the pathogenicity of brucella suis biovar 4 for bison - BioOne

8 downloads 0 Views 710KB Size Report
Jan 23, 1992 - suis biovar. 4-challenged bison. Brucella abortus was isolated from several tissues in all control ..... fall at hunting season. Although the. B.
Journal

Wildlife

of

32(4).

l)(ses

© Wildlife

THE

PATHOGENICITY

Julia S. Bevins,1 John Donald S. Davis2

OF BRUCELLA E. Blake,1

L. Garry

SUIS

BIOVAR

Jamie

Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, 99775, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M College Station, Texas, 77843-4467, USA Green Valley Veterinary Services, 1483 Green Valley Road, Watsonville, California,

The pathogenicity of 2.1 X 10’ colony cows. Six pregnant

inoculation six pregnant strain

2308

calving

as

or

tological internal

a

positive

abortion

control.

examinations

Bison

they conducted

which

after

organs.

of Brucella suis biovar forming units (CFU) bison were inoculated

were Terminal

serum

on

from

Assuxiation

1996

BISON

K. Morton3

and

95076,

USA

bison (Bison bison) was evaluated by nil saline into the conjunctival sac of 1.27 X 10’ CFU of Brucella abortus on 23 January 1992, and observed until and necropsied. Bacteriological and hisreproductive tract, mammary gland, and

euthanized, lymph nodes,

samples

551-.555

4 for in 0.1 with

inoculated

were were

PP

USA University,

2

ABSTRACT:

Disease

4 FOR

J. W. Templeton,2

Adams,2

I.

calves

and

cows

were

evaluated

by

card,

rivanol

standard tube agglutination, cold complement fixation tube, indirect bison conjugated enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (EUISA), competitive ELISA, and particle-concentration fluorescence immunoassay. No clinical signs of brucellosis were seen in bison inoculated with B. suis biovar 4, and infection was found only in lymph nodes of two animals. There was no evidence of metastasis of this organism to the mammary gland or the reproductive tract. There were no detectable levels of antibodies to Brucella spp. in terminal blood samples taken from B. suis biovar 4-challenged bison. Brucella abortus was isolated from several tissues in all control bison. All B. abortus-challenged animals developed uterine infection and five developed mammarv gland infection. Reproductive disease resulted in abortions in five B. abortu.s’-challenged bison and neonatal death in the remaining calf. Brucella .suis hiovar 4 does not appear to he pathogenic for bison. Key words: Brncella suis biovar 4, brucellosis, bison, Bison bison, pathogenesis. precipitation,

INTRODUCTION

Brucellosis (Ran

4;

causes

late-term birth

rate

symptoms

Bruce!losis of reindeer

have

1961).

Alaskan

arctic

(Meyer, range

1966). from less

in some

arthritis

moschatus) 1984).

with One

mentally infection biovar to

4 can cattle

(Alces

developed et al., be via

and tesZabrodin,

been

reindeer. of

Alaska

(USA),

(Gates alces)

in

in

usually

or the

infects

herds

of

cattle

of weak has

bison

to specan

abortus

birth

organism

calves

been

main-

independent

infected

with

area. the

Brucella

The

a free

susceptible

abortus,

1990).

abortion

in that are

which

a!.,

bison.

tamed

cattle

of

(Tessaro,

1986).

isolated

In

response

to the

the perceived Delta Junction

al.,

experi-

ka,

a generalized 1991). Brucella with

et

contact

et

Brucella

of Brucella

cause

areas

with

about

4 into

present

bison)

Junction,

concerns

biovar

B.

catgame

Delta

raised

of B. sins herd

than

in intensive near

(Bison

Litof

other

Interest has

1993).

pathogenicity

ruminants

reindeer

bison

(Davis

Tessaro,

the

4 for

farming

cies

and

about

tle and

moschatus

experimentally contact

biovar

infection

in most located in

(Ovibos

bursitis

moose

infected (Dieterich

4 has

suis

Bison

1981).

biovar muskox

wild

is known

ranging

and

coastal

(Forbes

tle

introduction

of bruce!losis to 30% or more

(Dieterich,

suis

a

and

Prevalences than 1%

and a poor

Additional

are

enzootic caribou

regions

herds

Brucella

from

is and

disease

females,

with associated lameness infection (Golosov and

1959). herds

mitted

in

seen

suis

the

that

(Davidov,

caribou

Brucella

calves

commonly

bursitis ticular

and

abortion

of weak

survival

suis

reindeer

spp.) is caused by in these animals,

gfer

biovar the

in

reindeer

sins

we

evaluated

biovar

jective

trans-

could

infected 581

threat bison the

4 infection

was be

public

to

infected

concern

over

of brucel!osis herd in Interior pathogenicity

in

determine with

to

of

bison.

