5377

rium-bacterium interactions) by B. pseudomallei 08 and K96243, we investigated whether temperature also affects adherence (bacterium-cell interactions) of these strains by determining the mean infection index (number of cells with at least one adherent bacterium). B. pseudomallei 08 grown at 27°C prior to assay had an infection index 1.1-fold (14.2%) greater than 08 grown at 37°C (Fig. 2), indicating a minor, though statistically significant, increase in adherence to ME-180 cells. In contrast, growth temperature did not influence the infection index of K96243 (Fig. 2). pilA enhances B. pseudomallei 08 association with eukaryotic cells by mediating microcolony formation. A previous study demonstrated that pilA in B. pseudomallei K96243 is necessary for optimal adherence to eukaryotic cells in vitro (18). We identified pilA in B. pseudomallei 08 (results not shown) and investigated its role in 08 interactions with host cells by generating the ⌬pilA strain JAB1608. The association indexes for JAB1608 were reduced 6.8-fold and 1.3-fold compared to that for 08 when bacteria were grown at 27°C and 37°C prior to assay, respectively (Fig. 3A), indicating that pilA is essential for optimal association of 08 with ME-180 cells. Furthermore, the microcolony indexes for JAB1608 were reduced 20.0-fold and 1.6-fold compared to that for 08 when bacteria were grown at 27°C and 37°C prior to assay, respectively (Fig. 3B to D). These

FIG. 3. Role of pilA in microcolony formation and bacterial association with ME-180 cells. (A) Mean numbers of ME-180-associated bacteria per cell ⫾ standard errors of the means (association index) following growth at 27°C and 37°C. (B) Mean numbers of adherent microcolonies per field of view ⫾ standard errors of the means (microcolony index) following growth at 27°C and 37°C. Data (A and B) are pooled from triplicate experiments in which approximately equal inocula were delivered. *, P value of ⬍0.004. (C) Digital image capturing B. pseudomallei 08 adherence, with microcolony formation (arrows), to ME-180 cells following growth at 27°C. Bar represents 10 ␮m. (D) Digital image capturing JAB1608 adherence, without microcolony formation, to ME-180 cells following growth at 27°C.

5378

BODDEY ET AL.

FIG. 4. pilA is not required for adherence of B. pseudomallei 08 to ME-180 cells. Mean percentages of ME-180 cells with one or more adherent bacteria ⫾ standard errors of the means (infection index) following growth at 27°C and 37°C are shown. Data are pooled from triplicate experiments in which approximately equal inocula were delivered.

data indicate that pilA is critical for the formation of large adherent microcolonies, which enhances the association of 08 with eukaryotic cells. pilA does not mediate direct adherence of B. pseudomallei 08 to eukaryotic cells. The infection indexes were determined for 08 and JAB1608 in order to assess whether pilA was involved with adherence. The infection indexes for 08 and JAB1608 were statistically equivalent when bacteria were grown at both 27°C and 37°C (P ⫽ 0.194) (Fig. 4), indicating that pilA is not required for interacting directly with eukaryotic cells under the tested conditions. pilA expression correlates with microcolony-forming conditions and is modulated by temperature, media, and the presence of eukaryotic cells. Since microcolonies of B. pseudomallei 08 are observed during an adherence assay with prior bacterial

INFECT. IMMUN.

growth at 27°C but not 37°C, we assessed whether pilA expression correlated with growth temperature. We also investigated the possible role of cultured eukaryotic cells in pilA expression. pilA mRNA expression was measured by using Q-PCR; after overnight growth at 37°C in Luria Broth, expression was relatively low, as was expression 3 h after transfer to McCoy’s 5a medium at 37°C with or without ME-180 cells (Fig. 5A). pilA mRNA expression after overnight growth at 27°C in Luria broth, and following 3 h in McCoy’s 5a medium at 37°C, was also relatively low but increased dramatically after transfer to McCoy’s 5a medium at 37°C when ME-180 cells were also present (32.5-fold increase) (Fig. 5). To further explore the effects of temperature and growth conditions on pilA expression, Q-PCR was performed on samples of strain 08 following overnight growth on LB agar at 27°C and 37°C. Relative to that for cells grown at 37°C, 1,205-fold more expression was observed following growth at 27°C (Fig. 5A) and the level of expression was statistically equivalent to that observed under microcolony-forming conditions (i.e., in the presence of eukaryotic cells) (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, pilA was expressed 90.5-fold more at 27°C when 08 was grown overnight on agar than when it was grown in Luria broth (P ⫽ 0.015) (Fig. 5A). It may be noted that no expression of pilA in JAB1608 (or JAB16) was detected by Q-PCR when cultured on agar at either temperature, consistent with successful mutagenesis of pilA (Fig. 5A). We conclude that both low growth temperature and the presence of either a solid substratum or cultured cells at 37°C are effective in eliciting pilA expression in strain 08. In contrast, pilA expression was not temperature regulated in strain K96243 (P ⫽ 0.189 in the presence of ME-180 cells) (Fig. 5B). However, like 08, ME-180 cells elicited the most pilA expression by K96243; irrespective of growth temperature, pilA expression by K96243 in the presence of ME-180 cells was statistically equivalent to levels observed for 08 in the presence

