Trajectory Assessment and Modification Tools - IEEE Xplore

1 downloads 20406 Views 2MB Size Report
NASA Ames Research Center. 1 ... Planning Tools for Flow Based Trajectory Management (FBTM) .... Arrow next to the aircraft call sign- opens basic route trial.
Next Generation Air Traffic Management Operations

DASC October 16-20, 2011 Connie Brasil Paul Lee, Matthew Mainini, Jeffrey Homola & Hwasoo Lee San Jose State University Research Foundation

Thomas Prevot & Nancy Smith NASA Ames Research Center 1

Talk Overview  Introduction: Air Traffic Flow Management concept  Background  NASA Ames Airspace Operations Lab (AOL)  Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) overview

 Flow Based Trajectory Modification Tools  AOL Planning Stations  Situation Assessment Tools  Trajectory Planning and Coordination Tools  Results  Tool Usage Overview  Usefulness and Usability  Discussion  Conclusion 2

Introduction  Air traffic to increase twofold in coming decades  FAA Aerospace Forecast Fiscal Years 2011-2031

 Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen)  Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR)  Managed vs Controlled airspace operations

 Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM)  Aided by Enhanced Automation and Decision Support Tools  Aircraft  ADS-B  Performance-based Navigation  Data Comm

 NASA Ames Airspace Operations Laboratory (AOL)  Ground-based Automation and Decision Support Tools 3

Background  AOL Simulation Environment

Air Traffic Planning Stations

 Multi Aircraft Control System (MACS)  



High fidelity ground based software platform Rapid prototype test bed for adaptable air traffic control environments. Interactive trajectory assessment and modification tools

Air Traffic Control Radar Stations Pseudo Pilot Stations

4

Background: HITL Overview  HITL Overview  2009 Multi-Sector Planning (MSP2) HITL  

Introduces new ATFM position to facility team Planning Tools for Flow Based Trajectory Management (FBTM)   

Traffic load and complexity Trajectory planning and coordination Full Data Comm operational environment

 2010 Multi-Sector Planning (MSP3) HITL  

Incorporated FBTM tool set into Area Supervisor and TMC stations Advanced DSTs for a Mixed-Equipage environment  



Planning station enhanced with equipage sensitive color-coding of data tags and aircraft symbols Waypoint-based trajectory planning, amendment and communication mechanisms for voice clearances Upgraded equipage sensitive aircraft filters and traffic complexity computations

 2010 Flexible Airspace Management (FAM) HITL  



Demonstrate the benefits and feasibility of dynamic airspace configuration Incorporates FBTM tools with newly designed airspace reconfiguration tools Full Air-to-Ground Data Comm with new Ground-to-Ground Data Comm procedures 5

FBTM Defined Flow Based Trajectory Management Tools  FAA and NASA AOL    

Simulated Defined Enhanced Operational Environments for NextGen

 Process for planning and coordinating aircraft trajectory

changes to meet local area traffic flow management objectives.  Purpose of Paper  Review situational and planning tools used with trajectory

assessment and modifications  Demonstrate Usefulness and Usability  Show Feasibility and Benefits

6

FBTM Tools Trajectory Assessment and Modification  Built into planning stations of all ATFM participants  14 Operationally Current TMCs and/or Supervisors   

5-TMCs 5-Area Supervisors 4-MSPs (both Area Supervisor and TMC experience)

 Situation assessment  Planning and plan coordination  Linked for common understanding in order to assess

available options for the management, communication and execution of proposed plans 7

FBTM Tools AOL ATFM Planning Station

8

FBTM Tools Assessment and Modification  Assessment Tools  Load Display Control Window  Load Table Window  Load Graph Window  Aircraft (AC) Filters  Modification Tools  “trial plans” for single or multi-aircraft trajectories   

Altitude Route Both Altitude and Route

 Conflict avoidance, Weather avoidance or Airspace congestion

 Coordination Tools  Air-to-ground Data Comm  Ground-to-ground Data Comm 9

Situation Assessment Tools  New traffic load, sector complexity and aircraft

filtering tools  Support the planners traffic assessment in large congested airspace  Traffic Volumes

 Congestion Points  Weather Impacts

 Increased MAP values with enhanced DSTs  Today MAP max = ~18  NextGen potential max= 22 to 26+ 10

Situation Assessment Tools (cont.)  AC Filter  Gain awareness of current and predicted traffic subsets  Highlight particular aircraft sets      

  

TO or FROM specific airports VIA routes or waypoints FL- specific altitude stratums GEO specific areas DRAW-dynamically drawn objects WX- forecasted weather areas LOAD- traffic load and complexity tables/graphs Color Code optional ETC…. 11

Situation Assessment Tools (cont.)  Load Tables and Graphs  Traffic Loads  Tables/Graphs  

Specific Sector Specific Time (15 min. intervals)

 Complexity Factors  Unequipped  Transitioning aircraft  Conflict predictions  Weather penetrations  Sector shape and size

12

Trajectory Planning and Coordination  Display System

Replacement (DSR)  Interactive Trial Planning

Tool 



Single or Multi-aircraft Altitude, Route, or Both

 AC Filter Options  Data Comm  Air-to-ground  Ground-to-ground  Weather Information 13

