The Regulation of Autophagy in Eukaryotic Cells

1 downloads 0 Views 192KB Size Report
Department of Molecular Genetics; The Ohio State University; Columbus, Ohio USA ... State University; 484 West Twelfth Avenue, Room 984; Columbus, Ohio ...
[Autophagy 2:2, 146-148, April/May/June 2006]; ©2006 Landes Bioscience

The Regulation of Autophagy in Eukaryotic Cells Addenda

Do All Roads Pass Through Atg1? ABSTRACT

KEY WORDS autophagy, cAMP-dependent protein kinase, Tor proteins, Snf1 protein kinase, Atg1, macroautophagy, pre-autophagosomal structure

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

.

UT E

RIB

Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is a highly conserved, degradative pathway that was originally identified as a cellular response to nutrient deprivation.1,2 More recent work has implicated autophagy in a wide variety of processes, including programmed cell death, innate immunity and organismal aging.3-5 During autophagy, bulk portions of the cytoplasm, including whole organelles, are engulfed in vesicular structures, known as autophagosomes.6 In S. cerevisiae, these intermediates originate from a poorly-defined organelle, the preautophagosomal structure (PAS), and are targeted to the vacuole/lysosome for degradation.7 The amount of flux through this pathway can be rather high and may in fact be incompatible with cell growth. Thus, it is imperative that the induction of autophagy be tightly regulated. This control is arguably best-understood in the budding yeast, S. cerevisiae, where three signaling pathways important for growth control have been implicated in the regulation of autophagy. In this organism, autophagy is generally triggered by starvation and is required for the survival of these nutrient-deprived cells.8 Two of these signaling pathways, containing the Tor and Ras proteins, respectively, are growth-stimulatory and both inhibit autophagy in dividing cells.9-11 The Tor proteins are highly conserved protein kinases that are responsible for coordinating eukaryotic cell growth with nutrient availability.12 The Ras proteins are small GTP-binding proteins that, in S. cerevisiae, control the activity of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA).13,14 The inactivation of either of these pathways results in a G0-like growth arrest and in the full induction of the autophagy pathway. Finally, autophagy also appears to be controlled by the Snf1 protein, the S. cerevisiae analog of the AMP-activated protein kinase.15 Snf1 activity increases in response to particular environmental insults, including starvation, and, in contrast to the above pathways, Snf1 activity is required for the induction of the autophagy process.15,16 Interestingly, all of these pathways appear to converge upon Atg1, a conserved serine/ threonine-specific protein kinase that is, itself, a key regulator of autophagy.17 Upon nutrient deprivation, Atg1 protein kinase activity increases and this protein is rapidly recruited from the cytosol to the PAS.10,18,19 Recent work from our lab indicates that this relocalization of Atg1 is regulated by Ras/PKA signaling activity.20 PKA directly phosphorylates Atg1 and thereby prevents its association with the PAS. However, this PKA phosphorylation had no effect on Atg1 protein kinase activity. Instead, previous work has suggested a role for the Tor pathway in the regulation of this Atg1 activity. The Tor pathway appears to regulate the phosphorylation state of Atg13, a protein important for autophagy that is associated with Atg1 specifically in nutrient-deprived cells.10 Atg13 is heavily

IEN

We thank Dr. Stephen Deminoff for valuable discussions and comments on this manuscript. This work is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM65227) to P.K.H.

IST

Previously published online as a Autophagy E-publication: http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/autophagy/abstract.php?id=2485

OT D

Received 01/01/06; Accepted 01/07/06

ON

*Correspondence to: Paul K. Herman; Department of Molecular Genetics; The Ohio State University; 484 West Twelfth Avenue, Room 984; Columbus, Ohio 43210 USA; Tel.: 614.688.5581; Fax: 614.292.4466; Email: [email protected]

.D

Department of Molecular Genetics; The Ohio State University; Columbus, Ohio USA

The induction of autophagy appears to be tightly controlled in all eukaryotic cells. This highly conserved, degradative process is induced by a variety of signals, including nutrient deprivation, and is generally thought to be incompatible with rapid cell growth. Recent work in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has suggested that the Atg1 protein kinase is at the center of this control. Atg1, and its associated proteins, appear to be directly targeted by multiple signaling pathways important for the control of both autophagy and cell growth. These pathways involve the small GTP-binding Ras proteins, the Tor protein kinases and the AMP-activated protein kinase, Snf1, respectively. A key question that remains is whether this regulatory paradigm has been evolutionarily conserved. In other words, is Atg1 the primary target of those signaling pathways responsible for coordinating growth with environmental influences in other eukaryotes? Here, we suggest that Atg1 is very likely to fulfill this role but that a truly definitive answer will require that we develop a better understanding of this protein kinase and its targets in all eukaryotes.