Our

whether B.

suis

the Alas-

4, and

B.

obbison if so,

582

JOURNAL

if

they

would

OF WILDLIFE

would

be

transmit

the

DISEASES,

adversely bacteria

VOL.

32, NO. 4, OCTOBER

affected to other

or bison.

1996

samples

of

lymph

nodes;

froni

MATERIALS Twelve

second

pies

AND METHODS tri mester

pregnant

bison

were

ol)tained frolli a privately owned bnicelherd located near Gillette, Wyoming (USA) (43#{176}40’to 43#{176}41N, 105#{176}28’to 105#{176}29’W). All bison were seronegative for brucellosis by card test (Alton et al. , 1975) and had not l)een vaccinated with B. a/)Ortu.s strain 19. These hison were shipped via truck to the Brucella spp. research facility at the Texas Veterinary Medical Park, Texas A&M University (College Station, Texas, USA). All bison were given hay and water ad lihitum and fed a balanced ration at 2 to 3% of body weight (TAMU Mix Number losis-free

1; Producer’s

Cooperative

Association,

College

Station, Texas). Experimental protocols for the studies were approved by an independent campus-wide animal welfare committee. Six bison were moved into an animal facility that met published Bio Safety Level 3 requireinents (Richardson and Barkle 1988). Bison were housed in individual pens within this facility. These animals were challenged on 23 January 1992 with 2.1 X 10’ colony forming units (CFU) B. suis biovar 4 in a 0.1 nil physiological saline suspension placed in the conjunctival sac. The B. suis biovar 4 culture was originally isolated from the carpus of a reindeer shot near Nome, Alaska in 1977 and had been passed once th rough lemmings (Lenunu.s sibiricus) to assure virulence. This culture and challenge protocol had been employed successfully in similar challenge experiments in reindeer at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska (Dieterich et al., 1981). Two lemmings and a guinea iig (Cavia porcellu.s) were inoculated with the challenge suspension, as an additional virulence check. The remaining six pregnant bison were challenged with 1.27 X 10’ CFU of B. abortus strain 2308 as positive controls. These positive control bison remained in outdoor biocontainment pens at the Brucella spp. research facility. All bison were observed until the time of abortion or calving, after which they were thanized with an overdose of 19.5 g pentobarbital sodium and 2.5 g phenvtoin sodium (Beuthanasia-D, Shering-Plough Animal Health Corp. Phoenix, Arizona, USA) and necropsied from 21 February to 14 May 1992. Samples taken at the time of necropsy included blood for serology and 49 tissues for bacterial culture. These tissues included: right an(l left atlantal, axillary,

internal

liteal, prefelnoral, malnmary, and

iliac,

mandibular, prescapular,

suprapharangeal

parotid,

each

pop-

of

hepatic,

niediastinal

tissue mammary

kidney,

and

samples gland

liver,

mesenteric

an(l

milk

quarter;

lungs,

both

swabs

and

sam-

adrenal

glands,

spleen, tonsil, both uterine horns, vagina, and cervix. Tissues from B. suis biovar 4-challenged bison were frozen at - 70 C and later thawed and inoculated onto trypticase soy agar ( Baltimore Biological Laboratories, Cockeysville, Maryland, USA) and a more selective media containing per liter: 25g tryptose broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Michigan, USA), 20 g agar (Bacto agar, Difco Laboratories), 0.15 ml Tergitol 7 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri, USA), 25 ml Tween 40 (Sigma Chemical Co.), 1.4 ing ethyl violet (Sigma Chemical Co.), 1.44

