Why spider silk?

3 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
Justin A. Jones. Randolph V. Lewis Laboratory. Aqueous Based Processing of Recombinant. Spider Silks. Page 2. Fiber. Film. Hydrogel. Lyogel. Sponge.
Aqueous Based Processing of Recombinant Spider Silks Justin A. Jones

Randolph V. Lewis Laboratory

A

B C

Fiber Film Hydrogel Lyogel Sponge Adhesive

Aqueous Based Films

FlYS3

80kDa

E. coli

MaSp1 + MaSp2

65kDa ea.

Goat

Aqueous Based Films

Aqueous Based Films: Mechanical Properties 250

200

150

100

50

0

Stress (Mpa)

Strain (%)

Aqueous-Based Recombinant

HFIP-Based Recombinant

Collagen X-Linked

Polylactic Acid

B. mori Silk Fibroin

B. mori: Jiang, C.; Wang, X.; Gunawidjaja, R.; Lin, Y.-H.; Gupta, M. K.; Kaplan, D. L.; Naik, R. R.; Tsukruk, V. V. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 2229–2237. Collagen: Mallika, P.; Himabindu, A.; Shailaja, D. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 101, 63–69. PLA: Brandrup, J.; Immergut, E. H.; Grulke, E. A. Polymer handbook, 4th edition; Wiley: New York; Chichester, 2004.

2D WAXD of Aqueous Based MaSp1 Films A: As-poured film

• Stretched film (B) shows substantial increase in β-sheet and clear alignment parallel to fiber axis.

B: 2.5X Stretched in 80:20 MeOH:Water

1H-13C

CP-MAS of Aqueous Based MaSp1 Films

Protein Powder

As-poured film

Stretched film

• Protein powder: β-sheets • As-poured film: helical • Stretched films: β-sheets

Aqueous Based Fibers

Aqueous Based Fibers

• • • • •

4 touch screen control monitors along fiber path. 3 godet system allowing for 2 independent stretches. Multi-fiber spinning. Variable temperature. Real-time video monitoring of fiber properties.

Aqueous Based Fibers

Dope Not Sonicated: 12.5% w/v M4, 40X objective

Dope Sonicated: 5% w/v M4, 40X objective.

• Dope processing • Sonicating suspension improves fiber • Reduces qty of silk required to form fiber

Aqueous Based Fiber Comparison 400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0 Teule (J. Mat. Sci. 2007)

Teule Silkworm (Spider 6) 2012)

Stress (Mpa)

(PNAS Teule Silkworm (Spider 6-GFP) (PNAS 2012)

Strain (%)

Lewis Aqueous Method

ETB (MJ/m3)

• Aqueous fibers compare to or are better than other rSSP fibers in literature. • No optimization of process.

Aqueous Based Fibers 12% w/v Aqueous Dope, MaSp1:MaSp2

Energy to Break (MJ/m3) + S.D.

Avg. Stress (MPa) + S.D.

Avg. Strain (mm/mm) + S.D.

30:70 (1.5X/1.5X)

8.788 ± 16.194

53.009 ± 28.403

0.115 ± 0.170

50:50 (2.5X/2.5X)

52.22 ± 21.055

144.481 ± 36.101

0.438 ± 0.193

80:20 (2.5X/2.5X)

16.224 ± 4.615

101.359 ± 32.380

0.199 ± 0.049

90:10 (2.5X/2.0X)

33.770 ± 33.552

192.224 ± 51.470

0.281 ± 0.260

0:100 (2.0X/2.0X)

30.369 ± 19.764

145.006 ± 24.108

0.465 ± 0.181

Maxima Values

85.76

272.27

0.64

• Varying protein ratio (rMaSP1 to rMaSP2) alters the mechanical properties of the fiber. • Varied ratios require different stretches to achieve maximum properties.

Aqueous Based Fibers

100 cycles to 50% load and then testing to failure • Aqueous fibers able to withstand repeated loadings. • Multiple loadings demonstrate nearly identical stress-strain.

Aqueous Based Material

Aqueous Coatings with Antibiotic

Silicone Wafer with Kanamycin D ≈ 22mm

Stainless Steel with Kanamycin D ≈ 20mm

• Can coat and functionalize silicone and stainless steel with antibiotics.

Silicone Catheters with Kanamycin L ≈ 2.5mm

rSSP coating with azole Candida albicans

1

3 C: Control rSSP without azole 1: 1.0X concentration of azole 2: 1.5X concentration of azole 3: 2.0X concentration of azole

2

• Can functionalize silk protein with azole and coat silicone.

CHO Cells Control

MaSP1 silk film + RGD

Collagen film

MaSP1 silk film

• CHO cells grow well on both RGD functionalized MaSP1 and MaSP1 films produced from our aqueous method.

Drug Release 0.3

6% Hydrogel 0.25

6% Hydrogel2 12% Hydrogel 0.2

O.D. 580

1.5 mL 12% Hydrogel 1.5 mL 12% Hydrogel2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0 1

2

4

5

6

7

8

11

12

13

14

15

17

18

19

20

Time (Days)

• Methyl violet diffuses from hydrogels beyond two weeks.

Conclusions • Solubilization method developed for a variety of rSSP that are otherwise insoluble in water. • Additives can enhance/change solubility and ability to process dopes and/or form gels, fibers, films and foams.

• Films and fibers produced from this aqueous method have equal or better mechanical properties and protein structures to those produced using HFIP. • Aqueous based material can be functionalized with antibiotics, antimycotics, heparin and drug analogues. • Biocompatiblity is preserved with this aqueous method when compared to HFIP derived material as indicated by E. coli and CHO cell growth.

Acknowledgments Funding: • Utah Science and Technology Research initiative (USTAR) • National Science Foundation • Department of Defense: Office of Naval Research

Individuals: • • • • • • •



Chauncey Tucker (Aq. and films) Kyle Berg (Aq. and fibers) Thomas Harris (Coatings and films) Cole Petersen (Piriform) Dr. Paula Oliviera (MaSp1) Dr. Sreevidhya Tarakkad Krishnaji (FlYS and FlAS) Dr. Jeffery Yarger, Arizona State University (Structural Determinations) Dr. Jon Takemoto (Antimycotic)