CE

Joseph S. Stephan Paul K. Herman*

Addendum to:

BIO

SC

An Evolutionary Proteomics Approach Identifies Substrates of the cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase.

©

20

05

LA

ND

ES

Y.V. Budovskaya, J.S. Stephan, S.J. Deminoff and P.K. Herman Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:13933-8

146

Autophagy

2006; Vol. 2 Issue 2

The Regulation of Autophagy in Eukaryotic Cells

component of this regulation. However, it should be pointed out that several of the important regulators of this protein kinase, including Atg13, do not have clear orthologs in animals.28 Therefore, it is imperative that we begin to define the proteins associated with Atg1 in other organisms and to examine whether these partners might also be targets of the signaling pathways controlling growth. For example, are there functional homologs of Atg13 that are not recognizable with simple sequence comparisons?29 Clearly, these experiments will be guided by the studies already done in yeast, but we expect that the results will provide some interesting new twists into the multilayered regulation of this degradative process. References

Figure 1. The Atg1 protein kinase complex is targeted by both the Ras/PKA and Tor signaling pathways in S. cerevisiae. Potential roles for the Ras/PKA and Tor pathways in the regulation of the Atg1-PAS and Atg1-Atg13 associations are shown, respectively. See the text for more details. The other proteins known to be associated with Atg1 are not shown for the sake of simplicity.3 PAS, preautophagosomal structure.

phosphorylated in dividing cells and is rapidly dephosphorylated upon either nutrient deprivation or the inactivation of the Tor pathway.10,21 Atg1 specifically associates with the hypophosphorylated form of Atg13.10,22 Although it is not known whether this regulation by Tor is direct or indirect, recent work has indicated that this Atg13 phosphorylation is not the result of PKA activity.20 Therefore, in the simplest sense, the Ras/PKA pathway appears to influence the subcellular localization of Atg1 while the Tor pathway may be regulating Atg1 protein kinase activity (Fig. 1). Unfortunately, this simple model does not fully account for all of the present experimental data. For example, the inactivation of the Tor pathway also causes Atg1 to relocalize to the PAS.18 This could be either because the Tor pathway independently regulates Atg1 localization or that this pathway, directly or indirectly, influences Ras/PKA activities. This latter point is important as the precise relationship between the Ras and Tor pathways is not yet clear in S. cerevisiae.14,23,24 In fact, we think that autophagy may serve as a useful readout in future attempts to resolve this regulatory relationship. The ability to specifically assess the phosphorylation of Atg1 and Atg13 may allow us to determine precisely how the Ras/PKA and Tor signaling pathways have an impact upon one another. We would be remiss if we failed to point out that to truly understand the role of Atg1 in autophagy, we will need to identify the substrates of this enzyme. Although substrate identification has historically been a difficult task, there are a number of emerging technologies that should facilitate this endeavor for Atg1.20,25 Of particular interest is the protein chip technology that allows you to query specific biochemical properties of an entire library of proteins that are fixed to a solid substrate. A study using this approach recently identified a number of potential Atg1 substrates in S. cerevisiae.26 Although more than 180 proteins were identified in this report, at least two, Atg8 and Atg18, are of particular interest because of their previously-described roles in the autophagy process. The final but perhaps most important question here is whether Atg1 also has a central role in the regulation of autophagy in other organisms. Although a number of signaling pathways have been implicated in the control of autophagy in metazoans, the target of this control has for the most part not been established.4,27 Based on the above results with yeast, we propose that Atg1 will be a key www.landesbioscience.com