g

Co.),

sodium 1

vial

of

laulryl

sulfate

CNV

(Cholistin

(Sigma

Chemical sulfate,

7,500

mcg, nystatin, 12,5(X) units, vancomycin, 3,000 mcg, Difco Laboratories) and 500 rug of cycloheximide (Actidione, Sigma Chemical Co.) Tissues from B. abortus-cha!!enged bison were frozen at -70 C and later thawed and plated on Farrell’s restrictive media (Farrell, 1974). Fetuses were necropsied within 12 hr of abortion. Healthy calves were bled, euthanized, and necropsied at the time of adult necropsy. Tissues taken for bacterial culture frolu calves and fetuses included liver, kidney, spleen, lung, abomasal and rectal swabs, and mediastinal lymph nodes. Serum salnples were riot taken from bison l)etween the time of challenge and necropsy because of the risk of inducing stress-related abortions. Serum samples from calves and cows were evaluated by card (Aiton et al., 1975), rivanol precipitation (Alton et a!., 1975), standard tube agglutination (Alton et a!., 1975), cold complement fixation tube (Alton et al., 1975), indirect bison conjugated enzyme linked i bent assay (ELISA) (Davis et al., 1990), competitive ELISA (Adams and Mia, 1992), and particle concentration fluorescence immunoassay (PCFIA) (Reynolds, 1987). Minimum criteria for diagnostically positive reactions for bison on these tests are listed in Animal an(l Plant Health Inspection Service (1992). RESULTS Two biovar this

of

3 wk

renal,

suipra-

mo

lymph

nodes;

tamed

from the

pathogen.

One no

the

fetus. from bison

All Both

B.

SUiS

case

brucellosis.

isolated second

post-challenge.

this

with neither

in

post-challenge;

was of

infected but

to

isolated

pyogene.s

uterus

bison

attributable

aborted were

the

4 aborted,

was bison

pathogens

Actinoinyces

the that

fetal

fetus

and

aborted,

2

tissues bison

cows

also

BEVINS

TABLE

and

Pre-inoculation

1.

I)iovar

ET AL.-PATHOGENICITY

terminal

serology

OF BRUCELLA

in bison

challenged

SUIS

with

BIOVAR

Brucella

4 FOR

and

ahortus

583

BISON

Brncella

suis

4.

Indirect

ELISA

B. ahortu.s (n = 6) Pre-inoculation

0.194

B.

±

0.068I Terminal

6)

0.280

±

±

0.217

±

0.2.33

0.167

0.428e

0.125

B. abortus

B.

0.601

0.604

±

0.000

0.123

0.975

Calf

=

Competitiv

PCFIAh

4

sni.s

(ii

0.152

±

results

1) Particle

concentration

are

> 1 (XX)

ELISA.

Cornpetitive

Positive

± standard

Mean

optical

((3D)

±

4.98

7.22

±

1.76

±

0.601

0.046

0.000

0.64

0.601

±

71.65

±

23.02

6.24

±

2.30

4.14

±

0.98

2.72

±

units.

iinmunoa.ssay. results

4.58

o.ooo

density

fluorescence

±

B. .‘iui.s 4

0.008

o.iii a Positive

e ELISAC

B. abortus

4

suis

are

>70%

Positive

results

inhibition.

Bison

are

40%

inhibition.

deviation.

1.

ii

to

=

4.

were

infected

with

B.

was

isolated

from

a

node

of

the

dibular

first

cow

and

a

second Brucella

tracts

or

and

both

was

node no

lymph

from

of

the

the of

reproductive

glands.

The

four

re-

maining bison challenged with B. suis biovar 4 bore healthy calves at term, approximately 4 mo post-challenge. These four cows and for brucellosis brucellosis son

their when

were

observed

challenged

A!!

six

calves cultured.

with

bison

were No

suis

vano! nation Results

for

Similarly,

all

negative (Table By

surviving

by all tests 1). comparison,

five

lenged with B. ahortus 50 days post-challenge, weak Four 24

calf

that

swabs

taken

calving

or

from abortion

of

six

card,

animal

yielded

ri-

the

2).

sero-

bison

cha!-

after

to a

birth.

placentas Vaginal shortly

cultures

after of B.

also

six of

calf

and

obtained

cows

five

Many tissues contained

from

the

were

all

of

glands

(Table 2). challenged

obtained in

Cultures

uterus

mammary

serologic

test

and

from

of these

ani-

in each

of the (Ta-

B. abortus

(Table

1).