Trajectory Planning and Coordination  Trial Plan Options

Multiple Aircraft Trial Plan- FF

 Single or Multi-Aircraft  Typed Commands into DSR CRD 

FF- selects aircraft for group trial planning



TT- opens basic route trial plan



TA- opens an altitude trial plan



TR- opens a more specified route trial plan

 Interactive Flight Data Block (FDB) 









Arrow next to the aircraft call sign- opens basic route trial plan, similar to TT command Same arrow (but magenta-colored)- to review a suggested trial plan from another planner or a trial plan already sent to others Altitude line of the FDB- opens an altitude trial plan, similar to the TA command Conflict number to start a automated trial plan resolution to solve for the predicted traffic conflict Weather number to start a trial plan to solve for the predicted weather penetration

FDB Trial Plan Plan Portal Portal FDB Trial ♦AAL423 6 350C ♦AAL423 5 628 350C456 15 628 456 15 14

Trajectory Planning and Coordination  Trajectory Plan Coordination via Data Comm  Ground-to-Air Data Comm 

Uplink the trajectory modification directly to the aircraft

 Ground-to-Ground Data Comm 



Coordinate the clearance with the radar controllers who have track control of those aircraft, upon approval, they can uplink it to the aircraft directly Send a modified Coordination Plan to other team members

 Voice Communications  

Available at all times Required for Mixed-equipage 15

Results  Collaborative Use of FBTM Tools  High level combined tool usage summary  Combined Usefulness and Usability ratings from post-

simulation questionnaires  Scenarios were designed to exceed high peak and complexity values  Obligated to use the tools  Bring traffic loads under control  Limited disruption of user preferred routings  Goal is to increase aircraft throughput without

increasing workload 16

Results Usage Data: Load and Complexity Tables/Graphs  Load and Complexity  Tables 64.5% 

Necessary for traffic assessment and planning

 Graphs 35.5% 

Reference for how long peak periods would last

17

Results Usage Data: AC Filter  AC Filter  Total of 3,427 Filter Options  LOAD and TO used most  Questionnaire Feedback 



Easily used in conjunction with Load tables/graphs Liked the idea of the many filter options

AC Filter Type

MSPs and FAM HITL Totals

Selected/Deselected: LOAD

501/272

Selected/Deselected: TO

1222/881

Selected/Deselected: FROM

8/8

Selected/Deselected: FL

36/36

Selected/Deselected: GEO

61/56

Selected/Deselected: VIA

5/5

Selected/Deselected: WX

95/70

Deselected: All

AC Filter Totals

171

3427

18

Results Usage Data: Total Trial Plans Combined  Trial Plan  Total of 6,244 trial plans initiated 

 

44% sent via Data Comm for approval 46% developed but cancelled 10% suggested trial plans opened from other planners

19

Results Usage Data: Data Comm Coordination  Data Comm Usage  Uplink Clearance (66 times)  Coordinated Clearances

(1,620 times)  Coordinated Plans (1,555 times)

20

Results Usefulness and Usability Data for All FBTM Tools

21

Discussion  FAA NextGen Implementation Plan  Increased Automation and DST technologies  Trajectory Based Operations (TBO)   

High-altitude cruise En-route operations DSTs Automation to manage flight path trajectories  Full performance based navigation  User preferences

 Collaborative Air Traffic Management (CATM)  Improving system-wide traffic flow management  Collaborative Advanced Automation  Airspace capacity solutions  User preferred routing options  Dynamic airspace boundaries 22

Discussion (cont.)  Flow Based Trajectory Management Tools  Core NextGen Components   

Situation Awareness Tools Trajectory Modification Tools Coordination Tools

 Tool Commonality   

Quickly identify problem areas Informed coordinated decisions Common understanding of constraints and goals

 Flexible Air Traffic Operations   

User Preferred Routings Replacing or augmenting traffic load counts with complexity parameters Airspace design and procedures  



Reduces airspace complexity Increased aircraft throughput Maintained normal workload levels 23

Conclusion     

NextGen solutions have to be integrated Move from controlled airspace to managed airspace Leverage and expand on current technologies Implement new automated DSTs Ground systems that can work with advanced aircraft technologies  ADS-B  Performance-based trajectory navigation  Data Comm

 Support a more advanced, efficient, safe and flexible air

traffic control system 24

Closing the Generation Gap… Opening the Next Generation of Air Traffic Control

Questions?? Thanks for listening, enjoy the rest of your day! 25

Extra Slides

26

Results Usage Data: Total Trial Plans by Type of Usage  Trial Plan Usage Type  Typing TT or clicking on the FDB

trial plan portal arrow (50%, 3,130 times)  Multi-aircraft trial plan feature (FF) was used for 34% of all trial plans, 539 times, encompassing 2,119 aircraft (34%, n=539, 2,119 aircraft)  Typing TA of clicking on Altitude portion of the FDB (9%, 577 times)  Typing TR for specific route trial planning (7%, 406 times) 27