FIG. 5. Expression of pilA mRNA in B. pseudomallei 08 and K96243. Q-PCR was used to measure the expression of mRNA for pilA in B. pseudomallei 08 (A) and K96243 (B) grown at 27°C and 37°C with different media and under different conditions. Expression is reported as mean numbers of copies of pilA per copy of 16S rRNA ⫾ standard errors of the means. Experiments using McCoy’s 5a media were conducted at 37°C, with bacteria pregrown at 27°C or 37°C, as shown and in the presence or absence of ME-180 cells. Data are pooled from triplicate experiments. *, P value of ⬍0.025.


VOL. 74, 2006

5379

FIG. 6. Biofilm formation by B. pseudomallei 08 and K96243 is modulated by temperature and media and is pilA independent. Mean adjusted biofilm formation levels ⫾ standard errors of the means for B. pseudomallei 08, K96243, and respective ⌬pilA strains JAB1608 and JAB16 when grown at 27°C and 37°C in Luria broth (A) and M9 medium supplemented with Casamino Acids (B) are shown. Data are pooled from triplicate experiments. *, P value of 0.028.

of ME-180 cells, when grown at 27°C prior to exposure (Fig. 5A, B). Temperature and media modulate biofilm formation by B. pseudomallei 08 and K96243. It has been reported that biofilm formation by B. pseudomallei varies depending on growth media (33). Given that temperature is a regulatory stimulus for microcolony formation and for pilA expression in B. pseudomallei 08, we investigated whether temperature, in addition to media, was involved in regulating biofilm formation by B. pseudomallei strains 08 and K96243. Biofilm formation was greater at 27°C than at 37°C for both B. pseudomallei 08 and K96243 when grown in Luria broth (P ⬍ 0.001) (Fig. 6A); however, this was not the case in minimal medium in which biofilm formation was significantly increased at 37°C for K96243 but not for 08 (Fig. 6B). Biofilm formation at 37°C was increased in M9 medium relative to that in Luria broth, but this was reversed when bacteria were grown at 27°C (Fig. 6). pilA reduces biofilm formation by B. pseudomallei 08 but not K96243. Type IV pili have a role in the development of biofilms by many bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7, 38). The role of pilA in biofilm formation by B. pseudomallei 08 and K96243 was therefore investigated by using the pilA deletion mutants JAB1608 and JAB16, respectively. Biofilm formation levels were equivalent for all mutant strains compared to levels for their respective wild-type strains under all test conditions except in M9 medium at 37°C, where JAB1608 formed 1.7-fold more biofilms than 08 and an equivalent level of biofilms compared to K96243 (Fig. 6). DISCUSSION It is apparent from this and previous work (6) that temperature is a key regulatory signal for microcolony formation and, to a lesser extent, direct adherence of B. pseudomallei 08 to eukaryotic cells. However, it is also apparent that colonization of a eukaryotic monolayer by B. pseudomallei can involve two types of cellular interactions, depending on the strain: bacterium-cell interactions (adherence) and bacterium-bacterium interactions (microcolonies), the latter dramatically increasing