1. Mizushima N, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T. Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. Cell Struct Funct 2002; 27:421-9. 2. Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science 2000; 290:1717-21. 3. Nair U, Klionsky DJ. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of specific and nonspecific autophagy pathways in yeast. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:41785-8. 4. Levine B, Klionsky DJ. Development by self-digestion: Molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell 2004; 6:463-77. 5. Cuervo AM. Autophagy: In sickness and in health. Trends Cell Biol 2004; 14:70-7. 6. Reggiori F, Klionsky DJ. Autophagosomes: Biogenesis from scratch? Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005; 17:415-22. 7. Noda T, Suzuki K, Ohsumi Y. Yeast autophagosomes: De novo formation of a membrane structure. Trends Cell Biol 2002; 12:231-5. 8. Takeshige K, Baba M, Tsuboi S, Noda T, Ohsumi Y. Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction. J Cell Biol 1992; 119:301-11. 9. Noda T, Ohsumi Y. Tor, a phosphatidylinositol kinase homologue, controls autophagy in yeast. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:3963-6. 10. Kamada Y, Funakoshi T, Shintani T, Nagano K, Ohsumi M, Ohsumi Y. Tor-mediated induction of autophagy via an Apg1 protein kinase complex. J Cell Biol 2000; 150:1507-13. 11. Budovskaya YV, Stephan JS, Reggiori F, Klionsky DJ, Herman PK. The Ras/cAMP-dependent protein kinase signaling pathway regulates an early step of the autophagy process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:20663-71. 12. Lorberg A, Hall MN. TOR: The first 10 years. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2004; 279:1-18. 13. Toda T, Uno I, Ishikawa T, Powers S, Kataoka T, Broek D, Cameron S, Broach J, Matsumoto K, Wigler M. In yeast, RAS proteins are controlling elements of adenylate cyclase. Cell 1985; 40:27-36. 14. Herman PK. Stationary phase in yeast. Curr Opin Microbiol 2002; 5:602-7. 15. Wang Z, Wilson WA, Fujino MA, Roach PJ. Antagonistic controls of autophagy and glycogen accumulation by Snf1p, the yeast homolog of AMP-activated protein kinase, and the cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85p. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:5742-52. 16. Sanz P. Snf1 protein kinase: A key player in the response to cellular stress in yeast. Biochem Soc Trans 2003; 31:178-81. 17. Matsuura A, Tsukada M, Wada Y, Ohsumi Y. Apg1p, a novel protein kinase required for the autophagic process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 1997; 192:245-50. 18. Suzuki K, Kirisako T, Kamada Y, Mizushima N, Noda T, Ohsumi Y. The preautophagosomal structure organized by concerted functions of APG genes is essential for autophagosome formation. EMBO J 2001; 20:5971-81. 19. Kim J, Huang WP, Stromhaug PE, Klionsky DJ. Convergence of multiple autophagy and cytoplasm to vacuole targeting components to a perivacuolar membrane compartment prior to de novo vesicle formation. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:763-73. 20. Budovskaya YV, Stephan JS, Deminoff SJ, Herman PK. An evolutionary proteomics approach identifies substrates of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:13933-8. 21. Scott SV, Nice IIIrd DC, Nau JJ, Weisman LS, Kamada Y, Keizer-Gunnink I, Funakoshi T, Veenhuis M, Ohsumi Y, Klionsky DJ. Apg13p and Vac8p are part of a complex of phosphoproteins that are required for cytoplasm to vacuole targeting. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:25840-9. 22. Kabeya Y, Kamada Y, Baba M, Takikawa H, Sasaki M, Ohsumi Y. Atg17 functions in cooperation with atg1 and atg13 in yeast autophagy. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:2544-53. 23. Zurita-Martinez SA, Cardenas ME. Tor and cyclic AMP-protein kinase A: Two parallel pathways regulating expression of genes required for cell growth. Eukaryot Cell 2005; 4:63-71. 24. Martin DE, Soulard A, Hall MN. TOR regulates ribosomal protein gene expression via PKA and the Forkhead transcription factor FHL1. Cell 2004; 119:969-79. 25. Johnson SA, Hunter T. Kinomics: Methods for deciphering the kinome. Nat Methods 2005; 2:17-25. 26. Ptacek J, Devgan G, Michaud G, Zhu H, Zhu X, Fasolo J, Guo H, Jona G, Breitkreutz A, Sopko R, McCartney RR, Schmidt MC, Rachidi N, Lee SJ, Mah AS, Meng L, Stark MJ, Stern DF, De Virgilio C, Tyers M, Andrews B, Gerstein M, Schweitzer B, Predki PF, Snyder M. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 2005; 438:679-84.

Autophagy

147

The Regulation of Autophagy in Eukaryotic Cells

27. Codogno P, Meijer AJ. Autophagy and signaling: Their role in cell survival and cell death. Cell Death Differ 2005; 12:1509-18. 28. Cheong H, Yorimitsu T, Reggiori F, Legakis JE, Wang CW, Klionsky DJ. Atg17 regulates the magnitude of the autophagic response. Mol Biol Cell 2005;16:3438-53. . 29. Boube M, Joulia L, Cribbs DL, Bourbon HM. Evidence for a mediator of RNA polymerase II transcriptional regulation conserved from yeast to man. Cell 2002; 110:143-51.

148

Autophagy

2006; Vol. 2 Issue 2