Ultrafiltration Versus Tertiary Membrane Reactor

4 downloads 0 Views 48KB Size Report
27% for atenolol, paraxanthine, caffeine and clofibric acid, respectively). Keywords: Membrane fouling; Pharmaceutical active compounds; Secondary clarifiers;.
(1 of 10) 1600014 Oliver Dıaz1 lez1 Enrique Gonza 1 Luisa Vera  n1 Laura Porla Juan Rodrıguez-Sevilla1 Cristina Afonso-Olivares2 Zoraida Sosa-Ferrera2  Juan Santana-Rodrıguez2 Jose n Facultad de Ciencias-Seccio Quımica, Departamento de Ingenierıa Quımica y T.F., Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain 2 Departamento de Quımica, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain 1

Research Article Nanofiltration/Reverse Osmosis as Pretreatment Technique for Water Reuse: Ultrafiltration Versus Tertiary Membrane Reactor The potential for nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) in secondary effluent reclamation is noteworthy, but both processes require extensive pre-treatment to prevent membrane fouling and promote system longevity. In this study, performance of direct ultrafiltration (UF) and tertiary membrane bioreactors (tMBRs) as feed pretreatments were assessed on a pilot scale. Both technologies achieved high organic matter removal (87 and 93% for UF and tMBR, respectively). Differences in efficiencies were related to suspended biomass in the tMBR, which enhanced degradation of the dissolved organic substances (