the number of bacteria in association with cells. Given that microcolonies were infrequently formed when bacteria were grown at 37°C prior to assay and that the infection index (adherence) was essentially unchanged despite growth temperature, microcolonies clearly do not directly enhance the number of eukaryotic cells with adherent bacteria; rather, they enhance the number of bacteria associated with a cell via bacterium-bacterium interactions. For other pathogens, such as enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, Vibrio cholerae, Bartonella henselae, and Neisseria meningitidis, microcolony formation or “bacterial aggregation” is considered important for colonization in vivo or in in vitro models (3, 16, 29, 36), and this may also be the case for B. pseudomallei. Since microcolonies of B. pseudomallei 08 form only at 37°C (during an adherence assay) following prior growth at 27°C, we propose that the environmental niche is an important component of microcolony formation by B. pseudomallei and for transmission to a host, since mammal-mammal transmission (37°C) is very rare and the majority of B. pseudomallei infections are acquired from soil and/or water (12, 32). Furthermore, the ability of B. pseudomallei 08 to form microcolonies may be relevant to virulence in vivo since microcolony formation in the lungs of infected humans and animals has been reported (49). However, the ability of strain K96243 to cause serious disease, despite forming very few microcolonies in vitro, suggests either that microcolony formation by K96243 occurs under conditions other than those used in this study or that microcolonies are not essential for virulence in vivo. We have shown that pilA is essential for microcolony formation by B. pseudomallei 08, which significantly enhances the number of bacteria associated with a cell. Indeed, in the case of B. henselae, the aggregated bacteria are engulfed and internalized as a specific structure, the “invasome” (16). Type IV pili also mediate microcolony formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (35, 39), enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (3, 46), V. cholerae (29), and N. meningitidis (36). Our results indicate that the presence of ME-180 cells or media surrounding ME-180 cells or, alternatively, contact with a solid surface are important signals for pilA mRNA expression in 08 and that temper-

5380

BODDEY ET AL.

ature preconditioning is essential for optimal pilA expression. These conditions for pilA mRNA expression correlate with those required for adherent microcolony formation. Since K96243 rarely forms microcolonies but requires pilA for adherence to eukaryotic cells in vitro (18), it appears that pilA has different roles, and is differentially regulated, in 08 and K96243. Our evidence does indeed suggest that the regulation of pilA in K96243 is different from that in 08: in particular, in K96243, pilA does not appear to be upregulated by low temperature when grown either in Luria broth or on LB agar. However, pilA is strongly expressed by K96243 in the presence of eukaryotic cells, following growth at either 27°C or 37°C, pointing to other explanations for the relative lack of microcolony formation under these conditions. It is possible that molecules in addition to PilA are required for microcolony formation and that these are differentially present/regulated between 08 and K96243. The regulation of pilA in 08 and K96243 clearly merits further investigation with respect to both the effect of temperature and the effect of agar or the presence of ME-180 cells. It may be noted that contact regulation of gene expression in bacteria is not unprecedented (15, 34). Biofilms are important in bacterial pathogenesis as they generate a physiologically heterogeneous population of organisms and the biofilm matrix can protect bacteria from host defenses and antibiotics (7, 21, 42). Therefore, biofilms are often associated with chronic infection (21). Melioidosis is often a chronic disease, and the ability for B. pseudomallei to generate biofilms both in vitro and in vivo is well documented (33, 44), though the molecular basis is poorly understood. Although microcolonies and biofilms may be mediated by the same pilus in other bacteria (30), this does not seem to be the case for strain 08. Firstly, pilA is not required for biofilm formation by 08 (or K96243). Indeed, under one condition, namely, minimal medium at 37°C, deletion of pilA increased biofilm formation. Secondly, K96243 rarely formed adherent microcolonies but was able to generate biofilms at least to the same extent as 08. We therefore conclude that the formation of biofilms by B. pseudomallei does not involve pilA and that the formation of microcolonies and biofilms by B. pseudomallei 08 involves two separate processes requiring different molecules. Phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity between strains, including differences between strains 08 and K96243 (24), is extensive in the microbial world and is well documented for B. pseudomallei (2, 22, 40, 44, 47). In this study, we report differences in microcolony formation, pilA expression, and biofilm formation between strains 08 and K96243; although the molecular basis for these differences is yet to be further delineated, they emphasize the need to consider virulence in B. pseudomallei to be due to a collection of factors distributed unequally between significantly different strains. Clearly, as many strains as possible should be systematically studied for their adherence properties. Also, potential adhesins other than type IVA pili should be investigated (18, 24). These tasks should be aided by the availability of genome sequence data for 10 additional B. pseudomallei isolates (52). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS J.A.B. and C.J.D. were recipients of Australian Postgraduate Awards. This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.