DISCUSSION Based

on a sample size of six animals, biovar 4, at a dose of 2 X i07 CFU, not pathogenic for bison. Although bi-

suis

son may become infected biovar 4, these preliminary idence that with infection

of necropsy

had retained parturition. each

at

33 days one bore

shortly

sampled

ble 2). All bison infected with B. ahortus developed antibodies to the disease and were strongly positive on more than one

was

suis

tests

were

aborted and

died

of these bison hr following

a!!

PCFIA and in Table 1.

time

were

tissues

(Table

mals bison

B.

tube agglutifixation tests.

calves at the

bi-

B.

ELISA, are given

ELISA

of the

with

standard complement

Indirect

competitive

of

4.

challenged

precipitation, and cold

signs

biovar

biovar 4 were seronegative by the time of necropsy, including

Cultures

negative

in any

B.

eight

fetuses

evidence

in the

mammary

all

man-

parotid

lymph

There infection

abortus.

lymph

from

a

popliteal

cow. spp.

4, which

mandibular

nodes,

lymph

node

biovar

suis

the

ripheral which

lymph aborted,

pathogens idence

that

ed.

There

B.

suis

reproductive mentally is unlikely

infection localized nodes. lack

with results

B.

are

In the of any

was no evidence 4 to the mammary

that

B.

ev-

was sub-clinical, in regional or peone bison significant

in the fetus and uterus was this abortion was stress-relat-

tract infected

suis

of metastasis gland or

evof the

in any of the experibison, and therefore, it suis

biovar

4 would

shed by these animals. The experimental dose of B. suis biovar 4 should have been a sufficient challenge dose. A dose of 1.4 X i03 CFU B. abortus

be

584

JOURNAL

TABLE

2.

OF WILDLIFE

Tissues

DISEASES,

VOL.

32, NO. 4, OCTOBER

Brucella

spp.

was

which

from

isolated

1996

in bison

challenged

with

B.

ahortus.

Animal

and

Tissues

Head

ivniph

organs

nodesa

Organ

lymph

Other

peripheral

nodesb lymph

nodese

lymph

Supramammarv

Mammary

gland

Reproductive Other

808

nodes

and

swahsd

Calf

glands or

fetal

Right

and

left

I) Bronchial.

Right

tjssuesg

and

Tissue

left

from

Right

and

Liver,

long,

g Calf

atlantal.

hepatic.

mammary

each

uterine

spleen.

cervix,

and

819

6/8

5/8

418

5/8

3/6

3/6

4/6

2/6

0/6

4/10

9/10

SIlo

SIlo

4110

4110

2/2

2/2

2/2

212

1/2

2/2

2/8

5/8

2/8

0/8

5/8

1/8

1/4

2/4

1/4

1/4

1/4

1/4

0/4

3/4

1/4

0/4

0/4

0/4

1/1

1/1

0/1

0/1

1/1

0/1

0/2

0/2

0/2

0/2

0/2

0/2

4/8

8/8

8/8

2/8

7/8

8/8

and

suprapharvngeal

and

right

and

lymph

nodes.

left adrenal

popliteal.

and

corresponding

with

817

8/8

prefemoral.

quarter

horns, and

fetal

or

parotid. nuesenteric.

prescapular.

axillarv.

left

(808)

mandibular. mediastinal,

816

0/6

Tonsil Adrenal

812

3/8

organse

organst

SI()

lymph

internal

nodes.

lymph

iliac

nodes.

swabs.

vagina.

kidney.

(all others)

liver,

lung.

kid,ie

spleen.

aboniasal

aboma.sum.

rectal

SWOI).

swab,

and

mediastinal

lymph

node.

is

sufficient

to

infect

1939).

