Tracking surgical day care patients using RFID technology

3 downloads 8 Views 439KB Size Report
Apr 3, 2015 - anaesthesia: 0h01). RFID tracking (622 patients): Significant ... A Patient Tracking System was designed to .... desk and the nurse at day ward (=ward nurse) col- lected the ..... cerning transfer of patients and can help nurses to.

Downloaded from http://innovations.bmj.com/ on April 7, 2015 - Published by group.bmj.com

BMJ Innovations Publish Ahead of Print, published on April 3, 2015 as doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000038 HEALTH IT, SYSTEMS AND PROCESS INNOVATIONS

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Tracking surgical day care patients using RFID technology L S G L Wauben,1,2,3 A C P Guédon,1 D F de Korne,4,5,6,7 J J van den Dobbelsteen1

For numbered affiliations see end of article. Correspondence to Research Professor LSGL Wauben, Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands; [email protected] Received 5 January 2015 Revised 3 March 2015 Accepted 13 March 2015

To cite: Wauben LSGL, Guédon ACP, de Korne DF, et al. BMJ Innov Published Online First: [ please include Day Month Year] doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2015000038

ABSTRACT Objective Measure wait times, characterise current information flow and define requirements for a technological information system that supports the patient’s journey. Design First, patients were observed during eight random weekdays and the durations of actions performed at each phase of the surgical trajectory were measured. Patients were grouped into patients receiving general anaesthesia or local (or topical) anaesthesia. Second (active) Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) technology was installed and patients were tracked during 52 weekdays. Length of hospital stay, length of stay and wait times per phase, and differences in wait times between the two types of administered anaesthesia were analysed. Third, interviews were conducted to characterise the current information flow between staff, and between staff and escorts ( patients’ family/ friends escorting them throughout their journey). Results Observations (198 patients) showed that the average duration of actions for general anaesthesia patients took longer than for local anaesthesia patients, especially at the recovery phase (general anaesthesia: 0h16, local anaesthesia: 0h01). RFID tracking (622 patients): Significant differences were seen for wait times between general and local anaesthesia patients at: preoperative ward ( p=0.014), recovery ( p

Suggest Documents