INFECT. IMMUN. REFERENCES 1. Ahmed, K., H. D. R. Enciso, H. Masaki, M. Tao, A. Omori, P. Tharavichikul, and T. Nagatake. 1999. Attachment of Burkholderia pseudomallei to pharyngeal epithelial cells: a highly pathogenic bacteria with low attachment ability. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 60:90–93. 2. Anuntagool, N., P. Aramsri, T. Panichakul, V. R. Wuthiekanun, R. Ki-noshita, N. J. White, and S. Sirisinha. 2000. Antigenic heterogeneity of lipopolysaccharide among Burkholderia pseudomallei clinical isolates. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 31:46–152. 3. Bieber, D. S., S. W. Ramer, C.-Y. Wu, M. W. J. T. Toru, R. E. Fernandez, and G. K. Schoolnik. 1998. Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates and virulence of enterpathogenic Escherichia coli. Science 280:2114–2118. 4. Brett, P. J., D. DeShazer, and D. E. Woods. 1997. Characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei-like strains. Epidemiol. Infect. 118:137–148. 5. Brown, N. F., and I. R. Beacham. 2000. Cloning and analysis of genomic differences unique to Burkholderia pseudomallei by comparison with B. thailandensis. J. Med. Microbiol. 49:993–1001. 6. Brown, N. F., J. A. Boddey, C. P. Flegg, and I. R. Beacham. 2002. Adherence of Burkholderia pseudomallei cells to cultured human epithelial cell lines is regulated by growth temperature. Infect. Immun. 70:974–980. 7. Costerton, J. W., P. S. Stewart, and E. P. Greenberg. 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322. 8. Craig, L., M. E. Pique, and J. A. Tainer. 2004. Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2:363–378. 9. Currie, B. J. 2000. Melioidosis: an Australian perspective of an emerging infectious disease, vol. 8. Australian Society for Microbiology, Melbourne, Australia. 10. Currie, B. J., D. A. Fisher, D. M. Howard, J. N. Burrow, S. Selvanayagam, P. L. Snelling, N. M. Anstey, and M. J. Mayo. 2000. The epidemiology of melioidosis in Australia and Papua New Guinea. Acta Trop. 74:121–127. 11. Currie, B. J., D. A. Fisher, D. M. Howard, J. N. C. Burrow, D. Lo, S. Selva-nayagam, N. M. Anstey, S. E. Huffam, P. L. Snelling, P. J. Marks, D. P. Stephens, G. D. Lum, S. P. Jacups, and V. L. Krause. 2000. Endemic melioidosis in tropical northern Australia: a 10-year prospective study and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis. 31:981–986. 12. Dance, D. A. B. 1990. Melioidosis. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 1:143–150. 13. Dance, D. A. B. 2000. Melioidosis as an emerging global problem. Acta Trop. 74:115–119. 14. Day, C. J., M. S. Kim, S. R. Stephens, W. E. Simcock, C. J. Aitken, G. C. Nicholsen, and N. A. Morrison. 2004. Gene array identification of osteoclast genes: differential inhibition of osteoclastogenesis by cyclosporin A and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor. J. Cell. Biochem. 91:303– 315. 15. Deghmane, A.-E., D. Giorgini, L. Maigre, and M.-K. Taha. 2004. Analysis in vitro and in vivo of the transcriptional regulator CrgA of Neisseria meningitidis upon contact with target cells. Mol. Microbiol. 53:917–927. 16. Dehio, C., M. Meyer, J. Berger, H. Schwarz, and C. Lanz. 1997. Interaction of Bartonella henselae with endothelial cells results in bacterial aggregation on the cell surface and the subsequent engulfment and internalisation of the bacterial aggregate by a unique structure, the invasome. J. Cell Sci. 110: 2141–2154. 17. Ellis, J. F., and R. W. Titball. 1999. Burkholderia pseudomallei: medical, veterinary and environmental aspects. Infect. Dis. Rev. 1:174–181. 18. Essex-Lopresti, A. E., J. A. Boddey, R. Thomas, M. P. Smith, M. G. Hartley, T. Atkins, N. F. Brown, C. H. Tsang, I. R. A. Peak, J. Hill, I. R. Beacham, and R. W. Titball. 2005. A type IV pilin, PilA, contributes to adherence of Burkholderia pseudomallei and virulence in vivo. Infect. Immun. 73:1260– 1264. 19. Falkow, S., R. R. Isberg, and D. A. Portnoy. 1992. The interaction of bacteria with mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8:333–363. 20. Finlay, B. B., and S. Falkow. 1997. Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:136–169. 21. Fux, C. A., J. W. Costerton, P. S. Stewart, and P. Stoodley. 2005. Survival strategies of infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13:34–40. 22. Gori, A. H., K. Ahmed, G. Martinez, H. Masaki, K. Watanabe, and T. Nagatake. 1999. Mediation of attachment of Burkholderia pseudomallei to human pharyngeal epithelial cells by the asialoganglioside GM1-GM2 receptor complex. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61:473–475. 23. Guard, R. W., F. A. Khafagi, M. C. Brigden, and L. R. Ashdown. 1984. Melioidosis in Far North Queensland. A clinical and epidemiological review of twenty cases. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 33:467–473. 24. Holden, M. T. G., R. W. Titball, S. J. Peacock, A. M. Cerdeno-Tarraga, T. Atkins, L. C. Crossman, T. L. Pitt, C. Churcher, K. Mungall, S. D. Bentley, M. Sebaihia, N. R. Thomson, N. Bason, I. R. Beacham, K. Brooks, K. A. Brown, N. F. Brown, G. L. Challis, I. Cherevach, T. Chillingworth, A. Cronin, B. Crossett, P. Davis, D. DeShazer, T. Feltwell, A. Fraser, Z. Hance, H. Hauser, S. Holroyd, K. Jagels, K. E. Keith, M. Maddison, S. Moule, C. Price, M. A. Quail, E. Rabbinowitsch, K. Rutherford, M. Sanders, M. Simmonds, S. Songsivilai, K. Stevens, S. Tumapa, M. Vesaratchavest, S. Whitehead, C. Yeats, B. G. Barrell, P. C. F. Osyston, and J. Parkhill. 2004. Genomic