Tests

of

al.,

species

a cow

(McEwen

vaccine

et

efficacy

have used 106 or i07 CFU of Bruspp. as challenge doses (Plommet,

cella

1990). If bison rally-occurring

B.

were

the been

of i07 CFU should to produce infection.

challenge sufficient

suis

If

these biovar

the

susceptibility

susceptible

suis

to

biovar

4

the

species,

natu-

if B.

biovar 4 was not shed by infected imals, then it is possible to extrapolate state that B. suis biovar 4 is unlikely maintained

in

a bison

source

unlike

B. abortus

infection both

ease

and

causes mammary

son, and the in populations

disease of

has wild

fected

cattle

been bison

of

(Tessaro,

1986;

in

able

levels

bodies biovar

in-

Meagher,

bison

for Brucella tion between

in this

study

spp.-specific the

of

necropsy.

challenged

with

time

were antibody

biovar

tested produc-

of challenge

It is possible B. .cuis

not

and that

bison

4 developed

The

lack

are

infec-

of

detect-

anti-

necropsy in B. bison is evidence to this

E!evated

wild

or more spp.

spp.-specific

of

bison

in yearly

organism re-

unlikely

samplings, in

of

antibody are

sampled

suis

to

be

particularly

the

fall

at

if

hunting

season.

did we

Although the B. SiLZS biovar 4 organism not appear to be pathogenic for bison, are recommending that precautions be

taken when reindeer are shipped from the Seward Peninsula to Alaska’s interior. Such precautions include adequate fencing for of bison

antine

and

In

summary,

results

from

causes

and

testing

reindeer

of

and

shipped

quar-

reindeer

1991).

(Stahmann, the

months

Brucella

are

in detect-

Bnzcella

immunoreactivity

separation

The

several

at the time 4 -challenged

animals

dis-

with

of

they significance.

produced

species.

detected

maintained in North

produced,

active

other

of

1973).

time

tions

in

in bi-

contact

to

sponses

Bra-

infections

for

response

were

protocol.

diagnostic

usually

quantities

in

be

is clearly

in bison. reproductive

gland

independent

America

This

were

are

which

experimental

little

species.

and to

these of

reduced in this

an-

independent

of infection.

abortus

cella

herd

indeed

able

responses

by our

Antibodies

have

suis

another

If

infection,

and

antibody

detected

probably

results of an experimenta! B. 4 infection in six bison reflected of

temporary

not

other

only

based

six sub-clinical

bison,

on

the B.

experimental suis

infections

biovar in bison.

4

BEVINS

Imported

reindeer

cellosis

are

which

not

may

expected

cellosis disease of Alaska.

risk

ET AL-PATHOGENICITY

to interior

tus

bru-

carry

to present

from

sion nal

This

ence

study

was

and

supported

L.

B.,

S. T. TESSARO.

brucellosis

Alaskan

Technology Foundation, Medical Center,

A&M Veterinary stitute of Arctic Fairbanks.

Biology,

the Texas and the In-

University

of

C.,

box

,noschatus

nal

of Wildlife

of

AND

D-Tec

A.

S.

A.

Brucella

petitive

A”,

a monoclonal-based

com-

im munosorbent

assay

enzyme-linked

(cELISA) tle.

for

serodiagnosis

Proceedings

of

States

Animal

United

Field evaluation

of brucellosis

the

Annual Health

Association

peutics National

of

the

tional

95:

92-

G.

G.,

L. M.

Laboratory

E.

D.

in

Organization

1975.

PIETZ.

brucellosis.

Press,

World

Geneva,

and

Switzerland,

1992.

PLANT

Bruceilosis

and

rules.

Service, ington,

pp

N.

W.

to

the

study

KOPEC,

A.

AND

in

captive

bison.

of

Wildlife

I. Se-

aging

R. A. Diseases,

of

Alaska

1981. Brucellosis. R. A. Dieterich Press,

In: (ed).

Fairbanks,

Alaska,

26:

fects

of killed

cine

on

reindeer

Brucella mary

Brucella

suis

type

in

tories. No.

pp.

Vashington,

53-

challenge

exposed Journal

R.

L.

suis aices).

ZARNKE.

biovar Journal

Diseases

selective

I.

D. media

1974. for

The the

development isolation

of

of Brucella

C.

1991.

biovar In

A.

and Human

University pp. S. V.

The

1986. of

nadian

wildlife:

27:

for

Ver-

In

Bio-

laboraPublication

Printing

Office,

reindeer and

and

sustainable

and

Alaska

Bru-

from Problems R.