VOL. 74, 2006

25. 26. 27.

28.

29. 30. 31.

32. 33. 34.

35.

36. 37. 38.


plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:14240–14245. Howe, C., A. Sampath, and M. Spotnitz. 1971. The Pseudomallei group: a review. J. Infect. Dis. 124:598–606. Hultgren, S. J., S. Abraham, M. Caparon, P. Falk, J. W. St. Geme III, and S. Normark. 1993. Pilus and nonpilus bacterial adhesins: assembly and function in cell recognition. Cell 73:887–901. Kanai, K., Y. Suzuki, E. Kondo, Y. Maejima, D. Miyamoto, T. Suzuki, and T. Kurata. 1997. Specific binding of Burkholderia pseudomallei cells and their cell surface acid phosphatase to gangliotetraosylceramide (asialo GM1) and gangliotriaosylceramide (asialo GM2). Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 28:781–790. Kespichayawattana, W., P. Intachote, P. Utaisincharoen, and S. Sirisinha. 2004. Virulent Burkholderia pseudomallei is more efficient than avirulent Burkholderia thailandensis in invasion of and adherence to cultured human epithelial cells. Microb. Pathog. 36:287–292. Kirn, T. J., M. J. Lafferty, C. M. Sandoe, and R. K. Taylor. 2000. Delineation of pilin domains required for bacterial association into microcolonies and intestinal colonization by Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 35:896–910. Klemm, P., L. Hjerrild, M. Gjermansen, and M. A. Schembri. 2004. Structure-function analysis of the self-recognising antigen 43 autotransporter protein from Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 51:283–296. Korbsrisate, S., M. Vanaporn, P. Kerdsuk, W. Kespichayawattana, P. Vattanaviboon, P. Kiatpapan, and G. Lertmemongkolchai. 2005. The Burkholderia pseudomallei RpoE (AlgU) operon is involved in environmental stress tolerance and biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 252:243–249. Leelarasamee, A., and S. Bovornkitti. 1989. Melioidosis: review and update. Rev. Infect. Dis. 11:413–425. Loprasert, S., R. Sallabhan, W. Whangsuk, and S. Mongkolsuk. 2002. The Burkholderia pseudomallei oxyR gene: expression analysis and mutant characterisation. Gene 296:161–169. Marenda, M., B. Brito, D. Callard, S. Genin, P. Barberis, C. Boucher, and M. Arlat. 1998. PrhA controls a novel regulatory pathway required for the specific induction of Ralstonia solanacearum hrp genes in the presence of plant cells. Mol. Microbiol. 27:437–453. Matz, C., T. Bergfeld, S. A. Rice, and S. Kjelleberg. 2004. Microcolonies, quorum sensing and cytotoxicity determine the survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to protozoan grazing. Environ. Microbiol. 6:218–226. Merz, A. J., and M. So. 2000. Interactions of pathogenic Neisseriae with epithelial cell membranes. Annu. Rev. Dev. Biol. 16:423–457. Milton, D. L., R. O’Toole, P. Horstedt, and H. Wolf-Watz. 1996. Flagellin A is essential for the virulence of Vibrio anguillarum. J. Bacteriol. 178:1310– 1319. O’Toole, G., H. B. Kaplan, and R. Kolter. 2000. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54:49–79.