Press,

T.

deHudson

Fairbanks,

403-406.

Journal Received

1988.

biomedical

existing and

brucellosis A

and review.

tuberculosis Canadian

119-124.

a new ahor-

266-275.

criteria.

herds:

Renecker of

United

30-38.

Shipping

A.

cattle.

of the

Services

4 infected

L.

in man-

91:

level

field particle

range

BARKLEY.

Conservation

(eds.).

portance

Meeting

\V.

pp.

and

in

Government

D.C.,

Alaska, TESSARO, a

and U.S.

J.

velopment,

in

of Wildlife

pp.

portable

immunoassay

microbiological

suis

with

Experi-

infection

A &

Texas,

of the

Association

AND

Health

solutions.

of Veter-

1991.

4

Texas

assay

biosafety

88-8395,

‘ac-

27: 470-472. FARRELL,

celia

131-134.

Brucella (Alce.s’

45/20

Ef-

A.,

animal

Univer-

1981.

strain

4. American

42: AND

moose

ahortus

later

Research

mental

J. K. MORTON.

Curin bru-

(ed).

infection

Health

J.

STAH MANN, AND

in cattle:

Station,

use

abortus

Animal

Alaskan

The

of its Annual

tebrate

57. B. L. DEYOE,

Adams

College

fluorescence

RICHARDSON,

safety

DIETERICH, Wildlife

of Vet-

In Advances

immunosorbent

Brucelia

States

transmis-

Diseases

eskimos

Journal

vaccines

G.

1987.

Proceedings

360-371.

sity

S. L.

concentration D.

ADAMS.

and

L. Press,

enzyme-linked

J.

C.

L.

pathogenesis, Journal

brucellosis

FICHT,

virulence

from

353-357.

prospects.

research,

University

and

isolated

Killed

and

1, Na-

Printing

215-227.

5: 48-51. T

ahortus

cattle.

M

Wash-

of

Veterinariia

bacteriology,

sion

cellosis

Inspection

1990.

Yellowstone

pp.

American

27:

situation

REYNOLDS,

On

D.

Briicel!a

1990.

Research

cattle. Thera-

Series

161

strains

in Alaska.

M.

rent

methods

Health

TEMPLETON,

J.

WILLIAMS, rology,

Uniform

Plant

of Agriculture,

reindeer.

J.

S.,

SERVICE.

48-49.

1961.

northern D.

and

Department

D.C., N.

INSPECTION

eradication.

Animal U.S.

DAVIDO\’,

DAVIS,

HEALTH

of

Identification

of Brucella

erinary

on

Government

D.C.,

1966.

reindeer

bison

PAT-

of Bru-

and

Mongraph

U.S.

D.

dose test

The

1973.

Service,

E.

J.

AND

infective

Scientific

Bru-

1959.

Pathology’

Washington,

PLOMMET,

AND

immunization

116-128.

M.

studies

86-103.

ANIMAL

in

AND

techniques

Health pp.

JONES,

for

M.

Ovi-

36: 23-25.

PRICOTLEY

suitable

52:

FORBES. Jour-

ZABRODIN.

Veterinariia

Comparative

Park

MEYER,

ALTON,

A.

An

M.

B.

20: 233-234.

V

F. W.

Park.

Office,

112.

D.,

L.

(Zimmermann).

Diseases AND

of

MEACHER,

in cat-

Meeting

Jour-

Association

in a muskox,

mnoschatus

ahortus

Journal

AND

brucellosis

1939.

ERSON.

1992.

MR.

Transmis-

to cattle.

Medical

WOBESER,

I. M.,

celia L. G.,

ADAMS,

C.

Rangiferine

MCEwEN,

CITED

1993.

reindeer

Veterinary

cellosis in reindeer.

LITERATURE

in Vet-

289-294. C.

GOLOS0v,

Alaska

585

280-286. from

American

1984.

Sci-

AND

BISON

Research

of of

GATES,

by the

sources.

16:

203:

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

4 FOR

Science

FORBES,

herds

SUIS BIOVAR

contaminated

erinary

a bru-

bison

BRUCELLA

OF

publication

7 June

1993.

potential

imin

Veterinary

Ca-