Editor: V. J. DiRita

5381

39. O’Toole, G. A., and R. Kolter. 1998. Flagella and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol. Microbiol. 30:295–304. 40. Ou, K., C. Ong, S. Y. Koh, F. Rodrigues, S. H. Sim, D. Wong, C. H. Ooi, K. C. Ng, H. Jikuya, C. C. Yau, S. Y. Soon, D. Kesuma, M. A. Lee, and P. Tan. 2005. Integrative genomic, transcriptional, and proteomic diversity in natural isolates of the human pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei. J. Bacteriol. 187:4276–4285. 41. Penfold, R. J., and J. M. Pemberton. 1992. An improved suicide vector for the construction of chromosomal insertion mutations in bacteria. Gene 118: 145–146. 42. Reisner, A., N. Hoiby, T. Tolker-Nielsen, and S. Molin. 2005. Microbial pathogenesis and biofilm development. Contrib. Microbiol. 12:114–131. 43. Rosenau, A., P. Y. Sizaret, J. M. Musser, A. Godeau, and R. Quentin. 1993. Adherence to human cells of a cryptic Haemophilus genospecies responsible for genital and neonatal infections. Infect. Immun. 61:4112–4118. 44. Taweechaisupapong, S., C. Kaewpa, C. Arunyanart, P. Kanla, P. Homchampa, S. Sirishna, T. Proungvitaya, and S. Wongratanacheewin. 2005. Virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei does not correlate with biofilm formation. Microb. Pathog. 3:77–85. 45. Thomas, R., and T. Brooks. 2004. Common oligosaccharide moieties inhibit the adherence of typical and atypical respiratory pathogens. J. Med. Microbiol. 53:833–840. 46. Tobe, T., and C. Sasakawa. 2001. Role of bundle-forming pilus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in host cell adherence and in microcolony development. Cell. Microbiol. 3:579–585. 47. Ulett, G. C., B. J. Currie, T. W. Clair, M. Mayo, N. Ketheesan, J. Labrooy, D. Gal, R. Norton, C. A. Smith, J. Barnes, J. Warner, and R. G. Hirst. 2001. Burkholderia pseudomallei virulence: definition, stability and association with clonality. Microbes Infect. 3:621–631. 48. Vorachit, M., P. Chongtrakool, S. Arkomsean, and S. Boonsong. 2000. Antimicrobial resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Acta Trop. 74:139– 144. 49. Vorachit, M., K. Lam, P. Jayanetra, and J. W. Costerton. 1995. Electron microscopy study of the mode of growth of Pseudomonas pseudomallei in vitro and in vivo. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 98:379–391. 50. Vorachit, M., K. Lam, P. Jayanetra, and J. W. Costerton. 1993. Resistance of Pseudomaonas pseudomallei growing as a biofilm on silastic discs to ceftazidime and co-trimoxazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:2000–2002. 51. White, N. J. 2003. Melioidosis. Lancet 361:1715–1722. 52. Wiersinga, W. J., T. van der Poll, N. J. White, N. P. Day, and S. J. Peacock. 2006. Melioidosis: insights into the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:272–282. 53. Woods, D. E. 2002. The use of animal infection models to study the pathogenesis of melioidosis and glanders. Trends Microbiol. 10:483–484.